Y Aisu, T Okada, Y Itatani, A Masuo, R Tani, K Fujimoto, A Kido, A Sawada, Y Sakai, K Obama
{"title":"下段直肠癌手术中男性盆底软组织结构自动分割的解剖模拟和形态学评估。","authors":"Y Aisu, T Okada, Y Itatani, A Masuo, R Tani, K Fujimoto, A Kido, A Sawada, Y Sakai, K Obama","doi":"10.1007/s10151-025-03218-z","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Pelvic anatomy is a complex network of organs that varies between individuals. Understanding the anatomy of individual patients is crucial for precise rectal cancer surgeries. Therefore, developing technology that can allow visualization of anatomy before surgery is necessary. This study aims to develop an auto-segmentation model of pelvic structures using AI technology and to evaluate the accuracy of the model toward preoperative anatomical understanding.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Data were collected from 63 male patients who underwent 3D MRI during a preoperative examination for colorectal and urogenital diseases between November 2015 and July 2019 and from 11 healthy male volunteers. Eleven organs and tissues were segmented. The model was developed using a threefold cross-validation process with a total of 59 cases as development data. The accuracy was evaluated with the separately prepared test data using dice similarity coefficient (DSC), true positive rate (TPR), and positive predictive value (PPV) by comparing AI-segmented data with manual-segmented data.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The highest value of DSC, TPR, and PPV were 0.927, 0.909, and 0.948 for the internal anal sphincter (including the rectum), respectively. On the other hand, the lowest values were 0.384, 0.772, and 0.263 for the superficial transverse perineal muscle, respectively. While there were differences among organs, the overall quality of automatic segmentation was maintained in our model, suggesting that the morphological characteristics of the organs may influence the accuracy.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>We developed an auto-segmentation model that can independently delineate soft-tissue structures in the male pelvis using 3D T2-weighted MRIs, providing valuable assistance to doctors in understanding pelvic anatomy.</p>","PeriodicalId":51192,"journal":{"name":"Techniques in Coloproctology","volume":"29 1","pages":"176"},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Automatic segmentation of male pelvic floor soft tissue structures for anatomical simulation and morphological assessment in lower rectal cancer surgery.\",\"authors\":\"Y Aisu, T Okada, Y Itatani, A Masuo, R Tani, K Fujimoto, A Kido, A Sawada, Y Sakai, K Obama\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s10151-025-03218-z\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Pelvic anatomy is a complex network of organs that varies between individuals. Understanding the anatomy of individual patients is crucial for precise rectal cancer surgeries. Therefore, developing technology that can allow visualization of anatomy before surgery is necessary. This study aims to develop an auto-segmentation model of pelvic structures using AI technology and to evaluate the accuracy of the model toward preoperative anatomical understanding.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Data were collected from 63 male patients who underwent 3D MRI during a preoperative examination for colorectal and urogenital diseases between November 2015 and July 2019 and from 11 healthy male volunteers. Eleven organs and tissues were segmented. The model was developed using a threefold cross-validation process with a total of 59 cases as development data. The accuracy was evaluated with the separately prepared test data using dice similarity coefficient (DSC), true positive rate (TPR), and positive predictive value (PPV) by comparing AI-segmented data with manual-segmented data.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The highest value of DSC, TPR, and PPV were 0.927, 0.909, and 0.948 for the internal anal sphincter (including the rectum), respectively. On the other hand, the lowest values were 0.384, 0.772, and 0.263 for the superficial transverse perineal muscle, respectively. While there were differences among organs, the overall quality of automatic segmentation was maintained in our model, suggesting that the morphological characteristics of the organs may influence the accuracy.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>We developed an auto-segmentation model that can independently delineate soft-tissue structures in the male pelvis using 3D T2-weighted MRIs, providing valuable assistance to doctors in understanding pelvic anatomy.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":51192,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Techniques in Coloproctology\",\"volume\":\"29 1\",\"pages\":\"176\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-10-08\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Techniques in Coloproctology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10151-025-03218-z\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Techniques in Coloproctology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10151-025-03218-z","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Automatic segmentation of male pelvic floor soft tissue structures for anatomical simulation and morphological assessment in lower rectal cancer surgery.
Background: Pelvic anatomy is a complex network of organs that varies between individuals. Understanding the anatomy of individual patients is crucial for precise rectal cancer surgeries. Therefore, developing technology that can allow visualization of anatomy before surgery is necessary. This study aims to develop an auto-segmentation model of pelvic structures using AI technology and to evaluate the accuracy of the model toward preoperative anatomical understanding.
Methods: Data were collected from 63 male patients who underwent 3D MRI during a preoperative examination for colorectal and urogenital diseases between November 2015 and July 2019 and from 11 healthy male volunteers. Eleven organs and tissues were segmented. The model was developed using a threefold cross-validation process with a total of 59 cases as development data. The accuracy was evaluated with the separately prepared test data using dice similarity coefficient (DSC), true positive rate (TPR), and positive predictive value (PPV) by comparing AI-segmented data with manual-segmented data.
Results: The highest value of DSC, TPR, and PPV were 0.927, 0.909, and 0.948 for the internal anal sphincter (including the rectum), respectively. On the other hand, the lowest values were 0.384, 0.772, and 0.263 for the superficial transverse perineal muscle, respectively. While there were differences among organs, the overall quality of automatic segmentation was maintained in our model, suggesting that the morphological characteristics of the organs may influence the accuracy.
Conclusions: We developed an auto-segmentation model that can independently delineate soft-tissue structures in the male pelvis using 3D T2-weighted MRIs, providing valuable assistance to doctors in understanding pelvic anatomy.
期刊介绍:
Techniques in Coloproctology is an international journal fully devoted to diagnostic and operative procedures carried out in the management of colorectal diseases. Imaging, clinical physiology, laparoscopy, open abdominal surgery and proctoperineology are the main topics covered by the journal. Reviews, original articles, technical notes and short communications with many detailed illustrations render this publication indispensable for coloproctologists and related specialists. Both surgeons and gastroenterologists are represented on the distinguished Editorial Board, together with pathologists, radiologists and basic scientists from all over the world. The journal is strongly recommended to those who wish to be updated on recent developments in the field, and improve the standards of their work.
Manuscripts submitted for publication must contain a statement to the effect that all human studies have been reviewed by the appropriate ethics committee and have therefore been performed in accordance with the ethical standards laid down in an appropriate version of the 1965 Declaration of Helsinki. It should also be stated clearly in the text that all persons gave their informed consent prior to their inclusion in the study. Details that might disclose the identity of the subjects under study should be omitted. Reports of animal experiments must state that the Principles of Laboratory Animal Care (NIH publication no. 86-23 revised 1985) were followed as were applicable national laws (e.g. the current version of the German Law on the Protection of Animals). The Editor-in-Chief reserves the right to reject manuscripts that do not comply with the above-mentioned requirements. Authors will be held responsible for false statements or for failure to fulfill such requirements.