香肠类似物作为新的非肉类替代品:改善成分、营养和感官特性的新见解

IF 3.4 2区 农林科学 Q2 FOOD SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY
Jazmín Hernández R., Luis Mojica
{"title":"香肠类似物作为新的非肉类替代品:改善成分、营养和感官特性的新见解","authors":"Jazmín Hernández R.,&nbsp;Luis Mojica","doi":"10.1111/1750-3841.70613","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>During the last few years, health, environmental, and ethical concerns related to meat consumption have led to global interest in developing meat analogs. Primary examples include reconstituted meat analogs, such as patties, nuggets, and sausages. However, besides innovation, only a few meat analog developments, including sausages, have targeted adequate health and taste aspects that can compete with traditional meat products and satisfy consumer expectations. Thus, this review analyzes and compares sausage analog formulations, exploring their nutritional quality and sensorial properties. Differences in composition, ingredients, and processing methods that mimic meat-like structures are also discussed. Novel sausage analogs are presented as fresh, emulsified, and dry-fermented alternatives, incorporating vegetal protein isolates and flours, fungal species, vegetal oils, and hydrocolloids as primary ingredient formulations. Extrusion, emulsification, and drying are the preferred methods for modifying base ingredients through the generation of polysaccharide/protein–lipid interactions and targeting similar physicochemical properties to target products. Still, besides acquiring desirable texture and taste, nutritional aspects have not been fully accomplished. Findings suggest the need for further research to improve nutritional profiles and evaluate their potential health benefits.</p>","PeriodicalId":193,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Food Science","volume":"90 10","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ift.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/1750-3841.70613","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Sausage Analogs as Novel Nonmeat Alternative: New Insights to Improve Composition, Nutritional, and Sensory Characteristics\",\"authors\":\"Jazmín Hernández R.,&nbsp;Luis Mojica\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/1750-3841.70613\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>During the last few years, health, environmental, and ethical concerns related to meat consumption have led to global interest in developing meat analogs. Primary examples include reconstituted meat analogs, such as patties, nuggets, and sausages. However, besides innovation, only a few meat analog developments, including sausages, have targeted adequate health and taste aspects that can compete with traditional meat products and satisfy consumer expectations. Thus, this review analyzes and compares sausage analog formulations, exploring their nutritional quality and sensorial properties. Differences in composition, ingredients, and processing methods that mimic meat-like structures are also discussed. Novel sausage analogs are presented as fresh, emulsified, and dry-fermented alternatives, incorporating vegetal protein isolates and flours, fungal species, vegetal oils, and hydrocolloids as primary ingredient formulations. Extrusion, emulsification, and drying are the preferred methods for modifying base ingredients through the generation of polysaccharide/protein–lipid interactions and targeting similar physicochemical properties to target products. Still, besides acquiring desirable texture and taste, nutritional aspects have not been fully accomplished. Findings suggest the need for further research to improve nutritional profiles and evaluate their potential health benefits.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":193,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Food Science\",\"volume\":\"90 10\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-10-10\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://ift.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/1750-3841.70613\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Food Science\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"97\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://ift.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/1750-3841.70613\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"农林科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"FOOD SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Food Science","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://ift.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/1750-3841.70613","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"FOOD SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在过去的几年里,与肉类消费有关的健康、环境和伦理问题引起了全球对开发肉类类似物的兴趣。主要的例子包括重组肉类类似物,如肉饼、鸡块和香肠。然而,除了创新之外,只有一些肉类模拟物的开发,包括香肠,针对足够的健康和味道方面,可以与传统肉类产品竞争,并满足消费者的期望。因此,本文对香肠类似物配方进行了分析和比较,探讨了它们的营养品质和感官特性。在组成,成分和加工方法的差异,模拟肉样结构也进行了讨论。新型香肠类似物作为新鲜,乳化和干发酵的替代品,结合植物分离蛋白和面粉,真菌物种,植物油和水胶体作为主要成分配方。挤出、乳化和干燥是通过产生多糖/蛋白质-脂质相互作用和使目标产品具有相似的物理化学性质来修饰基础成分的首选方法。然而,除了获得理想的质地和味道,营养方面还没有完全完成。研究结果表明,需要进一步研究以改善营养状况并评估其潜在的健康益处。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Sausage Analogs as Novel Nonmeat Alternative: New Insights to Improve Composition, Nutritional, and Sensory Characteristics

Sausage Analogs as Novel Nonmeat Alternative: New Insights to Improve Composition, Nutritional, and Sensory Characteristics

During the last few years, health, environmental, and ethical concerns related to meat consumption have led to global interest in developing meat analogs. Primary examples include reconstituted meat analogs, such as patties, nuggets, and sausages. However, besides innovation, only a few meat analog developments, including sausages, have targeted adequate health and taste aspects that can compete with traditional meat products and satisfy consumer expectations. Thus, this review analyzes and compares sausage analog formulations, exploring their nutritional quality and sensorial properties. Differences in composition, ingredients, and processing methods that mimic meat-like structures are also discussed. Novel sausage analogs are presented as fresh, emulsified, and dry-fermented alternatives, incorporating vegetal protein isolates and flours, fungal species, vegetal oils, and hydrocolloids as primary ingredient formulations. Extrusion, emulsification, and drying are the preferred methods for modifying base ingredients through the generation of polysaccharide/protein–lipid interactions and targeting similar physicochemical properties to target products. Still, besides acquiring desirable texture and taste, nutritional aspects have not been fully accomplished. Findings suggest the need for further research to improve nutritional profiles and evaluate their potential health benefits.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Food Science
Journal of Food Science 工程技术-食品科技
CiteScore
7.10
自引率
2.60%
发文量
412
审稿时长
3.1 months
期刊介绍: The goal of the Journal of Food Science is to offer scientists, researchers, and other food professionals the opportunity to share knowledge of scientific advancements in the myriad disciplines affecting their work, through a respected peer-reviewed publication. The Journal of Food Science serves as an international forum for vital research and developments in food science. The range of topics covered in the journal include: -Concise Reviews and Hypotheses in Food Science -New Horizons in Food Research -Integrated Food Science -Food Chemistry -Food Engineering, Materials Science, and Nanotechnology -Food Microbiology and Safety -Sensory and Consumer Sciences -Health, Nutrition, and Food -Toxicology and Chemical Food Safety The Journal of Food Science publishes peer-reviewed articles that cover all aspects of food science, including safety and nutrition. Reviews should be 15 to 50 typewritten pages (including tables, figures, and references), should provide in-depth coverage of a narrowly defined topic, and should embody careful evaluation (weaknesses, strengths, explanation of discrepancies in results among similar studies) of all pertinent studies, so that insightful interpretations and conclusions can be presented. Hypothesis papers are especially appropriate in pioneering areas of research or important areas that are afflicted by scientific controversy.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信