{"title":"将PMC集成到大型语言模型中的一种新的自动策略文本评估框架","authors":"Xiaobin Lu, Zinan Yang, Chaoguang Huo","doi":"10.1016/j.ipm.2025.104440","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Automated policy text evaluation is a critical research topic in policy informatics. Previous methods rely predominantly on manual variable assignment, making them inadequate for large-scale policy evaluation, while their context-dependent indicators extracted from specific policies lack cross-domain applicability. To address this, we propose a novel policy text automated evaluation framework by redesigning three generalized first-level evaluation indicators that are applicable to policies in any domain, integrating Policy Modeling Consistency Model (PMC) into large language models (LLM), and constructing automated PMC-scoring models based on LLaMA-3-Chinese-8B and Qwen-2.5-7B respectively. Using Chinese S&T policies as examples, we construct the first Chinese policy evaluation dataset with 22,630 labeled policy samples and train four PMC indicator automated calculation models. Compared to the baselines, the model based on Qwen-2.5-7B achieves the best performance in the evaluation of policy character, with an F1-score of 80.41%. The model based on LLaMA-3-Chinese-8B achieves best performance in the evaluation of policy normativity and policy function, with F1-scores of 75.07% and 74.11% respectively. This enables the automated calculation of PMC indices and the generation of a multi-input-output table for comprehensive policy analysis. The application in biosafety policies and data governance policies validate the cross-domain applicability of the framework. As the first framework for automated PMC evaluation, our methodology provides an innovative approach for large-scale, cross-domain policy evaluation.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":50365,"journal":{"name":"Information Processing & Management","volume":"63 2","pages":"Article 104440"},"PeriodicalIF":6.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A novel automated policy text evaluation framework integrating PMC into large language models\",\"authors\":\"Xiaobin Lu, Zinan Yang, Chaoguang Huo\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.ipm.2025.104440\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>Automated policy text evaluation is a critical research topic in policy informatics. Previous methods rely predominantly on manual variable assignment, making them inadequate for large-scale policy evaluation, while their context-dependent indicators extracted from specific policies lack cross-domain applicability. To address this, we propose a novel policy text automated evaluation framework by redesigning three generalized first-level evaluation indicators that are applicable to policies in any domain, integrating Policy Modeling Consistency Model (PMC) into large language models (LLM), and constructing automated PMC-scoring models based on LLaMA-3-Chinese-8B and Qwen-2.5-7B respectively. Using Chinese S&T policies as examples, we construct the first Chinese policy evaluation dataset with 22,630 labeled policy samples and train four PMC indicator automated calculation models. Compared to the baselines, the model based on Qwen-2.5-7B achieves the best performance in the evaluation of policy character, with an F1-score of 80.41%. The model based on LLaMA-3-Chinese-8B achieves best performance in the evaluation of policy normativity and policy function, with F1-scores of 75.07% and 74.11% respectively. This enables the automated calculation of PMC indices and the generation of a multi-input-output table for comprehensive policy analysis. The application in biosafety policies and data governance policies validate the cross-domain applicability of the framework. As the first framework for automated PMC evaluation, our methodology provides an innovative approach for large-scale, cross-domain policy evaluation.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":50365,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Information Processing & Management\",\"volume\":\"63 2\",\"pages\":\"Article 104440\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":6.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-10-10\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Information Processing & Management\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"94\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0306457325003814\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"管理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"COMPUTER SCIENCE, INFORMATION SYSTEMS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Information Processing & Management","FirstCategoryId":"94","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0306457325003814","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"COMPUTER SCIENCE, INFORMATION SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
政策文本自动评估是政策信息学领域的一个重要研究课题。以往的方法主要依赖于人工变量赋值,不适合大规模的政策评估,而从具体政策中提取的上下文相关指标缺乏跨领域适用性。为了解决这一问题,我们重新设计了三个适用于任何领域策略的通用一级评估指标,将策略建模一致性模型(PMC)集成到大型语言模型(LLM)中,并分别基于LLaMA-3-Chinese-8B和Qwen-2.5-7B构建了PMC自动评分模型,提出了一种新的策略文本自动评估框架。以中国s&p;T政策为例,构建了第一个包含22630个标记政策样本的中国政策评估数据集,并训练了4个PMC指标自动计算模型。与基线相比,基于Qwen-2.5-7B的模型在政策特征评价中表现最好,f1得分为80.41%。基于llama -3- china - 8b的模型在政策规范性和政策功能的评价中表现最好,f1得分分别为75.07%和74.11%。这使PMC指数能够自动计算,并生成多投入产出表,以进行全面的政策分析。在生物安全政策和数据治理政策中的应用验证了该框架的跨领域适用性。作为自动化PMC评估的第一个框架,我们的方法为大规模、跨领域的政策评估提供了一种创新的方法。
A novel automated policy text evaluation framework integrating PMC into large language models
Automated policy text evaluation is a critical research topic in policy informatics. Previous methods rely predominantly on manual variable assignment, making them inadequate for large-scale policy evaluation, while their context-dependent indicators extracted from specific policies lack cross-domain applicability. To address this, we propose a novel policy text automated evaluation framework by redesigning three generalized first-level evaluation indicators that are applicable to policies in any domain, integrating Policy Modeling Consistency Model (PMC) into large language models (LLM), and constructing automated PMC-scoring models based on LLaMA-3-Chinese-8B and Qwen-2.5-7B respectively. Using Chinese S&T policies as examples, we construct the first Chinese policy evaluation dataset with 22,630 labeled policy samples and train four PMC indicator automated calculation models. Compared to the baselines, the model based on Qwen-2.5-7B achieves the best performance in the evaluation of policy character, with an F1-score of 80.41%. The model based on LLaMA-3-Chinese-8B achieves best performance in the evaluation of policy normativity and policy function, with F1-scores of 75.07% and 74.11% respectively. This enables the automated calculation of PMC indices and the generation of a multi-input-output table for comprehensive policy analysis. The application in biosafety policies and data governance policies validate the cross-domain applicability of the framework. As the first framework for automated PMC evaluation, our methodology provides an innovative approach for large-scale, cross-domain policy evaluation.
期刊介绍:
Information Processing and Management is dedicated to publishing cutting-edge original research at the convergence of computing and information science. Our scope encompasses theory, methods, and applications across various domains, including advertising, business, health, information science, information technology marketing, and social computing.
We aim to cater to the interests of both primary researchers and practitioners by offering an effective platform for the timely dissemination of advanced and topical issues in this interdisciplinary field. The journal places particular emphasis on original research articles, research survey articles, research method articles, and articles addressing critical applications of research. Join us in advancing knowledge and innovation at the intersection of computing and information science.