完成健康饮食测验的澳大利亚成年人的饮食质量变化和特征差异:一项队列研究。

IF 3.2 4区 医学 Q3 NUTRITION & DIETETICS
Sasha Fenton, Megan Whatnall, Hannah Edwards, Amelia Rae, Anna Jansson, Erin D Clarke, Clare E Collins
{"title":"完成健康饮食测验的澳大利亚成年人的饮食质量变化和特征差异:一项队列研究。","authors":"Sasha Fenton, Megan Whatnall, Hannah Edwards, Amelia Rae, Anna Jansson, Erin D Clarke, Clare E Collins","doi":"10.1111/1747-0080.70049","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aim: </strong>Investigate changes in diet quality scores in adults who repeated a brief online dietary assessment tool, the Healthy Eating Quiz, and whether changes in diet quality varied by sociodemographic variables, dietary characteristics, or motivations for completing the tool.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This is a secondary analysis of longitudinal data collected July 2019-May 2022. Data from respondents aged 16-100 years who repeated the dietary assessment tool were analysed, including diet quality, measured using the validated Australian Recommended Food Score (range 0-73), sociodemographic and dietary characteristics (gender, age, socioeconomic status, vegetarian status, and meal sharing), and the main motivation for completing the tool. Paired t-tests assessed change in score between first and second tool completion (reported as mean (SD)). One-way ANOVA was used to test whether mean change in score differed by respondent sociodemographic, dietary, or motivation variables.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Across 5189 respondents (73.6% female, 42.0 (17.4) years), mean score improved by 2.28 points during a mean 231 (11) days (p <0.001). Non-vegetarians reported a significantly greater improvement in score than vegetarians (2.39 (6.78) versus 1.56 (6.97) points, p = 0.003). Similarly, those who ate main meals alone improved more (2.70 (7.05) points) compared to those who ate with one (2.15 (6.67) points) or ≥two others (2.14 (6.72) points, p = 0.035).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Using the Healthy Eating Quiz, a diet quality assessment tool, on repeated occasions may contribute to improvements in diet quality in adults.</p>","PeriodicalId":19368,"journal":{"name":"Nutrition & Dietetics","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Change in diet quality and differences in characteristics in Australian adults who completed the Healthy Eating Quiz: A cohort study.\",\"authors\":\"Sasha Fenton, Megan Whatnall, Hannah Edwards, Amelia Rae, Anna Jansson, Erin D Clarke, Clare E Collins\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/1747-0080.70049\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Aim: </strong>Investigate changes in diet quality scores in adults who repeated a brief online dietary assessment tool, the Healthy Eating Quiz, and whether changes in diet quality varied by sociodemographic variables, dietary characteristics, or motivations for completing the tool.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This is a secondary analysis of longitudinal data collected July 2019-May 2022. Data from respondents aged 16-100 years who repeated the dietary assessment tool were analysed, including diet quality, measured using the validated Australian Recommended Food Score (range 0-73), sociodemographic and dietary characteristics (gender, age, socioeconomic status, vegetarian status, and meal sharing), and the main motivation for completing the tool. Paired t-tests assessed change in score between first and second tool completion (reported as mean (SD)). One-way ANOVA was used to test whether mean change in score differed by respondent sociodemographic, dietary, or motivation variables.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Across 5189 respondents (73.6% female, 42.0 (17.4) years), mean score improved by 2.28 points during a mean 231 (11) days (p <0.001). Non-vegetarians reported a significantly greater improvement in score than vegetarians (2.39 (6.78) versus 1.56 (6.97) points, p = 0.003). Similarly, those who ate main meals alone improved more (2.70 (7.05) points) compared to those who ate with one (2.15 (6.67) points) or ≥two others (2.14 (6.72) points, p = 0.035).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Using the Healthy Eating Quiz, a diet quality assessment tool, on repeated occasions may contribute to improvements in diet quality in adults.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":19368,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Nutrition & Dietetics\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-10-08\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Nutrition & Dietetics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1111/1747-0080.70049\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"NUTRITION & DIETETICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Nutrition & Dietetics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/1747-0080.70049","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"NUTRITION & DIETETICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:调查重复简短在线饮食评估工具健康饮食测验的成年人饮食质量评分的变化,以及饮食质量的变化是否因社会人口统计学变量、饮食特征或完成该工具的动机而变化。方法:对2019年7月至2022年5月收集的纵向数据进行二次分析。分析了16-100岁重复使用饮食评估工具的受访者的数据,包括饮食质量,使用经过验证的澳大利亚推荐食物评分(范围0-73),社会人口统计学和饮食特征(性别,年龄,社会经济地位,素食状态和用餐共享)进行测量,以及完成该工具的主要动机。配对t检验评估了第一次和第二次工具完成之间的得分变化(以平均值(SD)报告)。采用单因素方差分析来检验得分的平均变化是否因被调查者的社会人口学、饮食或动机变量而异。结果:在5189名受访者中(73.6%为女性,42.0(17.4)岁),平均得分在平均231(11)天内提高了2.28分(p结论:反复使用健康饮食测验,一种饮食质量评估工具,可能有助于改善成年人的饮食质量。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Change in diet quality and differences in characteristics in Australian adults who completed the Healthy Eating Quiz: A cohort study.

Aim: Investigate changes in diet quality scores in adults who repeated a brief online dietary assessment tool, the Healthy Eating Quiz, and whether changes in diet quality varied by sociodemographic variables, dietary characteristics, or motivations for completing the tool.

Methods: This is a secondary analysis of longitudinal data collected July 2019-May 2022. Data from respondents aged 16-100 years who repeated the dietary assessment tool were analysed, including diet quality, measured using the validated Australian Recommended Food Score (range 0-73), sociodemographic and dietary characteristics (gender, age, socioeconomic status, vegetarian status, and meal sharing), and the main motivation for completing the tool. Paired t-tests assessed change in score between first and second tool completion (reported as mean (SD)). One-way ANOVA was used to test whether mean change in score differed by respondent sociodemographic, dietary, or motivation variables.

Results: Across 5189 respondents (73.6% female, 42.0 (17.4) years), mean score improved by 2.28 points during a mean 231 (11) days (p <0.001). Non-vegetarians reported a significantly greater improvement in score than vegetarians (2.39 (6.78) versus 1.56 (6.97) points, p = 0.003). Similarly, those who ate main meals alone improved more (2.70 (7.05) points) compared to those who ate with one (2.15 (6.67) points) or ≥two others (2.14 (6.72) points, p = 0.035).

Conclusion: Using the Healthy Eating Quiz, a diet quality assessment tool, on repeated occasions may contribute to improvements in diet quality in adults.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Nutrition & Dietetics
Nutrition & Dietetics 医学-营养学
CiteScore
6.40
自引率
16.10%
发文量
69
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Nutrition & Dietetics is the official journal of the Dietitians Association of Australia. Covering all aspects of food, nutrition and dietetics, the Journal provides a forum for the reporting, discussion and development of scientifically credible knowledge related to human nutrition and dietetics. Widely respected in Australia and around the world, Nutrition & Dietetics publishes original research, methodology analyses, research reviews and much more. The Journal aims to keep health professionals abreast of current knowledge on human nutrition and diet, and accepts contributions from around the world.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信