制定加拿大助产研究优先框架:德尔菲共识研究。

IF 3.2 2区 医学 Q1 HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES
Beth Murray-Davis, Emma Ruby, Joanne Rack, Sofia Al-Balkhi, Lindsay Grenier, Ginny Brunton, Elizabeth K Darling, Eileen K Hutton, Laura Banfield, Cristina Mattison, Karyn Kaufman
{"title":"制定加拿大助产研究优先框架:德尔菲共识研究。","authors":"Beth Murray-Davis, Emma Ruby, Joanne Rack, Sofia Al-Balkhi, Lindsay Grenier, Ginny Brunton, Elizabeth K Darling, Eileen K Hutton, Laura Banfield, Cristina Mattison, Karyn Kaufman","doi":"10.1186/s12961-025-01401-0","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Globally, there is a commitment to evidence informed midwifery practice. In Canada, the midwifery profession has grown significantly over the past three decades, yet Canadian midwifery research lacks coordination and infrastructure. Developing a unified research agenda to address emerging clinical, population and policy challenges is essential for advancing research capacity building.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This study employed a modified Delphi technique, a robust consensus-seeking method, to identify national research priorities for Canadian midwifery. The process included a scoping review, a cross-sectional national survey, regional focus groups and follow-up surveys. Participants included midwives, researchers, service users, students and policymakers. Data were analysed using both qualitative and quantitative methods to identify and rank priority areas.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The study identified three primary research priority areas: organizing models of care, optimizing reproductive care and strengthening the profession. Key themes included access to care, expanding midwifery roles, informed choice and addressing systemic barriers. Facilitating factors such as effective collaboration, policy changes and building research capacity were also highlighted. The final framework emphasizes the need for coordinated efforts to enhance the quality and accessibility of midwifery services across Canada.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The findings underscore the importance of a coordinated national research agenda to support the growth and development of midwifery in Canada. By focusing on identified priority areas and facilitating factors, the midwifery profession can continue to provide high-quality, equitable care. The study's methodology and results can inform similar efforts globally, promoting the integration of midwifery care into health systems worldwide.</p>","PeriodicalId":12870,"journal":{"name":"Health Research Policy and Systems","volume":"23 1","pages":"126"},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Developing a Canadian midwifery research priority framework: a Delphi consensus study.\",\"authors\":\"Beth Murray-Davis, Emma Ruby, Joanne Rack, Sofia Al-Balkhi, Lindsay Grenier, Ginny Brunton, Elizabeth K Darling, Eileen K Hutton, Laura Banfield, Cristina Mattison, Karyn Kaufman\",\"doi\":\"10.1186/s12961-025-01401-0\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Globally, there is a commitment to evidence informed midwifery practice. In Canada, the midwifery profession has grown significantly over the past three decades, yet Canadian midwifery research lacks coordination and infrastructure. Developing a unified research agenda to address emerging clinical, population and policy challenges is essential for advancing research capacity building.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This study employed a modified Delphi technique, a robust consensus-seeking method, to identify national research priorities for Canadian midwifery. The process included a scoping review, a cross-sectional national survey, regional focus groups and follow-up surveys. Participants included midwives, researchers, service users, students and policymakers. Data were analysed using both qualitative and quantitative methods to identify and rank priority areas.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The study identified three primary research priority areas: organizing models of care, optimizing reproductive care and strengthening the profession. Key themes included access to care, expanding midwifery roles, informed choice and addressing systemic barriers. Facilitating factors such as effective collaboration, policy changes and building research capacity were also highlighted. The final framework emphasizes the need for coordinated efforts to enhance the quality and accessibility of midwifery services across Canada.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The findings underscore the importance of a coordinated national research agenda to support the growth and development of midwifery in Canada. By focusing on identified priority areas and facilitating factors, the midwifery profession can continue to provide high-quality, equitable care. The study's methodology and results can inform similar efforts globally, promoting the integration of midwifery care into health systems worldwide.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":12870,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Health Research Policy and Systems\",\"volume\":\"23 1\",\"pages\":\"126\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-10-10\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Health Research Policy and Systems\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12961-025-01401-0\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Health Research Policy and Systems","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12961-025-01401-0","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

导言:在全球范围内,有一个承诺的证据知情助产实践。在加拿大,助产专业在过去三十年中有了显著的发展,但加拿大的助产研究缺乏协调和基础设施。制定一个统一的研究议程来应对新出现的临床、人口和政策挑战,对于推进研究能力建设至关重要。方法:本研究采用改进的德尔菲技术,一种强有力的共识寻求方法,以确定加拿大助产学的国家研究重点。这一过程包括范围审查、横断面全国调查、区域焦点小组和后续调查。参与者包括助产士、研究人员、服务使用者、学生和政策制定者。使用定性和定量方法对数据进行分析,以确定优先领域并对其进行排序。结果:研究确定了三个主要的研究重点领域:组织护理模式,优化生殖护理和加强专业。关键主题包括获得护理、扩大助产作用、知情选择和解决体制障碍。他们还强调了诸如有效合作、政策变化和建设研究能力等促进因素。最后的框架强调需要协调努力,以提高加拿大各地助产服务的质量和可及性。结论:研究结果强调了协调国家研究议程的重要性,以支持加拿大助产学的增长和发展。通过专注于确定的优先领域和促进因素,助产专业可以继续提供高质量、公平的护理。该研究的方法和结果可以为全球类似的努力提供信息,促进将助产保健纳入世界各地的卫生系统。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Developing a Canadian midwifery research priority framework: a Delphi consensus study.

Introduction: Globally, there is a commitment to evidence informed midwifery practice. In Canada, the midwifery profession has grown significantly over the past three decades, yet Canadian midwifery research lacks coordination and infrastructure. Developing a unified research agenda to address emerging clinical, population and policy challenges is essential for advancing research capacity building.

Methods: This study employed a modified Delphi technique, a robust consensus-seeking method, to identify national research priorities for Canadian midwifery. The process included a scoping review, a cross-sectional national survey, regional focus groups and follow-up surveys. Participants included midwives, researchers, service users, students and policymakers. Data were analysed using both qualitative and quantitative methods to identify and rank priority areas.

Results: The study identified three primary research priority areas: organizing models of care, optimizing reproductive care and strengthening the profession. Key themes included access to care, expanding midwifery roles, informed choice and addressing systemic barriers. Facilitating factors such as effective collaboration, policy changes and building research capacity were also highlighted. The final framework emphasizes the need for coordinated efforts to enhance the quality and accessibility of midwifery services across Canada.

Conclusions: The findings underscore the importance of a coordinated national research agenda to support the growth and development of midwifery in Canada. By focusing on identified priority areas and facilitating factors, the midwifery profession can continue to provide high-quality, equitable care. The study's methodology and results can inform similar efforts globally, promoting the integration of midwifery care into health systems worldwide.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Health Research Policy and Systems
Health Research Policy and Systems HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES-
CiteScore
7.50
自引率
7.50%
发文量
124
审稿时长
27 weeks
期刊介绍: Health Research Policy and Systems is an Open Access, peer-reviewed, online journal that aims to provide a platform for the global research community to share their views, findings, insights and successes. Health Research Policy and Systems considers manuscripts that investigate the role of evidence-based health policy and health research systems in ensuring the efficient utilization and application of knowledge to improve health and health equity, especially in developing countries. Research is the foundation for improvements in public health. The problem is that people involved in different areas of research, together with managers and administrators in charge of research entities, do not communicate sufficiently with each other.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信