4点腹横面阻滞对腹腔镜胆囊切除术患者膈膜厚度的影响。

IF 1.1 4区 医学 Q3 SURGERY
Nuran Akinci Ekinci, Mehmet Akif Yazar, Yasin Tire, Esma Karaarslan, Betül Kozanhan, Yusuf Mutluay
{"title":"4点腹横面阻滞对腹腔镜胆囊切除术患者膈膜厚度的影响。","authors":"Nuran Akinci Ekinci, Mehmet Akif Yazar, Yasin Tire, Esma Karaarslan, Betül Kozanhan, Yusuf Mutluay","doi":"10.4103/jmas.jmas_151_25","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>This study investigates the effect of a 4-point transversus abdominis plane (TAP) block on diaphragm thickness (DT) and post-operative recovery following laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC). This study aims to evaluate whether the 4-point TAP block preserves DT closer to baseline values and enhances post-operative pain control and recovery quality.</p><p><strong>Patients and methods: </strong>This prospective randomised controlled trial was conducted at a tertiary care hospital. A total of 86 American Society of Anesthesiologists I-II patients aged 18-65 years undergoing elective LC were randomly assigned into two groups. Group B received a 4-point TAP block postoperatively, whereas Group C received no interventional analgesia. In Group B, 10 mL of 0.25% bupivacaine was administered bilaterally under ultrasound guidance to the upper abdominal (Th6-Th9) and typical TAP (T10-T12) regions. DT, the primary outcome, was measured by ultrasonography preoperatively and at 5 and 30 min post-extubation. Secondary outcomes included Visual Analogue Scale pain scores and Quality of Recovery-15 (QoR-15) scores. Statistical analysis was performed using SPSS v22.0. The Shapiro-Wilk test, Chi-square, independent samples t-test, Mann-Whitney U-test and repeated-measures ANOVA were used. P < 0.05 was considered statistically significant. Based on power analysis, 86 patients were sufficient.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Group B demonstrated significantly better preservation of inspiratory DT, lower post-operative pain scores and higher QoR-15 scores compared to Group C (P < 0.05).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The 4-point TAP block improves DT preservation and enhances post-operative pain control and recovery following LC. Further large-scale studies are warranted to support these findings.</p>","PeriodicalId":48905,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Minimal Access Surgery","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Effect of 4-point transversus abdominal plane block on diaphragm thickness in patients undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy.\",\"authors\":\"Nuran Akinci Ekinci, Mehmet Akif Yazar, Yasin Tire, Esma Karaarslan, Betül Kozanhan, Yusuf Mutluay\",\"doi\":\"10.4103/jmas.jmas_151_25\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>This study investigates the effect of a 4-point transversus abdominis plane (TAP) block on diaphragm thickness (DT) and post-operative recovery following laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC). This study aims to evaluate whether the 4-point TAP block preserves DT closer to baseline values and enhances post-operative pain control and recovery quality.</p><p><strong>Patients and methods: </strong>This prospective randomised controlled trial was conducted at a tertiary care hospital. A total of 86 American Society of Anesthesiologists I-II patients aged 18-65 years undergoing elective LC were randomly assigned into two groups. Group B received a 4-point TAP block postoperatively, whereas Group C received no interventional analgesia. In Group B, 10 mL of 0.25% bupivacaine was administered bilaterally under ultrasound guidance to the upper abdominal (Th6-Th9) and typical TAP (T10-T12) regions. DT, the primary outcome, was measured by ultrasonography preoperatively and at 5 and 30 min post-extubation. Secondary outcomes included Visual Analogue Scale pain scores and Quality of Recovery-15 (QoR-15) scores. Statistical analysis was performed using SPSS v22.0. The Shapiro-Wilk test, Chi-square, independent samples t-test, Mann-Whitney U-test and repeated-measures ANOVA were used. P < 0.05 was considered statistically significant. Based on power analysis, 86 patients were sufficient.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Group B demonstrated significantly better preservation of inspiratory DT, lower post-operative pain scores and higher QoR-15 scores compared to Group C (P < 0.05).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The 4-point TAP block improves DT preservation and enhances post-operative pain control and recovery following LC. Further large-scale studies are warranted to support these findings.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48905,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Minimal Access Surgery\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-10-08\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Minimal Access Surgery\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4103/jmas.jmas_151_25\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"SURGERY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Minimal Access Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/jmas.jmas_151_25","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

摘要:本研究探讨4点腹横平面(TAP)阻滞对腹腔镜胆囊切除术(LC)后膈膜厚度(DT)和术后恢复的影响。本研究旨在评估4点TAP阻滞是否使DT更接近基线值,并提高术后疼痛控制和恢复质量。患者和方法:本前瞻性随机对照试验在一家三级保健医院进行。86例年龄在18-65岁的美国麻醉医师学会I-II期择期LC患者被随机分为两组。B组术后给予4点TAP阻滞,C组无介入镇痛。B组在超声引导下双侧给药10 mL 0.25%布比卡因至上腹部(Th6-Th9)和典型TAP (T10-T12)区域。术前、拔管后5分钟和30分钟分别用超声测量DT。次要结果包括视觉模拟量表疼痛评分和恢复质量-15 (QoR-15)评分。采用SPSS v22.0进行统计分析。采用夏皮罗-威尔克检验、卡方检验、独立样本t检验、Mann-Whitney u检验和重复测量方差分析。P < 0.05为差异有统计学意义。根据功率分析,86例患者是足够的。结果:与C组相比,B组吸气DT保存明显更好,术后疼痛评分更低,QoR-15评分更高(P < 0.05)。结论:4点TAP阻滞改善了DT保存,增强了LC术后疼痛控制和恢复。需要进一步的大规模研究来支持这些发现。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Effect of 4-point transversus abdominal plane block on diaphragm thickness in patients undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy.

Introduction: This study investigates the effect of a 4-point transversus abdominis plane (TAP) block on diaphragm thickness (DT) and post-operative recovery following laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC). This study aims to evaluate whether the 4-point TAP block preserves DT closer to baseline values and enhances post-operative pain control and recovery quality.

Patients and methods: This prospective randomised controlled trial was conducted at a tertiary care hospital. A total of 86 American Society of Anesthesiologists I-II patients aged 18-65 years undergoing elective LC were randomly assigned into two groups. Group B received a 4-point TAP block postoperatively, whereas Group C received no interventional analgesia. In Group B, 10 mL of 0.25% bupivacaine was administered bilaterally under ultrasound guidance to the upper abdominal (Th6-Th9) and typical TAP (T10-T12) regions. DT, the primary outcome, was measured by ultrasonography preoperatively and at 5 and 30 min post-extubation. Secondary outcomes included Visual Analogue Scale pain scores and Quality of Recovery-15 (QoR-15) scores. Statistical analysis was performed using SPSS v22.0. The Shapiro-Wilk test, Chi-square, independent samples t-test, Mann-Whitney U-test and repeated-measures ANOVA were used. P < 0.05 was considered statistically significant. Based on power analysis, 86 patients were sufficient.

Results: Group B demonstrated significantly better preservation of inspiratory DT, lower post-operative pain scores and higher QoR-15 scores compared to Group C (P < 0.05).

Conclusions: The 4-point TAP block improves DT preservation and enhances post-operative pain control and recovery following LC. Further large-scale studies are warranted to support these findings.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
151
审稿时长
36 weeks
期刊介绍: Journal of Minimal Access Surgery (JMAS), the official publication of Indian Association of Gastrointestinal Endo Surgeons, launched in early 2005. The JMAS, a quarterly publication, is the first English-language journal from India, as also from this part of the world, dedicated to Minimal Access Surgery. The JMAS boasts an outstanding editorial board comprising of Indian and international experts in the field.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信