胃癌胃切除术中增强恢复方案:评估虚弱的影响。

IF 2.5 3区 医学 Q2 SURGERY
Leonardo Solaini, Federica Filippini, Annalisa Coppola, Marco Realis Luc, Marco Milone, Laura Fortuna, Paolo Morgagni, Valentina Zucchini, Fabio Cianchi, Giovanni Domenico De Palma, Elio Treppiedi, Stefano de Pascale, Simone Giacopuzzi, Giorgio Ercolani
{"title":"胃癌胃切除术中增强恢复方案:评估虚弱的影响。","authors":"Leonardo Solaini, Federica Filippini, Annalisa Coppola, Marco Realis Luc, Marco Milone, Laura Fortuna, Paolo Morgagni, Valentina Zucchini, Fabio Cianchi, Giovanni Domenico De Palma, Elio Treppiedi, Stefano de Pascale, Simone Giacopuzzi, Giorgio Ercolani","doi":"10.1002/wjs.70118","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Frailty is a known risk factor for adverse postoperative outcomes after gastrectomy for gastric cancer. However, its impact within standardized enhanced recovery protocols (ERPs) has not been fully elucidated. This study aimed to evaluate the association of frailty with postoperative outcomes and protocol adherence in patients undergoing gastrectomy managed under ERP across six Italian centers.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This retrospective multicenter study included 957 patients undergoing gastrectomy within an ERP between 2018 and 2024. Frailty was assessed using the 5-item modified frailty index (5MFI), classifying patients as frail (5MFI ≥ 2) or nonfrail (5MFI < 2). Postoperative outcomes and compliance with individual ERP components were compared between frail and nonfrail patients. Entropy balancing was applied to adjust for confounders including surgical approach, procedure type, lymphadenectomy, and neoadjuvant therapy.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among ERP patients, 291 (30.4%) were frail. Frail patients were older (median 75 vs. 67 years; p < 0.001) and had higher comorbidity scores. Compliance to ERP items was significantly lower in the frail group for urinary catheter removal within 48 h (64.3% vs. 73.1%, p = 0.024) and avoidance of central venous catheters (36.7% vs. 45.0%, p = 0.043). Overall complication rates (36.8% vs. 32.0%, p = 0.212) and 90-day mortality (2.7% vs. 1.0%, p = 0.146) did not differ significantly between groups. However, frail patients experienced higher rates of pulmonary complications (13.0% vs. 6.2%, p = 0.008) and ICU admissions (15.8% vs. 9.3%, p = 0.029). Length of hospital stay and readmission rates were similar between groups.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Frailty remains a significant factor associated with specific postoperative complications and ICU admissions despite standardized ERP management. Although overall adherence to ERP items was largely comparable, frail patients showed lower compliance with selected preoperative components, suggesting the need for targeted strategies to support full protocol implementation in this vulnerable population.</p>","PeriodicalId":23926,"journal":{"name":"World Journal of Surgery","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Enhanced Recovery Protocols in Gastrectomy for Gastric Cancer: Evaluating the Impact of Frailty.\",\"authors\":\"Leonardo Solaini, Federica Filippini, Annalisa Coppola, Marco Realis Luc, Marco Milone, Laura Fortuna, Paolo Morgagni, Valentina Zucchini, Fabio Cianchi, Giovanni Domenico De Palma, Elio Treppiedi, Stefano de Pascale, Simone Giacopuzzi, Giorgio Ercolani\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/wjs.70118\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Frailty is a known risk factor for adverse postoperative outcomes after gastrectomy for gastric cancer. However, its impact within standardized enhanced recovery protocols (ERPs) has not been fully elucidated. This study aimed to evaluate the association of frailty with postoperative outcomes and protocol adherence in patients undergoing gastrectomy managed under ERP across six Italian centers.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This retrospective multicenter study included 957 patients undergoing gastrectomy within an ERP between 2018 and 2024. Frailty was assessed using the 5-item modified frailty index (5MFI), classifying patients as frail (5MFI ≥ 2) or nonfrail (5MFI < 2). Postoperative outcomes and compliance with individual ERP components were compared between frail and nonfrail patients. Entropy balancing was applied to adjust for confounders including surgical approach, procedure type, lymphadenectomy, and neoadjuvant therapy.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among ERP patients, 291 (30.4%) were frail. Frail patients were older (median 75 vs. 67 years; p < 0.001) and had higher comorbidity scores. Compliance to ERP items was significantly lower in the frail group for urinary catheter removal within 48 h (64.3% vs. 73.1%, p = 0.024) and avoidance of central venous catheters (36.7% vs. 45.0%, p = 0.043). Overall complication rates (36.8% vs. 32.0%, p = 0.212) and 90-day mortality (2.7% vs. 1.0%, p = 0.146) did not differ significantly between groups. However, frail patients experienced higher rates of pulmonary complications (13.0% vs. 6.2%, p = 0.008) and ICU admissions (15.8% vs. 9.3%, p = 0.029). Length of hospital stay and readmission rates were similar between groups.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Frailty remains a significant factor associated with specific postoperative complications and ICU admissions despite standardized ERP management. Although overall adherence to ERP items was largely comparable, frail patients showed lower compliance with selected preoperative components, suggesting the need for targeted strategies to support full protocol implementation in this vulnerable population.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":23926,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"World Journal of Surgery\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-10-08\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"World Journal of Surgery\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1002/wjs.70118\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"SURGERY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"World Journal of Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/wjs.70118","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

简介:虚弱是胃癌切除术后不良预后的已知危险因素。然而,它在标准化增强恢复协议(erp)中的影响尚未完全阐明。本研究旨在评估六个意大利中心接受ERP管理的胃切除术患者的虚弱与术后结果和方案依从性的关系。方法:这项回顾性多中心研究纳入了2018年至2024年间在ERP内接受胃切除术的957例患者。采用5项修正虚弱指数(5MFI)评估虚弱程度,将患者分为虚弱(5MFI≥2)和非虚弱(5MFI < 2)。比较体弱和非体弱患者的术后结果和个体ERP组件的依从性。应用熵平衡来调整混杂因素,包括手术入路、手术类型、淋巴结切除术和新辅助治疗。结果:ERP患者中虚弱291例(30.4%)。结论:尽管标准化的ERP管理,虚弱仍然是与特定术后并发症和ICU入院相关的重要因素。尽管对ERP项目的总体依从性在很大程度上是相似的,但虚弱的患者对术前部分的依从性较低,这表明需要有针对性的策略来支持在脆弱人群中全面实施方案。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Enhanced Recovery Protocols in Gastrectomy for Gastric Cancer: Evaluating the Impact of Frailty.

Introduction: Frailty is a known risk factor for adverse postoperative outcomes after gastrectomy for gastric cancer. However, its impact within standardized enhanced recovery protocols (ERPs) has not been fully elucidated. This study aimed to evaluate the association of frailty with postoperative outcomes and protocol adherence in patients undergoing gastrectomy managed under ERP across six Italian centers.

Methods: This retrospective multicenter study included 957 patients undergoing gastrectomy within an ERP between 2018 and 2024. Frailty was assessed using the 5-item modified frailty index (5MFI), classifying patients as frail (5MFI ≥ 2) or nonfrail (5MFI < 2). Postoperative outcomes and compliance with individual ERP components were compared between frail and nonfrail patients. Entropy balancing was applied to adjust for confounders including surgical approach, procedure type, lymphadenectomy, and neoadjuvant therapy.

Results: Among ERP patients, 291 (30.4%) were frail. Frail patients were older (median 75 vs. 67 years; p < 0.001) and had higher comorbidity scores. Compliance to ERP items was significantly lower in the frail group for urinary catheter removal within 48 h (64.3% vs. 73.1%, p = 0.024) and avoidance of central venous catheters (36.7% vs. 45.0%, p = 0.043). Overall complication rates (36.8% vs. 32.0%, p = 0.212) and 90-day mortality (2.7% vs. 1.0%, p = 0.146) did not differ significantly between groups. However, frail patients experienced higher rates of pulmonary complications (13.0% vs. 6.2%, p = 0.008) and ICU admissions (15.8% vs. 9.3%, p = 0.029). Length of hospital stay and readmission rates were similar between groups.

Conclusions: Frailty remains a significant factor associated with specific postoperative complications and ICU admissions despite standardized ERP management. Although overall adherence to ERP items was largely comparable, frail patients showed lower compliance with selected preoperative components, suggesting the need for targeted strategies to support full protocol implementation in this vulnerable population.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
World Journal of Surgery
World Journal of Surgery 医学-外科
CiteScore
5.10
自引率
3.80%
发文量
460
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: World Journal of Surgery is the official publication of the International Society of Surgery/Societe Internationale de Chirurgie (iss-sic.com). Under the editorship of Dr. Julie Ann Sosa, World Journal of Surgery provides an in-depth, international forum for the most authoritative information on major clinical problems in the fields of clinical and experimental surgery, surgical education, and socioeconomic aspects of surgical care. Contributions are reviewed and selected by a group of distinguished surgeons from across the world who make up the Editorial Board.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信