谁可以使用绿地?探索撒哈拉以南非洲后殖民首都的访问、认知和使用模式

IF 7 1区 经济学 Q1 DEVELOPMENT STUDIES
Shafi'u Adamu , Huang Yong , Danjuma Abdu Yusuf , Hisham Sharif Bala
{"title":"谁可以使用绿地?探索撒哈拉以南非洲后殖民首都的访问、认知和使用模式","authors":"Shafi'u Adamu ,&nbsp;Huang Yong ,&nbsp;Danjuma Abdu Yusuf ,&nbsp;Hisham Sharif Bala","doi":"10.1016/j.habitatint.2025.103615","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Urban green spaces are critical for promoting socio-ecological sustainability by enhancing public health, social well-being, and environmental quality in rapidly urbanizing cities. However, despite their importance, empirical understanding of how access, usage, and perceptions vary across socioeconomic groups in post-colonial African capitals remains limited. This study addresses this gap by investigating green space access, perceptions, and usage patterns in Abuja, Nigeria. A mixed-methods approach was adopted, combining a household survey of 421 residents across socio-spatial districts with GIS-based spatial accessibility analysis. Results show that only 4.7 % of residents live within 300 m—the World Health Organization's recommended walking distance. Survey findings further indicate that over half (51.2 %) travel more than 7 km to reach a green space, with the majority (31.8 %) visiting rarely. A prominent pattern in Abuja is the gendered and income disparity in green space usage: males were observed to be more frequent users than females (OR = 4.61, p &lt; 0.001). High-income residents enjoy privileged access through better facilities and private alternatives, while low-income residents—who depend most on public green spaces—are systematically excluded by distance, transport costs, and mobility constraints. This pattern reflects a “double burden” of disadvantage, where limited resources intersect with spatial marginalization, exposing persistent social and spatial divides rooted in the city's planning legacy. The study concludes that inequities in access and use mirror structural divides in urban development and call for inclusive policy interventions that prioritize equitable distribution and accessibility. Such measures are essential to ensure that the health, social, and environmental benefits of urban greenery are shared by all residents.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48376,"journal":{"name":"Habitat International","volume":"166 ","pages":"Article 103615"},"PeriodicalIF":7.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Who gets to use the green? Exploring access, perceptions, and usage patterns in a post-colonial capital of Sub-Saharan Africa\",\"authors\":\"Shafi'u Adamu ,&nbsp;Huang Yong ,&nbsp;Danjuma Abdu Yusuf ,&nbsp;Hisham Sharif Bala\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.habitatint.2025.103615\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>Urban green spaces are critical for promoting socio-ecological sustainability by enhancing public health, social well-being, and environmental quality in rapidly urbanizing cities. However, despite their importance, empirical understanding of how access, usage, and perceptions vary across socioeconomic groups in post-colonial African capitals remains limited. This study addresses this gap by investigating green space access, perceptions, and usage patterns in Abuja, Nigeria. A mixed-methods approach was adopted, combining a household survey of 421 residents across socio-spatial districts with GIS-based spatial accessibility analysis. Results show that only 4.7 % of residents live within 300 m—the World Health Organization's recommended walking distance. Survey findings further indicate that over half (51.2 %) travel more than 7 km to reach a green space, with the majority (31.8 %) visiting rarely. A prominent pattern in Abuja is the gendered and income disparity in green space usage: males were observed to be more frequent users than females (OR = 4.61, p &lt; 0.001). High-income residents enjoy privileged access through better facilities and private alternatives, while low-income residents—who depend most on public green spaces—are systematically excluded by distance, transport costs, and mobility constraints. This pattern reflects a “double burden” of disadvantage, where limited resources intersect with spatial marginalization, exposing persistent social and spatial divides rooted in the city's planning legacy. The study concludes that inequities in access and use mirror structural divides in urban development and call for inclusive policy interventions that prioritize equitable distribution and accessibility. Such measures are essential to ensure that the health, social, and environmental benefits of urban greenery are shared by all residents.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48376,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Habitat International\",\"volume\":\"166 \",\"pages\":\"Article 103615\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":7.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-10-10\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Habitat International\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"96\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0197397525003315\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"经济学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"DEVELOPMENT STUDIES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Habitat International","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0197397525003315","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"DEVELOPMENT STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在快速城市化的城市中,城市绿地通过提高公共健康、社会福祉和环境质量,对促进社会生态可持续性至关重要。然而,尽管它们很重要,但对后殖民时期非洲首都不同社会经济群体的获取、使用和看法的经验理解仍然有限。本研究通过调查尼日利亚阿布贾的绿色空间获取、认知和使用模式来解决这一差距。采用混合方法,将基于gis的空间可达性分析与社会空间区域421名居民的家庭调查相结合。结果显示,只有4.7%的居民居住在世界卫生组织推荐的300米步行距离内。调查结果进一步显示,超过一半(51.2%)的人要走7公里以上才能到达绿地,而大多数(31.8%)很少去。阿布贾的一个突出模式是绿地使用的性别和收入差异:男性比女性更频繁地使用绿地(OR = 4.61, p < 0.001)。高收入居民通过更好的设施和私人选择享有特权,而低收入居民——他们最依赖公共绿地——由于距离、交通成本和流动性限制而被系统性地排除在外。这种模式反映了劣势的“双重负担”,有限的资源与空间边缘化交织在一起,暴露出根植于城市规划遗产的持久的社会和空间鸿沟。该研究的结论是,获取和使用方面的不平等反映了城市发展中的结构性鸿沟,呼吁采取包容性政策干预措施,优先考虑公平分配和可及性。这些措施对于确保所有居民共享城市绿化的健康、社会和环境效益至关重要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Who gets to use the green? Exploring access, perceptions, and usage patterns in a post-colonial capital of Sub-Saharan Africa
Urban green spaces are critical for promoting socio-ecological sustainability by enhancing public health, social well-being, and environmental quality in rapidly urbanizing cities. However, despite their importance, empirical understanding of how access, usage, and perceptions vary across socioeconomic groups in post-colonial African capitals remains limited. This study addresses this gap by investigating green space access, perceptions, and usage patterns in Abuja, Nigeria. A mixed-methods approach was adopted, combining a household survey of 421 residents across socio-spatial districts with GIS-based spatial accessibility analysis. Results show that only 4.7 % of residents live within 300 m—the World Health Organization's recommended walking distance. Survey findings further indicate that over half (51.2 %) travel more than 7 km to reach a green space, with the majority (31.8 %) visiting rarely. A prominent pattern in Abuja is the gendered and income disparity in green space usage: males were observed to be more frequent users than females (OR = 4.61, p < 0.001). High-income residents enjoy privileged access through better facilities and private alternatives, while low-income residents—who depend most on public green spaces—are systematically excluded by distance, transport costs, and mobility constraints. This pattern reflects a “double burden” of disadvantage, where limited resources intersect with spatial marginalization, exposing persistent social and spatial divides rooted in the city's planning legacy. The study concludes that inequities in access and use mirror structural divides in urban development and call for inclusive policy interventions that prioritize equitable distribution and accessibility. Such measures are essential to ensure that the health, social, and environmental benefits of urban greenery are shared by all residents.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
10.50
自引率
10.30%
发文量
151
审稿时长
38 days
期刊介绍: Habitat International is dedicated to the study of urban and rural human settlements: their planning, design, production and management. Its main focus is on urbanisation in its broadest sense in the developing world. However, increasingly the interrelationships and linkages between cities and towns in the developing and developed worlds are becoming apparent and solutions to the problems that result are urgently required. The economic, social, technological and political systems of the world are intertwined and changes in one region almost always affect other regions.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信