实施临床脱碳行动:加州大学卫生系统的经验教训。

IF 2.4 Q2 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
Clémence Marty-Chastan, Claire D Brindis, Sheri D Weiser, Sapna Thottathil, Jodi D Sherman, Arianne Teherani
{"title":"实施临床脱碳行动:加州大学卫生系统的经验教训。","authors":"Clémence Marty-Chastan, Claire D Brindis, Sheri D Weiser, Sapna Thottathil, Jodi D Sherman, Arianne Teherani","doi":"10.1016/j.jcjq.2025.08.004","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Clinical decarbonization actions are needed to ensure that hospitals achieve commitments to reduce carbon emissions. Elucidating barriers and facilitators is key to developing sustainable and scalable clinical mitigation actions.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Semistructured interviews with key stakeholders sought to document barriers and opportunities in implementing clinical sustainability initiatives at the University of California Health System. The following Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR) domains were used to shape the interview guide and analyses: (1) individual characteristics, (2) innovation characteristics (3) inner setting, and (4) outer setting. Work responsibilities, knowledge of and interest in sustainability, project role, and recommendations for future sustainability and decarbonization efforts were also explored.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Fourteen frontline healthcare workers participated in the study, including 13 clinicians and one supply chain officer. All participants encountered challenges and solutions across CFIR domains. All participants acknowledged, explicitly or implicitly, the existence of multiple competing priorities as the strongest barrier to decarbonization implementation. Participants identified several required resources to achieve and sustain efforts: access to experienced peer professionals, data, dedicated time and funding, commitment to resolving supply chain issues, and embedding sustainability within the hospital's core mission.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Implementing clinical decarbonization actions is complex, requiring alignment between numerous stakeholders. Overcoming implementation challenges requires strategic action at the individual and organizational levels and alignment across internal and external constituents, including supply chain partners, state and federal policymakers, and industry, to build and sustain efforts.</p>","PeriodicalId":14835,"journal":{"name":"Joint Commission journal on quality and patient safety","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Implementing Clinical Decarbonization Actions: Lessons Learned from the University of California Health System.\",\"authors\":\"Clémence Marty-Chastan, Claire D Brindis, Sheri D Weiser, Sapna Thottathil, Jodi D Sherman, Arianne Teherani\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jcjq.2025.08.004\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Clinical decarbonization actions are needed to ensure that hospitals achieve commitments to reduce carbon emissions. Elucidating barriers and facilitators is key to developing sustainable and scalable clinical mitigation actions.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Semistructured interviews with key stakeholders sought to document barriers and opportunities in implementing clinical sustainability initiatives at the University of California Health System. The following Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR) domains were used to shape the interview guide and analyses: (1) individual characteristics, (2) innovation characteristics (3) inner setting, and (4) outer setting. Work responsibilities, knowledge of and interest in sustainability, project role, and recommendations for future sustainability and decarbonization efforts were also explored.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Fourteen frontline healthcare workers participated in the study, including 13 clinicians and one supply chain officer. All participants encountered challenges and solutions across CFIR domains. All participants acknowledged, explicitly or implicitly, the existence of multiple competing priorities as the strongest barrier to decarbonization implementation. Participants identified several required resources to achieve and sustain efforts: access to experienced peer professionals, data, dedicated time and funding, commitment to resolving supply chain issues, and embedding sustainability within the hospital's core mission.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Implementing clinical decarbonization actions is complex, requiring alignment between numerous stakeholders. Overcoming implementation challenges requires strategic action at the individual and organizational levels and alignment across internal and external constituents, including supply chain partners, state and federal policymakers, and industry, to build and sustain efforts.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":14835,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Joint Commission journal on quality and patient safety\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Joint Commission journal on quality and patient safety\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcjq.2025.08.004\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Joint Commission journal on quality and patient safety","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcjq.2025.08.004","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:需要采取临床脱碳行动,以确保医院实现减少碳排放的承诺。阐明障碍和促进因素是制定可持续和可扩展的临床缓解行动的关键。方法:与关键利益相关者进行半结构化访谈,试图记录加州大学卫生系统实施临床可持续性倡议的障碍和机会。本文采用以下实施研究整合框架(Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research, CFIR)域来构建访谈指南和分析:(1)个体特征、(2)创新特征、(3)内部环境、(4)外部环境。工作职责、对可持续发展的认识和兴趣、项目作用以及对未来可持续发展和脱碳工作的建议也进行了探讨。结果:14名一线医护人员参与研究,其中临床医生13名,供应链管理人员1名。所有参与者都遇到了跨CFIR领域的挑战和解决方案。所有与会者都或明或暗地承认,存在多个相互竞争的优先事项是实施脱碳的最大障碍。与会者确定了实现和维持努力所需的若干资源:获得经验丰富的同行专业人员、数据、专用时间和资金、致力于解决供应链问题,以及将可持续性纳入医院的核心使命。结论:实施临床脱碳行动是复杂的,需要众多利益相关者之间的协调。克服实施挑战需要在个人和组织层面采取战略行动,并跨内部和外部成分(包括供应链合作伙伴、州和联邦政策制定者以及行业)进行协调,以建立和维持努力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Implementing Clinical Decarbonization Actions: Lessons Learned from the University of California Health System.

Background: Clinical decarbonization actions are needed to ensure that hospitals achieve commitments to reduce carbon emissions. Elucidating barriers and facilitators is key to developing sustainable and scalable clinical mitigation actions.

Methods: Semistructured interviews with key stakeholders sought to document barriers and opportunities in implementing clinical sustainability initiatives at the University of California Health System. The following Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR) domains were used to shape the interview guide and analyses: (1) individual characteristics, (2) innovation characteristics (3) inner setting, and (4) outer setting. Work responsibilities, knowledge of and interest in sustainability, project role, and recommendations for future sustainability and decarbonization efforts were also explored.

Results: Fourteen frontline healthcare workers participated in the study, including 13 clinicians and one supply chain officer. All participants encountered challenges and solutions across CFIR domains. All participants acknowledged, explicitly or implicitly, the existence of multiple competing priorities as the strongest barrier to decarbonization implementation. Participants identified several required resources to achieve and sustain efforts: access to experienced peer professionals, data, dedicated time and funding, commitment to resolving supply chain issues, and embedding sustainability within the hospital's core mission.

Conclusion: Implementing clinical decarbonization actions is complex, requiring alignment between numerous stakeholders. Overcoming implementation challenges requires strategic action at the individual and organizational levels and alignment across internal and external constituents, including supply chain partners, state and federal policymakers, and industry, to build and sustain efforts.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.80
自引率
4.30%
发文量
116
审稿时长
49 days
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信