亚洲三级癌症中心复发/难治性弥漫性大b细胞淋巴瘤的结局:现实世界干预作为新疗法的基准

N.-A. Lim , Y. Sun , J.Y. Tan , R.M.H. Lim , Y.H. Tan , L.C.K. Ng , F.L.W.I. Lim , Y.T. Goh , J.T.M. Hoe , J. Chiang , E.W.Y. Chang , E.Y.L. Poon , N. Somasundaram , M. Tao , S.T. Lim , E.S. Mulvihill , A. Hanna-Elias , J.Y. Chan
{"title":"亚洲三级癌症中心复发/难治性弥漫性大b细胞淋巴瘤的结局:现实世界干预作为新疗法的基准","authors":"N.-A. Lim ,&nbsp;Y. Sun ,&nbsp;J.Y. Tan ,&nbsp;R.M.H. Lim ,&nbsp;Y.H. Tan ,&nbsp;L.C.K. Ng ,&nbsp;F.L.W.I. Lim ,&nbsp;Y.T. Goh ,&nbsp;J.T.M. Hoe ,&nbsp;J. Chiang ,&nbsp;E.W.Y. Chang ,&nbsp;E.Y.L. Poon ,&nbsp;N. Somasundaram ,&nbsp;M. Tao ,&nbsp;S.T. Lim ,&nbsp;E.S. Mulvihill ,&nbsp;A. Hanna-Elias ,&nbsp;J.Y. Chan","doi":"10.1016/j.esmorw.2025.100195","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Recent advances have led to the approval of several new therapies for relapsed/refractory diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (R/R DLBCL). However, real-world data for treatment patterns and outcomes in R/R DLBCL in Asian countries are lacking, limiting the benchmarking of novel treatments.</div></div><div><h3>Patients and methods</h3><div>We conducted a retrospective single-center cohort study including 227 patients with R/R DLBCL diagnosed from 2010 to 2022. Outcomes including progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were assessed.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>In the overall cohort, median OS was 13.5 months and 5-year OS was 29.8% from the time of first relapse. Median time to first relapse from completion of first-line immunochemotherapy was 7.03 months (range 0-148.4 months). Time to first relapse was significantly associated with OS outcomes. Patients who had earlier relapse, defined as 12 months or less from first-line treatment, had worse OS at 8.6 months, as compared with patients who relapsed &gt;12 months after first-line treatment, who had OS of 34.2 months (hazard ratio 1.73, 95% confidence interval 1.26-2.37, <em>P</em> = 0.007). Median PFS was 3.2 months as compared with 15.3 months, respectively. The majority (<em>n</em> = 121, 53.3%) were transplant-ineligible and only 44 (19.4%) were transplanted. The median PFS for non-transplant recipients was 3.5 months versus 34.4 months for transplant recipients. The median OS for non-transplant recipients was 8.5 months versus 114.1 months for transplant recipients.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>Poor outcomes remain for patients with R/R DLBCL. Novel therapeutics including bispecifics and CAR-T may improve outcomes of these patients.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":100491,"journal":{"name":"ESMO Real World Data and Digital Oncology","volume":"10 ","pages":"Article 100195"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Outcomes in relapsed/refractory diffuse large B-cell lymphoma in an Asian tertiary cancer center: real-world interventions as benchmark for novel therapy\",\"authors\":\"N.-A. Lim ,&nbsp;Y. Sun ,&nbsp;J.Y. Tan ,&nbsp;R.M.H. Lim ,&nbsp;Y.H. Tan ,&nbsp;L.C.K. Ng ,&nbsp;F.L.W.I. Lim ,&nbsp;Y.T. Goh ,&nbsp;J.T.M. Hoe ,&nbsp;J. Chiang ,&nbsp;E.W.Y. Chang ,&nbsp;E.Y.L. Poon ,&nbsp;N. Somasundaram ,&nbsp;M. Tao ,&nbsp;S.T. Lim ,&nbsp;E.S. Mulvihill ,&nbsp;A. Hanna-Elias ,&nbsp;J.Y. Chan\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.esmorw.2025.100195\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Recent advances have led to the approval of several new therapies for relapsed/refractory diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (R/R DLBCL). However, real-world data for treatment patterns and outcomes in R/R DLBCL in Asian countries are lacking, limiting the benchmarking of novel treatments.</div></div><div><h3>Patients and methods</h3><div>We conducted a retrospective single-center cohort study including 227 patients with R/R DLBCL diagnosed from 2010 to 2022. Outcomes including progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were assessed.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>In the overall cohort, median OS was 13.5 months and 5-year OS was 29.8% from the time of first relapse. Median time to first relapse from completion of first-line immunochemotherapy was 7.03 months (range 0-148.4 months). Time to first relapse was significantly associated with OS outcomes. Patients who had earlier relapse, defined as 12 months or less from first-line treatment, had worse OS at 8.6 months, as compared with patients who relapsed &gt;12 months after first-line treatment, who had OS of 34.2 months (hazard ratio 1.73, 95% confidence interval 1.26-2.37, <em>P</em> = 0.007). Median PFS was 3.2 months as compared with 15.3 months, respectively. The majority (<em>n</em> = 121, 53.3%) were transplant-ineligible and only 44 (19.4%) were transplanted. The median PFS for non-transplant recipients was 3.5 months versus 34.4 months for transplant recipients. The median OS for non-transplant recipients was 8.5 months versus 114.1 months for transplant recipients.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>Poor outcomes remain for patients with R/R DLBCL. Novel therapeutics including bispecifics and CAR-T may improve outcomes of these patients.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":100491,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"ESMO Real World Data and Digital Oncology\",\"volume\":\"10 \",\"pages\":\"Article 100195\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-10-06\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"ESMO Real World Data and Digital Oncology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2949820125000840\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ESMO Real World Data and Digital Oncology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2949820125000840","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

近年来,一些治疗复发/难治性弥漫性大b细胞淋巴瘤(R/R DLBCL)的新疗法获得批准。然而,亚洲国家缺乏关于R/R DLBCL治疗模式和结果的真实数据,限制了新治疗方法的基准设定。患者和方法我们进行了一项回顾性单中心队列研究,包括2010年至2022年诊断为R/R DLBCL的227例患者。结果包括无进展生存期(PFS)和总生存期(OS)进行评估。结果在整个队列中,从首次复发开始的中位生存期为13.5个月,5年生存期为29.8%。从完成一线免疫化疗到首次复发的中位时间为7.03个月(范围0-148.4个月)。首次复发时间与OS结果显著相关。复发较早的患者(定义为一线治疗后12个月或更短时间)的OS在8.6个月时较一线治疗后12个月复发的患者(OS为34.2个月)差(风险比1.73,95%可信区间1.26-2.37,P = 0.007)。中位PFS分别为3.2个月和15.3个月。大多数(n = 121, 53.3%)患者不适合移植,只有44例(19.4%)患者接受了移植。非移植受者的中位PFS为3.5个月,而移植受者为34.4个月。非移植受者的中位生存期为8.5个月,而移植受者为114.1个月。结论:复发/复发DLBCL患者预后仍然较差。包括双特异性和CAR-T在内的新疗法可能会改善这些患者的预后。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Outcomes in relapsed/refractory diffuse large B-cell lymphoma in an Asian tertiary cancer center: real-world interventions as benchmark for novel therapy

Outcomes in relapsed/refractory diffuse large B-cell lymphoma in an Asian tertiary cancer center: real-world interventions as benchmark for novel therapy

Background

Recent advances have led to the approval of several new therapies for relapsed/refractory diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (R/R DLBCL). However, real-world data for treatment patterns and outcomes in R/R DLBCL in Asian countries are lacking, limiting the benchmarking of novel treatments.

Patients and methods

We conducted a retrospective single-center cohort study including 227 patients with R/R DLBCL diagnosed from 2010 to 2022. Outcomes including progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were assessed.

Results

In the overall cohort, median OS was 13.5 months and 5-year OS was 29.8% from the time of first relapse. Median time to first relapse from completion of first-line immunochemotherapy was 7.03 months (range 0-148.4 months). Time to first relapse was significantly associated with OS outcomes. Patients who had earlier relapse, defined as 12 months or less from first-line treatment, had worse OS at 8.6 months, as compared with patients who relapsed >12 months after first-line treatment, who had OS of 34.2 months (hazard ratio 1.73, 95% confidence interval 1.26-2.37, P = 0.007). Median PFS was 3.2 months as compared with 15.3 months, respectively. The majority (n = 121, 53.3%) were transplant-ineligible and only 44 (19.4%) were transplanted. The median PFS for non-transplant recipients was 3.5 months versus 34.4 months for transplant recipients. The median OS for non-transplant recipients was 8.5 months versus 114.1 months for transplant recipients.

Conclusion

Poor outcomes remain for patients with R/R DLBCL. Novel therapeutics including bispecifics and CAR-T may improve outcomes of these patients.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信