泰国职业倦怠评估工具(T-BAT):在护士中的翻译、效度和信度检验。

IF 1.4 Q3 NURSING
Belitung Nursing Journal Pub Date : 2025-10-05 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.33546/bnj.4086
Vachira Posai, Wisarut Srisintorn, Paramee Thongsuksai, Chanokporn Jitpanya
{"title":"泰国职业倦怠评估工具(T-BAT):在护士中的翻译、效度和信度检验。","authors":"Vachira Posai, Wisarut Srisintorn, Paramee Thongsuksai, Chanokporn Jitpanya","doi":"10.33546/bnj.4086","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The Burnout Assessment Tool (BAT), an instrument for measuring burnout among healthcare professionals, was originally developed in English and remains unadopted and unvalidated within the Thai healthcare context. Despite its widespread international use, cultural and linguistic variations necessitate rigorous contextual validation.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study aimed to translate the BAT into Thai (T-BAT) and evaluate its psychometric properties among Thai nurses, addressing critical gaps in cross-cultural burnout assessment.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A cross-sectional survey was conducted among 1,005 nurses from two government hospitals in Thailand, employing a multistage sampling with quota-based convenience selection. Participant inclusion criteria comprised full-time nursing employment, a minimum bachelor's degree in nursing, and at least three months of hospital work experience. The BAT underwent a back-translation process to ensure linguistic and cultural equivalence. The psychometric evaluation encompassed descriptive statistical analysis, internal consistency assessment, known-group validity testing through hypothesis, and construct validation via confirmatory factor analysis (CFA). Finally, Rasch analysis, evaluating item performance and measurement precision, was used.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The T-BAT exhibited robust psychometric characteristics, including internal consistency (Cronbach's alpha = 0.93), known-group validity (significant score variations across nurse subgroups), and construct validity (confirmatory factor analysis validating the proposed four-factor model). Finally, Rasch analysis demonstrated optimal item performance, including fit statistics within acceptable ranges (Infit: 0.78-1.40; Outfit: 0.73-1.41). Person and item reliability indices consistently exceeded 0.80, indicating high reliability of the scale.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The study substantiates the T-BAT as a reliable and valid instrument for assessing burnout among Thai nurses. This culturally adapted tool provides a context-specific approach to understanding burnout, potentially enabling more targeted interventions by healthcare policymakers, hospital administrators, and nursing leaders.</p>","PeriodicalId":42002,"journal":{"name":"Belitung Nursing Journal","volume":"11 5","pages":"602-611"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12502758/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Thai Burnout Assessment Tool (T-BAT): Translation, validity, and reliability testing in nurses.\",\"authors\":\"Vachira Posai, Wisarut Srisintorn, Paramee Thongsuksai, Chanokporn Jitpanya\",\"doi\":\"10.33546/bnj.4086\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The Burnout Assessment Tool (BAT), an instrument for measuring burnout among healthcare professionals, was originally developed in English and remains unadopted and unvalidated within the Thai healthcare context. Despite its widespread international use, cultural and linguistic variations necessitate rigorous contextual validation.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study aimed to translate the BAT into Thai (T-BAT) and evaluate its psychometric properties among Thai nurses, addressing critical gaps in cross-cultural burnout assessment.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A cross-sectional survey was conducted among 1,005 nurses from two government hospitals in Thailand, employing a multistage sampling with quota-based convenience selection. Participant inclusion criteria comprised full-time nursing employment, a minimum bachelor's degree in nursing, and at least three months of hospital work experience. The BAT underwent a back-translation process to ensure linguistic and cultural equivalence. The psychometric evaluation encompassed descriptive statistical analysis, internal consistency assessment, known-group validity testing through hypothesis, and construct validation via confirmatory factor analysis (CFA). Finally, Rasch analysis, evaluating item performance and measurement precision, was used.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The T-BAT exhibited robust psychometric characteristics, including internal consistency (Cronbach's alpha = 0.93), known-group validity (significant score variations across nurse subgroups), and construct validity (confirmatory factor analysis validating the proposed four-factor model). Finally, Rasch analysis demonstrated optimal item performance, including fit statistics within acceptable ranges (Infit: 0.78-1.40; Outfit: 0.73-1.41). Person and item reliability indices consistently exceeded 0.80, indicating high reliability of the scale.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The study substantiates the T-BAT as a reliable and valid instrument for assessing burnout among Thai nurses. This culturally adapted tool provides a context-specific approach to understanding burnout, potentially enabling more targeted interventions by healthcare policymakers, hospital administrators, and nursing leaders.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":42002,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Belitung Nursing Journal\",\"volume\":\"11 5\",\"pages\":\"602-611\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-10-05\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12502758/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Belitung Nursing Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.33546/bnj.4086\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"NURSING\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Belitung Nursing Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.33546/bnj.4086","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:职业倦怠评估工具(BAT)是一种测量医疗保健专业人员职业倦怠的工具,最初是用英语开发的,在泰国医疗保健领域尚未采用和验证。尽管它在国际上广泛使用,但文化和语言的差异需要严格的语境验证。目的:本研究旨在将泰国护士职业倦怠量表(T-BAT)翻译成泰语,并评估其心理测量特征,以解决跨文化职业倦怠评估的关键空白。方法:对泰国两所公立医院的1005名护士进行横断面调查,采用多阶段抽样,配额选择方便。参与者的纳入标准包括全职护理工作,至少有护理学士学位,至少有三个月的医院工作经验。为了确保语言和文化上的对等,BAT经历了一个反译过程。心理测量学评估包括描述性统计分析、内部一致性评估、假设的已知组效度检验和验证性因子分析(CFA)的结构验证。最后,采用Rasch分析法评价项目性能和测量精度。结果:T-BAT表现出强大的心理测量特征,包括内部一致性(Cronbach's alpha = 0.93),已知组效度(护士亚组之间的显著得分差异)和结构效度(验证性因子分析验证了所提出的四因素模型)。最后,Rasch分析展示了最佳的项目性能,包括在可接受范围内的适合统计(Infit: 0.78-1.40; Outfit: 0.73-1.41)。人、项信度指标均超过0.80,表明量表具有较高的信度。结论:本研究证实T-BAT是一种可靠有效的评估泰国护士职业倦怠的工具。这种适应文化的工具提供了一种特定于情境的方法来理解倦怠,可能使医疗保健政策制定者、医院管理者和护理领导者能够更有针对性地进行干预。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Thai Burnout Assessment Tool (T-BAT): Translation, validity, and reliability testing in nurses.

Thai Burnout Assessment Tool (T-BAT): Translation, validity, and reliability testing in nurses.

Thai Burnout Assessment Tool (T-BAT): Translation, validity, and reliability testing in nurses.

Background: The Burnout Assessment Tool (BAT), an instrument for measuring burnout among healthcare professionals, was originally developed in English and remains unadopted and unvalidated within the Thai healthcare context. Despite its widespread international use, cultural and linguistic variations necessitate rigorous contextual validation.

Objective: This study aimed to translate the BAT into Thai (T-BAT) and evaluate its psychometric properties among Thai nurses, addressing critical gaps in cross-cultural burnout assessment.

Methods: A cross-sectional survey was conducted among 1,005 nurses from two government hospitals in Thailand, employing a multistage sampling with quota-based convenience selection. Participant inclusion criteria comprised full-time nursing employment, a minimum bachelor's degree in nursing, and at least three months of hospital work experience. The BAT underwent a back-translation process to ensure linguistic and cultural equivalence. The psychometric evaluation encompassed descriptive statistical analysis, internal consistency assessment, known-group validity testing through hypothesis, and construct validation via confirmatory factor analysis (CFA). Finally, Rasch analysis, evaluating item performance and measurement precision, was used.

Results: The T-BAT exhibited robust psychometric characteristics, including internal consistency (Cronbach's alpha = 0.93), known-group validity (significant score variations across nurse subgroups), and construct validity (confirmatory factor analysis validating the proposed four-factor model). Finally, Rasch analysis demonstrated optimal item performance, including fit statistics within acceptable ranges (Infit: 0.78-1.40; Outfit: 0.73-1.41). Person and item reliability indices consistently exceeded 0.80, indicating high reliability of the scale.

Conclusion: The study substantiates the T-BAT as a reliable and valid instrument for assessing burnout among Thai nurses. This culturally adapted tool provides a context-specific approach to understanding burnout, potentially enabling more targeted interventions by healthcare policymakers, hospital administrators, and nursing leaders.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.90
自引率
42.90%
发文量
0
审稿时长
12 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信