社会弱势群体心脏康复的地理可及性差异

IF 5.3 1区 医学 Q1 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS
Edward W Chen, Wen-Chih Wu, Ling Han, Parul U Gandhi, Lori A Bastian, Cynthia A Brandt, Kristin M Mattocks, Joyce Oen-Hsiao, Merilyn S Varghese
{"title":"社会弱势群体心脏康复的地理可及性差异","authors":"Edward W Chen, Wen-Chih Wu, Ling Han, Parul U Gandhi, Lori A Bastian, Cynthia A Brandt, Kristin M Mattocks, Joyce Oen-Hsiao, Merilyn S Varghese","doi":"10.1161/JAHA.124.040815","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>There is a dearth of research examining geographic disparities in access to cardiac rehabilitation (CR). We evaluated whether disparities in geographic access to CR exist among socially vulnerable communities, using the Social Vulnerability Index (SVI).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Among 3113 US counties, we investigated relationships between SVI and number of hospitals with CR per 100 000 adults, modeled with SVI as a linear variable, and SVI and distance to the nearest county with CR facilities, modeled using spline terms for SVI. We used multivariable zero-inflated negative binomial regression modeling adjusted for county population, CR eligibility, percentage without health insurance, metropolitan status, and availability of existing health care infrastructure. We explored whether these relationships changed in the context of rurality.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>After adjustment, as SVI increased by 1 percentile, number of hospitals with CR per 100 000 adults decreased by 1.2% (<i>P</i><0.001). For distance to CR, individual spline terms were not significant in our adjusted model; however, the overall predicted distance to CR increased as SVI increased. When stratified by metropolitan status, these relationships not only persisted but also intensified in rural counties. As SVI increased by 1 percentile, the odds of a county containing a CR facility decreased by 0.9% in metropolitan counties (<i>P</i>=0.002) versus 2.2% in rural counties (<i>P</i><0.001).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>More socially vulnerable communities experienced worse geographic access to CR facilities. This access disparity intensified in rural communities. Our findings call for reducing barriers to CR access among socially vulnerable and rural communities, potentially through virtual or hybrid models of CR.</p>","PeriodicalId":54370,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the American Heart Association","volume":" ","pages":"e040815"},"PeriodicalIF":5.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Disparities in Geographic Access to Cardiac Rehabilitation Among Socially Vulnerable Communities.\",\"authors\":\"Edward W Chen, Wen-Chih Wu, Ling Han, Parul U Gandhi, Lori A Bastian, Cynthia A Brandt, Kristin M Mattocks, Joyce Oen-Hsiao, Merilyn S Varghese\",\"doi\":\"10.1161/JAHA.124.040815\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>There is a dearth of research examining geographic disparities in access to cardiac rehabilitation (CR). We evaluated whether disparities in geographic access to CR exist among socially vulnerable communities, using the Social Vulnerability Index (SVI).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Among 3113 US counties, we investigated relationships between SVI and number of hospitals with CR per 100 000 adults, modeled with SVI as a linear variable, and SVI and distance to the nearest county with CR facilities, modeled using spline terms for SVI. We used multivariable zero-inflated negative binomial regression modeling adjusted for county population, CR eligibility, percentage without health insurance, metropolitan status, and availability of existing health care infrastructure. We explored whether these relationships changed in the context of rurality.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>After adjustment, as SVI increased by 1 percentile, number of hospitals with CR per 100 000 adults decreased by 1.2% (<i>P</i><0.001). For distance to CR, individual spline terms were not significant in our adjusted model; however, the overall predicted distance to CR increased as SVI increased. When stratified by metropolitan status, these relationships not only persisted but also intensified in rural counties. As SVI increased by 1 percentile, the odds of a county containing a CR facility decreased by 0.9% in metropolitan counties (<i>P</i>=0.002) versus 2.2% in rural counties (<i>P</i><0.001).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>More socially vulnerable communities experienced worse geographic access to CR facilities. This access disparity intensified in rural communities. Our findings call for reducing barriers to CR access among socially vulnerable and rural communities, potentially through virtual or hybrid models of CR.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":54370,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of the American Heart Association\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"e040815\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":5.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-10-09\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of the American Heart Association\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1161/JAHA.124.040815\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the American Heart Association","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1161/JAHA.124.040815","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:关于心脏康复(CR)的地理差异的研究缺乏。我们使用社会脆弱性指数(SVI)来评估社会弱势群体在获取CR方面是否存在地理差异。方法:在美国3113个县中,我们调查了SVI与每10万成年人有CR的医院数量之间的关系,SVI作为线性变量建模,SVI与到最近的有CR设施的县的距离,使用SVI的样条项建模。我们使用了多变量零膨胀负二项回归模型,调整了县人口、CR资格、无医疗保险百分比、大都市地位和现有医疗保健基础设施的可用性。我们探讨了这些关系是否在农村环境中发生了变化。结果:调整后,随着SVI增加1个百分位数,每10万名成年人中有CR的医院数量减少1.2% (PP=0.002),而农村县为2.2% (p结论:更多的社会弱势社区获得CR设施的地理机会更差。这种获取机会的差距在农村社区加剧。我们的研究结果呼吁减少社会弱势群体和农村社区获得CR的障碍,可能通过虚拟或混合CR模型。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Disparities in Geographic Access to Cardiac Rehabilitation Among Socially Vulnerable Communities.

Background: There is a dearth of research examining geographic disparities in access to cardiac rehabilitation (CR). We evaluated whether disparities in geographic access to CR exist among socially vulnerable communities, using the Social Vulnerability Index (SVI).

Methods: Among 3113 US counties, we investigated relationships between SVI and number of hospitals with CR per 100 000 adults, modeled with SVI as a linear variable, and SVI and distance to the nearest county with CR facilities, modeled using spline terms for SVI. We used multivariable zero-inflated negative binomial regression modeling adjusted for county population, CR eligibility, percentage without health insurance, metropolitan status, and availability of existing health care infrastructure. We explored whether these relationships changed in the context of rurality.

Results: After adjustment, as SVI increased by 1 percentile, number of hospitals with CR per 100 000 adults decreased by 1.2% (P<0.001). For distance to CR, individual spline terms were not significant in our adjusted model; however, the overall predicted distance to CR increased as SVI increased. When stratified by metropolitan status, these relationships not only persisted but also intensified in rural counties. As SVI increased by 1 percentile, the odds of a county containing a CR facility decreased by 0.9% in metropolitan counties (P=0.002) versus 2.2% in rural counties (P<0.001).

Conclusion: More socially vulnerable communities experienced worse geographic access to CR facilities. This access disparity intensified in rural communities. Our findings call for reducing barriers to CR access among socially vulnerable and rural communities, potentially through virtual or hybrid models of CR.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of the American Heart Association
Journal of the American Heart Association CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS-
CiteScore
9.40
自引率
1.90%
发文量
1749
审稿时长
12 weeks
期刊介绍: As an Open Access journal, JAHA - Journal of the American Heart Association is rapidly and freely available, accelerating the translation of strong science into effective practice. JAHA is an authoritative, peer-reviewed Open Access journal focusing on cardiovascular and cerebrovascular disease. JAHA provides a global forum for basic and clinical research and timely reviews on cardiovascular disease and stroke. As an Open Access journal, its content is free on publication to read, download, and share, accelerating the translation of strong science into effective practice.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信