MOGAD辅助特征在多发性硬化症诊断中的应用

IF 7.5 1区 医学 Q1 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Pietro Zara, Giacomo Greco, Francesco Masi, Stefania Leoni, Valentina Floris, Sabrine Othmani, M Margherita Sechi, Sara Carta, Eduardo Caverzasi, Anna Pichiecchio, Stefano Sotgiu, Paolo Solla, Elena Colombo, Rosa Cortese, Sara Mariotto, Matteo Gastaldi, Elia Sechi
{"title":"MOGAD辅助特征在多发性硬化症诊断中的应用","authors":"Pietro Zara, Giacomo Greco, Francesco Masi, Stefania Leoni, Valentina Floris, Sabrine Othmani, M Margherita Sechi, Sara Carta, Eduardo Caverzasi, Anna Pichiecchio, Stefano Sotgiu, Paolo Solla, Elena Colombo, Rosa Cortese, Sara Mariotto, Matteo Gastaldi, Elia Sechi","doi":"10.1212/NXI.0000000000200503","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and objectives: </strong>In the 2023 diagnostic criteria, supporting clinical/MRI features are required to diagnose myelin oligodendrocyte glycoprotein antibody-associated disease (MOGAD) in patients at high risk of false MOG-IgG positivity (low/unavailable titer, cerebrospinal fluid-restricted), to help differentiation from multiple sclerosis (MS). However, overlap is possible and determining the frequency of the MOGAD supporting features at MS onset may help prevent misdiagnosis. We assessed the frequency of the MOGAD supporting features and potential risk of misdiagnosis at first attack of MS/clinically isolated syndrome (CIS).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In this observational study, we retrospectively identified consecutive patients hospitalized between 2021 and 2024 at 2 Italian centers, with: (1) relapsing-remitting MS/CIS, and (2) first attack MRI available. The frequency of the MOGAD supporting features was assessed at MS/CIS presentation, and potential risk of misdiagnosis determined based on the probability of concurrent false MOG-IgG positivity. Other clinical-MRI features typical of MOGAD but not included in the 2023 diagnostic criteria were also evaluated.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 244 patients with MS/CIS were included (median age, 34 [range, 13-78] years; 66% were female). Overall, 65/244 (27%) patients with MS/CIS showed at least 1 MOGAD supporting feature during the presenting attack. \"Central cord lesion\" (27/82 [33%]) and \"deep gray nuclei involvement\" (24/86 [28%]) were more represented than other supporting features (0%-7%); <i>p</i> < 0.001. MOG-IgG was tested in 207/244 (85%) patients, showing false positivity in 3 (1.4%) patients. The combined probability of detecting a false MOG-IgG positivity and meeting 1 of the MOGAD supporting features was 0.4%. Among other typical MOGAD features not included in the diagnostic criteria, the following had a 0% frequency at MS/CIS presentation: (1) encephalopathy, (2) marked CSF pleocytosis (>50 cells/mm<sup>3</sup>), (3) wheelchair need during myelitis, and (4) MRI T2-lesion resolution postattack.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>Although the MOGAD supporting features can be met in one-fourth of patients at MS/CIS presentation, the risk of misdiagnosis in similar unselected cohorts remains low. Future refinements of the MOGAD supporting features should take into account their relative frequency in MS/CIS and possible integration with additional clinical-MRI features that are more specific for MOGAD.</p>","PeriodicalId":19472,"journal":{"name":"Neurology® Neuroimmunology & Neuroinflammation","volume":"12 6","pages":"e200503"},"PeriodicalIF":7.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12509963/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Applying the Supporting Features for MOGAD Diagnosis to Patients With Multiple Sclerosis.\",\"authors\":\"Pietro Zara, Giacomo Greco, Francesco Masi, Stefania Leoni, Valentina Floris, Sabrine Othmani, M Margherita Sechi, Sara Carta, Eduardo Caverzasi, Anna Pichiecchio, Stefano Sotgiu, Paolo Solla, Elena Colombo, Rosa Cortese, Sara Mariotto, Matteo Gastaldi, Elia Sechi\",\"doi\":\"10.1212/NXI.0000000000200503\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background and objectives: </strong>In the 2023 diagnostic criteria, supporting clinical/MRI features are required to diagnose myelin oligodendrocyte glycoprotein antibody-associated disease (MOGAD) in patients at high risk of false MOG-IgG positivity (low/unavailable titer, cerebrospinal fluid-restricted), to help differentiation from multiple sclerosis (MS). However, overlap is possible and determining the frequency of the MOGAD supporting features at MS onset may help prevent misdiagnosis. We assessed the frequency of the MOGAD supporting features and potential risk of misdiagnosis at first attack of MS/clinically isolated syndrome (CIS).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In this observational study, we retrospectively identified consecutive patients hospitalized between 2021 and 2024 at 2 Italian centers, with: (1) relapsing-remitting MS/CIS, and (2) first attack MRI available. The frequency of the MOGAD supporting features was assessed at MS/CIS presentation, and potential risk of misdiagnosis determined based on the probability of concurrent false MOG-IgG positivity. Other clinical-MRI features typical of MOGAD but not included in the 2023 diagnostic criteria were also evaluated.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 244 patients with MS/CIS were included (median age, 34 [range, 13-78] years; 66% were female). Overall, 65/244 (27%) patients with MS/CIS showed at least 1 MOGAD supporting feature during the presenting attack. \\\"Central cord lesion\\\" (27/82 [33%]) and \\\"deep gray nuclei involvement\\\" (24/86 [28%]) were more represented than other supporting features (0%-7%); <i>p</i> < 0.001. MOG-IgG was tested in 207/244 (85%) patients, showing false positivity in 3 (1.4%) patients. The combined probability of detecting a false MOG-IgG positivity and meeting 1 of the MOGAD supporting features was 0.4%. Among other typical MOGAD features not included in the diagnostic criteria, the following had a 0% frequency at MS/CIS presentation: (1) encephalopathy, (2) marked CSF pleocytosis (>50 cells/mm<sup>3</sup>), (3) wheelchair need during myelitis, and (4) MRI T2-lesion resolution postattack.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>Although the MOGAD supporting features can be met in one-fourth of patients at MS/CIS presentation, the risk of misdiagnosis in similar unselected cohorts remains low. Future refinements of the MOGAD supporting features should take into account their relative frequency in MS/CIS and possible integration with additional clinical-MRI features that are more specific for MOGAD.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":19472,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Neurology® Neuroimmunology & Neuroinflammation\",\"volume\":\"12 6\",\"pages\":\"e200503\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":7.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-11-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12509963/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Neurology® Neuroimmunology & Neuroinflammation\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1212/NXI.0000000000200503\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/10/8 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Neurology® Neuroimmunology & Neuroinflammation","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1212/NXI.0000000000200503","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/10/8 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景与目的:在2023年诊断标准中,对于MOGAD(髓鞘少突胶质细胞糖蛋白抗体相关疾病)假阳性(滴度低/不可用,脑脊液受限)高风险患者,需要支持临床/MRI特征来诊断MOGAD,以帮助与多发性硬化症(MS)鉴别。然而,重叠是可能的,确定MS发病时MOGAD支持特征的频率可能有助于防止误诊。我们评估了MOGAD支持特征的频率和MS/临床孤立综合征(CIS)首次发作时误诊的潜在风险。方法:在这项观察性研究中,我们回顾性地确定了2021年至2024年间在2个意大利中心连续住院的患者,(1)复发缓解型MS/CIS,(2)首次发作MRI可用。在MS/CIS呈现时评估MOGAD支持特征的频率,并根据同时出现MOG-IgG假阳性的概率确定误诊的潜在风险。其他典型的MOGAD的临床mri特征,但不包括在2023诊断标准也进行了评估。结果:共纳入244例MS/CIS患者(中位年龄34岁[范围13-78]岁,66%为女性)。总体而言,244例MS/CIS患者中有65例(27%)在发作时至少表现出1项MOGAD支持特征。“中枢脊髓病变”(27/82[33%])和“深灰色核受累”(24/86[28%])比其他支持特征(0%-7%)更具代表性;P < 0.001。244例患者中有207例(85%)检测了MOG-IgG, 3例(1.4%)患者出现假阳性。检测到MOG-IgG假阳性并满足MOGAD支持特征1的综合概率为0.4%。在其他未包括在诊断标准中的典型MOGAD特征中,以下特征在MS/CIS表现时的发生率为0%:(1)脑病,(2)明显的脑脊液多细胞症(bbb50细胞/mm3),(3)脊髓炎期间需要轮椅,(4)术后MRI t2病变分辨率。讨论:尽管四分之一的MS/CIS患者符合MOGAD支持特征,但在类似的未选择队列中误诊的风险仍然很低。未来对MOGAD支持特征的改进应考虑到它们在MS/CIS中的相对频率,并可能与MOGAD更具体的其他临床mri特征相结合。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Applying the Supporting Features for MOGAD Diagnosis to Patients With Multiple Sclerosis.

Background and objectives: In the 2023 diagnostic criteria, supporting clinical/MRI features are required to diagnose myelin oligodendrocyte glycoprotein antibody-associated disease (MOGAD) in patients at high risk of false MOG-IgG positivity (low/unavailable titer, cerebrospinal fluid-restricted), to help differentiation from multiple sclerosis (MS). However, overlap is possible and determining the frequency of the MOGAD supporting features at MS onset may help prevent misdiagnosis. We assessed the frequency of the MOGAD supporting features and potential risk of misdiagnosis at first attack of MS/clinically isolated syndrome (CIS).

Methods: In this observational study, we retrospectively identified consecutive patients hospitalized between 2021 and 2024 at 2 Italian centers, with: (1) relapsing-remitting MS/CIS, and (2) first attack MRI available. The frequency of the MOGAD supporting features was assessed at MS/CIS presentation, and potential risk of misdiagnosis determined based on the probability of concurrent false MOG-IgG positivity. Other clinical-MRI features typical of MOGAD but not included in the 2023 diagnostic criteria were also evaluated.

Results: A total of 244 patients with MS/CIS were included (median age, 34 [range, 13-78] years; 66% were female). Overall, 65/244 (27%) patients with MS/CIS showed at least 1 MOGAD supporting feature during the presenting attack. "Central cord lesion" (27/82 [33%]) and "deep gray nuclei involvement" (24/86 [28%]) were more represented than other supporting features (0%-7%); p < 0.001. MOG-IgG was tested in 207/244 (85%) patients, showing false positivity in 3 (1.4%) patients. The combined probability of detecting a false MOG-IgG positivity and meeting 1 of the MOGAD supporting features was 0.4%. Among other typical MOGAD features not included in the diagnostic criteria, the following had a 0% frequency at MS/CIS presentation: (1) encephalopathy, (2) marked CSF pleocytosis (>50 cells/mm3), (3) wheelchair need during myelitis, and (4) MRI T2-lesion resolution postattack.

Discussion: Although the MOGAD supporting features can be met in one-fourth of patients at MS/CIS presentation, the risk of misdiagnosis in similar unselected cohorts remains low. Future refinements of the MOGAD supporting features should take into account their relative frequency in MS/CIS and possible integration with additional clinical-MRI features that are more specific for MOGAD.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
15.60
自引率
2.30%
发文量
219
审稿时长
8 weeks
期刊介绍: Neurology Neuroimmunology & Neuroinflammation is an official journal of the American Academy of Neurology. Neurology: Neuroimmunology & Neuroinflammation will be the premier peer-reviewed journal in neuroimmunology and neuroinflammation. This journal publishes rigorously peer-reviewed open-access reports of original research and in-depth reviews of topics in neuroimmunology & neuroinflammation, affecting the full range of neurologic diseases including (but not limited to) Alzheimer's disease, Parkinson's disease, ALS, tauopathy, and stroke; multiple sclerosis and NMO; inflammatory peripheral nerve and muscle disease, Guillain-Barré and myasthenia gravis; nervous system infection; paraneoplastic syndromes, noninfectious encephalitides and other antibody-mediated disorders; and psychiatric and neurodevelopmental disorders. Clinical trials, instructive case reports, and small case series will also be featured.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信