循环死亡心脏移植后儿童捐献名单与改善等候名单结果相关

IF 5.3 1区 医学 Q1 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS
Michael A Catalano, Max Shin, Omar Toubat, Radhika Rastogi, Halil Beqaj, Amit Iyengar, Benjamin F Smood, Nikia Toomey, Jonathan B Edelson, Joseph W Rossano, Matthew J O'Connor, Humera Ahmed, J William Gaynor, Katsuhide Maeda, Constantine D Mavroudis
{"title":"循环死亡心脏移植后儿童捐献名单与改善等候名单结果相关","authors":"Michael A Catalano, Max Shin, Omar Toubat, Radhika Rastogi, Halil Beqaj, Amit Iyengar, Benjamin F Smood, Nikia Toomey, Jonathan B Edelson, Joseph W Rossano, Matthew J O'Connor, Humera Ahmed, J William Gaynor, Katsuhide Maeda, Constantine D Mavroudis","doi":"10.1161/JAHA.125.041633","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Advances in procurement techniques have enabled use of hearts obtained via donation after circulatory death (DCD), expanding the donor pool; however, the impact of DCD heart transplant on outcomes in children is not well described. We aim to characterize waitlist survival and outcomes in pediatric heart transplant candidates listed for donation after brain death (DBD) versus DCD hearts.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The United Network for Organ Sharing database was queried for patients aged <18 years at listing, waitlisted for heart transplant between January 2021 and June 2024. Patients were stratified by listing for DBD exclusively, versus DBD and DCD hearts. Waitlist and posttransplant outcomes were compared using Fine-Gray and Kaplan-Meier analyses.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of 2449 listed patients, 2353 (96.1%) were listed for DBD hearts exclusively, and 96 (3.9%) for DCD hearts as well. DCD recipient candidates had increased rates of cardiopulmonary support and were more likely to be status 1A. Of DCD recipient candidates, 15 (15.6%) received DCD hearts and 50 (52.1%) received DBD hearts. When controlling for status, extracorporeal membrane oxygenation, blood type, region, and year, DCD listing was not associated with likelihood of transplant or waitlist death. Among status 1B/2 patients, DCD listing was associated with increased likelihood of transplant (adjusted subhazard ratio, 2.05 [95% CI, 1.16-3.62]; <i>P</i>=0.01). No patients in the status 1B/2 DCD subgroup died while waitlisted. There were no differences in 1-year posttransplant survival.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Among candidates for pediatric heart transplant listed as status 1B/2, patients listed for DCD hearts in addition to DBD hearts have shorter waitlist duration, improved transplant rates, lower waitlist mortality rates, and comparable survival to patients listed for DBD hearts alone.</p>","PeriodicalId":54370,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the American Heart Association","volume":" ","pages":"e041633"},"PeriodicalIF":5.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Listing for Pediatric Donation After Circulatory Death Heart Transplantation Is Associated With Improved Waitlist Outcomes.\",\"authors\":\"Michael A Catalano, Max Shin, Omar Toubat, Radhika Rastogi, Halil Beqaj, Amit Iyengar, Benjamin F Smood, Nikia Toomey, Jonathan B Edelson, Joseph W Rossano, Matthew J O'Connor, Humera Ahmed, J William Gaynor, Katsuhide Maeda, Constantine D Mavroudis\",\"doi\":\"10.1161/JAHA.125.041633\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Advances in procurement techniques have enabled use of hearts obtained via donation after circulatory death (DCD), expanding the donor pool; however, the impact of DCD heart transplant on outcomes in children is not well described. We aim to characterize waitlist survival and outcomes in pediatric heart transplant candidates listed for donation after brain death (DBD) versus DCD hearts.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The United Network for Organ Sharing database was queried for patients aged <18 years at listing, waitlisted for heart transplant between January 2021 and June 2024. Patients were stratified by listing for DBD exclusively, versus DBD and DCD hearts. Waitlist and posttransplant outcomes were compared using Fine-Gray and Kaplan-Meier analyses.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of 2449 listed patients, 2353 (96.1%) were listed for DBD hearts exclusively, and 96 (3.9%) for DCD hearts as well. DCD recipient candidates had increased rates of cardiopulmonary support and were more likely to be status 1A. Of DCD recipient candidates, 15 (15.6%) received DCD hearts and 50 (52.1%) received DBD hearts. When controlling for status, extracorporeal membrane oxygenation, blood type, region, and year, DCD listing was not associated with likelihood of transplant or waitlist death. Among status 1B/2 patients, DCD listing was associated with increased likelihood of transplant (adjusted subhazard ratio, 2.05 [95% CI, 1.16-3.62]; <i>P</i>=0.01). No patients in the status 1B/2 DCD subgroup died while waitlisted. There were no differences in 1-year posttransplant survival.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Among candidates for pediatric heart transplant listed as status 1B/2, patients listed for DCD hearts in addition to DBD hearts have shorter waitlist duration, improved transplant rates, lower waitlist mortality rates, and comparable survival to patients listed for DBD hearts alone.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":54370,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of the American Heart Association\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"e041633\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":5.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-10-09\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of the American Heart Association\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1161/JAHA.125.041633\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the American Heart Association","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1161/JAHA.125.041633","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:采购技术的进步使循环性死亡(DCD)后通过捐赠获得的心脏得以使用,扩大了供体库;然而,DCD心脏移植对儿童预后的影响尚未得到很好的描述。我们的目标是描述脑死亡(DBD)与DCD心脏捐献的儿童心脏移植候选人的等待名单生存和结果。方法:查询美国器官共享网络数据库中年龄较大的患者。结果:2449例患者中,2353例(96.1%)为DBD心脏,96例(3.9%)为DCD心脏。DCD接受者候选人的心肺支持率增加,并且更有可能处于1A状态。在DCD患者中,15例(15.6%)接受了DCD心脏,50例(52.1%)接受了DBD心脏。当控制状态、体外膜氧合、血型、地区和年份时,DCD列表与移植或等待死亡的可能性无关。在1B/2状态的患者中,DCD列表与移植可能性增加相关(调整后亚危险比为2.05 [95% CI, 1.16-3.62]; P=0.01)。1B/2 DCD状态亚组中没有患者在等待期间死亡。移植后1年生存率无差异。结论:在状态为1B/2的儿童心脏移植候选者中,除DBD心脏外,DCD心脏候选者的等待时间更短,移植率更高,候选者死亡率更低,生存率与单独DBD心脏候选者相当。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Listing for Pediatric Donation After Circulatory Death Heart Transplantation Is Associated With Improved Waitlist Outcomes.

Background: Advances in procurement techniques have enabled use of hearts obtained via donation after circulatory death (DCD), expanding the donor pool; however, the impact of DCD heart transplant on outcomes in children is not well described. We aim to characterize waitlist survival and outcomes in pediatric heart transplant candidates listed for donation after brain death (DBD) versus DCD hearts.

Methods: The United Network for Organ Sharing database was queried for patients aged <18 years at listing, waitlisted for heart transplant between January 2021 and June 2024. Patients were stratified by listing for DBD exclusively, versus DBD and DCD hearts. Waitlist and posttransplant outcomes were compared using Fine-Gray and Kaplan-Meier analyses.

Results: Of 2449 listed patients, 2353 (96.1%) were listed for DBD hearts exclusively, and 96 (3.9%) for DCD hearts as well. DCD recipient candidates had increased rates of cardiopulmonary support and were more likely to be status 1A. Of DCD recipient candidates, 15 (15.6%) received DCD hearts and 50 (52.1%) received DBD hearts. When controlling for status, extracorporeal membrane oxygenation, blood type, region, and year, DCD listing was not associated with likelihood of transplant or waitlist death. Among status 1B/2 patients, DCD listing was associated with increased likelihood of transplant (adjusted subhazard ratio, 2.05 [95% CI, 1.16-3.62]; P=0.01). No patients in the status 1B/2 DCD subgroup died while waitlisted. There were no differences in 1-year posttransplant survival.

Conclusions: Among candidates for pediatric heart transplant listed as status 1B/2, patients listed for DCD hearts in addition to DBD hearts have shorter waitlist duration, improved transplant rates, lower waitlist mortality rates, and comparable survival to patients listed for DBD hearts alone.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of the American Heart Association
Journal of the American Heart Association CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS-
CiteScore
9.40
自引率
1.90%
发文量
1749
审稿时长
12 weeks
期刊介绍: As an Open Access journal, JAHA - Journal of the American Heart Association is rapidly and freely available, accelerating the translation of strong science into effective practice. JAHA is an authoritative, peer-reviewed Open Access journal focusing on cardiovascular and cerebrovascular disease. JAHA provides a global forum for basic and clinical research and timely reviews on cardiovascular disease and stroke. As an Open Access journal, its content is free on publication to read, download, and share, accelerating the translation of strong science into effective practice.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信