复工辅导的时机:首次咨询时间对复工影响的观察性研究。

IF 2.5 3区 医学 Q1 REHABILITATION
Thomas B van Rossum, Robin N Kok, Karen Nieuwenhuijsen
{"title":"复工辅导的时机:首次咨询时间对复工影响的观察性研究。","authors":"Thomas B van Rossum, Robin N Kok, Karen Nieuwenhuijsen","doi":"10.1007/s10926-025-10334-y","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Return-to-work (RTW) counseling is a critical part of rehabilitation of sick-listed employees with common mental disorders (CMD). In the Netherlands it is mandatory that RTW counseling with an occupational physician (OP) starts within two weeks, but current literature and guidelines provide little empiric support. This study aims to answer the questions \"Is starting RTW counseling within two weeks associated with faster RTW?\" and \"Is there a dose-response effect (i.e. the earlier the better)?\".</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In an observational design, sick-listed employees (n = 12,169) seen by an OP within two weeks of onset of sick leave were compared to those seen later using Cox proportional hazards analysis. Next, per week effects were examined, reporting pairwise comparisons of weeks 1 through 6 if the omnibus test was significant.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Earlier RTW counseling was associated with earlier RTW (HR: 0.89, 95%CI: 0.86-0.93). There was a dose-response effect (LLR χ<sup>2</sup>: 46.08, df = 5, p < 0.001) with significant earlier RTW when RTW counseling was started in week 1 versus week 3 (HR: 0.90(95%CI 0.85-0.96), p < 0.001), week 1 versus week 5 (HR: 0.88(95%CI 0.81-0.94), p < 0.001), week 1 versus week 6 (HR: 0.82(95%CI 0.77-0.88), p < 0.001), and week 2 versus week 6 (HR: 0.84(95%CI 0.79-0.89), p < 0.001). However, subgroup analyses showed these findings only held for employees with adjustment disorders.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>There is a modest benefit to starting RTW counseling earlier. However, this effect is limited to those seen very early and there are no significant differences between weeks 2 through 5. Whether these modest benefits warrant strict adherence to a two-week deadline should be re-evaluated.</p>","PeriodicalId":48035,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Occupational Rehabilitation","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Timing Return-to-Work Counseling: An Observational Study Into the Effect of Time to First Consultation on Return to Work.\",\"authors\":\"Thomas B van Rossum, Robin N Kok, Karen Nieuwenhuijsen\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s10926-025-10334-y\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Return-to-work (RTW) counseling is a critical part of rehabilitation of sick-listed employees with common mental disorders (CMD). In the Netherlands it is mandatory that RTW counseling with an occupational physician (OP) starts within two weeks, but current literature and guidelines provide little empiric support. This study aims to answer the questions \\\"Is starting RTW counseling within two weeks associated with faster RTW?\\\" and \\\"Is there a dose-response effect (i.e. the earlier the better)?\\\".</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In an observational design, sick-listed employees (n = 12,169) seen by an OP within two weeks of onset of sick leave were compared to those seen later using Cox proportional hazards analysis. Next, per week effects were examined, reporting pairwise comparisons of weeks 1 through 6 if the omnibus test was significant.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Earlier RTW counseling was associated with earlier RTW (HR: 0.89, 95%CI: 0.86-0.93). There was a dose-response effect (LLR χ<sup>2</sup>: 46.08, df = 5, p < 0.001) with significant earlier RTW when RTW counseling was started in week 1 versus week 3 (HR: 0.90(95%CI 0.85-0.96), p < 0.001), week 1 versus week 5 (HR: 0.88(95%CI 0.81-0.94), p < 0.001), week 1 versus week 6 (HR: 0.82(95%CI 0.77-0.88), p < 0.001), and week 2 versus week 6 (HR: 0.84(95%CI 0.79-0.89), p < 0.001). However, subgroup analyses showed these findings only held for employees with adjustment disorders.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>There is a modest benefit to starting RTW counseling earlier. However, this effect is limited to those seen very early and there are no significant differences between weeks 2 through 5. Whether these modest benefits warrant strict adherence to a two-week deadline should be re-evaluated.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48035,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Occupational Rehabilitation\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-10-08\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Occupational Rehabilitation\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10926-025-10334-y\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"REHABILITATION\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Occupational Rehabilitation","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10926-025-10334-y","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"REHABILITATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:重返工作岗位(RTW)咨询是常见精神障碍(CMD)患病员工康复的重要组成部分。在荷兰,与职业医生(OP)的RTW咨询是强制性的,在两周内开始,但目前的文献和指南提供很少的经验支持。本研究旨在回答“两周内开始RTW咨询是否与更快的RTW有关?”和“是否存在剂量反应效应(即越早越好)?”方法:采用观察性设计,使用Cox比例风险分析,将OP在病假开始两周内看到的病假名单员工(n = 12,169)与之后看到的员工进行比较。接下来,检查每周的效果,如果综合测试显着,则报告第1周至第6周的两两比较。结果:早期RTW咨询与早期RTW相关(HR: 0.89, 95%CI: 0.86-0.93)。存在剂量-反应效应(LLR χ2: 46.08, df = 5, p)。结论:尽早开始RTW咨询有一定的益处。然而,这种影响仅限于那些早期发现的患者,并且在第2周到第5周之间没有显着差异。这些适度的好处是否值得严格遵守两周的最后期限,应该重新评估。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Timing Return-to-Work Counseling: An Observational Study Into the Effect of Time to First Consultation on Return to Work.

Purpose: Return-to-work (RTW) counseling is a critical part of rehabilitation of sick-listed employees with common mental disorders (CMD). In the Netherlands it is mandatory that RTW counseling with an occupational physician (OP) starts within two weeks, but current literature and guidelines provide little empiric support. This study aims to answer the questions "Is starting RTW counseling within two weeks associated with faster RTW?" and "Is there a dose-response effect (i.e. the earlier the better)?".

Methods: In an observational design, sick-listed employees (n = 12,169) seen by an OP within two weeks of onset of sick leave were compared to those seen later using Cox proportional hazards analysis. Next, per week effects were examined, reporting pairwise comparisons of weeks 1 through 6 if the omnibus test was significant.

Results: Earlier RTW counseling was associated with earlier RTW (HR: 0.89, 95%CI: 0.86-0.93). There was a dose-response effect (LLR χ2: 46.08, df = 5, p < 0.001) with significant earlier RTW when RTW counseling was started in week 1 versus week 3 (HR: 0.90(95%CI 0.85-0.96), p < 0.001), week 1 versus week 5 (HR: 0.88(95%CI 0.81-0.94), p < 0.001), week 1 versus week 6 (HR: 0.82(95%CI 0.77-0.88), p < 0.001), and week 2 versus week 6 (HR: 0.84(95%CI 0.79-0.89), p < 0.001). However, subgroup analyses showed these findings only held for employees with adjustment disorders.

Conclusions: There is a modest benefit to starting RTW counseling earlier. However, this effect is limited to those seen very early and there are no significant differences between weeks 2 through 5. Whether these modest benefits warrant strict adherence to a two-week deadline should be re-evaluated.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.80
自引率
12.10%
发文量
64
期刊介绍: The Journal of Occupational Rehabilitation is an international forum for the publication of peer-reviewed original papers on the rehabilitation, reintegration, and prevention of disability in workers. The journal offers investigations involving original data collection and research synthesis (i.e., scoping reviews, systematic reviews, and meta-analyses). Papers derive from a broad array of fields including rehabilitation medicine, physical and occupational therapy, health psychology and psychiatry, orthopedics, oncology, occupational and insurance medicine, neurology, social work, ergonomics, biomedical engineering, health economics, rehabilitation engineering, business administration and management, and law.  A single interdisciplinary source for information on work disability rehabilitation, the Journal of Occupational Rehabilitation helps to advance the scientific understanding, management, and prevention of work disability.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信