从指导到影响:揭示机构和技能在青年生计中的作用

IF 2.3 3区 教育学 Q1 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH
Kazim Syed , Fatma Türüç-Seraj , Şerife Zihni-Eyüpoğlu
{"title":"从指导到影响:揭示机构和技能在青年生计中的作用","authors":"Kazim Syed ,&nbsp;Fatma Türüç-Seraj ,&nbsp;Şerife Zihni-Eyüpoğlu","doi":"10.1016/j.ijedudev.2025.103415","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>This study develops and empirically tests a dual-path mediation model within Pakistan’s Technical Vocational Education and Training (TVET) context, drawing on Human Capital Theory and the Capability Approach to examine how Training Quality (TQ) and Institutional Policies (PIP) shape outcomes. Using structured survey data from 396 TVET graduates and applying structural equation modelling, the analysis identifies two distinct pathways. TQ improves Livelihood Outcomes mainly through Skill Acquisition, confirming that the quality of instruction directly strengthens learning gains. In contrast, PIP shape outcomes through the creation of Support Networks such as mentoring and peer guidance systems, and close to one-third of their overall effect flows through these supports. This highlights their often-neglected role in linking training with employment. The findings move beyond standard input–output models by showing that technical instruction alone is not sufficient, and that career advice, social support, and institutional backing are equally vital. Theoretically, the study contributes to TVET literature by bringing individual learning processes and systemic enablers into a single framework. Practically, it offers clear policy directions aligned with Sustainable Development Goal (SDG) 4 and 8, stressing the need to institutionalise mentorship structures within TEVTAs while modernising training delivery and design.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48004,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Educational Development","volume":"118 ","pages":"Article 103415"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"From instruction to impact: Unpacking the role of institutions and skills in youth livelihoods\",\"authors\":\"Kazim Syed ,&nbsp;Fatma Türüç-Seraj ,&nbsp;Şerife Zihni-Eyüpoğlu\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.ijedudev.2025.103415\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>This study develops and empirically tests a dual-path mediation model within Pakistan’s Technical Vocational Education and Training (TVET) context, drawing on Human Capital Theory and the Capability Approach to examine how Training Quality (TQ) and Institutional Policies (PIP) shape outcomes. Using structured survey data from 396 TVET graduates and applying structural equation modelling, the analysis identifies two distinct pathways. TQ improves Livelihood Outcomes mainly through Skill Acquisition, confirming that the quality of instruction directly strengthens learning gains. In contrast, PIP shape outcomes through the creation of Support Networks such as mentoring and peer guidance systems, and close to one-third of their overall effect flows through these supports. This highlights their often-neglected role in linking training with employment. The findings move beyond standard input–output models by showing that technical instruction alone is not sufficient, and that career advice, social support, and institutional backing are equally vital. Theoretically, the study contributes to TVET literature by bringing individual learning processes and systemic enablers into a single framework. Practically, it offers clear policy directions aligned with Sustainable Development Goal (SDG) 4 and 8, stressing the need to institutionalise mentorship structures within TEVTAs while modernising training delivery and design.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48004,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Journal of Educational Development\",\"volume\":\"118 \",\"pages\":\"Article 103415\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-10-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Journal of Educational Development\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"95\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0738059325002135\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"教育学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Educational Development","FirstCategoryId":"95","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0738059325002135","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本研究在巴基斯坦职业技术教育与培训(TVET)背景下开发并实证检验了一个双路径中介模型,利用人力资本理论和能力方法来研究培训质量(TQ)和制度政策(PIP)如何影响结果。利用396名TVET毕业生的结构化调查数据,并应用结构方程模型,分析确定了两种不同的途径。TQ主要通过技能习得来改善生计成果,这证实了教学质量直接增强了学习收益。相比之下,PIP通过创建支持网络(如指导和同伴指导系统)来塑造结果,其总体效果的近三分之一是通过这些支持来实现的。这突出了它们在将培训与就业联系起来方面经常被忽视的作用。研究结果超越了标准的投入产出模型,表明仅靠技术指导是不够的,职业建议、社会支持和机构支持同样至关重要。从理论上讲,该研究通过将个人学习过程和系统促成因素纳入单一框架,为TVET文献做出了贡献。实际上,它提供了与可持续发展目标(SDG) 4和8相一致的明确政策方向,强调在实现培训交付和设计现代化的同时,需要将TEVTAs内的指导结构制度化。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
From instruction to impact: Unpacking the role of institutions and skills in youth livelihoods
This study develops and empirically tests a dual-path mediation model within Pakistan’s Technical Vocational Education and Training (TVET) context, drawing on Human Capital Theory and the Capability Approach to examine how Training Quality (TQ) and Institutional Policies (PIP) shape outcomes. Using structured survey data from 396 TVET graduates and applying structural equation modelling, the analysis identifies two distinct pathways. TQ improves Livelihood Outcomes mainly through Skill Acquisition, confirming that the quality of instruction directly strengthens learning gains. In contrast, PIP shape outcomes through the creation of Support Networks such as mentoring and peer guidance systems, and close to one-third of their overall effect flows through these supports. This highlights their often-neglected role in linking training with employment. The findings move beyond standard input–output models by showing that technical instruction alone is not sufficient, and that career advice, social support, and institutional backing are equally vital. Theoretically, the study contributes to TVET literature by bringing individual learning processes and systemic enablers into a single framework. Practically, it offers clear policy directions aligned with Sustainable Development Goal (SDG) 4 and 8, stressing the need to institutionalise mentorship structures within TEVTAs while modernising training delivery and design.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
International Journal of Educational Development
International Journal of Educational Development EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH-
CiteScore
4.20
自引率
12.00%
发文量
106
审稿时长
40 days
期刊介绍: The purpose of the International Journal of Educational Development is to foster critical debate about the role that education plays in development. IJED seeks both to develop new theoretical insights into the education-development relationship and new understandings of the extent and nature of educational change in diverse settings. It stresses the importance of understanding the interplay of local, national, regional and global contexts and dynamics in shaping education and development. Orthodox notions of development as being about growth, industrialisation or poverty reduction are increasingly questioned. There are competing accounts that stress the human dimensions of development.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信