为什么菲律宾改变其母语教学政策:追踪菲律宾第一语言教育政治优先权的侵蚀

IF 2.3 3区 教育学 Q1 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH
Romylyn A. Metila , TJ D’Agostino , Erina Iwasaki
{"title":"为什么菲律宾改变其母语教学政策:追踪菲律宾第一语言教育政治优先权的侵蚀","authors":"Romylyn A. Metila ,&nbsp;TJ D’Agostino ,&nbsp;Erina Iwasaki","doi":"10.1016/j.ijedudev.2025.103408","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Using qualitative process tracing, the study applies an adapted version of Shiffman’s framework on the generation of political priority to analyze the factors shaping the Philippines’ national Mother Tongue-Based Multilingual Education (MTB-MLE) policy and its political trajectory. Data sources include policy documents, legislative records, media coverage, and data from a systems-thinking workshop with national stakeholders. Findings identify several interrelated causes for the decline in political priority: persistent implementation difficulties, weak actor power, fragmented framing, leadership transitions, lack of clear proofs of concept, and the rising appeal of early English immersion as a competing policy priority. Although the policy was legally codified and internationally supported, these factors were insufficient to sustain political commitment amidst implementation challenges and a shifting political context. The study’s methodological contributions include its application of process tracing to language policy research and offers critical insights into the political dynamics that can weaken political support for an evidence-based language-in-education policy. It highlights the need for strong implementation, rigorous evaluation, and sustained coalitions to preserve promising policies and advance language equity in multilingual systems.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48004,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Educational Development","volume":"118 ","pages":"Article 103408"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Why the Philippines reversed its mother-tongue instruction policy: Tracing the erosion of political priority for first language-based education in the Philippines\",\"authors\":\"Romylyn A. Metila ,&nbsp;TJ D’Agostino ,&nbsp;Erina Iwasaki\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.ijedudev.2025.103408\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>Using qualitative process tracing, the study applies an adapted version of Shiffman’s framework on the generation of political priority to analyze the factors shaping the Philippines’ national Mother Tongue-Based Multilingual Education (MTB-MLE) policy and its political trajectory. Data sources include policy documents, legislative records, media coverage, and data from a systems-thinking workshop with national stakeholders. Findings identify several interrelated causes for the decline in political priority: persistent implementation difficulties, weak actor power, fragmented framing, leadership transitions, lack of clear proofs of concept, and the rising appeal of early English immersion as a competing policy priority. Although the policy was legally codified and internationally supported, these factors were insufficient to sustain political commitment amidst implementation challenges and a shifting political context. The study’s methodological contributions include its application of process tracing to language policy research and offers critical insights into the political dynamics that can weaken political support for an evidence-based language-in-education policy. It highlights the need for strong implementation, rigorous evaluation, and sustained coalitions to preserve promising policies and advance language equity in multilingual systems.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48004,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Journal of Educational Development\",\"volume\":\"118 \",\"pages\":\"Article 103408\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-10-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Journal of Educational Development\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"95\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0738059325002068\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"教育学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Educational Development","FirstCategoryId":"95","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0738059325002068","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本研究采用定性过程追踪法,采用Shiffman关于政治优先级产生的框架的改编版本,分析了菲律宾以母语为基础的国家多语教育(MTB-MLE)政策及其政治轨迹的形成因素。数据来源包括政策文件、立法记录、媒体报道以及与国家利益攸关方举行的系统思考研讨会的数据。研究结果确定了政治优先级下降的几个相互关联的原因:持续的实施困难、弱行动者力量、支离破碎的框架、领导过渡、缺乏明确的概念证明,以及早期英语浸入作为一项竞争性政策优先级的吸引力日益增加。虽然这项政策已被法律编纂并得到国际支持,但在执行方面的挑战和不断变化的政治背景下,这些因素不足以维持政治承诺。该研究在方法论上的贡献包括将过程追踪应用于语言政策研究,并对可能削弱基于证据的语言教育政策的政治支持的政治动态提供了重要见解。它强调需要强有力的实施、严格的评估和持续的联盟,以维护有希望的政策并促进多语言系统中的语言公平。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Why the Philippines reversed its mother-tongue instruction policy: Tracing the erosion of political priority for first language-based education in the Philippines
Using qualitative process tracing, the study applies an adapted version of Shiffman’s framework on the generation of political priority to analyze the factors shaping the Philippines’ national Mother Tongue-Based Multilingual Education (MTB-MLE) policy and its political trajectory. Data sources include policy documents, legislative records, media coverage, and data from a systems-thinking workshop with national stakeholders. Findings identify several interrelated causes for the decline in political priority: persistent implementation difficulties, weak actor power, fragmented framing, leadership transitions, lack of clear proofs of concept, and the rising appeal of early English immersion as a competing policy priority. Although the policy was legally codified and internationally supported, these factors were insufficient to sustain political commitment amidst implementation challenges and a shifting political context. The study’s methodological contributions include its application of process tracing to language policy research and offers critical insights into the political dynamics that can weaken political support for an evidence-based language-in-education policy. It highlights the need for strong implementation, rigorous evaluation, and sustained coalitions to preserve promising policies and advance language equity in multilingual systems.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
International Journal of Educational Development
International Journal of Educational Development EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH-
CiteScore
4.20
自引率
12.00%
发文量
106
审稿时长
40 days
期刊介绍: The purpose of the International Journal of Educational Development is to foster critical debate about the role that education plays in development. IJED seeks both to develop new theoretical insights into the education-development relationship and new understandings of the extent and nature of educational change in diverse settings. It stresses the importance of understanding the interplay of local, national, regional and global contexts and dynamics in shaping education and development. Orthodox notions of development as being about growth, industrialisation or poverty reduction are increasingly questioned. There are competing accounts that stress the human dimensions of development.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信