多输入切向插值驱动的喷气式教练机损伤检测

IF 5.8 1区 工程技术 Q1 ENGINEERING, AEROSPACE
Gabriele Dessena , Marco Civera , Andrés Marcos , Bernardino Chiaia , Oscar E. Bonilla-Manrique
{"title":"多输入切向插值驱动的喷气式教练机损伤检测","authors":"Gabriele Dessena ,&nbsp;Marco Civera ,&nbsp;Andrés Marcos ,&nbsp;Bernardino Chiaia ,&nbsp;Oscar E. Bonilla-Manrique","doi":"10.1016/j.ast.2025.111032","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>The problem of damage detection and identification is of interest for many aerospace and aeronautical engineering systems. However, relevant literature mostly focuses on subsystems and parts, rather than full airframes. In structural dynamics, modal parameters, such as natural frequencies and mode shapes, from any structure are the main building blocks of vibration-based damage detection. However, traditional comparisons of these parameters are often ambiguous in large systems, complicating damage detection and assessment. The modified total modal assurance criterion (MTMAC), an index well-known in the field of finite element model updating, is extended to address this challenge and is proposed as an index for damage identification and severity assessment. To support the requirement for precise and robust modal identification of Structural Health Monitoring (SHM), the improved Loewner Framework (iLF), known for its reliability and computational performance, is pioneeringly employed within SHM. Since the MTMAC is proposed solely as a damage identification and severity assessment index, the coordinate modal assurance criterion (COMAC), also a well-established tool, but for damage localisation using mode shapes, is used for completeness. The iLF SHM capabilities are validated through comparisons with traditional methods, including least-squares complex exponential (LSCE) and stochastic subspace identification with canonical variate analysis (SSI-CVA) on a numerical case study of a cantilever beam. Furthermore, the MTMAC is validated against the traditional vibration-based approach, which involves directly comparing natural frequencies and mode shapes. Finally, an experimental dataset from a BAE Systems Hawk T1A jet trainer ground vibration test is used to demonstrate the iLF and MTMAC capabilities on a real-life, real-size SHM problem, showing their effectiveness in detecting and assessing damage.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":50955,"journal":{"name":"Aerospace Science and Technology","volume":"168 ","pages":"Article 111032"},"PeriodicalIF":5.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Multiple input tangential interpolation-driven damage detection of a jet trainer aircraft\",\"authors\":\"Gabriele Dessena ,&nbsp;Marco Civera ,&nbsp;Andrés Marcos ,&nbsp;Bernardino Chiaia ,&nbsp;Oscar E. Bonilla-Manrique\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.ast.2025.111032\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>The problem of damage detection and identification is of interest for many aerospace and aeronautical engineering systems. However, relevant literature mostly focuses on subsystems and parts, rather than full airframes. In structural dynamics, modal parameters, such as natural frequencies and mode shapes, from any structure are the main building blocks of vibration-based damage detection. However, traditional comparisons of these parameters are often ambiguous in large systems, complicating damage detection and assessment. The modified total modal assurance criterion (MTMAC), an index well-known in the field of finite element model updating, is extended to address this challenge and is proposed as an index for damage identification and severity assessment. To support the requirement for precise and robust modal identification of Structural Health Monitoring (SHM), the improved Loewner Framework (iLF), known for its reliability and computational performance, is pioneeringly employed within SHM. Since the MTMAC is proposed solely as a damage identification and severity assessment index, the coordinate modal assurance criterion (COMAC), also a well-established tool, but for damage localisation using mode shapes, is used for completeness. The iLF SHM capabilities are validated through comparisons with traditional methods, including least-squares complex exponential (LSCE) and stochastic subspace identification with canonical variate analysis (SSI-CVA) on a numerical case study of a cantilever beam. Furthermore, the MTMAC is validated against the traditional vibration-based approach, which involves directly comparing natural frequencies and mode shapes. Finally, an experimental dataset from a BAE Systems Hawk T1A jet trainer ground vibration test is used to demonstrate the iLF and MTMAC capabilities on a real-life, real-size SHM problem, showing their effectiveness in detecting and assessing damage.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":50955,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Aerospace Science and Technology\",\"volume\":\"168 \",\"pages\":\"Article 111032\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":5.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-10-09\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Aerospace Science and Technology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1270963825010958\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"工程技术\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ENGINEERING, AEROSPACE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Aerospace Science and Technology","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1270963825010958","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, AEROSPACE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

损伤检测和识别问题是许多航空航天工程系统感兴趣的问题。然而,相关文献大多侧重于子系统和部件,而不是整个机身。在结构动力学中,来自任何结构的模态参数,如固有频率和模态振型,是基于振动的损伤检测的主要组成部分。然而,在大型系统中,这些参数的传统比较通常是模糊的,使损伤检测和评估复杂化。针对这一问题,提出了改进的全模态保证准则(MTMAC)作为一种损伤识别和严重程度评估指标。为了支持结构健康监测(SHM)对精确和鲁棒的模态识别的要求,改进的Loewner框架(iLF)以其可靠性和计算性能而闻名,在SHM中被率先采用。由于MTMAC仅作为损伤识别和严重程度评估指标提出,因此使用坐标模态保证准则(COMAC),这也是一种完善的工具,但用于使用模态振型进行损伤定位,以确保完整性。通过与传统方法(包括最小二乘复指数(LSCE)和随机子空间识别与典型变量分析(SSI-CVA))在悬臂梁数值研究中的比较,验证了iLF SHM的能力。此外,MTMAC与传统的基于振动的方法进行了验证,后者涉及直接比较固有频率和模态振型。最后,来自BAE系统公司Hawk T1A喷气教练机地面振动测试的实验数据集用于在真实的、真实尺寸的SHM问题上演示iLF和MTMAC能力,显示它们在检测和评估损伤方面的有效性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Multiple input tangential interpolation-driven damage detection of a jet trainer aircraft
The problem of damage detection and identification is of interest for many aerospace and aeronautical engineering systems. However, relevant literature mostly focuses on subsystems and parts, rather than full airframes. In structural dynamics, modal parameters, such as natural frequencies and mode shapes, from any structure are the main building blocks of vibration-based damage detection. However, traditional comparisons of these parameters are often ambiguous in large systems, complicating damage detection and assessment. The modified total modal assurance criterion (MTMAC), an index well-known in the field of finite element model updating, is extended to address this challenge and is proposed as an index for damage identification and severity assessment. To support the requirement for precise and robust modal identification of Structural Health Monitoring (SHM), the improved Loewner Framework (iLF), known for its reliability and computational performance, is pioneeringly employed within SHM. Since the MTMAC is proposed solely as a damage identification and severity assessment index, the coordinate modal assurance criterion (COMAC), also a well-established tool, but for damage localisation using mode shapes, is used for completeness. The iLF SHM capabilities are validated through comparisons with traditional methods, including least-squares complex exponential (LSCE) and stochastic subspace identification with canonical variate analysis (SSI-CVA) on a numerical case study of a cantilever beam. Furthermore, the MTMAC is validated against the traditional vibration-based approach, which involves directly comparing natural frequencies and mode shapes. Finally, an experimental dataset from a BAE Systems Hawk T1A jet trainer ground vibration test is used to demonstrate the iLF and MTMAC capabilities on a real-life, real-size SHM problem, showing their effectiveness in detecting and assessing damage.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Aerospace Science and Technology
Aerospace Science and Technology 工程技术-工程:宇航
CiteScore
10.30
自引率
28.60%
发文量
654
审稿时长
54 days
期刊介绍: Aerospace Science and Technology publishes articles of outstanding scientific quality. Each article is reviewed by two referees. The journal welcomes papers from a wide range of countries. This journal publishes original papers, review articles and short communications related to all fields of aerospace research, fundamental and applied, potential applications of which are clearly related to: • The design and the manufacture of aircraft, helicopters, missiles, launchers and satellites • The control of their environment • The study of various systems they are involved in, as supports or as targets. Authors are invited to submit papers on new advances in the following topics to aerospace applications: • Fluid dynamics • Energetics and propulsion • Materials and structures • Flight mechanics • Navigation, guidance and control • Acoustics • Optics • Electromagnetism and radar • Signal and image processing • Information processing • Data fusion • Decision aid • Human behaviour • Robotics and intelligent systems • Complex system engineering. Etc.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信