美国农村康复之家康复支持干预的障碍和促进因素:实施SMART生活技能计划。

IF 2 4区 社会学 Q2 SOCIAL SCIENCES, INTERDISCIPLINARY
Madison Ashworth, David Johnson, Robin A Thompson, Grace L Clancy, Jennah Baier, Jean Spielman
{"title":"美国农村康复之家康复支持干预的障碍和促进因素:实施SMART生活技能计划。","authors":"Madison Ashworth, David Johnson, Robin A Thompson, Grace L Clancy, Jennah Baier, Jean Spielman","doi":"10.1016/j.evalprogplan.2025.102717","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>As substance use disorder continues to impact millions of Americans, various recovery support treatment and service modalities are being developed, evaluated, and refined for effectiveness. Recovery housing provides substance-free living environments for individuals in recovery and can offer a variety of services and structured programs for residents. One such program that has the potential to enhance resident outcomes is the Self-Management and Recovery Training (SMART) Successful Life Skills program (SLS), a 12-session curriculum that uses a mix of behavioral tools and aspects of the social model of recovery employed by standard mutual aid groups. In this paper, we discuss the implementation barriers and facilitators of a 3-year initiative that aimed to implement SLS in 100 rural recovery houses across the U.S. During this initiative, the study team faced significant barriers in recruitment and program implementation. Recruitment barriers included the unknown landscape of recovery housing, stigma and mistrust in research, inconsistent staffing models, and differing treatment philosophies. Further, access to technology, technical literacy, time constraints for both residents and recovery house staff, and staff turnover created a difficult environment to successfully implement and evaluate the impact of the SLS program. Numerous solutions were employed to overcome implementation and recruitment barriers in recovery housing such as multiple contact methods, collaboration, stakeholder engagement, financial/material support, evaluation flexibility and adaptability, and transparency.</p>","PeriodicalId":48046,"journal":{"name":"Evaluation and Program Planning","volume":"114 ","pages":"102717"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Barriers and facilitators to recovery support interventions in US Rural Recovery Houses: Implementing the SMART life skills program.\",\"authors\":\"Madison Ashworth, David Johnson, Robin A Thompson, Grace L Clancy, Jennah Baier, Jean Spielman\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.evalprogplan.2025.102717\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>As substance use disorder continues to impact millions of Americans, various recovery support treatment and service modalities are being developed, evaluated, and refined for effectiveness. Recovery housing provides substance-free living environments for individuals in recovery and can offer a variety of services and structured programs for residents. One such program that has the potential to enhance resident outcomes is the Self-Management and Recovery Training (SMART) Successful Life Skills program (SLS), a 12-session curriculum that uses a mix of behavioral tools and aspects of the social model of recovery employed by standard mutual aid groups. In this paper, we discuss the implementation barriers and facilitators of a 3-year initiative that aimed to implement SLS in 100 rural recovery houses across the U.S. During this initiative, the study team faced significant barriers in recruitment and program implementation. Recruitment barriers included the unknown landscape of recovery housing, stigma and mistrust in research, inconsistent staffing models, and differing treatment philosophies. Further, access to technology, technical literacy, time constraints for both residents and recovery house staff, and staff turnover created a difficult environment to successfully implement and evaluate the impact of the SLS program. Numerous solutions were employed to overcome implementation and recruitment barriers in recovery housing such as multiple contact methods, collaboration, stakeholder engagement, financial/material support, evaluation flexibility and adaptability, and transparency.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48046,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Evaluation and Program Planning\",\"volume\":\"114 \",\"pages\":\"102717\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-10-03\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Evaluation and Program Planning\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"90\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.evalprogplan.2025.102717\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"社会学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"SOCIAL SCIENCES, INTERDISCIPLINARY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Evaluation and Program Planning","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.evalprogplan.2025.102717","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"SOCIAL SCIENCES, INTERDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

由于物质使用障碍继续影响着数百万美国人,各种康复支持治疗和服务模式正在开发、评估和改进其有效性。康复住房为康复中的个人提供无物质的生活环境,可以为居民提供各种服务和结构化的项目。自我管理和康复训练(SMART)成功生活技能项目(SLS)就是这样一个有可能提高住院医生治疗效果的项目,这是一个12节课的课程,混合使用行为工具和标准互助会采用的康复社会模式的各个方面。在本文中,我们讨论了一项为期三年的计划的实施障碍和促进因素,该计划旨在在美国100个农村恢复屋实施SLS。在该计划中,研究小组在招聘和计划实施方面面临重大障碍。招聘障碍包括康复住房的未知景观,研究中的耻辱和不信任,不一致的人员配备模式以及不同的治疗理念。此外,技术的获取、技术素养、居民和康复中心工作人员的时间限制以及工作人员的更替都为成功实施和评估SLS计划的影响创造了一个困难的环境。为了克服恢复性住房的实施和招聘障碍,采用了多种解决方案,如多种联系方式、合作、利益相关者参与、财务/物质支持、评估灵活性和适应性以及透明度。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Barriers and facilitators to recovery support interventions in US Rural Recovery Houses: Implementing the SMART life skills program.

As substance use disorder continues to impact millions of Americans, various recovery support treatment and service modalities are being developed, evaluated, and refined for effectiveness. Recovery housing provides substance-free living environments for individuals in recovery and can offer a variety of services and structured programs for residents. One such program that has the potential to enhance resident outcomes is the Self-Management and Recovery Training (SMART) Successful Life Skills program (SLS), a 12-session curriculum that uses a mix of behavioral tools and aspects of the social model of recovery employed by standard mutual aid groups. In this paper, we discuss the implementation barriers and facilitators of a 3-year initiative that aimed to implement SLS in 100 rural recovery houses across the U.S. During this initiative, the study team faced significant barriers in recruitment and program implementation. Recruitment barriers included the unknown landscape of recovery housing, stigma and mistrust in research, inconsistent staffing models, and differing treatment philosophies. Further, access to technology, technical literacy, time constraints for both residents and recovery house staff, and staff turnover created a difficult environment to successfully implement and evaluate the impact of the SLS program. Numerous solutions were employed to overcome implementation and recruitment barriers in recovery housing such as multiple contact methods, collaboration, stakeholder engagement, financial/material support, evaluation flexibility and adaptability, and transparency.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Evaluation and Program Planning
Evaluation and Program Planning SOCIAL SCIENCES, INTERDISCIPLINARY-
CiteScore
3.10
自引率
6.20%
发文量
112
期刊介绍: Evaluation and Program Planning is based on the principle that the techniques and methods of evaluation and planning transcend the boundaries of specific fields and that relevant contributions to these areas come from people representing many different positions, intellectual traditions, and interests. In order to further the development of evaluation and planning, we publish articles from the private and public sectors in a wide range of areas: organizational development and behavior, training, planning, human resource development, health and mental, social services, mental retardation, corrections, substance abuse, and education.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信