Madison Ashworth, David Johnson, Robin A Thompson, Grace L Clancy, Jennah Baier, Jean Spielman
{"title":"美国农村康复之家康复支持干预的障碍和促进因素:实施SMART生活技能计划。","authors":"Madison Ashworth, David Johnson, Robin A Thompson, Grace L Clancy, Jennah Baier, Jean Spielman","doi":"10.1016/j.evalprogplan.2025.102717","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>As substance use disorder continues to impact millions of Americans, various recovery support treatment and service modalities are being developed, evaluated, and refined for effectiveness. Recovery housing provides substance-free living environments for individuals in recovery and can offer a variety of services and structured programs for residents. One such program that has the potential to enhance resident outcomes is the Self-Management and Recovery Training (SMART) Successful Life Skills program (SLS), a 12-session curriculum that uses a mix of behavioral tools and aspects of the social model of recovery employed by standard mutual aid groups. In this paper, we discuss the implementation barriers and facilitators of a 3-year initiative that aimed to implement SLS in 100 rural recovery houses across the U.S. During this initiative, the study team faced significant barriers in recruitment and program implementation. Recruitment barriers included the unknown landscape of recovery housing, stigma and mistrust in research, inconsistent staffing models, and differing treatment philosophies. Further, access to technology, technical literacy, time constraints for both residents and recovery house staff, and staff turnover created a difficult environment to successfully implement and evaluate the impact of the SLS program. Numerous solutions were employed to overcome implementation and recruitment barriers in recovery housing such as multiple contact methods, collaboration, stakeholder engagement, financial/material support, evaluation flexibility and adaptability, and transparency.</p>","PeriodicalId":48046,"journal":{"name":"Evaluation and Program Planning","volume":"114 ","pages":"102717"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Barriers and facilitators to recovery support interventions in US Rural Recovery Houses: Implementing the SMART life skills program.\",\"authors\":\"Madison Ashworth, David Johnson, Robin A Thompson, Grace L Clancy, Jennah Baier, Jean Spielman\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.evalprogplan.2025.102717\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>As substance use disorder continues to impact millions of Americans, various recovery support treatment and service modalities are being developed, evaluated, and refined for effectiveness. Recovery housing provides substance-free living environments for individuals in recovery and can offer a variety of services and structured programs for residents. One such program that has the potential to enhance resident outcomes is the Self-Management and Recovery Training (SMART) Successful Life Skills program (SLS), a 12-session curriculum that uses a mix of behavioral tools and aspects of the social model of recovery employed by standard mutual aid groups. In this paper, we discuss the implementation barriers and facilitators of a 3-year initiative that aimed to implement SLS in 100 rural recovery houses across the U.S. During this initiative, the study team faced significant barriers in recruitment and program implementation. Recruitment barriers included the unknown landscape of recovery housing, stigma and mistrust in research, inconsistent staffing models, and differing treatment philosophies. Further, access to technology, technical literacy, time constraints for both residents and recovery house staff, and staff turnover created a difficult environment to successfully implement and evaluate the impact of the SLS program. Numerous solutions were employed to overcome implementation and recruitment barriers in recovery housing such as multiple contact methods, collaboration, stakeholder engagement, financial/material support, evaluation flexibility and adaptability, and transparency.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48046,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Evaluation and Program Planning\",\"volume\":\"114 \",\"pages\":\"102717\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-10-03\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Evaluation and Program Planning\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"90\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.evalprogplan.2025.102717\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"社会学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"SOCIAL SCIENCES, INTERDISCIPLINARY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Evaluation and Program Planning","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.evalprogplan.2025.102717","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"SOCIAL SCIENCES, INTERDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Barriers and facilitators to recovery support interventions in US Rural Recovery Houses: Implementing the SMART life skills program.
As substance use disorder continues to impact millions of Americans, various recovery support treatment and service modalities are being developed, evaluated, and refined for effectiveness. Recovery housing provides substance-free living environments for individuals in recovery and can offer a variety of services and structured programs for residents. One such program that has the potential to enhance resident outcomes is the Self-Management and Recovery Training (SMART) Successful Life Skills program (SLS), a 12-session curriculum that uses a mix of behavioral tools and aspects of the social model of recovery employed by standard mutual aid groups. In this paper, we discuss the implementation barriers and facilitators of a 3-year initiative that aimed to implement SLS in 100 rural recovery houses across the U.S. During this initiative, the study team faced significant barriers in recruitment and program implementation. Recruitment barriers included the unknown landscape of recovery housing, stigma and mistrust in research, inconsistent staffing models, and differing treatment philosophies. Further, access to technology, technical literacy, time constraints for both residents and recovery house staff, and staff turnover created a difficult environment to successfully implement and evaluate the impact of the SLS program. Numerous solutions were employed to overcome implementation and recruitment barriers in recovery housing such as multiple contact methods, collaboration, stakeholder engagement, financial/material support, evaluation flexibility and adaptability, and transparency.
期刊介绍:
Evaluation and Program Planning is based on the principle that the techniques and methods of evaluation and planning transcend the boundaries of specific fields and that relevant contributions to these areas come from people representing many different positions, intellectual traditions, and interests. In order to further the development of evaluation and planning, we publish articles from the private and public sectors in a wide range of areas: organizational development and behavior, training, planning, human resource development, health and mental, social services, mental retardation, corrections, substance abuse, and education.