你是什么类型的人?新婚夫妇性别意识的潜在阶层

IF 3.4 1区 社会学 Q1 FAMILY STUDIES
Ashley Larsen Gibby, Jane Lankes Smith, Jeremy B. Yorgason, Aubrey Bardsley, Erin Kramer Holmes, Spencer L. James
{"title":"你是什么类型的人?新婚夫妇性别意识的潜在阶层","authors":"Ashley Larsen Gibby,&nbsp;Jane Lankes Smith,&nbsp;Jeremy B. Yorgason,&nbsp;Aubrey Bardsley,&nbsp;Erin Kramer Holmes,&nbsp;Spencer L. James","doi":"10.1111/jomf.13103","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Objective</h3>\n \n <p>This study aims to understand how married couples agree or disagree on gender ideologies, as well as what sociodemographic characteristics are related to these pairings.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Background</h3>\n \n <p>Past studies have explored the multidimensional nature of gender ideologies within individuals; however, this multidimensionality at the couple level is less understood. Although some research suggests couples will largely agree on gender ideologies, other theories imply that women in different-sex couples will be more gender progressive than their partners.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Method</h3>\n \n <p>Using data from 1290 different-sex couples married mostly in 2014 who participated in a nationally representative study in the United States, the authors identified latent classes of partners' gender ideologies using several measures. The authors then examined how latent class membership varied by sociodemographic characteristics using multinomial regression.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>Results showed five underlying latent classes: Moderate (30%), Strongly Egalitarian (20%), Nuanced Traditional (20%), Mixed (18%), and Neutral (12%). About 82% of couples in the sample consisted of two partners who shared similar views. Results showed high levels of non-extreme stances. About 42% of couples belonged in either a Neutral class—neither agreeing nor disagreeing with the gender ideology measures—or a Moderate class. Several sociodemographic characteristics significantly predicted class membership.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusion</h3>\n \n <p>Findings provide support for assortative mating—people tend to agree with their spouse on gender ideologies. Further, the findings show that although some individuals stuck “in the middle” between traditionalism and egalitarianism adopt moderate views, others seemingly adopt what the authors title <i>firm equivocation</i>.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":48440,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Marriage and Family","volume":"87 5","pages":"2056-2074"},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"What is your type? Latent classes of newly married couples' gender ideologies\",\"authors\":\"Ashley Larsen Gibby,&nbsp;Jane Lankes Smith,&nbsp;Jeremy B. Yorgason,&nbsp;Aubrey Bardsley,&nbsp;Erin Kramer Holmes,&nbsp;Spencer L. James\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/jomf.13103\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div>\\n \\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Objective</h3>\\n \\n <p>This study aims to understand how married couples agree or disagree on gender ideologies, as well as what sociodemographic characteristics are related to these pairings.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Background</h3>\\n \\n <p>Past studies have explored the multidimensional nature of gender ideologies within individuals; however, this multidimensionality at the couple level is less understood. Although some research suggests couples will largely agree on gender ideologies, other theories imply that women in different-sex couples will be more gender progressive than their partners.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Method</h3>\\n \\n <p>Using data from 1290 different-sex couples married mostly in 2014 who participated in a nationally representative study in the United States, the authors identified latent classes of partners' gender ideologies using several measures. The authors then examined how latent class membership varied by sociodemographic characteristics using multinomial regression.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Results</h3>\\n \\n <p>Results showed five underlying latent classes: Moderate (30%), Strongly Egalitarian (20%), Nuanced Traditional (20%), Mixed (18%), and Neutral (12%). About 82% of couples in the sample consisted of two partners who shared similar views. Results showed high levels of non-extreme stances. About 42% of couples belonged in either a Neutral class—neither agreeing nor disagreeing with the gender ideology measures—or a Moderate class. Several sociodemographic characteristics significantly predicted class membership.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Conclusion</h3>\\n \\n <p>Findings provide support for assortative mating—people tend to agree with their spouse on gender ideologies. Further, the findings show that although some individuals stuck “in the middle” between traditionalism and egalitarianism adopt moderate views, others seemingly adopt what the authors title <i>firm equivocation</i>.</p>\\n </section>\\n </div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48440,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Marriage and Family\",\"volume\":\"87 5\",\"pages\":\"2056-2074\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-03-29\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Marriage and Family\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"90\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/jomf.13103\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"社会学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"FAMILY STUDIES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Marriage and Family","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/jomf.13103","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"FAMILY STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的本研究旨在了解已婚夫妇如何认同或不认同性别意识形态,以及与这些配对相关的社会人口特征。过去的研究探索了个体内部性别意识形态的多维性;然而,这种多维度在夫妻层面上的理解较少。尽管一些研究表明,夫妻在性别意识形态上很大程度上是一致的,但其他理论暗示,异性伴侣中的女性会比她们的伴侣在性别方面更进步。研究人员使用了1290对2014年结婚的不同性别夫妇的数据,这些夫妇参加了美国一项具有全国代表性的研究,作者通过几种方法确定了伴侣性别意识形态的潜在类别。然后,作者使用多项回归检查了潜在阶级成员如何随社会人口统计学特征而变化。结果显示了五个潜在类别:中度(30%)、强烈平等主义(20%)、微妙传统(20%)、混合(18%)和中性(12%)。样本中约有82%的夫妻双方观点相似。结果显示,非极端立场的水平很高。大约42%的夫妇要么属于中立阶层——既不同意也不反对性别意识形态的测量——要么属于温和阶层。几个社会人口学特征显著地预测了阶级成员。结论研究结果支持了选择性婚配——人们倾向于认同配偶的性别意识。此外,研究结果还表明,尽管有些人“夹在”传统主义和平均主义之间,采取了温和的观点,但其他人似乎采取了作者所说的“坚定的模棱两可”。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

What is your type? Latent classes of newly married couples' gender ideologies

What is your type? Latent classes of newly married couples' gender ideologies

Objective

This study aims to understand how married couples agree or disagree on gender ideologies, as well as what sociodemographic characteristics are related to these pairings.

Background

Past studies have explored the multidimensional nature of gender ideologies within individuals; however, this multidimensionality at the couple level is less understood. Although some research suggests couples will largely agree on gender ideologies, other theories imply that women in different-sex couples will be more gender progressive than their partners.

Method

Using data from 1290 different-sex couples married mostly in 2014 who participated in a nationally representative study in the United States, the authors identified latent classes of partners' gender ideologies using several measures. The authors then examined how latent class membership varied by sociodemographic characteristics using multinomial regression.

Results

Results showed five underlying latent classes: Moderate (30%), Strongly Egalitarian (20%), Nuanced Traditional (20%), Mixed (18%), and Neutral (12%). About 82% of couples in the sample consisted of two partners who shared similar views. Results showed high levels of non-extreme stances. About 42% of couples belonged in either a Neutral class—neither agreeing nor disagreeing with the gender ideology measures—or a Moderate class. Several sociodemographic characteristics significantly predicted class membership.

Conclusion

Findings provide support for assortative mating—people tend to agree with their spouse on gender ideologies. Further, the findings show that although some individuals stuck “in the middle” between traditionalism and egalitarianism adopt moderate views, others seemingly adopt what the authors title firm equivocation.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
12.20
自引率
6.70%
发文量
81
期刊介绍: For more than 70 years, Journal of Marriage and Family (JMF) has been a leading research journal in the family field. JMF features original research and theory, research interpretation and reviews, and critical discussion concerning all aspects of marriage, other forms of close relationships, and families.In 2009, an institutional subscription to Journal of Marriage and Family includes a subscription to Family Relations and Journal of Family Theory & Review.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信