{"title":"香肠类似物作为新的非肉类替代品:改善成分、营养和感官特性的新见解","authors":"Jazmín Hernández R., Luis Mojica","doi":"10.1111/1750-3841.70613","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>During the last few years, health, environmental, and ethical concerns related to meat consumption have led to global interest in developing meat analogs. Primary examples include reconstituted meat analogs, such as patties, nuggets, and sausages. However, besides innovation, only a few meat analog developments, including sausages, have targeted adequate health and taste aspects that can compete with traditional meat products and satisfy consumer expectations. Thus, this review analyzes and compares sausage analog formulations, exploring their nutritional quality and sensorial properties. Differences in composition, ingredients, and processing methods that mimic meat-like structures are also discussed. Novel sausage analogs are presented as fresh, emulsified, and dry-fermented alternatives, incorporating vegetal protein isolates and flours, fungal species, vegetal oils, and hydrocolloids as primary ingredient formulations. Extrusion, emulsification, and drying are the preferred methods for modifying base ingredients through the generation of polysaccharide/protein–lipid interactions and targeting similar physicochemical properties to target products. Still, besides acquiring desirable texture and taste, nutritional aspects have not been fully accomplished. Findings suggest the need for further research to improve nutritional profiles and evaluate their potential health benefits.</p>","PeriodicalId":193,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Food Science","volume":"90 10","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ift.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/1750-3841.70613","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Sausage Analogs as Novel Nonmeat Alternative: New Insights to Improve Composition, Nutritional, and Sensory Characteristics\",\"authors\":\"Jazmín Hernández R., Luis Mojica\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/1750-3841.70613\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>During the last few years, health, environmental, and ethical concerns related to meat consumption have led to global interest in developing meat analogs. Primary examples include reconstituted meat analogs, such as patties, nuggets, and sausages. However, besides innovation, only a few meat analog developments, including sausages, have targeted adequate health and taste aspects that can compete with traditional meat products and satisfy consumer expectations. Thus, this review analyzes and compares sausage analog formulations, exploring their nutritional quality and sensorial properties. Differences in composition, ingredients, and processing methods that mimic meat-like structures are also discussed. Novel sausage analogs are presented as fresh, emulsified, and dry-fermented alternatives, incorporating vegetal protein isolates and flours, fungal species, vegetal oils, and hydrocolloids as primary ingredient formulations. Extrusion, emulsification, and drying are the preferred methods for modifying base ingredients through the generation of polysaccharide/protein–lipid interactions and targeting similar physicochemical properties to target products. Still, besides acquiring desirable texture and taste, nutritional aspects have not been fully accomplished. Findings suggest the need for further research to improve nutritional profiles and evaluate their potential health benefits.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":193,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Food Science\",\"volume\":\"90 10\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-10-10\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://ift.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/1750-3841.70613\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Food Science\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"97\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://ift.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/1750-3841.70613\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"农林科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"FOOD SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Food Science","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://ift.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/1750-3841.70613","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"FOOD SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Sausage Analogs as Novel Nonmeat Alternative: New Insights to Improve Composition, Nutritional, and Sensory Characteristics
During the last few years, health, environmental, and ethical concerns related to meat consumption have led to global interest in developing meat analogs. Primary examples include reconstituted meat analogs, such as patties, nuggets, and sausages. However, besides innovation, only a few meat analog developments, including sausages, have targeted adequate health and taste aspects that can compete with traditional meat products and satisfy consumer expectations. Thus, this review analyzes and compares sausage analog formulations, exploring their nutritional quality and sensorial properties. Differences in composition, ingredients, and processing methods that mimic meat-like structures are also discussed. Novel sausage analogs are presented as fresh, emulsified, and dry-fermented alternatives, incorporating vegetal protein isolates and flours, fungal species, vegetal oils, and hydrocolloids as primary ingredient formulations. Extrusion, emulsification, and drying are the preferred methods for modifying base ingredients through the generation of polysaccharide/protein–lipid interactions and targeting similar physicochemical properties to target products. Still, besides acquiring desirable texture and taste, nutritional aspects have not been fully accomplished. Findings suggest the need for further research to improve nutritional profiles and evaluate their potential health benefits.
期刊介绍:
The goal of the Journal of Food Science is to offer scientists, researchers, and other food professionals the opportunity to share knowledge of scientific advancements in the myriad disciplines affecting their work, through a respected peer-reviewed publication. The Journal of Food Science serves as an international forum for vital research and developments in food science.
The range of topics covered in the journal include:
-Concise Reviews and Hypotheses in Food Science
-New Horizons in Food Research
-Integrated Food Science
-Food Chemistry
-Food Engineering, Materials Science, and Nanotechnology
-Food Microbiology and Safety
-Sensory and Consumer Sciences
-Health, Nutrition, and Food
-Toxicology and Chemical Food Safety
The Journal of Food Science publishes peer-reviewed articles that cover all aspects of food science, including safety and nutrition. Reviews should be 15 to 50 typewritten pages (including tables, figures, and references), should provide in-depth coverage of a narrowly defined topic, and should embody careful evaluation (weaknesses, strengths, explanation of discrepancies in results among similar studies) of all pertinent studies, so that insightful interpretations and conclusions can be presented. Hypothesis papers are especially appropriate in pioneering areas of research or important areas that are afflicted by scientific controversy.