胫骨近端骨肿瘤切除联合腓肠肌内侧皮瓣重建。

IF 1.6 Q3 SURGERY
JBJS Essential Surgical Techniques Pub Date : 2025-10-08 eCollection Date: 2025-10-01 DOI:10.2106/JBJS.ST.24.00011
Andrea Angelini, Elisa Pala, Giulia Trovarelli, Mariachiara Cerchiaro, Pietro Ruggieri
{"title":"胫骨近端骨肿瘤切除联合腓肠肌内侧皮瓣重建。","authors":"Andrea Angelini, Elisa Pala, Giulia Trovarelli, Mariachiara Cerchiaro, Pietro Ruggieri","doi":"10.2106/JBJS.ST.24.00011","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Primary bone tumors frequently occur in the proximal tibia, ranking as the second most common location after the distal femur<sup>1</sup>. Challenges to treatment include the proximity of neurovascular structures, limited soft-tissue coverage, compromised knee extension, and postoperative complications<sup>1-8</sup>. The present video article describes proximal tibial resection for the treatment of a bone tumor and prosthetic reconstruction combined with a medial gastrocnemius flap.</p><p><strong>Description: </strong>Proximal tibial resection is performed with use of an anteromedial approach. After defining the resection level, the tumor is removed en bloc with wide free margins. Reconstruction is performed with use of a megaprosthesis, and the medial gastrocnemius flap is utilized for covering the prosthesis and for reconstruction of the extensor apparatus.</p><p><strong>Alternatives: </strong>Osteoarticular allografts and allograft-prosthesis composites allow restoration of bone stock and direct biological reattachment of host tendons, ligaments, and capsule. Autografting is performed using the fibula as a donor site. Custom-made implants can be designed according to the patient's anatomy. Amputation should be considered when the neurovascular bundle is widely involved by the tumor.</p><p><strong>Rationale: </strong>In contrast to alternative treatments, megaprosthetic reconstructions offer several advantages: technical simplicity, immediate weight-bearing, and shorter immobilization. Additionally, megaprostheses do not carry the risk of allograft-related complications, such as nonunion, fracture, subchondral collapse, articular cartilage degeneration, and instability.</p><p><strong>Expected outcomes: </strong>Patients with metallic endoprostheses demonstrate lower rates of complications and amputation, as well as higher patient survival rates, compared with those treated with allograft reconstructions<sup>7,9,10</sup>. The advancements in technology and design since 1977 have contributed to reduced mechanical stress at the bone-prosthesis interface and decreased rates of mechanical or structural failure<sup>3,11,12</sup>. However, despite advancements in design, proximal tibial prosthetic reconstructions continue to exhibit the least favorable outcomes and function among all limb-salvage procedures, accompanied by the highest rate of complications<sup>1,9-11</sup>. Studies report survival rates ranging from 45% to 82% at 5 years and 45% to 78% at 10 years<sup>1,13</sup>, with rates of revision for infection and loosening ranging from 40% at 5 years to 73% at 15 years<sup>1,10,13</sup>. Various techniques are utilized for attaching the extensor mechanism of the knee and providing coverage for proximal tibial reconstructions<sup>7,8,10,14,15</sup>. Various studies have emphasized the importance of direct attachment of the extensor mechanism to the megaprosthesis, which facilitates initial mechanical stability crucial for healing and scarring<sup>7,10,16</sup>. Pedicled muscle flaps, particularly the medial or lateral gastrocnemius, have commonly been utilized to supply blood to aid wound healing and to biologically reconstruct the extensor mechanism<sup>7-9</sup>. Despite some patients experiencing increased extension lag, gradual improvement in function<sup>17</sup> was observed during follow-up. In our experience with 225 proximal tibial resections, survival of megaprosthetic reconstructions was 82% and 78% at 5 and 10 years, respectively, without any difference between the use of a fixed versus rotating hinge<sup>1</sup>. However, the rate of good or excellent functional outcomes, as measured according to the Musculoskeletal Tumor Society (MSTS) system<sup>17</sup>, was significantly higher with use of a rotating hinge. Infection was, as expected, the most frequent complication, occurring in 27 patients (12%), followed by aseptic loosening (13 patients, 6%), rupture of the extensor mechanism (6 patients, 3%), breakage of the prostheses (4 patients, 1.6%), and wound dehiscence (4 patients, 1.6%)<sup>1</sup>.</p><p><strong>Important tips: </strong>Preoperative evaluation and imaging. Perform a thorough history and physical examination, assess for evidence of a syndrome or family history, and utilize imaging studies to evaluate the tumor.Patient positioning and incision planning. Position the patient supine to ensure full access to the proximal tibia. Prepare and drape the patient; center the incision on the mass through an anteromedial approach including the biopsy tract and perform a longitudinal incision.Harvest the gastrocnemius flap. After identifying the proximal vessels, proceed to dissect the gastrocnemius flap, which is typically straightforward and rapid (even after tumor removal).Dissection of soft tissue and definition of the tumor resection margin. Protect and retract the medial gastrocnemius flap and then isolate and protect the popliteal and posterior tibial vessels.Deep dissection and articular resection. If staging and preoperative planning indicated no evidence of tumor inside the joint, intra-articular knee resection should be conducted. Arthrotomy is performed through a parapatellar approach, and the cruciate ligaments are cut close to the femoral attachment.Tumor removal. After the specimen with the tumor is freed circumferentially, identify the osteotomy level and dissect any remaining structures connected with proximal tibia to remove the entire tumor.Inspection and hemostasis. Evaluate for hemostasis and send the specimen for pathologic analysis. Prepare for the reconstructive phase and close the surgical site.Proximal tibial reconstruction with a modular endoprosthesis. Tumor mega-endoprostheses are appealing because of their versatility, ability to yield favorable functional outcomes, ability to allow immediate weight-bearing, and possible cost-effectiveness.Reconstruction of the extensor mechanism. The commonly utilized approach involves employing a medial gastrocnemius flap.Monitoring and postoperative care. Postoperative monitoring is crucial. A strict rehabilitation protocol with immobilization in full extension for 4 weeks followed by progressive mobilization for 3 months is critical to guarantee better functional results.</p><p><strong>Acronyms and abbreviations: </strong>GCT = giant cell tumorHIV = human immunodeficiency virusHBV = hepatitis B virusHCV = hepatitis C virusf-up = follow-upCT = computed tomographyMRI = magnetic resonance imagingPET = positron emission tomographySUV = standardized uptake valueCht (ISG/OS2) = chemotherapyMTX-HD = high-dose methotrexateCDP = cisplatinADM = doxorubicinKMFTR = Kotz Modular Femur-Tibia Reconstruction systemHMRS = Howmedica Modular Resection SystemGMRS = Global Modular Replacement System.</p>","PeriodicalId":44676,"journal":{"name":"JBJS Essential Surgical Techniques","volume":"15 4","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12499655/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Proximal Tibial Resection for Bone Tumor and Prosthetic Reconstruction Combined with Medial Gastrocnemius Flap.\",\"authors\":\"Andrea Angelini, Elisa Pala, Giulia Trovarelli, Mariachiara Cerchiaro, Pietro Ruggieri\",\"doi\":\"10.2106/JBJS.ST.24.00011\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Primary bone tumors frequently occur in the proximal tibia, ranking as the second most common location after the distal femur<sup>1</sup>. Challenges to treatment include the proximity of neurovascular structures, limited soft-tissue coverage, compromised knee extension, and postoperative complications<sup>1-8</sup>. The present video article describes proximal tibial resection for the treatment of a bone tumor and prosthetic reconstruction combined with a medial gastrocnemius flap.</p><p><strong>Description: </strong>Proximal tibial resection is performed with use of an anteromedial approach. After defining the resection level, the tumor is removed en bloc with wide free margins. Reconstruction is performed with use of a megaprosthesis, and the medial gastrocnemius flap is utilized for covering the prosthesis and for reconstruction of the extensor apparatus.</p><p><strong>Alternatives: </strong>Osteoarticular allografts and allograft-prosthesis composites allow restoration of bone stock and direct biological reattachment of host tendons, ligaments, and capsule. Autografting is performed using the fibula as a donor site. Custom-made implants can be designed according to the patient's anatomy. Amputation should be considered when the neurovascular bundle is widely involved by the tumor.</p><p><strong>Rationale: </strong>In contrast to alternative treatments, megaprosthetic reconstructions offer several advantages: technical simplicity, immediate weight-bearing, and shorter immobilization. Additionally, megaprostheses do not carry the risk of allograft-related complications, such as nonunion, fracture, subchondral collapse, articular cartilage degeneration, and instability.</p><p><strong>Expected outcomes: </strong>Patients with metallic endoprostheses demonstrate lower rates of complications and amputation, as well as higher patient survival rates, compared with those treated with allograft reconstructions<sup>7,9,10</sup>. The advancements in technology and design since 1977 have contributed to reduced mechanical stress at the bone-prosthesis interface and decreased rates of mechanical or structural failure<sup>3,11,12</sup>. However, despite advancements in design, proximal tibial prosthetic reconstructions continue to exhibit the least favorable outcomes and function among all limb-salvage procedures, accompanied by the highest rate of complications<sup>1,9-11</sup>. Studies report survival rates ranging from 45% to 82% at 5 years and 45% to 78% at 10 years<sup>1,13</sup>, with rates of revision for infection and loosening ranging from 40% at 5 years to 73% at 15 years<sup>1,10,13</sup>. Various techniques are utilized for attaching the extensor mechanism of the knee and providing coverage for proximal tibial reconstructions<sup>7,8,10,14,15</sup>. Various studies have emphasized the importance of direct attachment of the extensor mechanism to the megaprosthesis, which facilitates initial mechanical stability crucial for healing and scarring<sup>7,10,16</sup>. Pedicled muscle flaps, particularly the medial or lateral gastrocnemius, have commonly been utilized to supply blood to aid wound healing and to biologically reconstruct the extensor mechanism<sup>7-9</sup>. Despite some patients experiencing increased extension lag, gradual improvement in function<sup>17</sup> was observed during follow-up. In our experience with 225 proximal tibial resections, survival of megaprosthetic reconstructions was 82% and 78% at 5 and 10 years, respectively, without any difference between the use of a fixed versus rotating hinge<sup>1</sup>. However, the rate of good or excellent functional outcomes, as measured according to the Musculoskeletal Tumor Society (MSTS) system<sup>17</sup>, was significantly higher with use of a rotating hinge. Infection was, as expected, the most frequent complication, occurring in 27 patients (12%), followed by aseptic loosening (13 patients, 6%), rupture of the extensor mechanism (6 patients, 3%), breakage of the prostheses (4 patients, 1.6%), and wound dehiscence (4 patients, 1.6%)<sup>1</sup>.</p><p><strong>Important tips: </strong>Preoperative evaluation and imaging. Perform a thorough history and physical examination, assess for evidence of a syndrome or family history, and utilize imaging studies to evaluate the tumor.Patient positioning and incision planning. Position the patient supine to ensure full access to the proximal tibia. Prepare and drape the patient; center the incision on the mass through an anteromedial approach including the biopsy tract and perform a longitudinal incision.Harvest the gastrocnemius flap. After identifying the proximal vessels, proceed to dissect the gastrocnemius flap, which is typically straightforward and rapid (even after tumor removal).Dissection of soft tissue and definition of the tumor resection margin. Protect and retract the medial gastrocnemius flap and then isolate and protect the popliteal and posterior tibial vessels.Deep dissection and articular resection. If staging and preoperative planning indicated no evidence of tumor inside the joint, intra-articular knee resection should be conducted. Arthrotomy is performed through a parapatellar approach, and the cruciate ligaments are cut close to the femoral attachment.Tumor removal. After the specimen with the tumor is freed circumferentially, identify the osteotomy level and dissect any remaining structures connected with proximal tibia to remove the entire tumor.Inspection and hemostasis. Evaluate for hemostasis and send the specimen for pathologic analysis. Prepare for the reconstructive phase and close the surgical site.Proximal tibial reconstruction with a modular endoprosthesis. Tumor mega-endoprostheses are appealing because of their versatility, ability to yield favorable functional outcomes, ability to allow immediate weight-bearing, and possible cost-effectiveness.Reconstruction of the extensor mechanism. The commonly utilized approach involves employing a medial gastrocnemius flap.Monitoring and postoperative care. Postoperative monitoring is crucial. A strict rehabilitation protocol with immobilization in full extension for 4 weeks followed by progressive mobilization for 3 months is critical to guarantee better functional results.</p><p><strong>Acronyms and abbreviations: </strong>GCT = giant cell tumorHIV = human immunodeficiency virusHBV = hepatitis B virusHCV = hepatitis C virusf-up = follow-upCT = computed tomographyMRI = magnetic resonance imagingPET = positron emission tomographySUV = standardized uptake valueCht (ISG/OS2) = chemotherapyMTX-HD = high-dose methotrexateCDP = cisplatinADM = doxorubicinKMFTR = Kotz Modular Femur-Tibia Reconstruction systemHMRS = Howmedica Modular Resection SystemGMRS = Global Modular Replacement System.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":44676,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"JBJS Essential Surgical Techniques\",\"volume\":\"15 4\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-10-08\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12499655/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"JBJS Essential Surgical Techniques\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2106/JBJS.ST.24.00011\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/10/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"SURGERY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JBJS Essential Surgical Techniques","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2106/JBJS.ST.24.00011","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/10/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:原发性骨肿瘤常发生在胫骨近端,是仅次于股骨远端的第二大常见部位1。治疗的挑战包括靠近神经血管结构、软组织覆盖范围有限、膝关节伸展受限以及术后并发症。本视频文章描述胫骨近端切除治疗骨肿瘤和假体重建联合内侧腓肠肌皮瓣。描述:胫骨近端切除采用前内侧入路。在确定切除水平后,将肿瘤整体切除,留下宽阔的自由边缘。使用大假体进行重建,腓肠肌内侧皮瓣用于覆盖假体和重建伸肌装置。替代方法:同种异体骨关节移植和同种异体移植物-假体复合材料允许骨储备的修复和宿主肌腱、韧带和囊的直接生物再附着。自体植骨采用腓骨作为供体部位。可以根据患者的解剖结构设计定制的植入物。当肿瘤广泛累及神经血管束时,应考虑截肢。理由:与其他治疗方法相比,大型假体重建具有以下优点:技术简单,立即负重,固定时间短。此外,大型假体没有同种异体移植物相关并发症的风险,如骨不连、骨折、软骨下塌陷、关节软骨退变和不稳定。预期结果:与同种异体移植重建相比,金属内假体患者并发症和截肢率较低,患者生存率较高7,9,10。自1977年以来,技术和设计的进步有助于减少骨-假体界面的机械应力,降低机械或结构失败率3,11,12。然而,尽管在设计上取得了进步,在所有保肢手术中,胫骨近端假体重建仍然表现出最不利的结果和功能,并伴有最高的并发症率1,9-11。研究报告5年生存率为45%至82%,10年生存率为45%至78% 1,13,感染和松动的翻修率为5年40%至15年73% 1,10,13。各种技术被用于连接膝关节伸肌机制并为胫骨近端重建提供覆盖7,8,10,14,15。各种研究都强调了将伸肌机制直接附着在大型假体上的重要性,这有助于最初的机械稳定性,对愈合和瘢痕形成至关重要7,10,16。带蒂肌皮瓣,特别是腓肠肌内侧或外侧,通常用于供血以帮助伤口愈合和生物重建伸肌机制7-9。尽管一些患者出现伸展滞后,但在随访期间观察到功能逐渐改善17。在我们225例胫骨近端切除的经验中,大型假体重建在5年和10年的存活率分别为82%和78%,使用固定和旋转铰链没有任何差异。然而,根据肌肉骨骼肿瘤学会(MSTS)系统17衡量,使用旋转铰链后,良好或极好的功能预后率明显更高。正如预期的那样,感染是最常见的并发症,发生27例(12%),其次是无菌性松动(13例,6%)、伸肌机制断裂(6例,3%)、假体断裂(4例,1.6%)和伤口开裂(4例,1.6%)1。重要提示:术前评估和影像学检查。进行彻底的病史和体格检查,评估综合征或家族史的证据,并利用影像学研究来评估肿瘤。患者体位和切口计划。患者仰卧位,确保胫骨近端有充分通路。准备并包扎病人;通过包括活检道在内的前内侧入路将切口置于肿块中心,并进行纵向切口。切除腓肠肌瓣。在确定近端血管后,继续解剖腓肠肌皮瓣,这通常是直接和快速的(即使在肿瘤切除后)。软组织的解剖及肿瘤切除边缘的确定。保护和收缩腓肠肌内侧皮瓣,然后分离和保护腘血管和胫后血管。深度清扫和关节切除术。如果分期和术前计划显示关节内没有肿瘤,则应进行关节内膝关节切除术。 经髌旁入路行关节切开术,在靠近股骨附着物处切开十字韧带。肿瘤切除。肿瘤标本经周向释放后,确定截骨水平,解剖与胫骨近端相连的任何剩余结构,以切除整个肿瘤。检查和止血。评估止血情况并送标本作病理分析。准备重建阶段,关闭手术部位。胫骨近端模数内假体重建。肿瘤巨型内假体因其多功能性、能够产生良好的功能结果、能够立即承重以及可能的成本效益而具有吸引力。伸肌机构重建。常用的入路包括内侧腓肠肌皮瓣。监测和术后护理。术后监测至关重要。严格的康复方案,全面伸展固定4周,然后渐进活动3个月,对于保证更好的功能效果至关重要。首字母缩写:GCT =巨细胞肿瘤hiv =人类免疫缺陷病毒hbv =乙型肝炎病毒hcv =丙型肝炎病毒-随访ct =计算机断层扫描mri =磁共振成像pet =正电子发射断层扫描suv =标准化摄取值echt (ISG/OS2) =化疗ymtx - hd =大剂量甲氨蝶呤ecdp =顺铂adm =多柔比星mftr = Kotz模块化股骨-胫骨重建系统hmrs = Howmedica模块化切除系统gmrs =全球模块化替代系统
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Proximal Tibial Resection for Bone Tumor and Prosthetic Reconstruction Combined with Medial Gastrocnemius Flap.

Background: Primary bone tumors frequently occur in the proximal tibia, ranking as the second most common location after the distal femur1. Challenges to treatment include the proximity of neurovascular structures, limited soft-tissue coverage, compromised knee extension, and postoperative complications1-8. The present video article describes proximal tibial resection for the treatment of a bone tumor and prosthetic reconstruction combined with a medial gastrocnemius flap.

Description: Proximal tibial resection is performed with use of an anteromedial approach. After defining the resection level, the tumor is removed en bloc with wide free margins. Reconstruction is performed with use of a megaprosthesis, and the medial gastrocnemius flap is utilized for covering the prosthesis and for reconstruction of the extensor apparatus.

Alternatives: Osteoarticular allografts and allograft-prosthesis composites allow restoration of bone stock and direct biological reattachment of host tendons, ligaments, and capsule. Autografting is performed using the fibula as a donor site. Custom-made implants can be designed according to the patient's anatomy. Amputation should be considered when the neurovascular bundle is widely involved by the tumor.

Rationale: In contrast to alternative treatments, megaprosthetic reconstructions offer several advantages: technical simplicity, immediate weight-bearing, and shorter immobilization. Additionally, megaprostheses do not carry the risk of allograft-related complications, such as nonunion, fracture, subchondral collapse, articular cartilage degeneration, and instability.

Expected outcomes: Patients with metallic endoprostheses demonstrate lower rates of complications and amputation, as well as higher patient survival rates, compared with those treated with allograft reconstructions7,9,10. The advancements in technology and design since 1977 have contributed to reduced mechanical stress at the bone-prosthesis interface and decreased rates of mechanical or structural failure3,11,12. However, despite advancements in design, proximal tibial prosthetic reconstructions continue to exhibit the least favorable outcomes and function among all limb-salvage procedures, accompanied by the highest rate of complications1,9-11. Studies report survival rates ranging from 45% to 82% at 5 years and 45% to 78% at 10 years1,13, with rates of revision for infection and loosening ranging from 40% at 5 years to 73% at 15 years1,10,13. Various techniques are utilized for attaching the extensor mechanism of the knee and providing coverage for proximal tibial reconstructions7,8,10,14,15. Various studies have emphasized the importance of direct attachment of the extensor mechanism to the megaprosthesis, which facilitates initial mechanical stability crucial for healing and scarring7,10,16. Pedicled muscle flaps, particularly the medial or lateral gastrocnemius, have commonly been utilized to supply blood to aid wound healing and to biologically reconstruct the extensor mechanism7-9. Despite some patients experiencing increased extension lag, gradual improvement in function17 was observed during follow-up. In our experience with 225 proximal tibial resections, survival of megaprosthetic reconstructions was 82% and 78% at 5 and 10 years, respectively, without any difference between the use of a fixed versus rotating hinge1. However, the rate of good or excellent functional outcomes, as measured according to the Musculoskeletal Tumor Society (MSTS) system17, was significantly higher with use of a rotating hinge. Infection was, as expected, the most frequent complication, occurring in 27 patients (12%), followed by aseptic loosening (13 patients, 6%), rupture of the extensor mechanism (6 patients, 3%), breakage of the prostheses (4 patients, 1.6%), and wound dehiscence (4 patients, 1.6%)1.

Important tips: Preoperative evaluation and imaging. Perform a thorough history and physical examination, assess for evidence of a syndrome or family history, and utilize imaging studies to evaluate the tumor.Patient positioning and incision planning. Position the patient supine to ensure full access to the proximal tibia. Prepare and drape the patient; center the incision on the mass through an anteromedial approach including the biopsy tract and perform a longitudinal incision.Harvest the gastrocnemius flap. After identifying the proximal vessels, proceed to dissect the gastrocnemius flap, which is typically straightforward and rapid (even after tumor removal).Dissection of soft tissue and definition of the tumor resection margin. Protect and retract the medial gastrocnemius flap and then isolate and protect the popliteal and posterior tibial vessels.Deep dissection and articular resection. If staging and preoperative planning indicated no evidence of tumor inside the joint, intra-articular knee resection should be conducted. Arthrotomy is performed through a parapatellar approach, and the cruciate ligaments are cut close to the femoral attachment.Tumor removal. After the specimen with the tumor is freed circumferentially, identify the osteotomy level and dissect any remaining structures connected with proximal tibia to remove the entire tumor.Inspection and hemostasis. Evaluate for hemostasis and send the specimen for pathologic analysis. Prepare for the reconstructive phase and close the surgical site.Proximal tibial reconstruction with a modular endoprosthesis. Tumor mega-endoprostheses are appealing because of their versatility, ability to yield favorable functional outcomes, ability to allow immediate weight-bearing, and possible cost-effectiveness.Reconstruction of the extensor mechanism. The commonly utilized approach involves employing a medial gastrocnemius flap.Monitoring and postoperative care. Postoperative monitoring is crucial. A strict rehabilitation protocol with immobilization in full extension for 4 weeks followed by progressive mobilization for 3 months is critical to guarantee better functional results.

Acronyms and abbreviations: GCT = giant cell tumorHIV = human immunodeficiency virusHBV = hepatitis B virusHCV = hepatitis C virusf-up = follow-upCT = computed tomographyMRI = magnetic resonance imagingPET = positron emission tomographySUV = standardized uptake valueCht (ISG/OS2) = chemotherapyMTX-HD = high-dose methotrexateCDP = cisplatinADM = doxorubicinKMFTR = Kotz Modular Femur-Tibia Reconstruction systemHMRS = Howmedica Modular Resection SystemGMRS = Global Modular Replacement System.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
22
期刊介绍: JBJS Essential Surgical Techniques (JBJS EST) is the premier journal describing how to perform orthopaedic surgical procedures, verified by evidence-based outcomes, vetted by peer review, while utilizing online delivery, imagery and video to optimize the educational experience, thereby enhancing patient care.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信