浏览数字疗法和生物标志物的监管框架。

IF 2.3 3区 医学 Q2 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
Health Informatics Journal Pub Date : 2025-10-01 Epub Date: 2025-10-09 DOI:10.1177/14604582251387656
Cinja Koller, Marc Blanchard, Thomas Hügle
{"title":"浏览数字疗法和生物标志物的监管框架。","authors":"Cinja Koller, Marc Blanchard, Thomas Hügle","doi":"10.1177/14604582251387656","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Background:</b> Digital health technologies are often subject to regulatory requirements. Regulatory auditing processes are complex but necessary to guarantee quality, efficacy and safety of patients. Evolvements such as digitalized clinical trials, and digital biomarkers require a constant adaption of regulatory frameworks. <b>Objective:</b> This review aims to provide an overview on current regulations and standards for digital therapeutics and digital biomarkers, from technical development to market access. <b>Methods:</b> We conducted an unstructured literature review to identify the relevant guidelines, policies and standards for software based digital therapeutics and digital biomarkers. <b>Results:</b> The principal regulations governing software as a medical device are outlined in Chapter 21 of the Code of Federal Regulations by the US Food and Drug Administration, as well as the European Medical Device Regulation 2017/745. Regulatory pathways, such as the DiGA, are in the process of development, particularly for digital therapeutics, which fall within the purview of software as a medical device. Qualification of (digital) biomarkers is typically voluntary but can play a significant role in the development and approval of digital therapeutics. <b>Conclusions:</b> Fragmented, lacking and diverse regulations around digital biomarkers and digital therapeutics highlight the urge to harmonize and foster regulatory frameworks on an international level.</p>","PeriodicalId":55069,"journal":{"name":"Health Informatics Journal","volume":"31 4","pages":"14604582251387656"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Navigating through regulatory frameworks for digital therapeutics and biomarkers.\",\"authors\":\"Cinja Koller, Marc Blanchard, Thomas Hügle\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/14604582251387656\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p><b>Background:</b> Digital health technologies are often subject to regulatory requirements. Regulatory auditing processes are complex but necessary to guarantee quality, efficacy and safety of patients. Evolvements such as digitalized clinical trials, and digital biomarkers require a constant adaption of regulatory frameworks. <b>Objective:</b> This review aims to provide an overview on current regulations and standards for digital therapeutics and digital biomarkers, from technical development to market access. <b>Methods:</b> We conducted an unstructured literature review to identify the relevant guidelines, policies and standards for software based digital therapeutics and digital biomarkers. <b>Results:</b> The principal regulations governing software as a medical device are outlined in Chapter 21 of the Code of Federal Regulations by the US Food and Drug Administration, as well as the European Medical Device Regulation 2017/745. Regulatory pathways, such as the DiGA, are in the process of development, particularly for digital therapeutics, which fall within the purview of software as a medical device. Qualification of (digital) biomarkers is typically voluntary but can play a significant role in the development and approval of digital therapeutics. <b>Conclusions:</b> Fragmented, lacking and diverse regulations around digital biomarkers and digital therapeutics highlight the urge to harmonize and foster regulatory frameworks on an international level.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":55069,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Health Informatics Journal\",\"volume\":\"31 4\",\"pages\":\"14604582251387656\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-10-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Health Informatics Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/14604582251387656\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/10/9 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Health Informatics Journal","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/14604582251387656","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/10/9 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:数字卫生技术经常受到监管要求的制约。监管审计过程很复杂,但对于保证患者的质量、疗效和安全是必要的。数字化临床试验和数字生物标志物等发展需要不断适应监管框架。目的:综述了数字疗法和数字生物标志物从技术开发到市场准入的现行法规和标准。方法:我们进行了一项非结构化的文献综述,以确定基于软件的数字治疗和数字生物标志物的相关指南、政策和标准。结果:美国食品和药物管理局在联邦法规第21章以及欧洲医疗器械法规2017/745中概述了将软件作为医疗器械的主要法规。监管途径,如DiGA,正处于发展过程中,特别是数字疗法,它属于软件作为医疗设备的范围。(数字)生物标志物的鉴定通常是自愿的,但在数字治疗的开发和批准中可以发挥重要作用。结论:围绕数字生物标志物和数字疗法的支离破碎、缺乏和多样化的监管,突显了在国际层面协调和促进监管框架的紧迫性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Navigating through regulatory frameworks for digital therapeutics and biomarkers.

Background: Digital health technologies are often subject to regulatory requirements. Regulatory auditing processes are complex but necessary to guarantee quality, efficacy and safety of patients. Evolvements such as digitalized clinical trials, and digital biomarkers require a constant adaption of regulatory frameworks. Objective: This review aims to provide an overview on current regulations and standards for digital therapeutics and digital biomarkers, from technical development to market access. Methods: We conducted an unstructured literature review to identify the relevant guidelines, policies and standards for software based digital therapeutics and digital biomarkers. Results: The principal regulations governing software as a medical device are outlined in Chapter 21 of the Code of Federal Regulations by the US Food and Drug Administration, as well as the European Medical Device Regulation 2017/745. Regulatory pathways, such as the DiGA, are in the process of development, particularly for digital therapeutics, which fall within the purview of software as a medical device. Qualification of (digital) biomarkers is typically voluntary but can play a significant role in the development and approval of digital therapeutics. Conclusions: Fragmented, lacking and diverse regulations around digital biomarkers and digital therapeutics highlight the urge to harmonize and foster regulatory frameworks on an international level.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Health Informatics Journal
Health Informatics Journal HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES-MEDICAL INFORMATICS
CiteScore
7.80
自引率
6.70%
发文量
80
审稿时长
6 months
期刊介绍: Health Informatics Journal is an international peer-reviewed journal. All papers submitted to Health Informatics Journal are subject to peer review by members of a carefully appointed editorial board. The journal operates a conventional single-blind reviewing policy in which the reviewer’s name is always concealed from the submitting author.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信