对比效应:分析师最新盈利预测的幻影

IF 2.6 4区 经济学 Q2 BUSINESS, FINANCE
Huan Cai, Xiaodi Zhang, Jie Zheng
{"title":"对比效应:分析师最新盈利预测的幻影","authors":"Huan Cai,&nbsp;Xiaodi Zhang,&nbsp;Jie Zheng","doi":"10.1111/irfi.70041","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Psychology research on contrast effects suggests that information from a previous decision may be compared with the information of the current task. We document a new stylized fact that an analyst's current annual earnings forecast error of one firm is negatively correlated with her latest forecast revision of another firm. We tease out contrast effects as the main driving force of this negative relationship by excluding other potential mechanisms such as firms' information environment and analyst constraints. We show that variables which may influence analysts' retrieval of past experiences have significant impacts on the magnitude of contrast effects, as predicted by the memory-based valuation model.</p>","PeriodicalId":46664,"journal":{"name":"International Review of Finance","volume":"25 4","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Contrast effects: The phantom of an analyst's latest earnings forecasts\",\"authors\":\"Huan Cai,&nbsp;Xiaodi Zhang,&nbsp;Jie Zheng\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/irfi.70041\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>Psychology research on contrast effects suggests that information from a previous decision may be compared with the information of the current task. We document a new stylized fact that an analyst's current annual earnings forecast error of one firm is negatively correlated with her latest forecast revision of another firm. We tease out contrast effects as the main driving force of this negative relationship by excluding other potential mechanisms such as firms' information environment and analyst constraints. We show that variables which may influence analysts' retrieval of past experiences have significant impacts on the magnitude of contrast effects, as predicted by the memory-based valuation model.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":46664,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Review of Finance\",\"volume\":\"25 4\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-10-08\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Review of Finance\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"96\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/irfi.70041\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"经济学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"BUSINESS, FINANCE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Review of Finance","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/irfi.70041","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"BUSINESS, FINANCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

对比效应的心理学研究表明,以前的决策信息可能会与当前任务的信息进行比较。我们记录了一个新的风格化事实,即分析师当前对一家公司的年度收益预测误差与她对另一家公司的最新预测修正负相关。我们通过排除公司信息环境和分析师约束等其他潜在机制,梳理出对比效应作为这种负相关关系的主要驱动力。我们发现,正如基于记忆的评估模型所预测的那样,可能影响分析师对过去经验检索的变量对对比效应的大小有显著影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Contrast effects: The phantom of an analyst's latest earnings forecasts

Contrast effects: The phantom of an analyst's latest earnings forecasts

Psychology research on contrast effects suggests that information from a previous decision may be compared with the information of the current task. We document a new stylized fact that an analyst's current annual earnings forecast error of one firm is negatively correlated with her latest forecast revision of another firm. We tease out contrast effects as the main driving force of this negative relationship by excluding other potential mechanisms such as firms' information environment and analyst constraints. We show that variables which may influence analysts' retrieval of past experiences have significant impacts on the magnitude of contrast effects, as predicted by the memory-based valuation model.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
International Review of Finance
International Review of Finance BUSINESS, FINANCE-
CiteScore
3.30
自引率
5.90%
发文量
28
期刊介绍: The International Review of Finance (IRF) publishes high-quality research on all aspects of financial economics, including traditional areas such as asset pricing, corporate finance, market microstructure, financial intermediation and regulation, financial econometrics, financial engineering and risk management, as well as new areas such as markets and institutions of emerging market economies, especially those in the Asia-Pacific region. In addition, the Letters Section in IRF is a premium outlet of letter-length research in all fields of finance. The length of the articles in the Letters Section is limited to a maximum of eight journal pages.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信