对经典半乳糖血症国际临床指南的实施和营养师观点的全球调查。

IF 2.5 3区 医学 Q3 NUTRITION & DIETETICS
Erica Wong, Louise Robertson
{"title":"对经典半乳糖血症国际临床指南的实施和营养师观点的全球调查。","authors":"Erica Wong,&nbsp;Louise Robertson","doi":"10.1111/jhn.70141","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Background</h3>\n \n <p>Galactosaemia is an inherited metabolic disorder, characterised by the inability to metabolise galactose. Dietary management previously varied worldwide due to the lack of standardised guidelines. The International Clinical Guidelines (CPG) for management of classical galactosaemia were published in 2017. The aim of the current study was to explore dietitians' perspectives and their use of the guidelines worldwide.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methodology</h3>\n \n <p>An international cross-sectional online survey was administered from April to June 2021 to registered dietitians who were working or had worked with galactosaemia patients since the guidelines were published. The study was piloted and received ethical approval. Descriptive statistical analysis and thematic analysis were performed.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>A total of 39 dietitians from 17 countries participated. 51% of participants had &gt; 10 years of experience working with patients with galactosaemia. 56.4% reported a change in their dietetic practice since the guidelines were published, namely relaxing the diet, and not restricting fruits and vegetable intake (46%). Most dietitians (76.9%) reported improved confidence because the guidelines support their clinical reasoning and existing dietary management approaches. Most dietitians (82%) suggested improvements for the CPG for classical galactosaemia.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusions</h3>\n \n <p>The findings are considered the first to describe how dietitians view and use the guidelines. The CPG for galactosaemia appears to have positively influenced practice. Currently, implementation of the CPG could be improved by addressing the gaps in the existing evidence base and minimising other barriers e.g. patient-related barriers, institutional barriers and lack of resources. Patient-friendly resources are also necessary to provide accessible, comprehensive information regarding the management of galactosaemia.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":54803,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Human Nutrition and Dietetics","volume":"38 5","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A Global Survey of Dietitians' Perspectives and Implementation of the International Clinical Guidelines for Classical Galactosaemia\",\"authors\":\"Erica Wong,&nbsp;Louise Robertson\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/jhn.70141\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div>\\n \\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Background</h3>\\n \\n <p>Galactosaemia is an inherited metabolic disorder, characterised by the inability to metabolise galactose. Dietary management previously varied worldwide due to the lack of standardised guidelines. The International Clinical Guidelines (CPG) for management of classical galactosaemia were published in 2017. The aim of the current study was to explore dietitians' perspectives and their use of the guidelines worldwide.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Methodology</h3>\\n \\n <p>An international cross-sectional online survey was administered from April to June 2021 to registered dietitians who were working or had worked with galactosaemia patients since the guidelines were published. The study was piloted and received ethical approval. Descriptive statistical analysis and thematic analysis were performed.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Results</h3>\\n \\n <p>A total of 39 dietitians from 17 countries participated. 51% of participants had &gt; 10 years of experience working with patients with galactosaemia. 56.4% reported a change in their dietetic practice since the guidelines were published, namely relaxing the diet, and not restricting fruits and vegetable intake (46%). Most dietitians (76.9%) reported improved confidence because the guidelines support their clinical reasoning and existing dietary management approaches. Most dietitians (82%) suggested improvements for the CPG for classical galactosaemia.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Conclusions</h3>\\n \\n <p>The findings are considered the first to describe how dietitians view and use the guidelines. The CPG for galactosaemia appears to have positively influenced practice. Currently, implementation of the CPG could be improved by addressing the gaps in the existing evidence base and minimising other barriers e.g. patient-related barriers, institutional barriers and lack of resources. Patient-friendly resources are also necessary to provide accessible, comprehensive information regarding the management of galactosaemia.</p>\\n </section>\\n </div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":54803,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Human Nutrition and Dietetics\",\"volume\":\"38 5\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-10-08\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Human Nutrition and Dietetics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/jhn.70141\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"NUTRITION & DIETETICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Human Nutrition and Dietetics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/jhn.70141","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"NUTRITION & DIETETICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:半乳糖血症是一种遗传性代谢性疾病,其特征是无法代谢半乳糖。由于缺乏标准化的指导方针,饮食管理以前在世界范围内各不相同。经典半乳糖血症管理国际临床指南(CPG)于2017年发布。当前研究的目的是探讨营养师的观点以及他们在全球范围内对指南的使用。方法:从2021年4月到6月,对自指南发布以来正在或曾与半乳糖血症患者合作的注册营养师进行了一项国际横断面在线调查。该研究进行了试点,并获得了伦理批准。进行描述性统计分析和专题分析。结果:共有来自17个国家的39名营养师参与了调查。51%的参与者有10年与半乳糖血症患者一起工作的经验。56.4%的人报告说,自指南发布以来,他们的饮食习惯发生了变化,即放松饮食,不限制水果和蔬菜的摄入量(46%)。大多数营养师(76.9%)报告说,由于指南支持他们的临床推理和现有的饮食管理方法,他们的信心有所提高。大多数营养学家(82%)建议改善经典半乳糖血症的CPG。结论:这些发现被认为是第一个描述营养师如何看待和使用指南的发现。半乳糖血症的CPG似乎对实践产生了积极影响。目前,CPG的实施可以通过解决现有证据基础中的差距和尽量减少其他障碍(如与患者有关的障碍、体制障碍和缺乏资源)来改进。对患者友好的资源对于提供关于半乳糖血症管理的可访问的、全面的信息也是必要的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

A Global Survey of Dietitians' Perspectives and Implementation of the International Clinical Guidelines for Classical Galactosaemia

A Global Survey of Dietitians' Perspectives and Implementation of the International Clinical Guidelines for Classical Galactosaemia

Background

Galactosaemia is an inherited metabolic disorder, characterised by the inability to metabolise galactose. Dietary management previously varied worldwide due to the lack of standardised guidelines. The International Clinical Guidelines (CPG) for management of classical galactosaemia were published in 2017. The aim of the current study was to explore dietitians' perspectives and their use of the guidelines worldwide.

Methodology

An international cross-sectional online survey was administered from April to June 2021 to registered dietitians who were working or had worked with galactosaemia patients since the guidelines were published. The study was piloted and received ethical approval. Descriptive statistical analysis and thematic analysis were performed.

Results

A total of 39 dietitians from 17 countries participated. 51% of participants had > 10 years of experience working with patients with galactosaemia. 56.4% reported a change in their dietetic practice since the guidelines were published, namely relaxing the diet, and not restricting fruits and vegetable intake (46%). Most dietitians (76.9%) reported improved confidence because the guidelines support their clinical reasoning and existing dietary management approaches. Most dietitians (82%) suggested improvements for the CPG for classical galactosaemia.

Conclusions

The findings are considered the first to describe how dietitians view and use the guidelines. The CPG for galactosaemia appears to have positively influenced practice. Currently, implementation of the CPG could be improved by addressing the gaps in the existing evidence base and minimising other barriers e.g. patient-related barriers, institutional barriers and lack of resources. Patient-friendly resources are also necessary to provide accessible, comprehensive information regarding the management of galactosaemia.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.30
自引率
15.20%
发文量
133
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Journal of Human Nutrition and Dietetics is an international peer-reviewed journal publishing papers in applied nutrition and dietetics. Papers are therefore welcomed on: - Clinical nutrition and the practice of therapeutic dietetics - Clinical and professional guidelines - Public health nutrition and nutritional epidemiology - Dietary surveys and dietary assessment methodology - Health promotion and intervention studies and their effectiveness - Obesity, weight control and body composition - Research on psychological determinants of healthy and unhealthy eating behaviour. Focus can for example be on attitudes, brain correlates of food reward processing, social influences, impulsivity, cognitive control, cognitive processes, dieting, psychological treatments. - Appetite, Food intake and nutritional status - Nutrigenomics and molecular nutrition - The journal does not publish animal research The journal is published in an online-only format. No printed issue of this title will be produced but authors will still be able to order offprints of their own articles.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信