PHQ-9在初级保健中监测抑郁症:一项定性研究。

IF 2 Q2 PRIMARY HEALTH CARE
BJGP Open Pub Date : 2025-10-08 DOI:10.3399/BJGPO.2025.0159
Brian Cf Ching, Rachel Dewar-Haggart, Carl R May, Geraldine Leydon, Tony Kendrick, Emilia Trapasso, Tasneem Patel, Molly Bird, Lauren Bridewell, Lien Bui, Emma Corcoran, Jane S Hahn, Riya Tiwari, Mekeda X Logan, Christopher Dowrick, Glyn Lewis, Mark Gabbay, Adam Wa Geraghty
{"title":"PHQ-9在初级保健中监测抑郁症:一项定性研究。","authors":"Brian Cf Ching, Rachel Dewar-Haggart, Carl R May, Geraldine Leydon, Tony Kendrick, Emilia Trapasso, Tasneem Patel, Molly Bird, Lauren Bridewell, Lien Bui, Emma Corcoran, Jane S Hahn, Riya Tiwari, Mekeda X Logan, Christopher Dowrick, Glyn Lewis, Mark Gabbay, Adam Wa Geraghty","doi":"10.3399/BJGPO.2025.0159","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Primary care guidelines recommend general practitioners consider using depression symptom questionnaires as patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) to monitor depression in adults to inform treatment and evaluate management strategies. The PROMDEP randomised controlled trial assessed the use of the Patient Health Questionnaire's (PHQ-9) effectiveness and cost-effectiveness for monitoring depression. We gathered qualitative evidence on the views and experiences of participating patients and practitioners to inform interpretation of the findings.</p><p><strong>Aim: </strong>To explore the views and experiences of patients and practitioners of using the PHQ-9 in the PROMDEP trial of monitoring depression in primary care.</p><p><strong>Design & setting: </strong>Nested qualitative study and process evaluation of the trial in primary care in England and Wales.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>Twenty-nine patients and 15 practitioners took part in semi-structured telephone or video interviews. Interview data were analysed using thematic analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Patients and practitioners both valued the PHQ-9 and reported limitations in its use for monitoring depression. This included its role in improving understanding of depression, impact on consultation and care, and integration within current primary care processes. In the context of the PROMDEP trial, our findings highlight potential reasons for the mixed trial findings, including how resistance in its use in practice may be due to barriers that make it hard for practitioners to integrate the PHQ-9 in consultations.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Monitoring of depression using PROMs need to be considered within the context of current primary care processes and resources. Further research is warranted to understand how the PHQ-9 can be successfully integrated into consultations.</p>","PeriodicalId":36541,"journal":{"name":"BJGP Open","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Monitoring depression with the PHQ-9 in primary care: a qualitative study.\",\"authors\":\"Brian Cf Ching, Rachel Dewar-Haggart, Carl R May, Geraldine Leydon, Tony Kendrick, Emilia Trapasso, Tasneem Patel, Molly Bird, Lauren Bridewell, Lien Bui, Emma Corcoran, Jane S Hahn, Riya Tiwari, Mekeda X Logan, Christopher Dowrick, Glyn Lewis, Mark Gabbay, Adam Wa Geraghty\",\"doi\":\"10.3399/BJGPO.2025.0159\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Primary care guidelines recommend general practitioners consider using depression symptom questionnaires as patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) to monitor depression in adults to inform treatment and evaluate management strategies. The PROMDEP randomised controlled trial assessed the use of the Patient Health Questionnaire's (PHQ-9) effectiveness and cost-effectiveness for monitoring depression. We gathered qualitative evidence on the views and experiences of participating patients and practitioners to inform interpretation of the findings.</p><p><strong>Aim: </strong>To explore the views and experiences of patients and practitioners of using the PHQ-9 in the PROMDEP trial of monitoring depression in primary care.</p><p><strong>Design & setting: </strong>Nested qualitative study and process evaluation of the trial in primary care in England and Wales.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>Twenty-nine patients and 15 practitioners took part in semi-structured telephone or video interviews. Interview data were analysed using thematic analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Patients and practitioners both valued the PHQ-9 and reported limitations in its use for monitoring depression. This included its role in improving understanding of depression, impact on consultation and care, and integration within current primary care processes. In the context of the PROMDEP trial, our findings highlight potential reasons for the mixed trial findings, including how resistance in its use in practice may be due to barriers that make it hard for practitioners to integrate the PHQ-9 in consultations.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Monitoring of depression using PROMs need to be considered within the context of current primary care processes and resources. Further research is warranted to understand how the PHQ-9 can be successfully integrated into consultations.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":36541,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"BJGP Open\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-10-08\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"BJGP Open\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3399/BJGPO.2025.0159\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"PRIMARY HEALTH CARE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BJGP Open","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3399/BJGPO.2025.0159","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PRIMARY HEALTH CARE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:初级保健指南建议全科医生考虑使用抑郁症状问卷作为患者报告的结果测量(PROMs)来监测成人抑郁症,为治疗和评估管理策略提供信息。PROMDEP随机对照试验评估了使用患者健康问卷(PHQ-9)监测抑郁症的有效性和成本效益。我们收集了关于参与研究的患者和从业人员的观点和经验的定性证据,以告知对研究结果的解释。目的:探讨PHQ-9在PROMDEP试验中用于初级保健抑郁监测的患者和医生的观点和经验。设计与设置:对英格兰和威尔士初级保健试验进行嵌套定性研究和过程评价。方法:对29名患者和15名执业医师进行半结构化电话或视频访谈。访谈数据采用专题分析进行分析。结果:患者和医生都重视PHQ-9,并报告了其用于监测抑郁症的局限性。这包括它在提高对抑郁症的理解方面的作用,对咨询和护理的影响,以及在当前初级保健过程中的整合。在PROMDEP试验的背景下,我们的研究结果强调了混合试验结果的潜在原因,包括在实践中使用PHQ-9的阻力可能是由于从业者难以在咨询中整合PHQ-9的障碍。结论:在当前初级保健流程和资源的背景下,需要考虑使用PROMs监测抑郁症。进一步的研究是必要的,以了解PHQ-9如何能够成功地整合到咨询中。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Monitoring depression with the PHQ-9 in primary care: a qualitative study.

Background: Primary care guidelines recommend general practitioners consider using depression symptom questionnaires as patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) to monitor depression in adults to inform treatment and evaluate management strategies. The PROMDEP randomised controlled trial assessed the use of the Patient Health Questionnaire's (PHQ-9) effectiveness and cost-effectiveness for monitoring depression. We gathered qualitative evidence on the views and experiences of participating patients and practitioners to inform interpretation of the findings.

Aim: To explore the views and experiences of patients and practitioners of using the PHQ-9 in the PROMDEP trial of monitoring depression in primary care.

Design & setting: Nested qualitative study and process evaluation of the trial in primary care in England and Wales.

Method: Twenty-nine patients and 15 practitioners took part in semi-structured telephone or video interviews. Interview data were analysed using thematic analysis.

Results: Patients and practitioners both valued the PHQ-9 and reported limitations in its use for monitoring depression. This included its role in improving understanding of depression, impact on consultation and care, and integration within current primary care processes. In the context of the PROMDEP trial, our findings highlight potential reasons for the mixed trial findings, including how resistance in its use in practice may be due to barriers that make it hard for practitioners to integrate the PHQ-9 in consultations.

Conclusion: Monitoring of depression using PROMs need to be considered within the context of current primary care processes and resources. Further research is warranted to understand how the PHQ-9 can be successfully integrated into consultations.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
BJGP Open
BJGP Open Medicine-Family Practice
CiteScore
5.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
181
审稿时长
22 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信