Javier Molina-Cerrillo, James Catto, Ashish M Kamat, Andrea Necchi, Morgan Roupre T, Enrique Grande
{"title":"适于顺铂治疗的肌肉浸润性膀胱癌的新辅助化疗","authors":"Javier Molina-Cerrillo, James Catto, Ashish M Kamat, Andrea Necchi, Morgan Roupre T, Enrique Grande","doi":"10.1016/j.euo.2025.09.006","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and objective: </strong>Management of muscle-invasive bladder cancer (MIBC) is evolving rapidly due to advances in systemic therapies and molecular understanding. Neoadjuvant cisplatin-based chemotherapy remains the cornerstone of cisplatin-eligible patients, supported by strong evidence of improved overall survival and pathological complete response. Phase 3 trials such as VESPER and NIAGARA have refined the standard of care by demonstrating the benefits of dose-dense methotrexate, vinblastine, doxorubicin, and cisplatin combination and chemoimmunotherapy, respectively. This review aims to summarize current and emerging neoadjuvant strategies and outline future directions toward a more individualized approach.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We reviewed the recent literature and pivotal clinical trial data evaluating neoadjuvant therapies for MIBC, with a focus on systemic chemotherapy, immunotherapy, combination regimens, novel agents, and biomarker-driven approaches. Emerging bladder-preserving strategies were also examined.</p><p><strong>Key findings and limitations: </strong>Neoadjuvant cisplatin-based chemotherapy remains the established benchmark; however, the NIAGARA trial has provided the first phase 3 evidence supporting neoadjuvant chemoimmunotherapy as a new therapeutic option. The addition of durvalumab to cisplatin-based chemotherapy resulted in a significant improvement in survival and response endpoints. Antibody-drug conjugates and biomarkers such as circulating tumor DNA and DNA damage response mutations are shaping a more personalized treatment paradigm. However, optimal regimen selection, sequencing of therapies, and robust methods for response assessment remain unresolved.</p><p><strong>Conclusions and clinical implications: </strong>Recent therapeutic advances, particularly the integration of immunotherapy, novel agents, and biomarker-driven strategies, are redefining the neoadjuvant landscape in MIBC. Neoadjuvant treatment for MIBC is moving toward a biomarker-informed risk-adapted approach, integrating novel agents and multidisciplinary decision-making. Refinement of patient selection and treatment sequencing will be critical to improving outcomes and advancing personalized, precision-based care.</p>","PeriodicalId":12256,"journal":{"name":"European urology oncology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":9.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Revisiting Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy in Cisplatin-eligible Muscle-invasive Bladder Cancer.\",\"authors\":\"Javier Molina-Cerrillo, James Catto, Ashish M Kamat, Andrea Necchi, Morgan Roupre T, Enrique Grande\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.euo.2025.09.006\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background and objective: </strong>Management of muscle-invasive bladder cancer (MIBC) is evolving rapidly due to advances in systemic therapies and molecular understanding. Neoadjuvant cisplatin-based chemotherapy remains the cornerstone of cisplatin-eligible patients, supported by strong evidence of improved overall survival and pathological complete response. Phase 3 trials such as VESPER and NIAGARA have refined the standard of care by demonstrating the benefits of dose-dense methotrexate, vinblastine, doxorubicin, and cisplatin combination and chemoimmunotherapy, respectively. This review aims to summarize current and emerging neoadjuvant strategies and outline future directions toward a more individualized approach.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We reviewed the recent literature and pivotal clinical trial data evaluating neoadjuvant therapies for MIBC, with a focus on systemic chemotherapy, immunotherapy, combination regimens, novel agents, and biomarker-driven approaches. Emerging bladder-preserving strategies were also examined.</p><p><strong>Key findings and limitations: </strong>Neoadjuvant cisplatin-based chemotherapy remains the established benchmark; however, the NIAGARA trial has provided the first phase 3 evidence supporting neoadjuvant chemoimmunotherapy as a new therapeutic option. The addition of durvalumab to cisplatin-based chemotherapy resulted in a significant improvement in survival and response endpoints. Antibody-drug conjugates and biomarkers such as circulating tumor DNA and DNA damage response mutations are shaping a more personalized treatment paradigm. However, optimal regimen selection, sequencing of therapies, and robust methods for response assessment remain unresolved.</p><p><strong>Conclusions and clinical implications: </strong>Recent therapeutic advances, particularly the integration of immunotherapy, novel agents, and biomarker-driven strategies, are redefining the neoadjuvant landscape in MIBC. Neoadjuvant treatment for MIBC is moving toward a biomarker-informed risk-adapted approach, integrating novel agents and multidisciplinary decision-making. Refinement of patient selection and treatment sequencing will be critical to improving outcomes and advancing personalized, precision-based care.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":12256,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"European urology oncology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":9.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-10-08\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"European urology oncology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.euo.2025.09.006\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ONCOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European urology oncology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.euo.2025.09.006","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Revisiting Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy in Cisplatin-eligible Muscle-invasive Bladder Cancer.
Background and objective: Management of muscle-invasive bladder cancer (MIBC) is evolving rapidly due to advances in systemic therapies and molecular understanding. Neoadjuvant cisplatin-based chemotherapy remains the cornerstone of cisplatin-eligible patients, supported by strong evidence of improved overall survival and pathological complete response. Phase 3 trials such as VESPER and NIAGARA have refined the standard of care by demonstrating the benefits of dose-dense methotrexate, vinblastine, doxorubicin, and cisplatin combination and chemoimmunotherapy, respectively. This review aims to summarize current and emerging neoadjuvant strategies and outline future directions toward a more individualized approach.
Methods: We reviewed the recent literature and pivotal clinical trial data evaluating neoadjuvant therapies for MIBC, with a focus on systemic chemotherapy, immunotherapy, combination regimens, novel agents, and biomarker-driven approaches. Emerging bladder-preserving strategies were also examined.
Key findings and limitations: Neoadjuvant cisplatin-based chemotherapy remains the established benchmark; however, the NIAGARA trial has provided the first phase 3 evidence supporting neoadjuvant chemoimmunotherapy as a new therapeutic option. The addition of durvalumab to cisplatin-based chemotherapy resulted in a significant improvement in survival and response endpoints. Antibody-drug conjugates and biomarkers such as circulating tumor DNA and DNA damage response mutations are shaping a more personalized treatment paradigm. However, optimal regimen selection, sequencing of therapies, and robust methods for response assessment remain unresolved.
Conclusions and clinical implications: Recent therapeutic advances, particularly the integration of immunotherapy, novel agents, and biomarker-driven strategies, are redefining the neoadjuvant landscape in MIBC. Neoadjuvant treatment for MIBC is moving toward a biomarker-informed risk-adapted approach, integrating novel agents and multidisciplinary decision-making. Refinement of patient selection and treatment sequencing will be critical to improving outcomes and advancing personalized, precision-based care.
期刊介绍:
Journal Name: European Urology Oncology
Affiliation: Official Journal of the European Association of Urology
Focus:
First official publication of the EAU fully devoted to the study of genitourinary malignancies
Aims to deliver high-quality research
Content:
Includes original articles, opinion piece editorials, and invited reviews
Covers clinical, basic, and translational research
Publication Frequency: Six times a year in electronic format