促进还是阻碍平等?国家女权主义和酷儿女性在官方报纸和微博上的表现

IF 1.9 3区 社会学 Q2 WOMENS STUDIES
Yingyi Luo , Shiyang Zhu , Yue Jiang
{"title":"促进还是阻碍平等?国家女权主义和酷儿女性在官方报纸和微博上的表现","authors":"Yingyi Luo ,&nbsp;Shiyang Zhu ,&nbsp;Yue Jiang","doi":"10.1016/j.wsif.2025.103215","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>In China, the state's ideological control over gender and sexuality has intensified, giving rise to a form of state feminism with Chinese characteristics. State feminism, the framework we build on, is typically understood as the extent to which state institutions align with women's movements. This paper extends the scope of state feminism by incorporating the role of media, analysing the gender and sexual norms articulated by state-controlled newspapers and social media in their representations of queer women, in order to understand how different media advance or undermine gender equality. Drawing on materials from state-owned newspapers and Weibo over a six-year period (April 13, 2018 – April 13, 2024), the findings show that the conditional visibility of queer women in state-controlled newspapers reflects a compromised form of state feminism, permitted only when serving Party–state interests by reinforcing heteronormativity and nationalist logics. In contrast, Weibo provides a space where queer women's visibility is subject to negotiation. We propose the concepts of normalisation and low-risk activism to capture how queer women activists on Weibo exercise bounded agency to promote gender and sexual diversity and to raise awareness of gender-based violence. This study aims to deepen our understanding of the distinctiveness of Chinese state feminism and to reveal the opportunities and limitations of the media's role in promoting gender equality.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":47940,"journal":{"name":"Womens Studies International Forum","volume":"114 ","pages":"Article 103215"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Promoting or hindering equality? State feminism and the representation of queer women in state-controlled newspapers and Weibo\",\"authors\":\"Yingyi Luo ,&nbsp;Shiyang Zhu ,&nbsp;Yue Jiang\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.wsif.2025.103215\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>In China, the state's ideological control over gender and sexuality has intensified, giving rise to a form of state feminism with Chinese characteristics. State feminism, the framework we build on, is typically understood as the extent to which state institutions align with women's movements. This paper extends the scope of state feminism by incorporating the role of media, analysing the gender and sexual norms articulated by state-controlled newspapers and social media in their representations of queer women, in order to understand how different media advance or undermine gender equality. Drawing on materials from state-owned newspapers and Weibo over a six-year period (April 13, 2018 – April 13, 2024), the findings show that the conditional visibility of queer women in state-controlled newspapers reflects a compromised form of state feminism, permitted only when serving Party–state interests by reinforcing heteronormativity and nationalist logics. In contrast, Weibo provides a space where queer women's visibility is subject to negotiation. We propose the concepts of normalisation and low-risk activism to capture how queer women activists on Weibo exercise bounded agency to promote gender and sexual diversity and to raise awareness of gender-based violence. This study aims to deepen our understanding of the distinctiveness of Chinese state feminism and to reveal the opportunities and limitations of the media's role in promoting gender equality.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":47940,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Womens Studies International Forum\",\"volume\":\"114 \",\"pages\":\"Article 103215\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-10-08\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Womens Studies International Forum\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"90\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0277539525001645\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"社会学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"WOMENS STUDIES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Womens Studies International Forum","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0277539525001645","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"WOMENS STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在中国,国家对性别和性行为的意识形态控制不断加强,形成了一种具有中国特色的国家女性主义。国家女权主义,我们赖以建立的框架,通常被理解为国家机构与妇女运动的一致程度。本文通过纳入媒体的角色,扩展了国家女权主义的范围,分析了国家控制的报纸和社交媒体在描述酷儿女性时所表达的性别和性规范,以了解不同的媒体是如何促进或破坏性别平等的。根据官方报纸和微博在6年期间(2018年4月13日至2024年4月13日)的资料,研究结果表明,酷儿女性在国有报纸上的有条件曝光反映了一种妥协形式的国家女权主义,只有在通过强化异性恋规范和民族主义逻辑为党和国家利益服务时才被允许。相比之下,微博提供了一个空间,酷儿女性的可见度可以协商。我们提出了正常化和低风险行动主义的概念,以捕捉微博上的酷儿女性活动家如何行使有限的代理来促进性别和性多样性,并提高对基于性别的暴力的认识。本研究旨在加深我们对中国国家女性主义的独特性的理解,并揭示媒体在促进性别平等方面的机会和局限性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Promoting or hindering equality? State feminism and the representation of queer women in state-controlled newspapers and Weibo
In China, the state's ideological control over gender and sexuality has intensified, giving rise to a form of state feminism with Chinese characteristics. State feminism, the framework we build on, is typically understood as the extent to which state institutions align with women's movements. This paper extends the scope of state feminism by incorporating the role of media, analysing the gender and sexual norms articulated by state-controlled newspapers and social media in their representations of queer women, in order to understand how different media advance or undermine gender equality. Drawing on materials from state-owned newspapers and Weibo over a six-year period (April 13, 2018 – April 13, 2024), the findings show that the conditional visibility of queer women in state-controlled newspapers reflects a compromised form of state feminism, permitted only when serving Party–state interests by reinforcing heteronormativity and nationalist logics. In contrast, Weibo provides a space where queer women's visibility is subject to negotiation. We propose the concepts of normalisation and low-risk activism to capture how queer women activists on Weibo exercise bounded agency to promote gender and sexual diversity and to raise awareness of gender-based violence. This study aims to deepen our understanding of the distinctiveness of Chinese state feminism and to reveal the opportunities and limitations of the media's role in promoting gender equality.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.50
自引率
7.10%
发文量
63
审稿时长
79 days
期刊介绍: Women"s Studies International Forum (formerly Women"s Studies International Quarterly, established in 1978) is a bimonthly journal to aid the distribution and exchange of feminist research in the multidisciplinary, international area of women"s studies and in feminist research in other disciplines. The policy of the journal is to establish a feminist forum for discussion and debate. The journal seeks to critique and reconceptualize existing knowledge, to examine and re-evaluate the manner in which knowledge is produced and distributed, and to assess the implications this has for women"s lives.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信