胶质纤维酸性蛋白和泛素c端水解酶L1对急性外伤性颅内病变的诊断准确性研究。

IF 5 1区 医学 Q1 EMERGENCY MEDICINE
Nathan B Roberts,Tian Xie,Hayley Falk,Jayapalli Bapuraj,Debra Demski,Carmen Gherasim,Christopher M Fung,Nathan L Haas,Keith E Kocher,Katharine S Seagly,Richard P Medlin,Adrianna Kallabat,Andrew Askar,Jacob Joseph,Matthew J Schipper,Frederick K Korley
{"title":"胶质纤维酸性蛋白和泛素c端水解酶L1对急性外伤性颅内病变的诊断准确性研究。","authors":"Nathan B Roberts,Tian Xie,Hayley Falk,Jayapalli Bapuraj,Debra Demski,Carmen Gherasim,Christopher M Fung,Nathan L Haas,Keith E Kocher,Katharine S Seagly,Richard P Medlin,Adrianna Kallabat,Andrew Askar,Jacob Joseph,Matthew J Schipper,Frederick K Korley","doi":"10.1016/j.annemergmed.2025.09.012","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"OBJECTIVE\r\nTo determine the diagnostic accuracy of glial fibrillary acidic protein (GFAP) and ubiquitin C-terminal hydrolase L1 (UCH-L1) for detecting clinically significant acute traumatic intracranial lesions in emergency department patients who undergo brain computed tomography (CT) after blunt trauma.\r\n\r\nMETHODS\r\nWe conducted a retrospective study of 1,867 patients aged more than or equal to 18 years, who presented with trauma-related complaints, underwent brain CT, and had residual samples collected less than or equal to 24 hours postinjury. We evaluated the diagnostic accuracy of GFAP and UCH-L1 using the Abbott i-STAT TBI Plasma test. Additionally, we assessed diagnostic accuracy within key clinical subgroups to define a proposed implementation cohort and assessed the diagnostic accuracy of the biomarkers within this cohort.\r\n\r\nRESULTS\r\nAmong 1,867 patients, 49 (2.6%) had clinically significant traumatic intracranial lesions. Elevated GFAP or UCH-L1 demonstrated 96% sensitivity (95% confidence interval [CI] 86% to 99%), 30% specificity (95% CI 28% to 32%), positive likelihood ratio (LR+) of 1.38 (95% CI 1.29 to 1.47), and negative likelihood ratio (LR-) of 0.13 (95% CI 0.03 to 0.53). Two patients had clinically significant CT lesions without elevated GFAP or UCH-L1. In the proposed implementation cohort of adults aged more than or equal to 18 years without coagulopathy elevated GFAP or UCH-L1 had a sensitivity of 100% (95% CI 86% to 100%), specificity of 33% (95% CI 31% to 36%), LR+ of 1.50 (95% CI 1.44 to 1.56), and LR- of 0.00 (95% CI 0.00 to 0.95).\r\n\r\nCONCLUSION\r\nPlasma GFAP and UCH-L1 in combination, measured ≤24 hours postinjury, demonstrated high sensitivity for clinically significant acute traumatic intracranial lesions. Further research is needed to determine whether deploying these biomarkers in the proposed implementation cohort decreases avoidable brain CT scans.","PeriodicalId":8236,"journal":{"name":"Annals of emergency medicine","volume":"8 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":5.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Glial Fibrillary Acidic Protein and Ubiquitin C-Terminal Hydrolase L1 for Acute Traumatic Intracranial Lesions: The PIONEER Diagnostic Accuracy Study.\",\"authors\":\"Nathan B Roberts,Tian Xie,Hayley Falk,Jayapalli Bapuraj,Debra Demski,Carmen Gherasim,Christopher M Fung,Nathan L Haas,Keith E Kocher,Katharine S Seagly,Richard P Medlin,Adrianna Kallabat,Andrew Askar,Jacob Joseph,Matthew J Schipper,Frederick K Korley\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.annemergmed.2025.09.012\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"OBJECTIVE\\r\\nTo determine the diagnostic accuracy of glial fibrillary acidic protein (GFAP) and ubiquitin C-terminal hydrolase L1 (UCH-L1) for detecting clinically significant acute traumatic intracranial lesions in emergency department patients who undergo brain computed tomography (CT) after blunt trauma.\\r\\n\\r\\nMETHODS\\r\\nWe conducted a retrospective study of 1,867 patients aged more than or equal to 18 years, who presented with trauma-related complaints, underwent brain CT, and had residual samples collected less than or equal to 24 hours postinjury. We evaluated the diagnostic accuracy of GFAP and UCH-L1 using the Abbott i-STAT TBI Plasma test. Additionally, we assessed diagnostic accuracy within key clinical subgroups to define a proposed implementation cohort and assessed the diagnostic accuracy of the biomarkers within this cohort.\\r\\n\\r\\nRESULTS\\r\\nAmong 1,867 patients, 49 (2.6%) had clinically significant traumatic intracranial lesions. Elevated GFAP or UCH-L1 demonstrated 96% sensitivity (95% confidence interval [CI] 86% to 99%), 30% specificity (95% CI 28% to 32%), positive likelihood ratio (LR+) of 1.38 (95% CI 1.29 to 1.47), and negative likelihood ratio (LR-) of 0.13 (95% CI 0.03 to 0.53). Two patients had clinically significant CT lesions without elevated GFAP or UCH-L1. In the proposed implementation cohort of adults aged more than or equal to 18 years without coagulopathy elevated GFAP or UCH-L1 had a sensitivity of 100% (95% CI 86% to 100%), specificity of 33% (95% CI 31% to 36%), LR+ of 1.50 (95% CI 1.44 to 1.56), and LR- of 0.00 (95% CI 0.00 to 0.95).\\r\\n\\r\\nCONCLUSION\\r\\nPlasma GFAP and UCH-L1 in combination, measured ≤24 hours postinjury, demonstrated high sensitivity for clinically significant acute traumatic intracranial lesions. Further research is needed to determine whether deploying these biomarkers in the proposed implementation cohort decreases avoidable brain CT scans.\",\"PeriodicalId\":8236,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Annals of emergency medicine\",\"volume\":\"8 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":5.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-10-09\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Annals of emergency medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.annemergmed.2025.09.012\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"EMERGENCY MEDICINE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annals of emergency medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.annemergmed.2025.09.012","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EMERGENCY MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的探讨胶质原纤维酸性蛋白(GFAP)和泛素c端水解酶L1 (UCH-L1)在急诊科钝性创伤后行脑计算机断层扫描(CT)的患者中检测具有临床意义的急性创伤性颅内病变的准确性。方法:我们对1867例年龄大于或等于18岁的患者进行了回顾性研究,这些患者均有创伤相关的主诉,接受了脑CT检查,并在损伤后小于或等于24小时内收集了残留样本。我们使用雅培i-STAT TBI血浆试验评估GFAP和UCH-L1的诊断准确性。此外,我们评估了关键临床亚组的诊断准确性,以确定拟议的实施队列,并评估了该队列中生物标志物的诊断准确性。结果1867例患者中,49例(2.6%)有临床显著的外伤性颅内病变。GFAP或UCH-L1升高的敏感性为96%(95%置信区间[CI] 86%至99%),特异性为30% (95% CI 28%至32%),阳性似然比(LR+)为1.38 (95% CI 1.29至1.47),阴性似然比(LR-)为0.13 (95% CI 0.03至0.53)。2例患者有临床意义的CT病变,GFAP或UCH-L1均未升高。在拟议的实施队列中,年龄大于或等于18岁且无凝血功能升高的GFAP或UCH-L1的敏感性为100% (95% CI 86%至100%),特异性为33% (95% CI 31%至36%),LR+为1.50 (95% CI 1.44至1.56),LR-为0.00 (95% CI 0.00至0.95)。结论损伤后≤24小时血浆GFAP和UCH-L1联合检测对临床意义重大的急性外伤性颅内病变具有较高的敏感性。需要进一步的研究来确定在拟议的实施队列中部署这些生物标志物是否会减少可避免的脑CT扫描。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Glial Fibrillary Acidic Protein and Ubiquitin C-Terminal Hydrolase L1 for Acute Traumatic Intracranial Lesions: The PIONEER Diagnostic Accuracy Study.
OBJECTIVE To determine the diagnostic accuracy of glial fibrillary acidic protein (GFAP) and ubiquitin C-terminal hydrolase L1 (UCH-L1) for detecting clinically significant acute traumatic intracranial lesions in emergency department patients who undergo brain computed tomography (CT) after blunt trauma. METHODS We conducted a retrospective study of 1,867 patients aged more than or equal to 18 years, who presented with trauma-related complaints, underwent brain CT, and had residual samples collected less than or equal to 24 hours postinjury. We evaluated the diagnostic accuracy of GFAP and UCH-L1 using the Abbott i-STAT TBI Plasma test. Additionally, we assessed diagnostic accuracy within key clinical subgroups to define a proposed implementation cohort and assessed the diagnostic accuracy of the biomarkers within this cohort. RESULTS Among 1,867 patients, 49 (2.6%) had clinically significant traumatic intracranial lesions. Elevated GFAP or UCH-L1 demonstrated 96% sensitivity (95% confidence interval [CI] 86% to 99%), 30% specificity (95% CI 28% to 32%), positive likelihood ratio (LR+) of 1.38 (95% CI 1.29 to 1.47), and negative likelihood ratio (LR-) of 0.13 (95% CI 0.03 to 0.53). Two patients had clinically significant CT lesions without elevated GFAP or UCH-L1. In the proposed implementation cohort of adults aged more than or equal to 18 years without coagulopathy elevated GFAP or UCH-L1 had a sensitivity of 100% (95% CI 86% to 100%), specificity of 33% (95% CI 31% to 36%), LR+ of 1.50 (95% CI 1.44 to 1.56), and LR- of 0.00 (95% CI 0.00 to 0.95). CONCLUSION Plasma GFAP and UCH-L1 in combination, measured ≤24 hours postinjury, demonstrated high sensitivity for clinically significant acute traumatic intracranial lesions. Further research is needed to determine whether deploying these biomarkers in the proposed implementation cohort decreases avoidable brain CT scans.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Annals of emergency medicine
Annals of emergency medicine 医学-急救医学
CiteScore
8.30
自引率
4.80%
发文量
819
审稿时长
20 days
期刊介绍: Annals of Emergency Medicine, the official journal of the American College of Emergency Physicians, is an international, peer-reviewed journal dedicated to improving the quality of care by publishing the highest quality science for emergency medicine and related medical specialties. Annals publishes original research, clinical reports, opinion, and educational information related to the practice, teaching, and research of emergency medicine. In addition to general emergency medicine topics, Annals regularly publishes articles on out-of-hospital emergency medical services, pediatric emergency medicine, injury and disease prevention, health policy and ethics, disaster management, toxicology, and related topics.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信