重复与单疗程的产前皮质类固醇治疗早产胎膜早破:系统回顾和荟萃分析。

IF 1.2 4区 医学 Q3 OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY
Yosteline Da Costa, Veena Ramanathan, Juliana Almeida Oliveira, Joaquim Brito, Abdelrahman Yousif
{"title":"重复与单疗程的产前皮质类固醇治疗早产胎膜早破:系统回顾和荟萃分析。","authors":"Yosteline Da Costa, Veena Ramanathan, Juliana Almeida Oliveira, Joaquim Brito, Abdelrahman Yousif","doi":"10.1055/a-2708-5314","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>A single course of antenatal corticosteroids is standard for women at risk of preterm birth, including those with ruptured membranes. The benefit of repeat courses in the setting of preterm premature rupture of membranes (PPROM) remains uncertain. This study aimed to assess the safety and effectiveness of repeat versus single course of corticosteroid in women with PPROM.We searched PubMed, Cochrane, and Embase databases from inception to September 17, 2025, with no language restrictions, using the terms related to PPROM and corticosteroids. Randomized and non-randomized clinical trials enrolling women with PPROM and comparing repeat with single course were included. Studies without PPROM or comparator group were excluded. Screening and quality assessment were performed by two authors, with a third author participation in case of disagreements. Statistical analysis used Review Manager 5.4 and R studio 4.5.0, with risk ratio (RR), random effects, Cochran Q test and I-squared statistics, and sensitivity analysis. This study was registered with PROSPERO (identifier: CRD420251069007).Six studies comprising 2,434 patients were included. Sensitivity analysis showed that repeat course of corticosteroids increased the risk of endometritis compared to a single course (RR = 1.63; 95% CI: 1.10 to 2.43). In the subgroup analysis the mixed hours corticosteroid favored the outcome of chorioamnionitis (RR = 1.62; 95% CI: 1.12 to 2.36; <i>p</i> = 0.001) with no overall subgroup difference. No difference was observed for the outcomes of respiratory distress syndrome, neonatal sepsis, necrotizing enterocolitis, and intraventricular hemorrhage.Repeat corticosteroid courses in PPROM may increase maternal infections morbidity without clear neonatal benefit. Further large, well-designed randomized trials are needed to clarify safety. · Repeat course of corticosteroid might increase maternal infections morbidity.. · A cautious approach due to potential increase in maternal morbidity related to repeat corticoid use.. · No significant neonatal benefit was observed with repeat courses of antenatal corticosteroids..</p>","PeriodicalId":7584,"journal":{"name":"American journal of perinatology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Repeat versus Single Course of Antenatal Corticosteroid in Management of Preterm Premature Rupture of Membranes: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.\",\"authors\":\"Yosteline Da Costa, Veena Ramanathan, Juliana Almeida Oliveira, Joaquim Brito, Abdelrahman Yousif\",\"doi\":\"10.1055/a-2708-5314\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>A single course of antenatal corticosteroids is standard for women at risk of preterm birth, including those with ruptured membranes. The benefit of repeat courses in the setting of preterm premature rupture of membranes (PPROM) remains uncertain. This study aimed to assess the safety and effectiveness of repeat versus single course of corticosteroid in women with PPROM.We searched PubMed, Cochrane, and Embase databases from inception to September 17, 2025, with no language restrictions, using the terms related to PPROM and corticosteroids. Randomized and non-randomized clinical trials enrolling women with PPROM and comparing repeat with single course were included. Studies without PPROM or comparator group were excluded. Screening and quality assessment were performed by two authors, with a third author participation in case of disagreements. Statistical analysis used Review Manager 5.4 and R studio 4.5.0, with risk ratio (RR), random effects, Cochran Q test and I-squared statistics, and sensitivity analysis. This study was registered with PROSPERO (identifier: CRD420251069007).Six studies comprising 2,434 patients were included. Sensitivity analysis showed that repeat course of corticosteroids increased the risk of endometritis compared to a single course (RR = 1.63; 95% CI: 1.10 to 2.43). In the subgroup analysis the mixed hours corticosteroid favored the outcome of chorioamnionitis (RR = 1.62; 95% CI: 1.12 to 2.36; <i>p</i> = 0.001) with no overall subgroup difference. No difference was observed for the outcomes of respiratory distress syndrome, neonatal sepsis, necrotizing enterocolitis, and intraventricular hemorrhage.Repeat corticosteroid courses in PPROM may increase maternal infections morbidity without clear neonatal benefit. Further large, well-designed randomized trials are needed to clarify safety. · Repeat course of corticosteroid might increase maternal infections morbidity.. · A cautious approach due to potential increase in maternal morbidity related to repeat corticoid use.. · No significant neonatal benefit was observed with repeat courses of antenatal corticosteroids..</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":7584,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"American journal of perinatology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-10-09\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"American journal of perinatology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1055/a-2708-5314\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American journal of perinatology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1055/a-2708-5314","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

对于有早产风险的妇女,包括那些胎膜破裂的妇女,一个疗程的产前皮质类固醇是标准的。重复疗程对早产儿胎膜早破(PPROM)的治疗效果仍不确定。本研究旨在评估PPROM女性重复治疗与单疗程皮质类固醇治疗的安全性和有效性。我们检索了PubMed、Cochrane和Embase数据库,从成立到2025年9月17日,没有语言限制,使用与PPROM和皮质类固醇相关的术语。纳入PPROM妇女的随机和非随机临床试验,并将重复疗程与单疗程进行比较。排除无PPROM的研究或比较组。筛选和质量评估由两位作者进行,如果有分歧,第三位作者参与。统计分析采用Review Manager 5.4和R studio 4.5.0,采用风险比(RR)、随机效应、Cochran Q检验、i方统计和敏感性分析。本研究已在PROSPERO注册(编号:CRD420251069007)。纳入了6项研究,共2434例患者。敏感性分析显示,与单一疗程相比,重复使用皮质类固醇会增加子宫内膜炎的风险(RR = 1.63; 95% CI: 1.10至2.43)。在亚组分析中,混合时间皮质类固醇有利于绒毛膜羊膜炎的结局(RR = 1.62; 95% CI: 1.12至2.36;p = 0.001),总体亚组差异无统计学意义。呼吸窘迫综合征、新生儿败血症、坏死性小肠结肠炎和脑室内出血的结局没有观察到差异。PPROM患者重复使用皮质类固醇治疗可能增加产妇感染发病率,但对新生儿无明显益处。需要进一步大规模、精心设计的随机试验来阐明其安全性。·重复使用皮质类固醇可能会增加孕产妇感染的发病率。·由于重复使用皮质激素可能增加孕产妇发病率,因此应谨慎使用。·重复使用产前皮质类固醇对新生儿没有明显的益处。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Repeat versus Single Course of Antenatal Corticosteroid in Management of Preterm Premature Rupture of Membranes: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.

A single course of antenatal corticosteroids is standard for women at risk of preterm birth, including those with ruptured membranes. The benefit of repeat courses in the setting of preterm premature rupture of membranes (PPROM) remains uncertain. This study aimed to assess the safety and effectiveness of repeat versus single course of corticosteroid in women with PPROM.We searched PubMed, Cochrane, and Embase databases from inception to September 17, 2025, with no language restrictions, using the terms related to PPROM and corticosteroids. Randomized and non-randomized clinical trials enrolling women with PPROM and comparing repeat with single course were included. Studies without PPROM or comparator group were excluded. Screening and quality assessment were performed by two authors, with a third author participation in case of disagreements. Statistical analysis used Review Manager 5.4 and R studio 4.5.0, with risk ratio (RR), random effects, Cochran Q test and I-squared statistics, and sensitivity analysis. This study was registered with PROSPERO (identifier: CRD420251069007).Six studies comprising 2,434 patients were included. Sensitivity analysis showed that repeat course of corticosteroids increased the risk of endometritis compared to a single course (RR = 1.63; 95% CI: 1.10 to 2.43). In the subgroup analysis the mixed hours corticosteroid favored the outcome of chorioamnionitis (RR = 1.62; 95% CI: 1.12 to 2.36; p = 0.001) with no overall subgroup difference. No difference was observed for the outcomes of respiratory distress syndrome, neonatal sepsis, necrotizing enterocolitis, and intraventricular hemorrhage.Repeat corticosteroid courses in PPROM may increase maternal infections morbidity without clear neonatal benefit. Further large, well-designed randomized trials are needed to clarify safety. · Repeat course of corticosteroid might increase maternal infections morbidity.. · A cautious approach due to potential increase in maternal morbidity related to repeat corticoid use.. · No significant neonatal benefit was observed with repeat courses of antenatal corticosteroids..

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
American journal of perinatology
American journal of perinatology 医学-妇产科学
CiteScore
5.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
302
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: The American Journal of Perinatology is an international, peer-reviewed, and indexed journal publishing 14 issues a year dealing with original research and topical reviews. It is the definitive forum for specialists in obstetrics, neonatology, perinatology, and maternal/fetal medicine, with emphasis on bridging the different fields. The focus is primarily on clinical and translational research, clinical and technical advances in diagnosis, monitoring, and treatment as well as evidence-based reviews. Topics of interest include epidemiology, diagnosis, prevention, and management of maternal, fetal, and neonatal diseases. Manuscripts on new technology, NICU set-ups, and nursing topics are published to provide a broad survey of important issues in this field. All articles undergo rigorous peer review, with web-based submission, expedited turn-around, and availability of electronic publication. The American Journal of Perinatology is accompanied by AJP Reports - an Open Access journal for case reports in neonatology and maternal/fetal medicine.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信