移动健康应用程序和可穿戴设备的可持续性评估:系统审查方案。

IF 1.5 Q3 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
Sehrish Khan, Pantea Keikhosrokiani, Kaisa Kauppinen, Sharon Guardado Medina, Minna Isomursu
{"title":"移动健康应用程序和可穿戴设备的可持续性评估:系统审查方案。","authors":"Sehrish Khan, Pantea Keikhosrokiani, Kaisa Kauppinen, Sharon Guardado Medina, Minna Isomursu","doi":"10.2196/68649","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Mobile health (mHealth) technology is widely used in health care systems globally to improve patients' quality of life and reduce the burden on caregivers. Mobile apps allow users to manage different health-related situations from their homes, such as self-monitoring their symptoms, keeping track of progress, and maintaining a profile for a particular condition. However, the benefits of mHealth apps are compromised due to a lack of sustainability evaluation. Currently, there is a lack of all-inclusive research that presents sustainability evaluation from economic, social, and environmental perspectives of mHealth and wearables. Thus, it is important to evaluate the sustainability of newly proposed or already in-use mHealth solutions.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>The objective of this systematic literature review is to deeply understand and analyze different dimensions of sustainability in the health care domain and identify existing evaluation criteria and frameworks for mHealth solutions.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This protocol was developed following the PRISMA-P (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis Protocols) guidelines. A planned and systematic approach will be used to identify, evaluate, and synthesize relevant studies reported in English. We have conducted a systematic search focusing on search terms related to sustainable health care, mHealth solutions, and evaluation or assessment criteria in digital databases of Scopus, Web of Science, ACM, PubMed, PubMed Central, and CINAHL.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>As of September 19, 2024, preliminary searches have been conducted, identifying 1368 relevant papers that meet the inclusion and exclusion criteria and are eligible for further screening.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This protocol will guide the review of existing literature on essential aspects of the sustainability of mHealth solutions and evaluation frameworks. To the best of our knowledge, the proposed systematic review will be the first review to extensively study essential concepts related to defining sustainable mHealth solutions, identifying key dimensions founding the basis for evaluation frameworks, and discussing the existing sustainability evaluation frameworks for mHealth solutions.</p><p><strong>Trial registration: </strong>PROSPERO CRD42024599333; https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/PROSPERO/view/CRD42024599333.</p><p><strong>International registered report identifier (irrid): </strong>DERR1-10.2196/68649.</p>","PeriodicalId":14755,"journal":{"name":"JMIR Research Protocols","volume":"14 ","pages":"e68649"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Sustainability Evaluation of mHealth Apps and Wearables: Protocol for a Systematic Review.\",\"authors\":\"Sehrish Khan, Pantea Keikhosrokiani, Kaisa Kauppinen, Sharon Guardado Medina, Minna Isomursu\",\"doi\":\"10.2196/68649\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Mobile health (mHealth) technology is widely used in health care systems globally to improve patients' quality of life and reduce the burden on caregivers. Mobile apps allow users to manage different health-related situations from their homes, such as self-monitoring their symptoms, keeping track of progress, and maintaining a profile for a particular condition. However, the benefits of mHealth apps are compromised due to a lack of sustainability evaluation. Currently, there is a lack of all-inclusive research that presents sustainability evaluation from economic, social, and environmental perspectives of mHealth and wearables. Thus, it is important to evaluate the sustainability of newly proposed or already in-use mHealth solutions.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>The objective of this systematic literature review is to deeply understand and analyze different dimensions of sustainability in the health care domain and identify existing evaluation criteria and frameworks for mHealth solutions.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This protocol was developed following the PRISMA-P (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis Protocols) guidelines. A planned and systematic approach will be used to identify, evaluate, and synthesize relevant studies reported in English. We have conducted a systematic search focusing on search terms related to sustainable health care, mHealth solutions, and evaluation or assessment criteria in digital databases of Scopus, Web of Science, ACM, PubMed, PubMed Central, and CINAHL.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>As of September 19, 2024, preliminary searches have been conducted, identifying 1368 relevant papers that meet the inclusion and exclusion criteria and are eligible for further screening.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This protocol will guide the review of existing literature on essential aspects of the sustainability of mHealth solutions and evaluation frameworks. To the best of our knowledge, the proposed systematic review will be the first review to extensively study essential concepts related to defining sustainable mHealth solutions, identifying key dimensions founding the basis for evaluation frameworks, and discussing the existing sustainability evaluation frameworks for mHealth solutions.</p><p><strong>Trial registration: </strong>PROSPERO CRD42024599333; https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/PROSPERO/view/CRD42024599333.</p><p><strong>International registered report identifier (irrid): </strong>DERR1-10.2196/68649.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":14755,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"JMIR Research Protocols\",\"volume\":\"14 \",\"pages\":\"e68649\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-10-10\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"JMIR Research Protocols\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2196/68649\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JMIR Research Protocols","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2196/68649","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:移动医疗(mHealth)技术在全球卫生保健系统中得到广泛应用,以提高患者的生活质量并减轻护理人员的负担。移动应用程序允许用户在家中管理不同的健康状况,例如自我监测自己的症状,跟踪进展,并维护特定疾病的档案。然而,由于缺乏可持续性评估,移动健康应用程序的好处受到了损害。目前,缺乏从经济、社会和环境角度对移动医疗和可穿戴设备的可持续性进行全面评估的研究。因此,评估新提出或已经在使用的移动医疗解决方案的可持续性是很重要的。目的:本系统文献综述的目的是深入了解和分析医疗保健领域可持续性的不同维度,并确定移动医疗解决方案的现有评估标准和框架。方法:本方案根据PRISMA-P(系统评价和荟萃分析方案的首选报告项目)指南制定。一个有计划的和系统的方法将被用来识别,评估和综合相关的研究报告的英文。我们对Scopus、Web of Science、ACM、PubMed、PubMed Central和CINAHL等数字数据库中与可持续医疗、移动医疗解决方案和评估标准相关的搜索词进行了系统搜索。结果:截至2024年9月19日,初步检索到符合纳入和排除标准的相关文献1368篇,符合进一步筛选条件。结论:本协议将指导对移动医疗解决方案和评估框架的可持续性基本方面的现有文献的审查。据我们所知,拟议的系统综述将是第一个广泛研究与定义可持续移动医疗解决方案相关的基本概念的综述,确定建立评估框架基础的关键维度,并讨论现有的移动医疗解决方案的可持续性评估框架。试验注册:PROSPERO CRD42024599333;https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/PROSPERO/view/CRD42024599333.International注册报告标识符(irrid): DERR1-10.2196/68649。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Sustainability Evaluation of mHealth Apps and Wearables: Protocol for a Systematic Review.

Background: Mobile health (mHealth) technology is widely used in health care systems globally to improve patients' quality of life and reduce the burden on caregivers. Mobile apps allow users to manage different health-related situations from their homes, such as self-monitoring their symptoms, keeping track of progress, and maintaining a profile for a particular condition. However, the benefits of mHealth apps are compromised due to a lack of sustainability evaluation. Currently, there is a lack of all-inclusive research that presents sustainability evaluation from economic, social, and environmental perspectives of mHealth and wearables. Thus, it is important to evaluate the sustainability of newly proposed or already in-use mHealth solutions.

Objective: The objective of this systematic literature review is to deeply understand and analyze different dimensions of sustainability in the health care domain and identify existing evaluation criteria and frameworks for mHealth solutions.

Methods: This protocol was developed following the PRISMA-P (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis Protocols) guidelines. A planned and systematic approach will be used to identify, evaluate, and synthesize relevant studies reported in English. We have conducted a systematic search focusing on search terms related to sustainable health care, mHealth solutions, and evaluation or assessment criteria in digital databases of Scopus, Web of Science, ACM, PubMed, PubMed Central, and CINAHL.

Results: As of September 19, 2024, preliminary searches have been conducted, identifying 1368 relevant papers that meet the inclusion and exclusion criteria and are eligible for further screening.

Conclusions: This protocol will guide the review of existing literature on essential aspects of the sustainability of mHealth solutions and evaluation frameworks. To the best of our knowledge, the proposed systematic review will be the first review to extensively study essential concepts related to defining sustainable mHealth solutions, identifying key dimensions founding the basis for evaluation frameworks, and discussing the existing sustainability evaluation frameworks for mHealth solutions.

Trial registration: PROSPERO CRD42024599333; https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/PROSPERO/view/CRD42024599333.

International registered report identifier (irrid): DERR1-10.2196/68649.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.40
自引率
5.90%
发文量
414
审稿时长
12 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信