{"title":"为什么菲律宾改变其母语教学政策:追踪菲律宾第一语言教育政治优先权的侵蚀","authors":"Romylyn A. Metila , TJ D’Agostino , Erina Iwasaki","doi":"10.1016/j.ijedudev.2025.103408","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Using qualitative process tracing, the study applies an adapted version of Shiffman’s framework on the generation of political priority to analyze the factors shaping the Philippines’ national Mother Tongue-Based Multilingual Education (MTB-MLE) policy and its political trajectory. Data sources include policy documents, legislative records, media coverage, and data from a systems-thinking workshop with national stakeholders. Findings identify several interrelated causes for the decline in political priority: persistent implementation difficulties, weak actor power, fragmented framing, leadership transitions, lack of clear proofs of concept, and the rising appeal of early English immersion as a competing policy priority. Although the policy was legally codified and internationally supported, these factors were insufficient to sustain political commitment amidst implementation challenges and a shifting political context. The study’s methodological contributions include its application of process tracing to language policy research and offers critical insights into the political dynamics that can weaken political support for an evidence-based language-in-education policy. It highlights the need for strong implementation, rigorous evaluation, and sustained coalitions to preserve promising policies and advance language equity in multilingual systems.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48004,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Educational Development","volume":"118 ","pages":"Article 103408"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Why the Philippines reversed its mother-tongue instruction policy: Tracing the erosion of political priority for first language-based education in the Philippines\",\"authors\":\"Romylyn A. Metila , TJ D’Agostino , Erina Iwasaki\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.ijedudev.2025.103408\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>Using qualitative process tracing, the study applies an adapted version of Shiffman’s framework on the generation of political priority to analyze the factors shaping the Philippines’ national Mother Tongue-Based Multilingual Education (MTB-MLE) policy and its political trajectory. Data sources include policy documents, legislative records, media coverage, and data from a systems-thinking workshop with national stakeholders. Findings identify several interrelated causes for the decline in political priority: persistent implementation difficulties, weak actor power, fragmented framing, leadership transitions, lack of clear proofs of concept, and the rising appeal of early English immersion as a competing policy priority. Although the policy was legally codified and internationally supported, these factors were insufficient to sustain political commitment amidst implementation challenges and a shifting political context. The study’s methodological contributions include its application of process tracing to language policy research and offers critical insights into the political dynamics that can weaken political support for an evidence-based language-in-education policy. It highlights the need for strong implementation, rigorous evaluation, and sustained coalitions to preserve promising policies and advance language equity in multilingual systems.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48004,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Journal of Educational Development\",\"volume\":\"118 \",\"pages\":\"Article 103408\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-10-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Journal of Educational Development\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"95\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0738059325002068\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"教育学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Educational Development","FirstCategoryId":"95","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0738059325002068","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
Why the Philippines reversed its mother-tongue instruction policy: Tracing the erosion of political priority for first language-based education in the Philippines
Using qualitative process tracing, the study applies an adapted version of Shiffman’s framework on the generation of political priority to analyze the factors shaping the Philippines’ national Mother Tongue-Based Multilingual Education (MTB-MLE) policy and its political trajectory. Data sources include policy documents, legislative records, media coverage, and data from a systems-thinking workshop with national stakeholders. Findings identify several interrelated causes for the decline in political priority: persistent implementation difficulties, weak actor power, fragmented framing, leadership transitions, lack of clear proofs of concept, and the rising appeal of early English immersion as a competing policy priority. Although the policy was legally codified and internationally supported, these factors were insufficient to sustain political commitment amidst implementation challenges and a shifting political context. The study’s methodological contributions include its application of process tracing to language policy research and offers critical insights into the political dynamics that can weaken political support for an evidence-based language-in-education policy. It highlights the need for strong implementation, rigorous evaluation, and sustained coalitions to preserve promising policies and advance language equity in multilingual systems.
期刊介绍:
The purpose of the International Journal of Educational Development is to foster critical debate about the role that education plays in development. IJED seeks both to develop new theoretical insights into the education-development relationship and new understandings of the extent and nature of educational change in diverse settings. It stresses the importance of understanding the interplay of local, national, regional and global contexts and dynamics in shaping education and development. Orthodox notions of development as being about growth, industrialisation or poverty reduction are increasingly questioned. There are competing accounts that stress the human dimensions of development.