Michael M Sawiris, Omneya M Khalil, Peter A Halim, Marwa S A Hassan
{"title":"新型吡唑啉衍生物EGFR/VEGFR-2双重抑制剂的设计、合成及生物学评价","authors":"Michael M Sawiris, Omneya M Khalil, Peter A Halim, Marwa S A Hassan","doi":"10.1016/j.bioorg.2025.109075","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Three series of pyrazoline compounds (3a-f, 4a-f and 5a-f) were designed and synthesized as antiproliferative agents and potential dual EGFR/VEGFR-2 inhibitors for targeted cancer therapy. All the synthesized compounds were screened by National Cancer Institute (NCI), Bethesda, USA for anticancer activity against 60 human cancer cell lines. Compounds 2f, 3b, 3c, 3e, 3f, 4b and 4e were selected for further antiproliferative activity investigation via MTT assay. Compounds 2f, 3e and 3f demonstrated better IC<sub>50</sub> results than doxorubicin in breast T47D and MCF7 cancer cells. Compound 3e was the most potent against EGFR and VEGFR2 with IC<sub>50</sub> values of 0.142 and 0.071 μM compared to erlotinib and axitinib with IC<sub>50</sub> values of 0.064 and 0.050 μM, respectively. Moreover, it reduced VEGFR2 phosphorylation and total VEGFR2 concentration in T47D cells by approximately 3.8 and 2.9-fold, respectively. Compound 3e also caused cell cycle arrest at G0/G1 phase and demonstrated significant increase in early and late apoptosis. Additionally, it upregulated pro-apoptotic genes (caspase-3, p53 and Bax) and downregulated anti-apoptotic gene (BCL-2). Boyden chamber and wound healing assays demonstrated that compound 3e could impair cell migration and invasion in T47D cells. The selectivity indices of compound 3e towards T47D or MCF7 breast cancer cells over the normal breast cell line MCF10A were approximately 46 and 25, respectively. In-silico studies revealed that compound 3e has a bioavailability score of 0.55 and did not violate Lipiniski's rule. Also, the molecular docking studies and molecular dynamics simulations confirmed that compound 3e could interact with EGFR (PDB: 1M17) and VEGFR2 (PDB: 4AG8) analogously to erlotinib and axitinib, respectively.</p>","PeriodicalId":257,"journal":{"name":"Bioorganic Chemistry","volume":"165 ","pages":"109075"},"PeriodicalIF":4.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Design, synthesis and biological evaluation of novel pyrazoline derivatives as dual EGFR/VEGFR-2 inhibitors for targeted cancer therapy.\",\"authors\":\"Michael M Sawiris, Omneya M Khalil, Peter A Halim, Marwa S A Hassan\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.bioorg.2025.109075\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Three series of pyrazoline compounds (3a-f, 4a-f and 5a-f) were designed and synthesized as antiproliferative agents and potential dual EGFR/VEGFR-2 inhibitors for targeted cancer therapy. All the synthesized compounds were screened by National Cancer Institute (NCI), Bethesda, USA for anticancer activity against 60 human cancer cell lines. Compounds 2f, 3b, 3c, 3e, 3f, 4b and 4e were selected for further antiproliferative activity investigation via MTT assay. Compounds 2f, 3e and 3f demonstrated better IC<sub>50</sub> results than doxorubicin in breast T47D and MCF7 cancer cells. Compound 3e was the most potent against EGFR and VEGFR2 with IC<sub>50</sub> values of 0.142 and 0.071 μM compared to erlotinib and axitinib with IC<sub>50</sub> values of 0.064 and 0.050 μM, respectively. Moreover, it reduced VEGFR2 phosphorylation and total VEGFR2 concentration in T47D cells by approximately 3.8 and 2.9-fold, respectively. Compound 3e also caused cell cycle arrest at G0/G1 phase and demonstrated significant increase in early and late apoptosis. Additionally, it upregulated pro-apoptotic genes (caspase-3, p53 and Bax) and downregulated anti-apoptotic gene (BCL-2). Boyden chamber and wound healing assays demonstrated that compound 3e could impair cell migration and invasion in T47D cells. The selectivity indices of compound 3e towards T47D or MCF7 breast cancer cells over the normal breast cell line MCF10A were approximately 46 and 25, respectively. In-silico studies revealed that compound 3e has a bioavailability score of 0.55 and did not violate Lipiniski's rule. Also, the molecular docking studies and molecular dynamics simulations confirmed that compound 3e could interact with EGFR (PDB: 1M17) and VEGFR2 (PDB: 4AG8) analogously to erlotinib and axitinib, respectively.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":257,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Bioorganic Chemistry\",\"volume\":\"165 \",\"pages\":\"109075\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-10-07\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Bioorganic Chemistry\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"92\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bioorg.2025.109075\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"BIOCHEMISTRY & MOLECULAR BIOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Bioorganic Chemistry","FirstCategoryId":"92","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bioorg.2025.109075","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BIOCHEMISTRY & MOLECULAR BIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Design, synthesis and biological evaluation of novel pyrazoline derivatives as dual EGFR/VEGFR-2 inhibitors for targeted cancer therapy.
Three series of pyrazoline compounds (3a-f, 4a-f and 5a-f) were designed and synthesized as antiproliferative agents and potential dual EGFR/VEGFR-2 inhibitors for targeted cancer therapy. All the synthesized compounds were screened by National Cancer Institute (NCI), Bethesda, USA for anticancer activity against 60 human cancer cell lines. Compounds 2f, 3b, 3c, 3e, 3f, 4b and 4e were selected for further antiproliferative activity investigation via MTT assay. Compounds 2f, 3e and 3f demonstrated better IC50 results than doxorubicin in breast T47D and MCF7 cancer cells. Compound 3e was the most potent against EGFR and VEGFR2 with IC50 values of 0.142 and 0.071 μM compared to erlotinib and axitinib with IC50 values of 0.064 and 0.050 μM, respectively. Moreover, it reduced VEGFR2 phosphorylation and total VEGFR2 concentration in T47D cells by approximately 3.8 and 2.9-fold, respectively. Compound 3e also caused cell cycle arrest at G0/G1 phase and demonstrated significant increase in early and late apoptosis. Additionally, it upregulated pro-apoptotic genes (caspase-3, p53 and Bax) and downregulated anti-apoptotic gene (BCL-2). Boyden chamber and wound healing assays demonstrated that compound 3e could impair cell migration and invasion in T47D cells. The selectivity indices of compound 3e towards T47D or MCF7 breast cancer cells over the normal breast cell line MCF10A were approximately 46 and 25, respectively. In-silico studies revealed that compound 3e has a bioavailability score of 0.55 and did not violate Lipiniski's rule. Also, the molecular docking studies and molecular dynamics simulations confirmed that compound 3e could interact with EGFR (PDB: 1M17) and VEGFR2 (PDB: 4AG8) analogously to erlotinib and axitinib, respectively.
期刊介绍:
Bioorganic Chemistry publishes research that addresses biological questions at the molecular level, using organic chemistry and principles of physical organic chemistry. The scope of the journal covers a range of topics at the organic chemistry-biology interface, including: enzyme catalysis, biotransformation and enzyme inhibition; nucleic acids chemistry; medicinal chemistry; natural product chemistry, natural product synthesis and natural product biosynthesis; antimicrobial agents; lipid and peptide chemistry; biophysical chemistry; biological probes; bio-orthogonal chemistry and biomimetic chemistry.
For manuscripts dealing with synthetic bioactive compounds, the Journal requires that the molecular target of the compounds described must be known, and must be demonstrated experimentally in the manuscript. For studies involving natural products, if the molecular target is unknown, some data beyond simple cell-based toxicity studies to provide insight into the mechanism of action is required. Studies supported by molecular docking are welcome, but must be supported by experimental data. The Journal does not consider manuscripts that are purely theoretical or computational in nature.
The Journal publishes regular articles, short communications and reviews. Reviews are normally invited by Editors or Editorial Board members. Authors of unsolicited reviews should first contact an Editor or Editorial Board member to determine whether the proposed article is within the scope of the Journal.