Sasha Fenton, Megan Whatnall, Hannah Edwards, Amelia Rae, Anna Jansson, Erin D Clarke, Clare E Collins
{"title":"完成健康饮食测验的澳大利亚成年人的饮食质量变化和特征差异:一项队列研究。","authors":"Sasha Fenton, Megan Whatnall, Hannah Edwards, Amelia Rae, Anna Jansson, Erin D Clarke, Clare E Collins","doi":"10.1111/1747-0080.70049","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aim: </strong>Investigate changes in diet quality scores in adults who repeated a brief online dietary assessment tool, the Healthy Eating Quiz, and whether changes in diet quality varied by sociodemographic variables, dietary characteristics, or motivations for completing the tool.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This is a secondary analysis of longitudinal data collected July 2019-May 2022. Data from respondents aged 16-100 years who repeated the dietary assessment tool were analysed, including diet quality, measured using the validated Australian Recommended Food Score (range 0-73), sociodemographic and dietary characteristics (gender, age, socioeconomic status, vegetarian status, and meal sharing), and the main motivation for completing the tool. Paired t-tests assessed change in score between first and second tool completion (reported as mean (SD)). One-way ANOVA was used to test whether mean change in score differed by respondent sociodemographic, dietary, or motivation variables.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Across 5189 respondents (73.6% female, 42.0 (17.4) years), mean score improved by 2.28 points during a mean 231 (11) days (p <0.001). Non-vegetarians reported a significantly greater improvement in score than vegetarians (2.39 (6.78) versus 1.56 (6.97) points, p = 0.003). Similarly, those who ate main meals alone improved more (2.70 (7.05) points) compared to those who ate with one (2.15 (6.67) points) or ≥two others (2.14 (6.72) points, p = 0.035).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Using the Healthy Eating Quiz, a diet quality assessment tool, on repeated occasions may contribute to improvements in diet quality in adults.</p>","PeriodicalId":19368,"journal":{"name":"Nutrition & Dietetics","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Change in diet quality and differences in characteristics in Australian adults who completed the Healthy Eating Quiz: A cohort study.\",\"authors\":\"Sasha Fenton, Megan Whatnall, Hannah Edwards, Amelia Rae, Anna Jansson, Erin D Clarke, Clare E Collins\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/1747-0080.70049\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Aim: </strong>Investigate changes in diet quality scores in adults who repeated a brief online dietary assessment tool, the Healthy Eating Quiz, and whether changes in diet quality varied by sociodemographic variables, dietary characteristics, or motivations for completing the tool.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This is a secondary analysis of longitudinal data collected July 2019-May 2022. Data from respondents aged 16-100 years who repeated the dietary assessment tool were analysed, including diet quality, measured using the validated Australian Recommended Food Score (range 0-73), sociodemographic and dietary characteristics (gender, age, socioeconomic status, vegetarian status, and meal sharing), and the main motivation for completing the tool. Paired t-tests assessed change in score between first and second tool completion (reported as mean (SD)). One-way ANOVA was used to test whether mean change in score differed by respondent sociodemographic, dietary, or motivation variables.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Across 5189 respondents (73.6% female, 42.0 (17.4) years), mean score improved by 2.28 points during a mean 231 (11) days (p <0.001). Non-vegetarians reported a significantly greater improvement in score than vegetarians (2.39 (6.78) versus 1.56 (6.97) points, p = 0.003). Similarly, those who ate main meals alone improved more (2.70 (7.05) points) compared to those who ate with one (2.15 (6.67) points) or ≥two others (2.14 (6.72) points, p = 0.035).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Using the Healthy Eating Quiz, a diet quality assessment tool, on repeated occasions may contribute to improvements in diet quality in adults.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":19368,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Nutrition & Dietetics\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-10-08\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Nutrition & Dietetics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1111/1747-0080.70049\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"NUTRITION & DIETETICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Nutrition & Dietetics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/1747-0080.70049","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"NUTRITION & DIETETICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
Change in diet quality and differences in characteristics in Australian adults who completed the Healthy Eating Quiz: A cohort study.
Aim: Investigate changes in diet quality scores in adults who repeated a brief online dietary assessment tool, the Healthy Eating Quiz, and whether changes in diet quality varied by sociodemographic variables, dietary characteristics, or motivations for completing the tool.
Methods: This is a secondary analysis of longitudinal data collected July 2019-May 2022. Data from respondents aged 16-100 years who repeated the dietary assessment tool were analysed, including diet quality, measured using the validated Australian Recommended Food Score (range 0-73), sociodemographic and dietary characteristics (gender, age, socioeconomic status, vegetarian status, and meal sharing), and the main motivation for completing the tool. Paired t-tests assessed change in score between first and second tool completion (reported as mean (SD)). One-way ANOVA was used to test whether mean change in score differed by respondent sociodemographic, dietary, or motivation variables.
Results: Across 5189 respondents (73.6% female, 42.0 (17.4) years), mean score improved by 2.28 points during a mean 231 (11) days (p <0.001). Non-vegetarians reported a significantly greater improvement in score than vegetarians (2.39 (6.78) versus 1.56 (6.97) points, p = 0.003). Similarly, those who ate main meals alone improved more (2.70 (7.05) points) compared to those who ate with one (2.15 (6.67) points) or ≥two others (2.14 (6.72) points, p = 0.035).
Conclusion: Using the Healthy Eating Quiz, a diet quality assessment tool, on repeated occasions may contribute to improvements in diet quality in adults.
期刊介绍:
Nutrition & Dietetics is the official journal of the Dietitians Association of Australia. Covering all aspects of food, nutrition and dietetics, the Journal provides a forum for the reporting, discussion and development of scientifically credible knowledge related to human nutrition and dietetics. Widely respected in Australia and around the world, Nutrition & Dietetics publishes original research, methodology analyses, research reviews and much more. The Journal aims to keep health professionals abreast of current knowledge on human nutrition and diet, and accepts contributions from around the world.