血小板计数对富血小板血浆治疗膝骨关节炎临床疗效的影响:一项系统回顾和荟萃分析

IF 2.2 3区 医学 Q2 ORTHOPEDICS
Mario Simental-Mendía, Carlos A Acosta-Olivo, Daniela Ortega-Mata, Héctor Javier Salazar-Domínguez, Gabriela Cecilia Carrizales-Hernández, Ximena Fernanda Sierra-Morales, Luis Alejandro Rodríguez-Corpus, Víctor M Peña-Martínez, Félix Vilchez-Cavazos
{"title":"血小板计数对富血小板血浆治疗膝骨关节炎临床疗效的影响:一项系统回顾和荟萃分析","authors":"Mario Simental-Mendía, Carlos A Acosta-Olivo, Daniela Ortega-Mata, Héctor Javier Salazar-Domínguez, Gabriela Cecilia Carrizales-Hernández, Ximena Fernanda Sierra-Morales, Luis Alejandro Rodríguez-Corpus, Víctor M Peña-Martínez, Félix Vilchez-Cavazos","doi":"10.1016/j.otsr.2025.104453","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Clinical effectiveness of platelet-rich plasma (PRP) for knee osteoarthritis (OA) continues to be debated, largely due to inconsistencies in PRP preparation methods and the variability in platelet concentrations. The optimal therapeutic range for platelet concentration remains unclear, leading to inconsistent treatment protocols and outcomes across studies. This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to evaluate whether platelet count in PRP influences clinical outcomes in patients with knee OA.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>A systematic search was conducted in MEDLINE, Scopus, EMBASE, Web of Science, and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials through February 2024. Randomized controlled trials evaluating PRP injections in knee OA were included. Studies reporting platelet counts in whole blood and PRP, as well as baseline and follow-up pain and functional scores, were analyzed. Standardized mean differences (SMD) were computed, and subgroup analyses were conducted based on platelet fold increase in PRP preparation.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Forty studies met the inclusion criteria. PRP improved both pain and function across all platelet concentration categories. However, lower platelet fold increases (0-2× and >2-4×) demonstrated greater clinical benefits (SMD 1.84, 95% CI [1.05, 2.04], p = 0.0004 and SMD 1.36, 95% CI [0.94, 1.79], p < 0.0001, respectively) compared to higher concentrations (>4-6× and >6-9×). Effect sizes for lower concentrations exceeded established minimal clinically important differences.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>Moderate platelet count increases (2-4×) in PRP appear optimal for knee OA treatment. Higher platelet concentrations may not provide additional benefit and could attenuate therapeutic effects. These findings highlight the importance of standardizing PRP formulations to optimize efficacy while minimizing variability.</p><p><strong>Level of evidence: </strong>I.</p>","PeriodicalId":54664,"journal":{"name":"Orthopaedics & Traumatology-Surgery & Research","volume":" ","pages":"104453"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Influence of platelet count on the clinical effectiveness of platelet-rich plasma in the treatment of knee osteoarthritis: A systematic review and meta-analysis.\",\"authors\":\"Mario Simental-Mendía, Carlos A Acosta-Olivo, Daniela Ortega-Mata, Héctor Javier Salazar-Domínguez, Gabriela Cecilia Carrizales-Hernández, Ximena Fernanda Sierra-Morales, Luis Alejandro Rodríguez-Corpus, Víctor M Peña-Martínez, Félix Vilchez-Cavazos\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.otsr.2025.104453\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Clinical effectiveness of platelet-rich plasma (PRP) for knee osteoarthritis (OA) continues to be debated, largely due to inconsistencies in PRP preparation methods and the variability in platelet concentrations. The optimal therapeutic range for platelet concentration remains unclear, leading to inconsistent treatment protocols and outcomes across studies. This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to evaluate whether platelet count in PRP influences clinical outcomes in patients with knee OA.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>A systematic search was conducted in MEDLINE, Scopus, EMBASE, Web of Science, and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials through February 2024. Randomized controlled trials evaluating PRP injections in knee OA were included. Studies reporting platelet counts in whole blood and PRP, as well as baseline and follow-up pain and functional scores, were analyzed. Standardized mean differences (SMD) were computed, and subgroup analyses were conducted based on platelet fold increase in PRP preparation.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Forty studies met the inclusion criteria. PRP improved both pain and function across all platelet concentration categories. However, lower platelet fold increases (0-2× and >2-4×) demonstrated greater clinical benefits (SMD 1.84, 95% CI [1.05, 2.04], p = 0.0004 and SMD 1.36, 95% CI [0.94, 1.79], p < 0.0001, respectively) compared to higher concentrations (>4-6× and >6-9×). Effect sizes for lower concentrations exceeded established minimal clinically important differences.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>Moderate platelet count increases (2-4×) in PRP appear optimal for knee OA treatment. Higher platelet concentrations may not provide additional benefit and could attenuate therapeutic effects. These findings highlight the importance of standardizing PRP formulations to optimize efficacy while minimizing variability.</p><p><strong>Level of evidence: </strong>I.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":54664,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Orthopaedics & Traumatology-Surgery & Research\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"104453\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-10-09\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Orthopaedics & Traumatology-Surgery & Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.otsr.2025.104453\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ORTHOPEDICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Orthopaedics & Traumatology-Surgery & Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.otsr.2025.104453","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:富血小板血浆(PRP)治疗膝关节骨性关节炎(OA)的临床疗效一直存在争议,主要是由于PRP制备方法的不一致性和血小板浓度的可变性。血小板浓度的最佳治疗范围尚不清楚,导致不同研究的治疗方案和结果不一致。本系统综述和荟萃分析旨在评估PRP中血小板计数是否影响膝关节OA患者的临床结局。材料和方法:系统检索MEDLINE、Scopus、EMBASE、Web of Science和Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials,检索时间截止到2024年2月。纳入评估PRP注射治疗膝关节OA的随机对照试验。研究报告了全血血小板计数和PRP,以及基线和随访疼痛和功能评分。计算标准化平均差异(SMD),并根据PRP制剂中血小板折叠数的增加进行亚组分析。结果:40项研究符合纳入标准。PRP改善了所有血小板浓度类别的疼痛和功能。然而,较低的血小板折叠增加(0-2倍和> -4倍)显示出更大的临床益处(SMD 1.84, 95% CI [1.05, 2.04], p = 0.0004; SMD 1.36, 95% CI [0.94, 1.79], p 4-6倍和>6-9倍)。较低浓度的效应值超过了已确定的最小临床重要差异。讨论:中度血小板计数增加(2-4倍)对于膝关节OA治疗是最佳的。较高的血小板浓度可能不会提供额外的益处,并可能减弱治疗效果。这些发现强调了标准化PRP配方的重要性,以优化疗效,同时尽量减少可变性。证据等级:1。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Influence of platelet count on the clinical effectiveness of platelet-rich plasma in the treatment of knee osteoarthritis: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Background: Clinical effectiveness of platelet-rich plasma (PRP) for knee osteoarthritis (OA) continues to be debated, largely due to inconsistencies in PRP preparation methods and the variability in platelet concentrations. The optimal therapeutic range for platelet concentration remains unclear, leading to inconsistent treatment protocols and outcomes across studies. This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to evaluate whether platelet count in PRP influences clinical outcomes in patients with knee OA.

Materials and methods: A systematic search was conducted in MEDLINE, Scopus, EMBASE, Web of Science, and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials through February 2024. Randomized controlled trials evaluating PRP injections in knee OA were included. Studies reporting platelet counts in whole blood and PRP, as well as baseline and follow-up pain and functional scores, were analyzed. Standardized mean differences (SMD) were computed, and subgroup analyses were conducted based on platelet fold increase in PRP preparation.

Results: Forty studies met the inclusion criteria. PRP improved both pain and function across all platelet concentration categories. However, lower platelet fold increases (0-2× and >2-4×) demonstrated greater clinical benefits (SMD 1.84, 95% CI [1.05, 2.04], p = 0.0004 and SMD 1.36, 95% CI [0.94, 1.79], p < 0.0001, respectively) compared to higher concentrations (>4-6× and >6-9×). Effect sizes for lower concentrations exceeded established minimal clinically important differences.

Discussion: Moderate platelet count increases (2-4×) in PRP appear optimal for knee OA treatment. Higher platelet concentrations may not provide additional benefit and could attenuate therapeutic effects. These findings highlight the importance of standardizing PRP formulations to optimize efficacy while minimizing variability.

Level of evidence: I.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.10
自引率
26.10%
发文量
329
审稿时长
12.5 weeks
期刊介绍: Orthopaedics & Traumatology: Surgery & Research (OTSR) publishes original scientific work in English related to all domains of orthopaedics. Original articles, Reviews, Technical notes and Concise follow-up of a former OTSR study are published in English in electronic form only and indexed in the main international databases.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信