基于最小生成树和层次分析法(SAHP)的软件需求优先级混合技术设计

IF 1.3 4区 计算机科学 Q3 COMPUTER SCIENCE, SOFTWARE ENGINEERING
IET Software Pub Date : 2025-10-09 DOI:10.1049/sfw2/8819735
Muhammad Yaseen, Esraa Ali, Nadeem Sarwar, Leila Jamel, Irfanud Din, Farrukh Yuldashev, Foongli Law
{"title":"基于最小生成树和层次分析法(SAHP)的软件需求优先级混合技术设计","authors":"Muhammad Yaseen,&nbsp;Esraa Ali,&nbsp;Nadeem Sarwar,&nbsp;Leila Jamel,&nbsp;Irfanud Din,&nbsp;Farrukh Yuldashev,&nbsp;Foongli Law","doi":"10.1049/sfw2/8819735","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Prioritizing software requirements in a sustainable manner can significantly contribute to the success of a software project, adding substantial value throughout its development lifecycle. Analytic hierarchical process (AHP) is considered to yield more accurate prioritized results, but due to high pairwise comparisons, it is not considered to be scalable for prioritization of high number of requirements. To address scalability issue, a hybrid approach of minimal spanning trees (MSTs) and AHP, called as spanning tree and AHP (SAHP), is designed for prioritizing large set of functional requirements (FRs) with fewer comparisons, and thus scalability issue is solved. In this research, on-demand open object (ODOO) enterprise resource planning (ERP) system FRs are prioritized, and the results are compared with AHP. The results of the case study proved that SAHP is more scalable that can prioritize any type of requirement with only <i>n</i>–1 pairs of requirements. Total FRs considered for case from ODOO were 100, where 18 spanning trees were constructed from it. With only 90 pairwise comparisons, these FRs were prioritized with more consistency compared to AHP. Total pairwise comparisons with AHP reach 4950, which is 55 times more compared with SAHP. Consistency of results is measured from average consistency index (CI) value, which was below 0.1. The consistency ratio (CR) value below 0.1 shows results are consistent and acceptable.</p>","PeriodicalId":50378,"journal":{"name":"IET Software","volume":"2025 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ietresearch.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1049/sfw2/8819735","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Design of Minimal Spanning Tree and Analytic Hierarchical Process (SAHP) Based Hybrid Technique for Software Requirements Prioritization\",\"authors\":\"Muhammad Yaseen,&nbsp;Esraa Ali,&nbsp;Nadeem Sarwar,&nbsp;Leila Jamel,&nbsp;Irfanud Din,&nbsp;Farrukh Yuldashev,&nbsp;Foongli Law\",\"doi\":\"10.1049/sfw2/8819735\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>Prioritizing software requirements in a sustainable manner can significantly contribute to the success of a software project, adding substantial value throughout its development lifecycle. Analytic hierarchical process (AHP) is considered to yield more accurate prioritized results, but due to high pairwise comparisons, it is not considered to be scalable for prioritization of high number of requirements. To address scalability issue, a hybrid approach of minimal spanning trees (MSTs) and AHP, called as spanning tree and AHP (SAHP), is designed for prioritizing large set of functional requirements (FRs) with fewer comparisons, and thus scalability issue is solved. In this research, on-demand open object (ODOO) enterprise resource planning (ERP) system FRs are prioritized, and the results are compared with AHP. The results of the case study proved that SAHP is more scalable that can prioritize any type of requirement with only <i>n</i>–1 pairs of requirements. Total FRs considered for case from ODOO were 100, where 18 spanning trees were constructed from it. With only 90 pairwise comparisons, these FRs were prioritized with more consistency compared to AHP. Total pairwise comparisons with AHP reach 4950, which is 55 times more compared with SAHP. Consistency of results is measured from average consistency index (CI) value, which was below 0.1. The consistency ratio (CR) value below 0.1 shows results are consistent and acceptable.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":50378,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"IET Software\",\"volume\":\"2025 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-10-09\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://ietresearch.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1049/sfw2/8819735\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"IET Software\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"94\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://ietresearch.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1049/sfw2/8819735\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"计算机科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"COMPUTER SCIENCE, SOFTWARE ENGINEERING\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"IET Software","FirstCategoryId":"94","ListUrlMain":"https://ietresearch.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1049/sfw2/8819735","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"计算机科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"COMPUTER SCIENCE, SOFTWARE ENGINEERING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

以可持续的方式对软件需求进行优先级排序可以显著地促进软件项目的成功,在整个开发生命周期中增加实质性的价值。分析层次过程(AHP)被认为产生更准确的优先级结果,但是由于高度两两比较,它不被认为是可伸缩的,用于大量需求的优先级排序。为了解决可伸缩性问题,设计了一种最小生成树(MSTs)和层次分析法的混合方法,称为生成树和层次分析法(SAHP),以较少的比较对大型功能需求(FRs)进行优先级排序,从而解决了可伸缩性问题。本研究对按需开放对象(ODOO)企业资源规划(ERP)系统中的FRs进行了优先级排序,并将结果与层次分析法进行了比较。案例研究的结果证明,SAHP具有更高的可伸缩性,可以用n-1对需求对任何类型的需求进行优先级排序。对于来自ODOO的案例,考虑的总FRs为100,其中18棵生成树是由它构建的。只有90个两两比较,与AHP相比,这些fr的优先级更具一致性。与AHP的两两比较总数达到4950,是SAHP的55倍。结果的一致性以平均一致性指数(CI)值衡量,CI值小于0.1。一致性比(CR)值小于0.1表示结果一致且可接受。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Design of Minimal Spanning Tree and Analytic Hierarchical Process (SAHP) Based Hybrid Technique for Software Requirements Prioritization

Design of Minimal Spanning Tree and Analytic Hierarchical Process (SAHP) Based Hybrid Technique for Software Requirements Prioritization

Prioritizing software requirements in a sustainable manner can significantly contribute to the success of a software project, adding substantial value throughout its development lifecycle. Analytic hierarchical process (AHP) is considered to yield more accurate prioritized results, but due to high pairwise comparisons, it is not considered to be scalable for prioritization of high number of requirements. To address scalability issue, a hybrid approach of minimal spanning trees (MSTs) and AHP, called as spanning tree and AHP (SAHP), is designed for prioritizing large set of functional requirements (FRs) with fewer comparisons, and thus scalability issue is solved. In this research, on-demand open object (ODOO) enterprise resource planning (ERP) system FRs are prioritized, and the results are compared with AHP. The results of the case study proved that SAHP is more scalable that can prioritize any type of requirement with only n–1 pairs of requirements. Total FRs considered for case from ODOO were 100, where 18 spanning trees were constructed from it. With only 90 pairwise comparisons, these FRs were prioritized with more consistency compared to AHP. Total pairwise comparisons with AHP reach 4950, which is 55 times more compared with SAHP. Consistency of results is measured from average consistency index (CI) value, which was below 0.1. The consistency ratio (CR) value below 0.1 shows results are consistent and acceptable.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
IET Software
IET Software 工程技术-计算机:软件工程
CiteScore
4.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
27
审稿时长
9 months
期刊介绍: IET Software publishes papers on all aspects of the software lifecycle, including design, development, implementation and maintenance. The focus of the journal is on the methods used to develop and maintain software, and their practical application. Authors are especially encouraged to submit papers on the following topics, although papers on all aspects of software engineering are welcome: Software and systems requirements engineering Formal methods, design methods, practice and experience Software architecture, aspect and object orientation, reuse and re-engineering Testing, verification and validation techniques Software dependability and measurement Human systems engineering and human-computer interaction Knowledge engineering; expert and knowledge-based systems, intelligent agents Information systems engineering Application of software engineering in industry and commerce Software engineering technology transfer Management of software development Theoretical aspects of software development Machine learning Big data and big code Cloud computing Current Special Issue. Call for papers: Knowledge Discovery for Software Development - https://digital-library.theiet.org/files/IET_SEN_CFP_KDSD.pdf Big Data Analytics for Sustainable Software Development - https://digital-library.theiet.org/files/IET_SEN_CFP_BDASSD.pdf
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信