来自国际膀胱癌组的中度危险非肌肉侵袭性膀胱癌:定义、风险分层、管理策略和临床试验设计的建议

IF 9.3 1区 医学 Q1 ONCOLOGY
Roger Li, Patrick J Hensley, Marko Babjuk, Laura Bukavina, Sarah P Psutka, Seth P Lerner, Michael A O'Donnell, Yair Lotan, Kelly K Bree, Joan Palou Redorta, David J McConkey, Byron H Lee, Paramananthan Mariappan, Laura S Mertens, Mark S Soloway, Robert S Svatek, Wei Shen Tan, Stephen B Williams, Shilpa Gupta, Roger Buckley, Ashish M Kamat
{"title":"来自国际膀胱癌组的中度危险非肌肉侵袭性膀胱癌:定义、风险分层、管理策略和临床试验设计的建议","authors":"Roger Li, Patrick J Hensley, Marko Babjuk, Laura Bukavina, Sarah P Psutka, Seth P Lerner, Michael A O'Donnell, Yair Lotan, Kelly K Bree, Joan Palou Redorta, David J McConkey, Byron H Lee, Paramananthan Mariappan, Laura S Mertens, Mark S Soloway, Robert S Svatek, Wei Shen Tan, Stephen B Williams, Shilpa Gupta, Roger Buckley, Ashish M Kamat","doi":"10.1016/j.euo.2025.08.003","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and objective: </strong>Intermediate-risk (IR) non-muscle-invasive bladder cancer (NMIBC) is a heterogeneous disease, and standardized definitions and risk-guided management are critical for appropriate patient care and clinical trial development.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A global committee of bladder cancer experts developed IR-NMIBC recommendations. Working groups reviewed literature and drafted recommendations, which were voted on by International Bladder Cancer Group (IBCG) members using a modified Delphi process. During an August 2024 meeting, voting results and evidence were presented, and recommendations were refined. Final recommendations achieved >75% agreement.</p><p><strong>Key findings and limitations: </strong>The IBCG recommends inclusion of only low-grade (LG; G1 and G2) tumors in the IR-NMIBC category, risk stratified using the IBCG IR-NMIBC risk scoring system. Given the relatively indolent course and treatment burden of IR-NMIBC, therapeutic deintensification with active surveillance or office-based ablation is appropriate for select patients. Morbidity related to transurethral resection of a bladder tumor can be mitigated by forgoing restaging resection in completely resected LG tumors and not mandating muscularis propria sampling. Perioperative chemotherapy reduces recurrences, and additional adjuvant intravesical treatment should be risk stratified. Clinical trials evaluating novel IR-NMIBC therapies, including adjuvant and ablative designs, should incorporate patient-reported outcomes and risk-stratified controls. Ablative trials, as proof-of-concept studies for efficacy, require randomized controlled studies in the adjuvant setting to confirm superiority over the standard of care.</p><p><strong>Conclusions and clinical implications: </strong>The IBCG consensus recommendations provide practical guidance for clinical care and clinical trial design for patients with IR-NMIBC.</p>","PeriodicalId":12256,"journal":{"name":"European urology oncology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":9.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Intermediate-risk Non-muscle-invasive Bladder Cancer: Recommendations for Definitions, Risk Stratification, Management Strategies, and Clinical Trial Design from the International Bladder Cancer Group.\",\"authors\":\"Roger Li, Patrick J Hensley, Marko Babjuk, Laura Bukavina, Sarah P Psutka, Seth P Lerner, Michael A O'Donnell, Yair Lotan, Kelly K Bree, Joan Palou Redorta, David J McConkey, Byron H Lee, Paramananthan Mariappan, Laura S Mertens, Mark S Soloway, Robert S Svatek, Wei Shen Tan, Stephen B Williams, Shilpa Gupta, Roger Buckley, Ashish M Kamat\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.euo.2025.08.003\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background and objective: </strong>Intermediate-risk (IR) non-muscle-invasive bladder cancer (NMIBC) is a heterogeneous disease, and standardized definitions and risk-guided management are critical for appropriate patient care and clinical trial development.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A global committee of bladder cancer experts developed IR-NMIBC recommendations. Working groups reviewed literature and drafted recommendations, which were voted on by International Bladder Cancer Group (IBCG) members using a modified Delphi process. During an August 2024 meeting, voting results and evidence were presented, and recommendations were refined. Final recommendations achieved >75% agreement.</p><p><strong>Key findings and limitations: </strong>The IBCG recommends inclusion of only low-grade (LG; G1 and G2) tumors in the IR-NMIBC category, risk stratified using the IBCG IR-NMIBC risk scoring system. Given the relatively indolent course and treatment burden of IR-NMIBC, therapeutic deintensification with active surveillance or office-based ablation is appropriate for select patients. Morbidity related to transurethral resection of a bladder tumor can be mitigated by forgoing restaging resection in completely resected LG tumors and not mandating muscularis propria sampling. Perioperative chemotherapy reduces recurrences, and additional adjuvant intravesical treatment should be risk stratified. Clinical trials evaluating novel IR-NMIBC therapies, including adjuvant and ablative designs, should incorporate patient-reported outcomes and risk-stratified controls. Ablative trials, as proof-of-concept studies for efficacy, require randomized controlled studies in the adjuvant setting to confirm superiority over the standard of care.</p><p><strong>Conclusions and clinical implications: </strong>The IBCG consensus recommendations provide practical guidance for clinical care and clinical trial design for patients with IR-NMIBC.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":12256,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"European urology oncology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":9.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-10-10\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"European urology oncology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.euo.2025.08.003\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ONCOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European urology oncology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.euo.2025.08.003","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景和目的:中危(IR)非肌肉浸润性膀胱癌(NMIBC)是一种异质性疾病,标准化定义和风险引导管理对于适当的患者护理和临床试验发展至关重要。方法:一个由膀胱癌专家组成的全球委员会制定了IR-NMIBC建议。工作组审查文献并起草建议,这些建议由国际膀胱癌小组(IBCG)成员使用改进的德尔菲过程进行投票。在2024年8月的一次会议上,提交了投票结果和证据,并对建议进行了改进。最终的建议获得了75%的同意。主要发现和局限性:IBCG建议仅将低级别(LG; G1和G2)肿瘤纳入IR-NMIBC类别,使用IBCG IR-NMIBC风险评分系统进行风险分层。考虑到IR-NMIBC相对缓慢的病程和治疗负担,治疗性去强化与主动监测或基于办公室的消融是合适的选择患者。经尿道膀胱肿瘤切除术相关的发病率可以通过放弃完全切除的LG肿瘤的再切除和不强制进行固有肌层取样来减轻。围手术期化疗可减少复发,额外的辅助膀胱内治疗应进行风险分层。评估新型IR-NMIBC疗法的临床试验,包括辅助和消融设计,应纳入患者报告的结果和风险分层对照。消融试验作为疗效的概念验证研究,需要在辅助治疗环境中进行随机对照研究,以确认其优于标准治疗。结论和临床意义:IBCG共识建议为IR-NMIBC患者的临床护理和临床试验设计提供了实用的指导。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Intermediate-risk Non-muscle-invasive Bladder Cancer: Recommendations for Definitions, Risk Stratification, Management Strategies, and Clinical Trial Design from the International Bladder Cancer Group.

Background and objective: Intermediate-risk (IR) non-muscle-invasive bladder cancer (NMIBC) is a heterogeneous disease, and standardized definitions and risk-guided management are critical for appropriate patient care and clinical trial development.

Methods: A global committee of bladder cancer experts developed IR-NMIBC recommendations. Working groups reviewed literature and drafted recommendations, which were voted on by International Bladder Cancer Group (IBCG) members using a modified Delphi process. During an August 2024 meeting, voting results and evidence were presented, and recommendations were refined. Final recommendations achieved >75% agreement.

Key findings and limitations: The IBCG recommends inclusion of only low-grade (LG; G1 and G2) tumors in the IR-NMIBC category, risk stratified using the IBCG IR-NMIBC risk scoring system. Given the relatively indolent course and treatment burden of IR-NMIBC, therapeutic deintensification with active surveillance or office-based ablation is appropriate for select patients. Morbidity related to transurethral resection of a bladder tumor can be mitigated by forgoing restaging resection in completely resected LG tumors and not mandating muscularis propria sampling. Perioperative chemotherapy reduces recurrences, and additional adjuvant intravesical treatment should be risk stratified. Clinical trials evaluating novel IR-NMIBC therapies, including adjuvant and ablative designs, should incorporate patient-reported outcomes and risk-stratified controls. Ablative trials, as proof-of-concept studies for efficacy, require randomized controlled studies in the adjuvant setting to confirm superiority over the standard of care.

Conclusions and clinical implications: The IBCG consensus recommendations provide practical guidance for clinical care and clinical trial design for patients with IR-NMIBC.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
15.50
自引率
2.40%
发文量
128
审稿时长
20 days
期刊介绍: Journal Name: European Urology Oncology Affiliation: Official Journal of the European Association of Urology Focus: First official publication of the EAU fully devoted to the study of genitourinary malignancies Aims to deliver high-quality research Content: Includes original articles, opinion piece editorials, and invited reviews Covers clinical, basic, and translational research Publication Frequency: Six times a year in electronic format
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信