气候和森林类型主导了亚热带山地森林土壤有机碳的高度变化

IF 3.4 2区 环境科学与生态学 Q1 BIODIVERSITY CONSERVATION
Zihao Fan, Jizhen Chen, Xin Zhang, Zhilin Huang
{"title":"气候和森林类型主导了亚热带山地森林土壤有机碳的高度变化","authors":"Zihao Fan,&nbsp;Jizhen Chen,&nbsp;Xin Zhang,&nbsp;Zhilin Huang","doi":"10.1016/j.gecco.2025.e03891","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Despite the recognized complexity of biotic-abiotic interactions in regulating soil organic carbon (SOC) dynamics, their relative contributions in subtropical montane forests remain poorly quantified. This study examined SOC and its drivers across an altitudinal gradient in four forest types—evergreen-deciduous broad-leaved forest (EDF), deciduous broad-leaved forest (DF), coniferous-broadleaved mixed forest (MF), and dark coniferous forest (DC) within the Shennongjia Forestry District. Using a stratified random sampling design, we established 160 plots across elevation zones to capture forest-type and elevational variation. Here, we hypothesized that SOC increases with elevation, with higher content in subalpine forests, abiotic factors exert stronger direct effects on SOC along elevation gradients than biotic factors and biotic factors dominate SOC dynamics in mixed and coniferous forests. We integrated biological (litter quality, stand attributes, tree diversity) and abiotic (climate, soil properties) factors, applying piecewise structural equation modeling (pSEM) to evaluate fixed effects and forest-type random effects on SOC. Linear SEM was further used to examine pathways across elevation and forest types. Results indicated that SOC increased significantly with elevation and showed substantial variation among forest types. Climate, in particular mean annual temperature (MAT), served as the primary driver of SOC variation along elevational gradients, followed by litter carbon-to-nitrogen ratio and soil pH. Forest types explained more SOC variability than environmental factors and played a significant mediating role in biogeochemical relationships. Biological factors, for example litter quality, species richness, and tree diameter at breast height (DBH), were the dominant influences across all forest types except deciduous broadleaved forests. Species richness indirectly enhanced SOC by reducing litter C/N, although this effect varied by forest type. These findings support a hierarchical framework wherein climate and forest type jointly regulate SOC, underscoring the importance of incorporating biotic-abiotic interactions to accurately predict carbon cycling under global change.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":54264,"journal":{"name":"Global Ecology and Conservation","volume":"63 ","pages":"Article e03891"},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Climate and forest type dominate altitudinal variations in soil organic carbon in subtropical montane forests\",\"authors\":\"Zihao Fan,&nbsp;Jizhen Chen,&nbsp;Xin Zhang,&nbsp;Zhilin Huang\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.gecco.2025.e03891\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>Despite the recognized complexity of biotic-abiotic interactions in regulating soil organic carbon (SOC) dynamics, their relative contributions in subtropical montane forests remain poorly quantified. This study examined SOC and its drivers across an altitudinal gradient in four forest types—evergreen-deciduous broad-leaved forest (EDF), deciduous broad-leaved forest (DF), coniferous-broadleaved mixed forest (MF), and dark coniferous forest (DC) within the Shennongjia Forestry District. Using a stratified random sampling design, we established 160 plots across elevation zones to capture forest-type and elevational variation. Here, we hypothesized that SOC increases with elevation, with higher content in subalpine forests, abiotic factors exert stronger direct effects on SOC along elevation gradients than biotic factors and biotic factors dominate SOC dynamics in mixed and coniferous forests. We integrated biological (litter quality, stand attributes, tree diversity) and abiotic (climate, soil properties) factors, applying piecewise structural equation modeling (pSEM) to evaluate fixed effects and forest-type random effects on SOC. Linear SEM was further used to examine pathways across elevation and forest types. Results indicated that SOC increased significantly with elevation and showed substantial variation among forest types. Climate, in particular mean annual temperature (MAT), served as the primary driver of SOC variation along elevational gradients, followed by litter carbon-to-nitrogen ratio and soil pH. Forest types explained more SOC variability than environmental factors and played a significant mediating role in biogeochemical relationships. Biological factors, for example litter quality, species richness, and tree diameter at breast height (DBH), were the dominant influences across all forest types except deciduous broadleaved forests. Species richness indirectly enhanced SOC by reducing litter C/N, although this effect varied by forest type. These findings support a hierarchical framework wherein climate and forest type jointly regulate SOC, underscoring the importance of incorporating biotic-abiotic interactions to accurately predict carbon cycling under global change.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":54264,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Global Ecology and Conservation\",\"volume\":\"63 \",\"pages\":\"Article e03891\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-10-10\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Global Ecology and Conservation\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"93\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2351989425004925\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"环境科学与生态学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"BIODIVERSITY CONSERVATION\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Global Ecology and Conservation","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2351989425004925","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BIODIVERSITY CONSERVATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

尽管生物-非生物相互作用在调节土壤有机碳(SOC)动态中的复杂性已得到公认,但它们在亚热带山地森林中的相对贡献仍缺乏量化。研究了神农架林区常绿-落叶阔叶林(EDF)、落叶阔叶林(DF)、针叶-阔叶混交林(MF)和暗针叶林(DC) 4种森林类型的土壤有机碳及其驱动因素。采用分层随机抽样设计,跨高程区建立了160个样地,以捕捉森林类型和海拔变化。本文假设土壤有机碳随海拔升高而增加,亚高山森林土壤有机碳含量较高,非生物因子对土壤有机碳沿海拔梯度的直接影响强于生物因子,混交林和针叶林土壤有机碳动态受生物因子主导。综合生物因子(凋落物质量、林分属性、树木多样性)和非生物因子(气候、土壤性质),采用分段结构方程模型(pSEM)评价了固定效应和林型随机效应对土壤有机碳的影响。线性扫描电镜进一步用于检查跨越海拔和森林类型的路径。结果表明,土壤有机碳随海拔升高而显著增加,且不同林型间存在较大差异。气候(尤其是年平均温度)是土壤有机碳沿海拔梯度变化的主要驱动因子,其次是凋落物碳氮比和土壤ph。森林类型比环境因子更能解释土壤有机碳变异,并在生物地球化学关系中发挥重要的中介作用。除落叶阔叶林外,生物因子对凋落物质量、物种丰富度和胸径均有显著影响。物种丰富度通过降低凋落物C/N间接提高有机碳含量,但这种作用因林型而异。这些发现支持了气候和森林类型共同调节有机碳的层次框架,强调了结合生物-非生物相互作用来准确预测全球变化下碳循环的重要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Climate and forest type dominate altitudinal variations in soil organic carbon in subtropical montane forests
Despite the recognized complexity of biotic-abiotic interactions in regulating soil organic carbon (SOC) dynamics, their relative contributions in subtropical montane forests remain poorly quantified. This study examined SOC and its drivers across an altitudinal gradient in four forest types—evergreen-deciduous broad-leaved forest (EDF), deciduous broad-leaved forest (DF), coniferous-broadleaved mixed forest (MF), and dark coniferous forest (DC) within the Shennongjia Forestry District. Using a stratified random sampling design, we established 160 plots across elevation zones to capture forest-type and elevational variation. Here, we hypothesized that SOC increases with elevation, with higher content in subalpine forests, abiotic factors exert stronger direct effects on SOC along elevation gradients than biotic factors and biotic factors dominate SOC dynamics in mixed and coniferous forests. We integrated biological (litter quality, stand attributes, tree diversity) and abiotic (climate, soil properties) factors, applying piecewise structural equation modeling (pSEM) to evaluate fixed effects and forest-type random effects on SOC. Linear SEM was further used to examine pathways across elevation and forest types. Results indicated that SOC increased significantly with elevation and showed substantial variation among forest types. Climate, in particular mean annual temperature (MAT), served as the primary driver of SOC variation along elevational gradients, followed by litter carbon-to-nitrogen ratio and soil pH. Forest types explained more SOC variability than environmental factors and played a significant mediating role in biogeochemical relationships. Biological factors, for example litter quality, species richness, and tree diameter at breast height (DBH), were the dominant influences across all forest types except deciduous broadleaved forests. Species richness indirectly enhanced SOC by reducing litter C/N, although this effect varied by forest type. These findings support a hierarchical framework wherein climate and forest type jointly regulate SOC, underscoring the importance of incorporating biotic-abiotic interactions to accurately predict carbon cycling under global change.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Global Ecology and Conservation
Global Ecology and Conservation Agricultural and Biological Sciences-Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics
CiteScore
8.10
自引率
5.00%
发文量
346
审稿时长
83 days
期刊介绍: Global Ecology and Conservation is a peer-reviewed, open-access journal covering all sub-disciplines of ecological and conservation science: from theory to practice, from molecules to ecosystems, from regional to global. The fields covered include: organismal, population, community, and ecosystem ecology; physiological, evolutionary, and behavioral ecology; and conservation science.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信