电子患者文件嵌入模型信息的精确给药与医生给药他克莫司在肾移植中的比较。

IF 5.5 2区 医学 Q1 PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY
Dirk R J Kuypers, Pieter Annaert, Borefore Jallah, Maarten Naesens, Maxine Teuns, Annouschka Laenen, Ruben Faelens
{"title":"电子患者文件嵌入模型信息的精确给药与医生给药他克莫司在肾移植中的比较。","authors":"Dirk R J Kuypers, Pieter Annaert, Borefore Jallah, Maarten Naesens, Maxine Teuns, Annouschka Laenen, Ruben Faelens","doi":"10.1002/cpt.70090","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Model-informed precision dosing (MIPD) of tacrolimus in renal allograft recipients, evaluated in silico, demonstrated improved (time to and) probability of target concentration attainment and smaller deviations from target range. Using simulated tacrolimus concentration-time profiles, a study of 200 patients was predicted to have sufficient power to demonstrate superior performance of MIPD for these exposure end points compared with physician-based dosing. A fully automated tacrolimus MIPD application integrated in the electronic patient file was tested in 293 de novo recipients in the first 14 days after transplantation in a prospective randomized controlled clinical validation study. More patients dosed with the MIPD application reached the primary study end point of three in-target tacrolimus pre-dose trough concentrations by Day 8, compared with physician-dosed patients: 52.2% (95% CI: 45.3-59.6) vs. 35.7% (95% CI: 27.4-45.6); HR: 1.64 (95% CI: 1.10-2.43) (P = 0.015). The mean fraction of samples per patient in target during the complete study period was higher in the MIPD arm: 0.38 ± 0.14 compared with the physician-dosed arm: 0.28 ± 0.14 (P < 0.001). The mean distance from target window was significantly lower in MIPD-treated patients: 0.022 (95% CI: 0.019-0.024) vs. 0.040 (95% CI: 0.036-0.044) (P < 0.001). On 19 occasions (< 1%), MIPD tacrolimus dose suggestions were actively overruled by physicians. A fully automated MIPD application for tacrolimus in de novo renal recipients, integrated in the electronic patient file, demonstrated superior performance in achieving tacrolimus exposure targets with limited active overruling of MIPD dose executions by physicians. Automated MIPD can be tested in larger trials to evaluate the impact of dosing decision support on clinical outcomes after renal transplantation.</p>","PeriodicalId":153,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Pharmacology & Therapeutics","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":5.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Electronic Patient File-Embedded Model-Informed Precision Dosing Compared with Physician Dosing of Tacrolimus in Kidney Transplantation.\",\"authors\":\"Dirk R J Kuypers, Pieter Annaert, Borefore Jallah, Maarten Naesens, Maxine Teuns, Annouschka Laenen, Ruben Faelens\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/cpt.70090\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Model-informed precision dosing (MIPD) of tacrolimus in renal allograft recipients, evaluated in silico, demonstrated improved (time to and) probability of target concentration attainment and smaller deviations from target range. Using simulated tacrolimus concentration-time profiles, a study of 200 patients was predicted to have sufficient power to demonstrate superior performance of MIPD for these exposure end points compared with physician-based dosing. A fully automated tacrolimus MIPD application integrated in the electronic patient file was tested in 293 de novo recipients in the first 14 days after transplantation in a prospective randomized controlled clinical validation study. More patients dosed with the MIPD application reached the primary study end point of three in-target tacrolimus pre-dose trough concentrations by Day 8, compared with physician-dosed patients: 52.2% (95% CI: 45.3-59.6) vs. 35.7% (95% CI: 27.4-45.6); HR: 1.64 (95% CI: 1.10-2.43) (P = 0.015). The mean fraction of samples per patient in target during the complete study period was higher in the MIPD arm: 0.38 ± 0.14 compared with the physician-dosed arm: 0.28 ± 0.14 (P < 0.001). The mean distance from target window was significantly lower in MIPD-treated patients: 0.022 (95% CI: 0.019-0.024) vs. 0.040 (95% CI: 0.036-0.044) (P < 0.001). On 19 occasions (< 1%), MIPD tacrolimus dose suggestions were actively overruled by physicians. A fully automated MIPD application for tacrolimus in de novo renal recipients, integrated in the electronic patient file, demonstrated superior performance in achieving tacrolimus exposure targets with limited active overruling of MIPD dose executions by physicians. Automated MIPD can be tested in larger trials to evaluate the impact of dosing decision support on clinical outcomes after renal transplantation.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":153,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Clinical Pharmacology & Therapeutics\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":5.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-10-11\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Clinical Pharmacology & Therapeutics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1002/cpt.70090\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical Pharmacology & Therapeutics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/cpt.70090","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

他克莫司在同种异体肾移植受者中的模型信息精确给药(MIPD),在计算机上进行了评估,显示(时间和)达到目标浓度的可能性有所改善,与目标范围的偏差较小。使用模拟的他克莫司浓度-时间曲线,一项200例患者的研究预测有足够的能力证明在这些暴露终点,与医生给药相比,MIPD的表现更优越。在一项前瞻性随机对照临床验证研究中,在293名移植后最初14天的新患者中测试了集成在电子患者档案中的全自动他克莫司MIPD应用程序。与医生给药的患者相比,更多使用MIPD的患者在第8天达到了三个靶点内他克莫司给药前谷浓度的主要研究终点:52.2% (95% CI: 45.3-59.6)对35.7% (95% CI: 27.4-45.6);Hr: 1.64 (95% ci: 1.10-2.43) (p = 0.015)。在整个研究期间,MIPD组每位患者的平均靶细胞样本比例为0.38±0.14,而医生给药组为0.28±0.14
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Electronic Patient File-Embedded Model-Informed Precision Dosing Compared with Physician Dosing of Tacrolimus in Kidney Transplantation.

Model-informed precision dosing (MIPD) of tacrolimus in renal allograft recipients, evaluated in silico, demonstrated improved (time to and) probability of target concentration attainment and smaller deviations from target range. Using simulated tacrolimus concentration-time profiles, a study of 200 patients was predicted to have sufficient power to demonstrate superior performance of MIPD for these exposure end points compared with physician-based dosing. A fully automated tacrolimus MIPD application integrated in the electronic patient file was tested in 293 de novo recipients in the first 14 days after transplantation in a prospective randomized controlled clinical validation study. More patients dosed with the MIPD application reached the primary study end point of three in-target tacrolimus pre-dose trough concentrations by Day 8, compared with physician-dosed patients: 52.2% (95% CI: 45.3-59.6) vs. 35.7% (95% CI: 27.4-45.6); HR: 1.64 (95% CI: 1.10-2.43) (P = 0.015). The mean fraction of samples per patient in target during the complete study period was higher in the MIPD arm: 0.38 ± 0.14 compared with the physician-dosed arm: 0.28 ± 0.14 (P < 0.001). The mean distance from target window was significantly lower in MIPD-treated patients: 0.022 (95% CI: 0.019-0.024) vs. 0.040 (95% CI: 0.036-0.044) (P < 0.001). On 19 occasions (< 1%), MIPD tacrolimus dose suggestions were actively overruled by physicians. A fully automated MIPD application for tacrolimus in de novo renal recipients, integrated in the electronic patient file, demonstrated superior performance in achieving tacrolimus exposure targets with limited active overruling of MIPD dose executions by physicians. Automated MIPD can be tested in larger trials to evaluate the impact of dosing decision support on clinical outcomes after renal transplantation.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
12.70
自引率
7.50%
发文量
290
审稿时长
2 months
期刊介绍: Clinical Pharmacology & Therapeutics (CPT) is the authoritative cross-disciplinary journal in experimental and clinical medicine devoted to publishing advances in the nature, action, efficacy, and evaluation of therapeutics. CPT welcomes original Articles in the emerging areas of translational, predictive and personalized medicine; new therapeutic modalities including gene and cell therapies; pharmacogenomics, proteomics and metabolomics; bioinformation and applied systems biology complementing areas of pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics, human investigation and clinical trials, pharmacovigilence, pharmacoepidemiology, pharmacometrics, and population pharmacology.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信