肘关节脱位和骨折脱位后外侧尺侧副韧带损伤的手术治疗:初级修复和掌长肌腱重建的比较结果。

IF 1.6 4区 医学
Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery Pub Date : 2025-09-01 Epub Date: 2025-10-08 DOI:10.1177/10225536251387310
Eralp Erdogan, Zafer Gunes
{"title":"肘关节脱位和骨折脱位后外侧尺侧副韧带损伤的手术治疗:初级修复和掌长肌腱重建的比较结果。","authors":"Eralp Erdogan, Zafer Gunes","doi":"10.1177/10225536251387310","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>ObjectivesThis study compared outcomes of primary repair and palmaris longus tendon reconstruction in patients with lateral ulnar collateral ligament (LUCL) injuries.Material and MethodA retrospective comparative cohort study was conducted between 2017 and 2023, including 40 patients who underwent surgery for elbow dislocation or fracture-dislocation with intraoperatively confirmed LUCL injury. Surgical choice was made intraoperatively: repair was performed if the ligament could be reattached without tension, while reconstruction was selected if the tissue was shortened, retracted, or degenerative. Patients were divided into a repair group (n = 17) and a reconstruction group (n = 23). Clinical outcomes included Visual Analog Scale (VAS), Quick Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand (QuickDASH), Mayo Elbow Performance Score (MEPS), range of motion (ROM), fracture healing, and complications, with a mean follow-up of 26.4 months.ResultsThe repair group showed mean VAS 16.2, QuickDASH 9.7, MEPS 89.9, and ROM 137.2°, while the reconstruction group had VAS 17.2, QuickDASH 8.4, MEPS 89.0, and ROM 133.6°. There were no significant differences in VAS, QuickDASH, or MEPS, though the repair group demonstrated superior ROM (p = 0.029). The absolute ROM difference (∼3-4°) was not considered clinically meaningful. In isolated LUCL cases (n = 15), no significant differences were observed between groups. All associated fractures achieved union without non-union or malunion. Complications included heterotopic ossification in seven patients (three repairs, four reconstructions) and two superficial infections, all successfully managed without reoperation. No patient developed recurrent instability, nerve deficits, or clinically significant stiffness.ConclusionBoth primary repair and palmaris longus tendon reconstruction provided satisfactory outcomes and durable stability. Although the repair group showed slightly greater ROM, this difference was not clinically relevant and disappeared when patients with concomitant fractures were excluded. Injury complexity, rather than surgical technique, appears to be the main determinant of long-term function.</p>","PeriodicalId":16608,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery","volume":"33 3","pages":"10225536251387310"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Surgical management of lateral ulnar collateral ligament injuries in elbow dislocations and fracture-dislocations: Comparative outcomes of primary repair and palmaris longus tendon reconstruction.\",\"authors\":\"Eralp Erdogan, Zafer Gunes\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/10225536251387310\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>ObjectivesThis study compared outcomes of primary repair and palmaris longus tendon reconstruction in patients with lateral ulnar collateral ligament (LUCL) injuries.Material and MethodA retrospective comparative cohort study was conducted between 2017 and 2023, including 40 patients who underwent surgery for elbow dislocation or fracture-dislocation with intraoperatively confirmed LUCL injury. Surgical choice was made intraoperatively: repair was performed if the ligament could be reattached without tension, while reconstruction was selected if the tissue was shortened, retracted, or degenerative. Patients were divided into a repair group (n = 17) and a reconstruction group (n = 23). Clinical outcomes included Visual Analog Scale (VAS), Quick Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand (QuickDASH), Mayo Elbow Performance Score (MEPS), range of motion (ROM), fracture healing, and complications, with a mean follow-up of 26.4 months.ResultsThe repair group showed mean VAS 16.2, QuickDASH 9.7, MEPS 89.9, and ROM 137.2°, while the reconstruction group had VAS 17.2, QuickDASH 8.4, MEPS 89.0, and ROM 133.6°. There were no significant differences in VAS, QuickDASH, or MEPS, though the repair group demonstrated superior ROM (p = 0.029). The absolute ROM difference (∼3-4°) was not considered clinically meaningful. In isolated LUCL cases (n = 15), no significant differences were observed between groups. All associated fractures achieved union without non-union or malunion. Complications included heterotopic ossification in seven patients (three repairs, four reconstructions) and two superficial infections, all successfully managed without reoperation. No patient developed recurrent instability, nerve deficits, or clinically significant stiffness.ConclusionBoth primary repair and palmaris longus tendon reconstruction provided satisfactory outcomes and durable stability. Although the repair group showed slightly greater ROM, this difference was not clinically relevant and disappeared when patients with concomitant fractures were excluded. Injury complexity, rather than surgical technique, appears to be the main determinant of long-term function.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":16608,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery\",\"volume\":\"33 3\",\"pages\":\"10225536251387310\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/10225536251387310\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/10/8 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/10225536251387310","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/10/8 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的比较尺侧副韧带(LUCL)损伤患者的初级修复和掌长肌腱重建的效果。材料与方法2017 - 2023年进行回顾性比较队列研究,纳入40例手术治疗肘关节脱位或骨折脱位并术中确认LUCL损伤的患者。术中进行手术选择:如果韧带可以无张力地重新连接,则进行修复,如果组织缩短、收缩或退行性变,则选择重建。患者分为修复组(17例)和重建组(23例)。临床结果包括视觉模拟量表(VAS)、手臂、肩膀和手的快速残疾(QuickDASH)、梅奥肘部功能评分(MEPS)、活动范围(ROM)、骨折愈合和并发症,平均随访26.4个月。结果修复组平均VAS 16.2, QuickDASH 9.7, MEPS 89.9, ROM 137.2°;重建组平均VAS 17.2, QuickDASH 8.4, MEPS 89.0, ROM 133.6°。VAS、QuickDASH、MEPS均无显著差异,修复组ROM优于对照组(p = 0.029)。绝对ROM差异(~ 3-4°)被认为没有临床意义。在孤立的LUCL病例中(n = 15),两组间无显著差异。所有相关骨折均愈合,无骨不连或畸形愈合。并发症包括7例患者异位骨化(3例修复,4例重建)和2例浅表感染,均成功处理,无需再次手术。没有患者出现复发性不稳定、神经缺损或临床上明显的僵硬。结论初级修复和掌长肌腱重建均能获得满意的结果和持久的稳定性。虽然修复组的ROM稍大,但这种差异没有临床意义,当排除合并骨折的患者时,这种差异就消失了。损伤的复杂性,而不是手术技术,似乎是长期功能的主要决定因素。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Surgical management of lateral ulnar collateral ligament injuries in elbow dislocations and fracture-dislocations: Comparative outcomes of primary repair and palmaris longus tendon reconstruction.

ObjectivesThis study compared outcomes of primary repair and palmaris longus tendon reconstruction in patients with lateral ulnar collateral ligament (LUCL) injuries.Material and MethodA retrospective comparative cohort study was conducted between 2017 and 2023, including 40 patients who underwent surgery for elbow dislocation or fracture-dislocation with intraoperatively confirmed LUCL injury. Surgical choice was made intraoperatively: repair was performed if the ligament could be reattached without tension, while reconstruction was selected if the tissue was shortened, retracted, or degenerative. Patients were divided into a repair group (n = 17) and a reconstruction group (n = 23). Clinical outcomes included Visual Analog Scale (VAS), Quick Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand (QuickDASH), Mayo Elbow Performance Score (MEPS), range of motion (ROM), fracture healing, and complications, with a mean follow-up of 26.4 months.ResultsThe repair group showed mean VAS 16.2, QuickDASH 9.7, MEPS 89.9, and ROM 137.2°, while the reconstruction group had VAS 17.2, QuickDASH 8.4, MEPS 89.0, and ROM 133.6°. There were no significant differences in VAS, QuickDASH, or MEPS, though the repair group demonstrated superior ROM (p = 0.029). The absolute ROM difference (∼3-4°) was not considered clinically meaningful. In isolated LUCL cases (n = 15), no significant differences were observed between groups. All associated fractures achieved union without non-union or malunion. Complications included heterotopic ossification in seven patients (three repairs, four reconstructions) and two superficial infections, all successfully managed without reoperation. No patient developed recurrent instability, nerve deficits, or clinically significant stiffness.ConclusionBoth primary repair and palmaris longus tendon reconstruction provided satisfactory outcomes and durable stability. Although the repair group showed slightly greater ROM, this difference was not clinically relevant and disappeared when patients with concomitant fractures were excluded. Injury complexity, rather than surgical technique, appears to be the main determinant of long-term function.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
91
期刊介绍: Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery is an open access peer-reviewed journal publishing original reviews and research articles on all aspects of orthopaedic surgery. It is the official journal of the Asia Pacific Orthopaedic Association. The journal welcomes and will publish materials of a diverse nature, from basic science research to clinical trials and surgical techniques. The journal encourages contributions from all parts of the world, but special emphasis is given to research of particular relevance to the Asia Pacific region.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信