非发育不良Barrett食管与高级别发育不良和食管腺癌鉴别的分子生物标志物的发现和验证。

IF 2.6
Caroline L Matchett, Seth W Slettedahl, William R Taylor, Calise K Berger, Caryn E Anderson, Melissa A Passe, Ramona M Lansing, Panwen Wang, Collin E Chalmers, Patrick H Foote, Jeanette E Eckel-Passow, Zhifu Sun, Douglas W Mahoney, D Chamil Codipilly, Cadman L Leggett, Francisco C Ramirez, Allon Kahn, Herbert C Wolfsen, Swathi Eluri, Vani J A Konda, Arvind J Trindade, Prasad G Iyer, John B Kisiel
{"title":"非发育不良Barrett食管与高级别发育不良和食管腺癌鉴别的分子生物标志物的发现和验证。","authors":"Caroline L Matchett, Seth W Slettedahl, William R Taylor, Calise K Berger, Caryn E Anderson, Melissa A Passe, Ramona M Lansing, Panwen Wang, Collin E Chalmers, Patrick H Foote, Jeanette E Eckel-Passow, Zhifu Sun, Douglas W Mahoney, D Chamil Codipilly, Cadman L Leggett, Francisco C Ramirez, Allon Kahn, Herbert C Wolfsen, Swathi Eluri, Vani J A Konda, Arvind J Trindade, Prasad G Iyer, John B Kisiel","doi":"10.1158/1940-6207.CAPR-25-0215","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Aberrant DNA methylation and copy number alterations (CNAs) drive Barrett's esophagus (BE) progression to esophageal adenocarcinoma (EAC); however, their combined utility for early detection is unclear. We aimed to identify and validate methylated DNA markers (MDMs) and CNAs to distinguish EAC/high-grade dysplasia (HGD) from non-dysplastic Barrett's esophagus (NDBE). In this multi-phase, multi-center study, we discovered and validated MDMs and quantified CNAs utilizing whole-genome methylation sequencing of esophageal brushings. DNA biomarkers identified from discovery were further validated in independent patients with paired esophageal brushing and swallowed capsule sponge samples. MDMs were filtered against a reduced representation bisulfite sequencing data set obtained from independent tissue samples to advance only concordant candidates. CNA burden was quantified using ichorCNA-derived aneuploidy scores (AS). Two hundred MDMs discovered in HGD (N=18) and EAC (N=18) versus NDBE brushing samples (N=18) were tested in independent samples (N=146). A 52-MDM panel achieved a cross-validated area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) 0.88 (95% CI: 0.82-0.95); the addition of AS improved discrimination of HGD/EAC from NDBE to 0.91 (95% CI: 0.86-0.97) AUC. At 80% specificity, the combined model detected 93% of EAC and 88% of HGD cases. In paired capsule sponge samples, a 58-MDM panel achieved a cross-validated AUC of 0.77 (95% CI: 0.66-0.88); a combined 58-MDM and AS model achieved AUC 0.80 (95% CI: 0.7-0.9). MDMs and AS discerned HGD/EAC from normal esophagus (NE)/NDBE in endoscopic brushing and capsule sponge samples. This approach may improve BE surveillance.</p>","PeriodicalId":72514,"journal":{"name":"Cancer prevention research (Philadelphia, Pa.)","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Discovery and validation of molecular biomarkers for differentiation of non-dysplastic Barrett esophagus from high-grade dysplasia and esophageal adenocarcinoma.\",\"authors\":\"Caroline L Matchett, Seth W Slettedahl, William R Taylor, Calise K Berger, Caryn E Anderson, Melissa A Passe, Ramona M Lansing, Panwen Wang, Collin E Chalmers, Patrick H Foote, Jeanette E Eckel-Passow, Zhifu Sun, Douglas W Mahoney, D Chamil Codipilly, Cadman L Leggett, Francisco C Ramirez, Allon Kahn, Herbert C Wolfsen, Swathi Eluri, Vani J A Konda, Arvind J Trindade, Prasad G Iyer, John B Kisiel\",\"doi\":\"10.1158/1940-6207.CAPR-25-0215\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Aberrant DNA methylation and copy number alterations (CNAs) drive Barrett's esophagus (BE) progression to esophageal adenocarcinoma (EAC); however, their combined utility for early detection is unclear. We aimed to identify and validate methylated DNA markers (MDMs) and CNAs to distinguish EAC/high-grade dysplasia (HGD) from non-dysplastic Barrett's esophagus (NDBE). In this multi-phase, multi-center study, we discovered and validated MDMs and quantified CNAs utilizing whole-genome methylation sequencing of esophageal brushings. DNA biomarkers identified from discovery were further validated in independent patients with paired esophageal brushing and swallowed capsule sponge samples. MDMs were filtered against a reduced representation bisulfite sequencing data set obtained from independent tissue samples to advance only concordant candidates. CNA burden was quantified using ichorCNA-derived aneuploidy scores (AS). Two hundred MDMs discovered in HGD (N=18) and EAC (N=18) versus NDBE brushing samples (N=18) were tested in independent samples (N=146). A 52-MDM panel achieved a cross-validated area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) 0.88 (95% CI: 0.82-0.95); the addition of AS improved discrimination of HGD/EAC from NDBE to 0.91 (95% CI: 0.86-0.97) AUC. At 80% specificity, the combined model detected 93% of EAC and 88% of HGD cases. In paired capsule sponge samples, a 58-MDM panel achieved a cross-validated AUC of 0.77 (95% CI: 0.66-0.88); a combined 58-MDM and AS model achieved AUC 0.80 (95% CI: 0.7-0.9). MDMs and AS discerned HGD/EAC from normal esophagus (NE)/NDBE in endoscopic brushing and capsule sponge samples. This approach may improve BE surveillance.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":72514,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Cancer prevention research (Philadelphia, Pa.)\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-10-08\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Cancer prevention research (Philadelphia, Pa.)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1158/1940-6207.CAPR-25-0215\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cancer prevention research (Philadelphia, Pa.)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1158/1940-6207.CAPR-25-0215","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

异常DNA甲基化和拷贝数改变(CNAs)驱动Barrett食管(BE)进展为食管腺癌(EAC)然而,它们在早期检测方面的综合效用尚不清楚。我们旨在鉴定和验证甲基化DNA标记(MDMs)和CNAs,以区分EAC/高级别发育不良(HGD)和非发育不良的巴雷特食管(NDBE)。在这项多阶段、多中心的研究中,我们利用食管刷毛的全基因组甲基化测序发现并验证了MDMs,并量化了CNAs。发现的DNA生物标志物在独立患者配对食管刷牙和吞咽胶囊海绵样本中进一步验证。MDMs对从独立组织样本中获得的亚硫酸氢盐测序数据集进行过滤,以只推进一致的候选物。使用ichorna衍生的非整倍性评分(AS)来量化CNA负担。在HGD (N=18)和EAC (N=18)与NDBE刷牙样本(N=18)中发现的200个MDMs在独立样本(N=146)中进行了测试。52-MDM面板在受试者工作特征曲线(AUC)下的交叉验证面积为0.88 (95% CI: 0.82-0.95);AS的加入将HGD/EAC的鉴别从NDBE提高到0.91 (95% CI: 0.86-0.97) AUC。在80%的特异性下,联合模型检测到93%的EAC和88%的HGD病例。在配对的胶囊海绵样本中,58-MDM面板的交叉验证AUC为0.77 (95% CI: 0.66-0.88);58-MDM和AS联合模型的AUC为0.80 (95% CI: 0.7-0.9)。MDMs和AS在内镜下刷牙和胶囊海绵样本中从正常食管(NE)/NDBE中识别出HGD/EAC。这种方法可以改善BE的监测。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Discovery and validation of molecular biomarkers for differentiation of non-dysplastic Barrett esophagus from high-grade dysplasia and esophageal adenocarcinoma.

Aberrant DNA methylation and copy number alterations (CNAs) drive Barrett's esophagus (BE) progression to esophageal adenocarcinoma (EAC); however, their combined utility for early detection is unclear. We aimed to identify and validate methylated DNA markers (MDMs) and CNAs to distinguish EAC/high-grade dysplasia (HGD) from non-dysplastic Barrett's esophagus (NDBE). In this multi-phase, multi-center study, we discovered and validated MDMs and quantified CNAs utilizing whole-genome methylation sequencing of esophageal brushings. DNA biomarkers identified from discovery were further validated in independent patients with paired esophageal brushing and swallowed capsule sponge samples. MDMs were filtered against a reduced representation bisulfite sequencing data set obtained from independent tissue samples to advance only concordant candidates. CNA burden was quantified using ichorCNA-derived aneuploidy scores (AS). Two hundred MDMs discovered in HGD (N=18) and EAC (N=18) versus NDBE brushing samples (N=18) were tested in independent samples (N=146). A 52-MDM panel achieved a cross-validated area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) 0.88 (95% CI: 0.82-0.95); the addition of AS improved discrimination of HGD/EAC from NDBE to 0.91 (95% CI: 0.86-0.97) AUC. At 80% specificity, the combined model detected 93% of EAC and 88% of HGD cases. In paired capsule sponge samples, a 58-MDM panel achieved a cross-validated AUC of 0.77 (95% CI: 0.66-0.88); a combined 58-MDM and AS model achieved AUC 0.80 (95% CI: 0.7-0.9). MDMs and AS discerned HGD/EAC from normal esophagus (NE)/NDBE in endoscopic brushing and capsule sponge samples. This approach may improve BE surveillance.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信