小脑卒中的幕下压力监测:可行性和预后效用。

IF 3.6 3区 医学 Q2 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Sae-Yeon Won, Eva Herrmann, Anne Neumeister, Jonas Hagemeier, Daniel Dubinski, Alhalabi T Obada, Bedjan Behmanesh, Joshua D Bernstock, Thomas M Freiman, Olaf Lademann, Artem Rafaelian, Jens-Christian Schewe, Alexander Storch, Andreas W Unterberg, Johannes Walter, Matthias Wittstock, Nazife Dinc, Florian Gessler
{"title":"小脑卒中的幕下压力监测:可行性和预后效用。","authors":"Sae-Yeon Won, Eva Herrmann, Anne Neumeister, Jonas Hagemeier, Daniel Dubinski, Alhalabi T Obada, Bedjan Behmanesh, Joshua D Bernstock, Thomas M Freiman, Olaf Lademann, Artem Rafaelian, Jens-Christian Schewe, Alexander Storch, Andreas W Unterberg, Johannes Walter, Matthias Wittstock, Nazife Dinc, Florian Gessler","doi":"10.1007/s12028-025-02391-1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Although supratentorial intracranial pressure (ICP) monitoring represents the current standard in neurocritical care, its validity for assessing infratentorial pathologies remains uncertain. This multicenter, prospective study aimd to (1) evaluate the feasibility and clinical utility of infratentorial ICP monitoring in acute posterior fossa pathologies and (2) develop a prognostic model for functional outcomes based on infratentorial pressure dynamics.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a prospective cohort study across three tertiary neurovascular centers in Germany (2021-2024), enrolling 35 consecutive patients with cerebellar stroke requiring surgical decompression and external ventricular drainage. All participants underwent simultaneous supratentorial and infratentorial ICP monitoring for seven posteroperative days. Functional outcomes were assessed using the modified Rankin scale at discharge and at six-month follow-up (FU). The primary end point was the comparison of ICP gradients between compartments; secondary analyses evaluated the association between infratentorial ICP and functional outcomes.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The mean infratentorial ICP was significantly higher than the supratentorial ICP (11.9 mm Hg [95% confidence interval (CI) 10.5-13.3] vs. 8.8 mm Hg [95% CI 7.4-10.1], P < 0.001). Patients with unfavorable outcomes had significantly higher infratentorial ICP values compared with those with favorable outcomes at FU (13.1 mm Hg [95% CI 11.1-15.1] vs. 9.5 mm Hg [95% CI 6.8-12.1], P = 0.042). Multivariate logistic regression analysis identified a novel scoring system-calculated as patient age (years) plus four times the mean infratentorial ICP (mm Hg)-as a significant predictor of unfavorable outcomes at both discharge and FU (P < 0.001 and P = 0.001, respectively), with area under the curve (AUC) values of 0.88 and 0.89. A cutoff value of 115 was established to predicting unfavorable outcomes at FU.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This study establishes that infratentorial ICP monitoring (1) reveals clinically significant pressure gradients undetctable by supratentorial measurement alone, (2) provides superior prognostic information compared with conventional monitoring, and (3) can be safely implemented with 94% technical success rate. These findings advocate for the integration of infratentorial ICP assessment into the neurocritical care paradigm for posterior fossa pathologies.</p>","PeriodicalId":19118,"journal":{"name":"Neurocritical Care","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Infratentorial Pressure Monitoring in Cerebellar Stroke: Feasibility and Prognostic Utility.\",\"authors\":\"Sae-Yeon Won, Eva Herrmann, Anne Neumeister, Jonas Hagemeier, Daniel Dubinski, Alhalabi T Obada, Bedjan Behmanesh, Joshua D Bernstock, Thomas M Freiman, Olaf Lademann, Artem Rafaelian, Jens-Christian Schewe, Alexander Storch, Andreas W Unterberg, Johannes Walter, Matthias Wittstock, Nazife Dinc, Florian Gessler\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s12028-025-02391-1\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Although supratentorial intracranial pressure (ICP) monitoring represents the current standard in neurocritical care, its validity for assessing infratentorial pathologies remains uncertain. This multicenter, prospective study aimd to (1) evaluate the feasibility and clinical utility of infratentorial ICP monitoring in acute posterior fossa pathologies and (2) develop a prognostic model for functional outcomes based on infratentorial pressure dynamics.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a prospective cohort study across three tertiary neurovascular centers in Germany (2021-2024), enrolling 35 consecutive patients with cerebellar stroke requiring surgical decompression and external ventricular drainage. All participants underwent simultaneous supratentorial and infratentorial ICP monitoring for seven posteroperative days. Functional outcomes were assessed using the modified Rankin scale at discharge and at six-month follow-up (FU). The primary end point was the comparison of ICP gradients between compartments; secondary analyses evaluated the association between infratentorial ICP and functional outcomes.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The mean infratentorial ICP was significantly higher than the supratentorial ICP (11.9 mm Hg [95% confidence interval (CI) 10.5-13.3] vs. 8.8 mm Hg [95% CI 7.4-10.1], P < 0.001). Patients with unfavorable outcomes had significantly higher infratentorial ICP values compared with those with favorable outcomes at FU (13.1 mm Hg [95% CI 11.1-15.1] vs. 9.5 mm Hg [95% CI 6.8-12.1], P = 0.042). Multivariate logistic regression analysis identified a novel scoring system-calculated as patient age (years) plus four times the mean infratentorial ICP (mm Hg)-as a significant predictor of unfavorable outcomes at both discharge and FU (P < 0.001 and P = 0.001, respectively), with area under the curve (AUC) values of 0.88 and 0.89. A cutoff value of 115 was established to predicting unfavorable outcomes at FU.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This study establishes that infratentorial ICP monitoring (1) reveals clinically significant pressure gradients undetctable by supratentorial measurement alone, (2) provides superior prognostic information compared with conventional monitoring, and (3) can be safely implemented with 94% technical success rate. These findings advocate for the integration of infratentorial ICP assessment into the neurocritical care paradigm for posterior fossa pathologies.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":19118,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Neurocritical Care\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-10-09\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Neurocritical Care\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s12028-025-02391-1\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Neurocritical Care","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s12028-025-02391-1","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:虽然幕上颅内压(ICP)监测是目前神经危重症护理的标准,但其评估幕下病变的有效性仍不确定。本多中心前瞻性研究旨在(1)评估幕下颅内压监测在急性后窝病变中的可行性和临床应用;(2)建立基于幕下颅内压动态的功能预后模型。方法:我们在德国的三个三级神经血管中心(2021-2024)进行了一项前瞻性队列研究,招募了35名需要手术减压和外脑室引流的连续小脑卒中患者。所有参与者术后7天同时进行幕上和幕下颅内压监测。出院时和6个月随访(FU)时使用改良Rankin量表评估功能结局。主要终点是室间ICP梯度的比较;二次分析评估了幕下ICP与功能预后之间的关系。结果:平均幕下ICP明显高于幕上ICP (11.9 mm Hg[95%可信区间(CI) 10.5-13.3] vs. 8.8 mm Hg[95%可信区间(CI) 7.4-10.1], P本研究确立了幕下ICP监测(1)显示单纯幕上测量无法检测到的具有临床意义的压力梯度,(2)与常规监测相比,提供了更好的预后信息,(3)可以安全地实施,技术成功率为94%。这些发现提倡将幕下颅内压评估纳入后窝病理的神经危重症护理范式。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Infratentorial Pressure Monitoring in Cerebellar Stroke: Feasibility and Prognostic Utility.

Background: Although supratentorial intracranial pressure (ICP) monitoring represents the current standard in neurocritical care, its validity for assessing infratentorial pathologies remains uncertain. This multicenter, prospective study aimd to (1) evaluate the feasibility and clinical utility of infratentorial ICP monitoring in acute posterior fossa pathologies and (2) develop a prognostic model for functional outcomes based on infratentorial pressure dynamics.

Methods: We conducted a prospective cohort study across three tertiary neurovascular centers in Germany (2021-2024), enrolling 35 consecutive patients with cerebellar stroke requiring surgical decompression and external ventricular drainage. All participants underwent simultaneous supratentorial and infratentorial ICP monitoring for seven posteroperative days. Functional outcomes were assessed using the modified Rankin scale at discharge and at six-month follow-up (FU). The primary end point was the comparison of ICP gradients between compartments; secondary analyses evaluated the association between infratentorial ICP and functional outcomes.

Results: The mean infratentorial ICP was significantly higher than the supratentorial ICP (11.9 mm Hg [95% confidence interval (CI) 10.5-13.3] vs. 8.8 mm Hg [95% CI 7.4-10.1], P < 0.001). Patients with unfavorable outcomes had significantly higher infratentorial ICP values compared with those with favorable outcomes at FU (13.1 mm Hg [95% CI 11.1-15.1] vs. 9.5 mm Hg [95% CI 6.8-12.1], P = 0.042). Multivariate logistic regression analysis identified a novel scoring system-calculated as patient age (years) plus four times the mean infratentorial ICP (mm Hg)-as a significant predictor of unfavorable outcomes at both discharge and FU (P < 0.001 and P = 0.001, respectively), with area under the curve (AUC) values of 0.88 and 0.89. A cutoff value of 115 was established to predicting unfavorable outcomes at FU.

Conclusions: This study establishes that infratentorial ICP monitoring (1) reveals clinically significant pressure gradients undetctable by supratentorial measurement alone, (2) provides superior prognostic information compared with conventional monitoring, and (3) can be safely implemented with 94% technical success rate. These findings advocate for the integration of infratentorial ICP assessment into the neurocritical care paradigm for posterior fossa pathologies.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Neurocritical Care
Neurocritical Care 医学-临床神经学
CiteScore
7.40
自引率
8.60%
发文量
221
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Neurocritical Care is a peer reviewed scientific publication whose major goal is to disseminate new knowledge on all aspects of acute neurological care. It is directed towards neurosurgeons, neuro-intensivists, neurologists, anesthesiologists, emergency physicians, and critical care nurses treating patients with urgent neurologic disorders. These are conditions that may potentially evolve rapidly and could need immediate medical or surgical intervention. Neurocritical Care provides a comprehensive overview of current developments in intensive care neurology, neurosurgery and neuroanesthesia and includes information about new therapeutic avenues and technological innovations. Neurocritical Care is the official journal of the Neurocritical Care Society.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信