基于机器学习的全膝关节置换术后并发症和残余疼痛预测

IF 1.5 Q3 ORTHOPEDICS
Dirk Müller , Amna Gillani , Florian Hinterwimmer , Anabel Arber , Heiko Graichen , Rüdiger von Eisenhart-Rothe , Igor Lazic
{"title":"基于机器学习的全膝关节置换术后并发症和残余疼痛预测","authors":"Dirk Müller ,&nbsp;Amna Gillani ,&nbsp;Florian Hinterwimmer ,&nbsp;Anabel Arber ,&nbsp;Heiko Graichen ,&nbsp;Rüdiger von Eisenhart-Rothe ,&nbsp;Igor Lazic","doi":"10.1016/j.jor.2025.08.038","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Accurate risk adjustment is critical for outcome prediction and quality improvement in total knee arthroplasty (TKA). While machine learning (ML) offers promising capabilities, most models rely solely on patient demographics and comorbidities. The American Association of Hip and Knee Surgeons (AAHKS) has proposed a set of nine risk factors to enhance current models. This study aimed to evaluate these factors using a machine learning model based on eXtreme Gradient Boosting (XGBoost).</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>We retrospectively analyzed 783 patients who underwent primary TKA at a single academic center between January 2020 and December 2022. Preoperative clinical data and AAHKS-defined risk factors were used to train and evaluate an XGBoost model. The primary outcome measures were: (1) major complications requiring revision, (2) any complication (major or minor), and (3) residual pain at one year (Visual Analog Scale ≥4). Model performance was assessed using area under the curve (AUC), sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy. Feature importance was determined using SHapley Additive exPlanations (SHAP).</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>The model achieved moderate predictive accuracy for major complications (AUC = 0.68) and any complication (AUC = 0.65), but performed poorly in predicting residual pain (AUC = 0.53). Among AAHKS-defined risk factors, only “smoking” and “previous open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF) of the knee” showed high predictive value. Other proposed variables, such as angular deformity &gt;15°, had limited impact.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>An XGBoost-based ML model incorporating AAHKS-defined risk factors showed moderate effectiveness in predicting postoperative complications following TKA. However, the model was unable to reliably predict residual pain. These findings underscore the need for broader inclusion of joint-specific variables and imaging data in future risk adjustment frameworks to enhance personalized care in knee arthroplasty.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":16633,"journal":{"name":"Journal of orthopaedics","volume":"71 ","pages":"Pages 60-66"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Machine Learning–Based prediction of complications and residual pain after total knee arthroplasty\",\"authors\":\"Dirk Müller ,&nbsp;Amna Gillani ,&nbsp;Florian Hinterwimmer ,&nbsp;Anabel Arber ,&nbsp;Heiko Graichen ,&nbsp;Rüdiger von Eisenhart-Rothe ,&nbsp;Igor Lazic\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jor.2025.08.038\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Accurate risk adjustment is critical for outcome prediction and quality improvement in total knee arthroplasty (TKA). While machine learning (ML) offers promising capabilities, most models rely solely on patient demographics and comorbidities. The American Association of Hip and Knee Surgeons (AAHKS) has proposed a set of nine risk factors to enhance current models. This study aimed to evaluate these factors using a machine learning model based on eXtreme Gradient Boosting (XGBoost).</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>We retrospectively analyzed 783 patients who underwent primary TKA at a single academic center between January 2020 and December 2022. Preoperative clinical data and AAHKS-defined risk factors were used to train and evaluate an XGBoost model. The primary outcome measures were: (1) major complications requiring revision, (2) any complication (major or minor), and (3) residual pain at one year (Visual Analog Scale ≥4). Model performance was assessed using area under the curve (AUC), sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy. Feature importance was determined using SHapley Additive exPlanations (SHAP).</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>The model achieved moderate predictive accuracy for major complications (AUC = 0.68) and any complication (AUC = 0.65), but performed poorly in predicting residual pain (AUC = 0.53). Among AAHKS-defined risk factors, only “smoking” and “previous open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF) of the knee” showed high predictive value. Other proposed variables, such as angular deformity &gt;15°, had limited impact.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>An XGBoost-based ML model incorporating AAHKS-defined risk factors showed moderate effectiveness in predicting postoperative complications following TKA. However, the model was unable to reliably predict residual pain. These findings underscore the need for broader inclusion of joint-specific variables and imaging data in future risk adjustment frameworks to enhance personalized care in knee arthroplasty.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":16633,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of orthopaedics\",\"volume\":\"71 \",\"pages\":\"Pages 60-66\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-29\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of orthopaedics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0972978X25003538\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"ORTHOPEDICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of orthopaedics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0972978X25003538","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景准确的风险调整对于全膝关节置换术(TKA)的预后预测和质量改善至关重要。虽然机器学习(ML)提供了很有前景的功能,但大多数模型仅依赖于患者的人口统计数据和合并症。美国髋关节和膝关节外科医师协会(AAHKS)提出了一套包含9个风险因素的模型,以改进现有的模型。本研究旨在使用基于极限梯度增强(XGBoost)的机器学习模型来评估这些因素。方法回顾性分析2020年1月至2022年12月在单一学术中心接受原发性TKA的783例患者。术前临床数据和aahks定义的危险因素用于训练和评估XGBoost模型。主要结局指标为:(1)需要翻修的主要并发症,(2)任何并发症(主要或轻微),(3)一年内的残留疼痛(视觉模拟量表≥4)。使用曲线下面积(AUC)、敏感性、特异性和准确性评估模型的性能。使用SHapley加性解释(SHAP)确定特征重要性。结果该模型对主要并发症(AUC = 0.68)和任何并发症(AUC = 0.65)的预测准确度中等,但对残余疼痛的预测准确度较差(AUC = 0.53)。在aahks定义的危险因素中,只有“吸烟”和“既往膝关节切开复位内固定(ORIF)”具有较高的预测价值。其他提出的变量,如角畸形>;15°,影响有限。结论基于xgboost的ML模型结合aahks定义的危险因素对TKA术后并发症的预测效果中等。然而,该模型不能可靠地预测残余疼痛。这些发现强调了在未来的风险调整框架中需要更广泛地纳入关节特异性变量和影像学数据,以加强膝关节置换术的个性化护理。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Machine Learning–Based prediction of complications and residual pain after total knee arthroplasty

Background

Accurate risk adjustment is critical for outcome prediction and quality improvement in total knee arthroplasty (TKA). While machine learning (ML) offers promising capabilities, most models rely solely on patient demographics and comorbidities. The American Association of Hip and Knee Surgeons (AAHKS) has proposed a set of nine risk factors to enhance current models. This study aimed to evaluate these factors using a machine learning model based on eXtreme Gradient Boosting (XGBoost).

Methods

We retrospectively analyzed 783 patients who underwent primary TKA at a single academic center between January 2020 and December 2022. Preoperative clinical data and AAHKS-defined risk factors were used to train and evaluate an XGBoost model. The primary outcome measures were: (1) major complications requiring revision, (2) any complication (major or minor), and (3) residual pain at one year (Visual Analog Scale ≥4). Model performance was assessed using area under the curve (AUC), sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy. Feature importance was determined using SHapley Additive exPlanations (SHAP).

Results

The model achieved moderate predictive accuracy for major complications (AUC = 0.68) and any complication (AUC = 0.65), but performed poorly in predicting residual pain (AUC = 0.53). Among AAHKS-defined risk factors, only “smoking” and “previous open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF) of the knee” showed high predictive value. Other proposed variables, such as angular deformity >15°, had limited impact.

Conclusion

An XGBoost-based ML model incorporating AAHKS-defined risk factors showed moderate effectiveness in predicting postoperative complications following TKA. However, the model was unable to reliably predict residual pain. These findings underscore the need for broader inclusion of joint-specific variables and imaging data in future risk adjustment frameworks to enhance personalized care in knee arthroplasty.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.50
自引率
6.70%
发文量
202
审稿时长
56 days
期刊介绍: Journal of Orthopaedics aims to be a leading journal in orthopaedics and contribute towards the improvement of quality of orthopedic health care. The journal publishes original research work and review articles related to different aspects of orthopaedics including Arthroplasty, Arthroscopy, Sports Medicine, Trauma, Spine and Spinal deformities, Pediatric orthopaedics, limb reconstruction procedures, hand surgery, and orthopaedic oncology. It also publishes articles on continuing education, health-related information, case reports and letters to the editor. It is requested to note that the journal has an international readership and all submissions should be aimed at specifying something about the setting in which the work was conducted. Authors must also provide any specific reasons for the research and also provide an elaborate description of the results.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信