碘造影剂相关超敏反应的危险因素分析。

IF 4.5 2区 医学 Q1 RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING
Lukas Beiner, Ingrid Boehm
{"title":"碘造影剂相关超敏反应的危险因素分析。","authors":"Lukas Beiner, Ingrid Boehm","doi":"10.1186/s13244-025-02099-y","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Hypersensitivity reactions caused by iodinated contrast media (ICM) are by definition type B adverse reactions and therefore, they are not predictable. To partially limit this uncertainty, since the 1980s, risk factors have been defined and published. Currently, there are so many risks that any patient undergoing a contrast-enhanced imaging examination would have at least one risk. This is not helpful and instead leads to uncertainty again. From both studies and clinical experience, we know that only a small percentage of patients develop hypersensitivity reactions after ICM administration. Therefore, we subjected the risks published to a critical analysis. Based on 126 publications, we identified 43 risks, which were divided into three categories (patient-related, contrast agent-related and management-related risks). We have also mentioned the appropriate management for each risk. After critical assessment, the risk status remains with a history of an ICM-hypersensitivity reaction, acute allergic symptoms, the culprit ICM and documentation errors (e.g., if an iodine allergy is mentioned, a latex allergy is incorrectly suspected as an ICM-allergy or the wrong trigger is documented). In addition, we found that several risks have been named differently, although they cover the same risk situation (e.g., chronic/severe disease and frequent ICM applications). Furthermore, for several of the published risks, no mitigation measures are available. Taken together, of the large number of published risks, only those with risk status should be used clinically in the future. Known risk factors do not influence the nature of type B reactions. Critical relevance statement For patient safety, it would be advisable in the future to consider the following three risks: a history of an ICM-hypersensitivity reaction, acute allergic symptoms and documentation errors (e.g., if an iodine allergy is mentioned, a latex allergy is incorrectly suspected as an ICM-allergy or the wrong trigger is documented). KEY POINTS: Risk factors are intended to limit the unpredictability of ICM hypersensitivity reactions. Currently, risks are nonspecific and ultimately apply to all patients. We found that identical factors are published under different names. Four risks are relevant: history of ICM-HSR, acute allergy, the culprit ICM and documentation/management errors.</p>","PeriodicalId":13639,"journal":{"name":"Insights into Imaging","volume":"16 1","pages":"216"},"PeriodicalIF":4.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12514124/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Risk factor analysis of iodinated contrast medium-related hypersensitivity reactions.\",\"authors\":\"Lukas Beiner, Ingrid Boehm\",\"doi\":\"10.1186/s13244-025-02099-y\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Hypersensitivity reactions caused by iodinated contrast media (ICM) are by definition type B adverse reactions and therefore, they are not predictable. To partially limit this uncertainty, since the 1980s, risk factors have been defined and published. Currently, there are so many risks that any patient undergoing a contrast-enhanced imaging examination would have at least one risk. This is not helpful and instead leads to uncertainty again. From both studies and clinical experience, we know that only a small percentage of patients develop hypersensitivity reactions after ICM administration. Therefore, we subjected the risks published to a critical analysis. Based on 126 publications, we identified 43 risks, which were divided into three categories (patient-related, contrast agent-related and management-related risks). We have also mentioned the appropriate management for each risk. After critical assessment, the risk status remains with a history of an ICM-hypersensitivity reaction, acute allergic symptoms, the culprit ICM and documentation errors (e.g., if an iodine allergy is mentioned, a latex allergy is incorrectly suspected as an ICM-allergy or the wrong trigger is documented). In addition, we found that several risks have been named differently, although they cover the same risk situation (e.g., chronic/severe disease and frequent ICM applications). Furthermore, for several of the published risks, no mitigation measures are available. Taken together, of the large number of published risks, only those with risk status should be used clinically in the future. Known risk factors do not influence the nature of type B reactions. Critical relevance statement For patient safety, it would be advisable in the future to consider the following three risks: a history of an ICM-hypersensitivity reaction, acute allergic symptoms and documentation errors (e.g., if an iodine allergy is mentioned, a latex allergy is incorrectly suspected as an ICM-allergy or the wrong trigger is documented). KEY POINTS: Risk factors are intended to limit the unpredictability of ICM hypersensitivity reactions. Currently, risks are nonspecific and ultimately apply to all patients. We found that identical factors are published under different names. Four risks are relevant: history of ICM-HSR, acute allergy, the culprit ICM and documentation/management errors.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":13639,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Insights into Imaging\",\"volume\":\"16 1\",\"pages\":\"216\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-10-10\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12514124/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Insights into Imaging\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1186/s13244-025-02099-y\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Insights into Imaging","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s13244-025-02099-y","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

碘造影剂(ICM)引起的超敏反应根据定义是B型不良反应,因此,它们是不可预测的。为了部分限制这种不确定性,自20世纪80年代以来,对风险因素进行了定义和公布。目前,风险如此之多,以至于任何接受对比增强成像检查的患者都至少有一种风险。这没有帮助,反而会再次导致不确定性。从研究和临床经验来看,我们知道只有一小部分患者在使用ICM后出现超敏反应。因此,我们对公布的风险进行了批判性分析。基于126篇出版物,我们确定了43种风险,分为三类(患者相关、造影剂相关和管理相关风险)。我们还提到了对每个风险的适当管理。经严格评估后,风险状态仍为ICM超敏反应史、急性过敏症状、ICM罪魁祸首和文件错误(例如,如果提到碘过敏,乳胶过敏被错误地怀疑为ICM过敏或记录了错误的触发因素)。此外,我们发现一些风险的命名不同,尽管它们涵盖了相同的风险情况(例如,慢性/严重疾病和频繁的ICM应用)。此外,对于一些已公布的风险,没有可用的缓解措施。综上所述,在大量已发表的风险中,只有具有风险状态的患者才应在未来临床使用。已知的危险因素不影响B型反应的性质。为了患者安全,建议将来考虑以下三种风险:icm超敏反应史、急性过敏症状和文件错误(例如,如果提到碘过敏,乳胶过敏被错误地怀疑为icm过敏或记录了错误的触发因素)。关键:危险因素旨在限制ICM超敏反应的不可预测性。目前,风险是非特异性的,最终适用于所有患者。我们发现相同的因子以不同的名称发表。四种风险是相关的:ICM- hsr病史、急性过敏、罪魁祸首ICM和文件/管理错误。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Risk factor analysis of iodinated contrast medium-related hypersensitivity reactions.

Hypersensitivity reactions caused by iodinated contrast media (ICM) are by definition type B adverse reactions and therefore, they are not predictable. To partially limit this uncertainty, since the 1980s, risk factors have been defined and published. Currently, there are so many risks that any patient undergoing a contrast-enhanced imaging examination would have at least one risk. This is not helpful and instead leads to uncertainty again. From both studies and clinical experience, we know that only a small percentage of patients develop hypersensitivity reactions after ICM administration. Therefore, we subjected the risks published to a critical analysis. Based on 126 publications, we identified 43 risks, which were divided into three categories (patient-related, contrast agent-related and management-related risks). We have also mentioned the appropriate management for each risk. After critical assessment, the risk status remains with a history of an ICM-hypersensitivity reaction, acute allergic symptoms, the culprit ICM and documentation errors (e.g., if an iodine allergy is mentioned, a latex allergy is incorrectly suspected as an ICM-allergy or the wrong trigger is documented). In addition, we found that several risks have been named differently, although they cover the same risk situation (e.g., chronic/severe disease and frequent ICM applications). Furthermore, for several of the published risks, no mitigation measures are available. Taken together, of the large number of published risks, only those with risk status should be used clinically in the future. Known risk factors do not influence the nature of type B reactions. Critical relevance statement For patient safety, it would be advisable in the future to consider the following three risks: a history of an ICM-hypersensitivity reaction, acute allergic symptoms and documentation errors (e.g., if an iodine allergy is mentioned, a latex allergy is incorrectly suspected as an ICM-allergy or the wrong trigger is documented). KEY POINTS: Risk factors are intended to limit the unpredictability of ICM hypersensitivity reactions. Currently, risks are nonspecific and ultimately apply to all patients. We found that identical factors are published under different names. Four risks are relevant: history of ICM-HSR, acute allergy, the culprit ICM and documentation/management errors.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Insights into Imaging
Insights into Imaging Medicine-Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging
CiteScore
7.30
自引率
4.30%
发文量
182
审稿时长
13 weeks
期刊介绍: Insights into Imaging (I³) is a peer-reviewed open access journal published under the brand SpringerOpen. All content published in the journal is freely available online to anyone, anywhere! I³ continuously updates scientific knowledge and progress in best-practice standards in radiology through the publication of original articles and state-of-the-art reviews and opinions, along with recommendations and statements from the leading radiological societies in Europe. Founded by the European Society of Radiology (ESR), I³ creates a platform for educational material, guidelines and recommendations, and a forum for topics of controversy. A balanced combination of review articles, original papers, short communications from European radiological congresses and information on society matters makes I³ an indispensable source for current information in this field. I³ is owned by the ESR, however authors retain copyright to their article according to the Creative Commons Attribution License (see Copyright and License Agreement). All articles can be read, redistributed and reused for free, as long as the author of the original work is cited properly. The open access fees (article-processing charges) for this journal are kindly sponsored by ESR for all Members. The journal went open access in 2012, which means that all articles published since then are freely available online.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信