{"title":"开发空间系统的安全指标:考虑NIST网络安全框架2.0和NIS2的研究","authors":"Francesco Casaril, Letterio Galletta","doi":"10.1016/j.ijcip.2025.100805","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Space-based assets are essential for critical societal functions across sectors like energy, transportation, communication, agriculture, and government. As these services become more integrated into daily life and reliance on cyber–physical systems grows, the interconnectivity and commercialization of space assets increases the attack surface and cybersecurity risks. Recent incidents affecting space infrastructure underscore the urgent need for robust cybersecurity measures. Legislators in the EU and other countries are addressing cyber risks to space and ground assets by developing minimum protection requirements. To support these measures, this paper evaluates whether existing security metrics in the literature cover all NIST functions, categories, and subcategories in the Cybersecurity Framework 2.0 (CSF 2.0). This framework provides a strong foundation for industry sectors and can serve as a baseline to ensure compliance with directives like NIS2. Our analysis reveals imbalances in academic discourse, with certain CSF 2.0 functions underrepresented. Then, we propose new metrics to address unaddressed NIST categories and adapt existing metrics to better suit the space domain. Considering practical challenges in implementing and monitoring these metrics, we propose a tool to facilitate their calculation and visualize security status. We also present a case study resembling real-world space infrastructure that demonstrates our tool’s applicability and the value of the designed metrics. Our research has managerial implications, supporting managers, CIOs, and CISOs in making informed decisions, helping companies understand their security levels, and complying with existing and forthcoming space sector regulations. We advocate for using security metrics to assess compliance with regulations like NIS2, CER, or upcoming space laws, demonstrating to policymakers that metrics can be integrated into policies to enhance their effectiveness.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":49057,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Critical Infrastructure Protection","volume":"51 ","pages":"Article 100805"},"PeriodicalIF":5.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Developing security metrics for space systems: A study considering the NIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.0 and the NIS2\",\"authors\":\"Francesco Casaril, Letterio Galletta\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.ijcip.2025.100805\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>Space-based assets are essential for critical societal functions across sectors like energy, transportation, communication, agriculture, and government. As these services become more integrated into daily life and reliance on cyber–physical systems grows, the interconnectivity and commercialization of space assets increases the attack surface and cybersecurity risks. Recent incidents affecting space infrastructure underscore the urgent need for robust cybersecurity measures. Legislators in the EU and other countries are addressing cyber risks to space and ground assets by developing minimum protection requirements. To support these measures, this paper evaluates whether existing security metrics in the literature cover all NIST functions, categories, and subcategories in the Cybersecurity Framework 2.0 (CSF 2.0). This framework provides a strong foundation for industry sectors and can serve as a baseline to ensure compliance with directives like NIS2. Our analysis reveals imbalances in academic discourse, with certain CSF 2.0 functions underrepresented. Then, we propose new metrics to address unaddressed NIST categories and adapt existing metrics to better suit the space domain. Considering practical challenges in implementing and monitoring these metrics, we propose a tool to facilitate their calculation and visualize security status. We also present a case study resembling real-world space infrastructure that demonstrates our tool’s applicability and the value of the designed metrics. Our research has managerial implications, supporting managers, CIOs, and CISOs in making informed decisions, helping companies understand their security levels, and complying with existing and forthcoming space sector regulations. We advocate for using security metrics to assess compliance with regulations like NIS2, CER, or upcoming space laws, demonstrating to policymakers that metrics can be integrated into policies to enhance their effectiveness.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":49057,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Journal of Critical Infrastructure Protection\",\"volume\":\"51 \",\"pages\":\"Article 100805\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":5.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-10-03\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Journal of Critical Infrastructure Protection\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1874548225000666\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"工程技术\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"COMPUTER SCIENCE, INFORMATION SYSTEMS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Critical Infrastructure Protection","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1874548225000666","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"COMPUTER SCIENCE, INFORMATION SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
Developing security metrics for space systems: A study considering the NIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.0 and the NIS2
Space-based assets are essential for critical societal functions across sectors like energy, transportation, communication, agriculture, and government. As these services become more integrated into daily life and reliance on cyber–physical systems grows, the interconnectivity and commercialization of space assets increases the attack surface and cybersecurity risks. Recent incidents affecting space infrastructure underscore the urgent need for robust cybersecurity measures. Legislators in the EU and other countries are addressing cyber risks to space and ground assets by developing minimum protection requirements. To support these measures, this paper evaluates whether existing security metrics in the literature cover all NIST functions, categories, and subcategories in the Cybersecurity Framework 2.0 (CSF 2.0). This framework provides a strong foundation for industry sectors and can serve as a baseline to ensure compliance with directives like NIS2. Our analysis reveals imbalances in academic discourse, with certain CSF 2.0 functions underrepresented. Then, we propose new metrics to address unaddressed NIST categories and adapt existing metrics to better suit the space domain. Considering practical challenges in implementing and monitoring these metrics, we propose a tool to facilitate their calculation and visualize security status. We also present a case study resembling real-world space infrastructure that demonstrates our tool’s applicability and the value of the designed metrics. Our research has managerial implications, supporting managers, CIOs, and CISOs in making informed decisions, helping companies understand their security levels, and complying with existing and forthcoming space sector regulations. We advocate for using security metrics to assess compliance with regulations like NIS2, CER, or upcoming space laws, demonstrating to policymakers that metrics can be integrated into policies to enhance their effectiveness.
期刊介绍:
The International Journal of Critical Infrastructure Protection (IJCIP) was launched in 2008, with the primary aim of publishing scholarly papers of the highest quality in all areas of critical infrastructure protection. Of particular interest are articles that weave science, technology, law and policy to craft sophisticated yet practical solutions for securing assets in the various critical infrastructure sectors. These critical infrastructure sectors include: information technology, telecommunications, energy, banking and finance, transportation systems, chemicals, critical manufacturing, agriculture and food, defense industrial base, public health and health care, national monuments and icons, drinking water and water treatment systems, commercial facilities, dams, emergency services, nuclear reactors, materials and waste, postal and shipping, and government facilities. Protecting and ensuring the continuity of operation of critical infrastructure assets are vital to national security, public health and safety, economic vitality, and societal wellbeing.
The scope of the journal includes, but is not limited to:
1. Analysis of security challenges that are unique or common to the various infrastructure sectors.
2. Identification of core security principles and techniques that can be applied to critical infrastructure protection.
3. Elucidation of the dependencies and interdependencies existing between infrastructure sectors and techniques for mitigating the devastating effects of cascading failures.
4. Creation of sophisticated, yet practical, solutions, for critical infrastructure protection that involve mathematical, scientific and engineering techniques, economic and social science methods, and/or legal and public policy constructs.