Claudia Borodziuk, Julia Wynn, Nina Harkavy, Amanda L. Bergner, Michelle E. Florido
{"title":"LGBTQ+客户的包容性遗传咨询:生殖遗传咨询师的经验和观点的定性研究","authors":"Claudia Borodziuk, Julia Wynn, Nina Harkavy, Amanda L. Bergner, Michelle E. Florido","doi":"10.1002/jgc4.70111","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>The availability of assisted reproductive technologies has enabled the lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender, queer, and other marginalized sexual orientations and gender identities (LGBTQ+) community to pursue reproductive healthcare services for family planning, including genetic testing and counseling. However, this group often encounters obstacles to equitable reproductive care related to discrimination, and genetic counselors (GCs) often feel underprepared to support LGBTQ+ clients. Limited literature exists on the interactions between reproductive GCs and LGBTQ+ clients, indicating a need for better understanding of how GCs can provide effective care to LGBTQ+ individuals seeking reproductive services. Using a semi-structured interview guide, we conducted in-depth interviews with 17 GCs practicing in preconception and/or prenatal genetics to examine their experiences and practices of LGBTQ+ inclusivity. Interviews were transcribed, coded, and thematically analyzed to identify broader patterns. Four thematic categories were produced in the reflexive thematic coding process: (1) obstacles for LGBTQ+ clients in navigating reproductive genetics; (2) challenges and opportunities experienced by GCs regarding LGBTQ+ inclusivity; (3) counseling strategies used by GCs to provide LGBTQ-inclusive care, as well as challenges and motivations in incorporating such strategies; and (4) the importance of LGBTQ+ topics in graduate training and continuing education in shaping GC practices of LGBTQ+ inclusivity. The results illustrate that although GCs recognize the impact of anti-LGBTQ+ discrimination on their clients and counseling, they and other providers often experience difficulties or reluctance with implementing LGBTQ-inclusive practices. Additionally, while participants described using various LGBTQ-inclusive counseling strategies, inconsistency and insufficient training in such practices suggest there is a need for meaningful continuing education on LGBTQ+ topics. These findings underscore the value of broad applications of LGBTQ-inclusive counseling in reproductive genetics, as well as the importance of continuing education to promote LGBTQ+ inclusivity and strengthen inclusive counseling skills.</p>","PeriodicalId":54829,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Genetic Counseling","volume":"34 5","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Inclusive genetic counseling for LGBTQ+ clients: A qualitative study of reproductive genetic counselors' experiences and perspectives\",\"authors\":\"Claudia Borodziuk, Julia Wynn, Nina Harkavy, Amanda L. Bergner, Michelle E. Florido\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/jgc4.70111\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>The availability of assisted reproductive technologies has enabled the lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender, queer, and other marginalized sexual orientations and gender identities (LGBTQ+) community to pursue reproductive healthcare services for family planning, including genetic testing and counseling. However, this group often encounters obstacles to equitable reproductive care related to discrimination, and genetic counselors (GCs) often feel underprepared to support LGBTQ+ clients. Limited literature exists on the interactions between reproductive GCs and LGBTQ+ clients, indicating a need for better understanding of how GCs can provide effective care to LGBTQ+ individuals seeking reproductive services. Using a semi-structured interview guide, we conducted in-depth interviews with 17 GCs practicing in preconception and/or prenatal genetics to examine their experiences and practices of LGBTQ+ inclusivity. Interviews were transcribed, coded, and thematically analyzed to identify broader patterns. Four thematic categories were produced in the reflexive thematic coding process: (1) obstacles for LGBTQ+ clients in navigating reproductive genetics; (2) challenges and opportunities experienced by GCs regarding LGBTQ+ inclusivity; (3) counseling strategies used by GCs to provide LGBTQ-inclusive care, as well as challenges and motivations in incorporating such strategies; and (4) the importance of LGBTQ+ topics in graduate training and continuing education in shaping GC practices of LGBTQ+ inclusivity. The results illustrate that although GCs recognize the impact of anti-LGBTQ+ discrimination on their clients and counseling, they and other providers often experience difficulties or reluctance with implementing LGBTQ-inclusive practices. Additionally, while participants described using various LGBTQ-inclusive counseling strategies, inconsistency and insufficient training in such practices suggest there is a need for meaningful continuing education on LGBTQ+ topics. These findings underscore the value of broad applications of LGBTQ-inclusive counseling in reproductive genetics, as well as the importance of continuing education to promote LGBTQ+ inclusivity and strengthen inclusive counseling skills.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":54829,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Genetic Counseling\",\"volume\":\"34 5\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-10-09\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Genetic Counseling\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/jgc4.70111\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"GENETICS & HEREDITY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Genetic Counseling","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/jgc4.70111","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"GENETICS & HEREDITY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Inclusive genetic counseling for LGBTQ+ clients: A qualitative study of reproductive genetic counselors' experiences and perspectives
The availability of assisted reproductive technologies has enabled the lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender, queer, and other marginalized sexual orientations and gender identities (LGBTQ+) community to pursue reproductive healthcare services for family planning, including genetic testing and counseling. However, this group often encounters obstacles to equitable reproductive care related to discrimination, and genetic counselors (GCs) often feel underprepared to support LGBTQ+ clients. Limited literature exists on the interactions between reproductive GCs and LGBTQ+ clients, indicating a need for better understanding of how GCs can provide effective care to LGBTQ+ individuals seeking reproductive services. Using a semi-structured interview guide, we conducted in-depth interviews with 17 GCs practicing in preconception and/or prenatal genetics to examine their experiences and practices of LGBTQ+ inclusivity. Interviews were transcribed, coded, and thematically analyzed to identify broader patterns. Four thematic categories were produced in the reflexive thematic coding process: (1) obstacles for LGBTQ+ clients in navigating reproductive genetics; (2) challenges and opportunities experienced by GCs regarding LGBTQ+ inclusivity; (3) counseling strategies used by GCs to provide LGBTQ-inclusive care, as well as challenges and motivations in incorporating such strategies; and (4) the importance of LGBTQ+ topics in graduate training and continuing education in shaping GC practices of LGBTQ+ inclusivity. The results illustrate that although GCs recognize the impact of anti-LGBTQ+ discrimination on their clients and counseling, they and other providers often experience difficulties or reluctance with implementing LGBTQ-inclusive practices. Additionally, while participants described using various LGBTQ-inclusive counseling strategies, inconsistency and insufficient training in such practices suggest there is a need for meaningful continuing education on LGBTQ+ topics. These findings underscore the value of broad applications of LGBTQ-inclusive counseling in reproductive genetics, as well as the importance of continuing education to promote LGBTQ+ inclusivity and strengthen inclusive counseling skills.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Genetic Counseling (JOGC), published for the National Society of Genetic Counselors, is a timely, international forum addressing all aspects of the discipline and practice of genetic counseling. The journal focuses on the critical questions and problems that arise at the interface between rapidly advancing technological developments and the concerns of individuals and communities at genetic risk. The publication provides genetic counselors, other clinicians and health educators, laboratory geneticists, bioethicists, legal scholars, social scientists, and other researchers with a premier resource on genetic counseling topics in national, international, and cross-national contexts.