SARS-CoV-2或流感病毒感染后成人急性后后遗症的比较风险:美国成年人的回顾性队列研究

IF 9.9 1区 医学 Q1 Medicine
Joseph A Lewnard, Debbie E Malden, Vennis Hong, Jessica Skela, Leora R Feldstein, Sharon Saydah, Iris Anne C Reyes, Rulin Hechter, Lina S Sy, Bradley K Ackerson, Sara Y Tartof
{"title":"SARS-CoV-2或流感病毒感染后成人急性后后遗症的比较风险:美国成年人的回顾性队列研究","authors":"Joseph A Lewnard, Debbie E Malden, Vennis Hong, Jessica Skela, Leora R Feldstein, Sharon Saydah, Iris Anne C Reyes, Rulin Hechter, Lina S Sy, Bradley K Ackerson, Sara Y Tartof","doi":"10.1371/journal.pmed.1004777","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Post-acute sequelae (PAS) of SARS-CoV-2 infection are well documented. However, it remains unclear whether such long-term health effects are unique to COVID-19, or also occur following other viral respiratory infections.</p><p><strong>Methods and findings: </strong>We undertook a retrospective cohort study of 74,738 COVID-19 cases and 18,790 influenza cases within the Kaiser Permanente Southern California healthcare system diagnosed between 1 September, 2022 and 31 December, 2023. Cases received care for index infections across a spectrum of clinical settings, spanning virtual (n = 35,835; 38.3%), ambulatory (n = 26,579; 28.4%), emergency department (n = 23,388; 25.0%) and inpatient (n = 7,726; 8.3%) facilities. We compared 180-day risk of PAS-related healthcare utilization among COVID-19 cases and influenza via adjusted hazard ratios (aHRs) weighted to account for cases' index infection type and follow-up retention. Adjustment models addressed patients' demographic characteristics, comorbidity profiles, prior healthcare utilization patterns, and index episode severity. Risk of PAS diagnoses in any clinical setting was only modestly higher among COVID-19 cases in comparison to influenza cases within 31-90 days after cases' initial illness (aHR = 1.04 [95% confidence interval: 0.99, 1.09]; risk difference = 0.6 [-0.1, 1.2] cases per 100 person-months). This difference was attenuated by 91-180 days (aHR = 1.01 [0.97, 1.06]; risk difference = 0.4 [-0.1, 0.9] cases per 100 person-months). However, COVID-19 cases faced higher risk of severe PAS conditions requiring hospitalization (aHR = 1.31 [1.07, 1.59] and 1.24 [1.03, 1.49] within 31-90 and 91-180 days, respectively). This excess risk of severe PAS was concentrated among COVID-19 cases hospitalized during acute-phase illness, and was attenuated among cases who received antiviral treatment, who had up-to-date vaccination status prior to infection, or who did not require inpatient admission for acute-phase illness. As a limitation, analyses included only PAS resulting in healthcare utilization; patient-reported symptoms and quality-of-life measures were not captured.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>In this large, real-world cohort, individuals with non-severe acute respiratory illness caused by SARS-CoV-2 experienced only modestly greater risk of PAS in comparison to those whose illness was caused by influenza. However, COVID-19 cases hospitalized for their initial illness experienced greater risk of severe PAS necessitating inpatient care, and this difference persisted through 180 days of follow-up. Our findings challenge assumptions about the uniqueness of post-acute COVID-19 morbidity and suggest the long-term burden of influenza may be underrecognized.</p>","PeriodicalId":49008,"journal":{"name":"PLoS Medicine","volume":"22 10","pages":"e1004777"},"PeriodicalIF":9.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparative risk of post-acute sequelae among adults following SARS-CoV-2 or influenza virus infection: A retrospective cohort study among United States adults.\",\"authors\":\"Joseph A Lewnard, Debbie E Malden, Vennis Hong, Jessica Skela, Leora R Feldstein, Sharon Saydah, Iris Anne C Reyes, Rulin Hechter, Lina S Sy, Bradley K Ackerson, Sara Y Tartof\",\"doi\":\"10.1371/journal.pmed.1004777\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Post-acute sequelae (PAS) of SARS-CoV-2 infection are well documented. However, it remains unclear whether such long-term health effects are unique to COVID-19, or also occur following other viral respiratory infections.</p><p><strong>Methods and findings: </strong>We undertook a retrospective cohort study of 74,738 COVID-19 cases and 18,790 influenza cases within the Kaiser Permanente Southern California healthcare system diagnosed between 1 September, 2022 and 31 December, 2023. Cases received care for index infections across a spectrum of clinical settings, spanning virtual (n = 35,835; 38.3%), ambulatory (n = 26,579; 28.4%), emergency department (n = 23,388; 25.0%) and inpatient (n = 7,726; 8.3%) facilities. We compared 180-day risk of PAS-related healthcare utilization among COVID-19 cases and influenza via adjusted hazard ratios (aHRs) weighted to account for cases' index infection type and follow-up retention. Adjustment models addressed patients' demographic characteristics, comorbidity profiles, prior healthcare utilization patterns, and index episode severity. Risk of PAS diagnoses in any clinical setting was only modestly higher among COVID-19 cases in comparison to influenza cases within 31-90 days after cases' initial illness (aHR = 1.04 [95% confidence interval: 0.99, 1.09]; risk difference = 0.6 [-0.1, 1.2] cases per 100 person-months). This difference was attenuated by 91-180 days (aHR = 1.01 [0.97, 1.06]; risk difference = 0.4 [-0.1, 0.9] cases per 100 person-months). However, COVID-19 cases faced higher risk of severe PAS conditions requiring hospitalization (aHR = 1.31 [1.07, 1.59] and 1.24 [1.03, 1.49] within 31-90 and 91-180 days, respectively). This excess risk of severe PAS was concentrated among COVID-19 cases hospitalized during acute-phase illness, and was attenuated among cases who received antiviral treatment, who had up-to-date vaccination status prior to infection, or who did not require inpatient admission for acute-phase illness. As a limitation, analyses included only PAS resulting in healthcare utilization; patient-reported symptoms and quality-of-life measures were not captured.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>In this large, real-world cohort, individuals with non-severe acute respiratory illness caused by SARS-CoV-2 experienced only modestly greater risk of PAS in comparison to those whose illness was caused by influenza. However, COVID-19 cases hospitalized for their initial illness experienced greater risk of severe PAS necessitating inpatient care, and this difference persisted through 180 days of follow-up. Our findings challenge assumptions about the uniqueness of post-acute COVID-19 morbidity and suggest the long-term burden of influenza may be underrecognized.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":49008,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"PLoS Medicine\",\"volume\":\"22 10\",\"pages\":\"e1004777\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":9.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-10-09\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"PLoS Medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pmed.1004777\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"Medicine\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"PLoS Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pmed.1004777","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:SARS-CoV-2感染的急性后后遗症(PAS)有充分的文献记载。然而,目前尚不清楚这种长期健康影响是COVID-19独有的,还是在其他病毒性呼吸道感染之后也会发生。方法和研究结果:我们对2022年9月1日至2023年12月31日期间在Kaiser Permanente南加州医疗保健系统诊断的74,738例COVID-19病例和18,790例流感病例进行了回顾性队列研究。病例在各种临床环境中接受了指数感染治疗,包括虚拟(n = 35,835; 38.3%)、门诊(n = 26,579; 28.4%)、急诊科(n = 23,388; 25.0%)和住院(n = 7,726; 8.3%)设施。我们通过校正风险比(aHRs)来比较COVID-19病例和流感病例180天内pas相关医疗保健利用的风险,以考虑病例的指数感染类型和随访保留。调整模型解决了患者的人口统计学特征、合并症概况、先前的医疗保健利用模式和指数发作严重程度。在任何临床环境中,COVID-19病例的PAS诊断风险仅略高于首次发病后31-90天内的流感病例(aHR = 1.04[95%置信区间:0.99,1.09];风险差异= 0.6[-0.1,1.2]例/ 100人月)。这种差异在91-180天后逐渐减弱(aHR = 1.01[0.97, 1.06];风险差= 0.4[-0.1,0.9]例/ 100人月)。然而,COVID-19病例发生严重PAS需要住院治疗的风险更高(31-90天和91-180天内的aHR分别为1.31[1.07,1.59]和1.24[1.03,1.49])。严重PAS的过度风险集中在急性期住院的COVID-19病例中,而在接受抗病毒治疗、感染前已接种最新疫苗或不需要因急性期疾病住院的病例中,严重PAS的过度风险有所降低。作为限制,分析仅包括PAS导致的医疗保健利用;患者报告的症状和生活质量指标未被捕获。结论:在这个庞大的现实世界队列中,与由流感引起的疾病相比,由SARS-CoV-2引起的非严重急性呼吸道疾病患者的PAS风险仅略高。然而,因初始疾病住院的COVID-19患者发生严重PAS的风险更大,需要住院治疗,这种差异在180天的随访中持续存在。我们的研究结果挑战了关于COVID-19急性后发病率独特性的假设,并表明流感的长期负担可能未得到充分认识。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Comparative risk of post-acute sequelae among adults following SARS-CoV-2 or influenza virus infection: A retrospective cohort study among United States adults.

Background: Post-acute sequelae (PAS) of SARS-CoV-2 infection are well documented. However, it remains unclear whether such long-term health effects are unique to COVID-19, or also occur following other viral respiratory infections.

Methods and findings: We undertook a retrospective cohort study of 74,738 COVID-19 cases and 18,790 influenza cases within the Kaiser Permanente Southern California healthcare system diagnosed between 1 September, 2022 and 31 December, 2023. Cases received care for index infections across a spectrum of clinical settings, spanning virtual (n = 35,835; 38.3%), ambulatory (n = 26,579; 28.4%), emergency department (n = 23,388; 25.0%) and inpatient (n = 7,726; 8.3%) facilities. We compared 180-day risk of PAS-related healthcare utilization among COVID-19 cases and influenza via adjusted hazard ratios (aHRs) weighted to account for cases' index infection type and follow-up retention. Adjustment models addressed patients' demographic characteristics, comorbidity profiles, prior healthcare utilization patterns, and index episode severity. Risk of PAS diagnoses in any clinical setting was only modestly higher among COVID-19 cases in comparison to influenza cases within 31-90 days after cases' initial illness (aHR = 1.04 [95% confidence interval: 0.99, 1.09]; risk difference = 0.6 [-0.1, 1.2] cases per 100 person-months). This difference was attenuated by 91-180 days (aHR = 1.01 [0.97, 1.06]; risk difference = 0.4 [-0.1, 0.9] cases per 100 person-months). However, COVID-19 cases faced higher risk of severe PAS conditions requiring hospitalization (aHR = 1.31 [1.07, 1.59] and 1.24 [1.03, 1.49] within 31-90 and 91-180 days, respectively). This excess risk of severe PAS was concentrated among COVID-19 cases hospitalized during acute-phase illness, and was attenuated among cases who received antiviral treatment, who had up-to-date vaccination status prior to infection, or who did not require inpatient admission for acute-phase illness. As a limitation, analyses included only PAS resulting in healthcare utilization; patient-reported symptoms and quality-of-life measures were not captured.

Conclusions: In this large, real-world cohort, individuals with non-severe acute respiratory illness caused by SARS-CoV-2 experienced only modestly greater risk of PAS in comparison to those whose illness was caused by influenza. However, COVID-19 cases hospitalized for their initial illness experienced greater risk of severe PAS necessitating inpatient care, and this difference persisted through 180 days of follow-up. Our findings challenge assumptions about the uniqueness of post-acute COVID-19 morbidity and suggest the long-term burden of influenza may be underrecognized.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
PLoS Medicine
PLoS Medicine MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL-
CiteScore
17.60
自引率
0.60%
发文量
227
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: PLOS Medicine is a prominent platform for discussing and researching global health challenges. The journal covers a wide range of topics, including biomedical, environmental, social, and political factors affecting health. It prioritizes articles that contribute to clinical practice, health policy, or a better understanding of pathophysiology, ultimately aiming to improve health outcomes across different settings. The journal is unwavering in its commitment to uphold the highest ethical standards in medical publishing. This includes actively managing and disclosing any conflicts of interest related to reporting, reviewing, and publishing. PLOS Medicine promotes transparency in the entire review and publication process. The journal also encourages data sharing and encourages the reuse of published work. Additionally, authors retain copyright for their work, and the publication is made accessible through Open Access with no restrictions on availability and dissemination. PLOS Medicine takes measures to avoid conflicts of interest associated with advertising drugs and medical devices or engaging in the exclusive sale of reprints.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信