Rohan Sharma, Marcio C Moschovas, Seetharam K R Bhatt, Shady Saikali, Yu Ozawa, Marco Sandri, Yavuz Onol, Ahmed Gamal, Travis Rogers, Vipul R Patel
{"title":"非常高的破译分数在前列腺癌的预后意义:朝着一个精确的基因组风险分类。","authors":"Rohan Sharma, Marcio C Moschovas, Seetharam K R Bhatt, Shady Saikali, Yu Ozawa, Marco Sandri, Yavuz Onol, Ahmed Gamal, Travis Rogers, Vipul R Patel","doi":"10.1016/j.euo.2025.09.009","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and objective: </strong>The 22-gene Decipher genomic classifier (DGC) is validated for risk stratification in prostate cancer. Our aim was to evaluate the association of a novel very high-risk (VHR) group (DGC score >0.85) with recurrence outcomes after radical prostatectomy (RP) and to assess the impact of integrating DGC scores with Cancer of the Prostate Risk Assessment Postsurgical (CAPRA-S) scores and European Association of Urology (EAU) biochemical recurrence (BCR) risk groups on prognostication.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We retrospectively analyzed data for 1673 patients who underwent RP (2015 and 2022). DGC scores were categorized as low risk (<0.45), intermediate (0.45-0.60), high (0.61-0.85), or VHR (>0.85). BCR was analyzed using the Kaplan-Meier method and log-rank tests. DGC scores were combined with CAPRA-S scores, and separately with EAU BCR risk groups to assess associations with BCR. Associations between DGC scores and adverse pathological features were also evaluated.</p><p><strong>Key findings and limitations: </strong>Among the 1673 men who underwent RP, the incidence of adverse pathological features (International Society of Urological Pathology grade group ≥4, pT3b/T4, or pN1) increased with increasing DGC score (p < 0.001). DGC VHR was an independent predictor of BCR (hazard ratio 1.70, 95% confidence interval 1.26-2.52; p = 0.008). DGC scores further refined risk stratification within the EAU BCR and CAPRA-S risk groups. Decision curve analysis showed that combining DGC scores with CAPRA-S scores or EAU risk groups yielded a greater net benefit in comparison to using each model alone across the risk threshold range from 0.18 to 0.50. The retrospective, single-institution nature of the study highlights the need for external validation.</p><p><strong>Conclusion and clinical implications: </strong>A DGC score >0.85 delineates a distinct subgroup with markedly adverse oncologic outcomes. Recognition of this VHR category refines postoperative assessment and supports personalized adjuvant or salvage therapy.</p>","PeriodicalId":12256,"journal":{"name":"European urology oncology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":9.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Prognostic Implications of Very High Decipher Scores in Prostate Cancer: Towards a Refined Genomic Risk Classification.\",\"authors\":\"Rohan Sharma, Marcio C Moschovas, Seetharam K R Bhatt, Shady Saikali, Yu Ozawa, Marco Sandri, Yavuz Onol, Ahmed Gamal, Travis Rogers, Vipul R Patel\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.euo.2025.09.009\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background and objective: </strong>The 22-gene Decipher genomic classifier (DGC) is validated for risk stratification in prostate cancer. Our aim was to evaluate the association of a novel very high-risk (VHR) group (DGC score >0.85) with recurrence outcomes after radical prostatectomy (RP) and to assess the impact of integrating DGC scores with Cancer of the Prostate Risk Assessment Postsurgical (CAPRA-S) scores and European Association of Urology (EAU) biochemical recurrence (BCR) risk groups on prognostication.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We retrospectively analyzed data for 1673 patients who underwent RP (2015 and 2022). DGC scores were categorized as low risk (<0.45), intermediate (0.45-0.60), high (0.61-0.85), or VHR (>0.85). BCR was analyzed using the Kaplan-Meier method and log-rank tests. DGC scores were combined with CAPRA-S scores, and separately with EAU BCR risk groups to assess associations with BCR. Associations between DGC scores and adverse pathological features were also evaluated.</p><p><strong>Key findings and limitations: </strong>Among the 1673 men who underwent RP, the incidence of adverse pathological features (International Society of Urological Pathology grade group ≥4, pT3b/T4, or pN1) increased with increasing DGC score (p < 0.001). DGC VHR was an independent predictor of BCR (hazard ratio 1.70, 95% confidence interval 1.26-2.52; p = 0.008). DGC scores further refined risk stratification within the EAU BCR and CAPRA-S risk groups. Decision curve analysis showed that combining DGC scores with CAPRA-S scores or EAU risk groups yielded a greater net benefit in comparison to using each model alone across the risk threshold range from 0.18 to 0.50. The retrospective, single-institution nature of the study highlights the need for external validation.</p><p><strong>Conclusion and clinical implications: </strong>A DGC score >0.85 delineates a distinct subgroup with markedly adverse oncologic outcomes. Recognition of this VHR category refines postoperative assessment and supports personalized adjuvant or salvage therapy.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":12256,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"European urology oncology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":9.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-10-08\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"European urology oncology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.euo.2025.09.009\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ONCOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European urology oncology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.euo.2025.09.009","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Prognostic Implications of Very High Decipher Scores in Prostate Cancer: Towards a Refined Genomic Risk Classification.
Background and objective: The 22-gene Decipher genomic classifier (DGC) is validated for risk stratification in prostate cancer. Our aim was to evaluate the association of a novel very high-risk (VHR) group (DGC score >0.85) with recurrence outcomes after radical prostatectomy (RP) and to assess the impact of integrating DGC scores with Cancer of the Prostate Risk Assessment Postsurgical (CAPRA-S) scores and European Association of Urology (EAU) biochemical recurrence (BCR) risk groups on prognostication.
Methods: We retrospectively analyzed data for 1673 patients who underwent RP (2015 and 2022). DGC scores were categorized as low risk (<0.45), intermediate (0.45-0.60), high (0.61-0.85), or VHR (>0.85). BCR was analyzed using the Kaplan-Meier method and log-rank tests. DGC scores were combined with CAPRA-S scores, and separately with EAU BCR risk groups to assess associations with BCR. Associations between DGC scores and adverse pathological features were also evaluated.
Key findings and limitations: Among the 1673 men who underwent RP, the incidence of adverse pathological features (International Society of Urological Pathology grade group ≥4, pT3b/T4, or pN1) increased with increasing DGC score (p < 0.001). DGC VHR was an independent predictor of BCR (hazard ratio 1.70, 95% confidence interval 1.26-2.52; p = 0.008). DGC scores further refined risk stratification within the EAU BCR and CAPRA-S risk groups. Decision curve analysis showed that combining DGC scores with CAPRA-S scores or EAU risk groups yielded a greater net benefit in comparison to using each model alone across the risk threshold range from 0.18 to 0.50. The retrospective, single-institution nature of the study highlights the need for external validation.
Conclusion and clinical implications: A DGC score >0.85 delineates a distinct subgroup with markedly adverse oncologic outcomes. Recognition of this VHR category refines postoperative assessment and supports personalized adjuvant or salvage therapy.
期刊介绍:
Journal Name: European Urology Oncology
Affiliation: Official Journal of the European Association of Urology
Focus:
First official publication of the EAU fully devoted to the study of genitourinary malignancies
Aims to deliver high-quality research
Content:
Includes original articles, opinion piece editorials, and invited reviews
Covers clinical, basic, and translational research
Publication Frequency: Six times a year in electronic format