先天性巨细胞病毒感染对家庭和照顾者的影响:对英国新生儿筛查公众咨询反应的定性分析。

IF 2.7 4区 医学 Q3 HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES
Rosamund Greiner, Sarah Dewar, Christine E Jones, Marthe Le Prevost, Tushna Vandrevala, Cristina Visintin, Heather Bailey
{"title":"先天性巨细胞病毒感染对家庭和照顾者的影响:对英国新生儿筛查公众咨询反应的定性分析。","authors":"Rosamund Greiner, Sarah Dewar, Christine E Jones, Marthe Le Prevost, Tushna Vandrevala, Cristina Visintin, Heather Bailey","doi":"10.1177/13558196251382548","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>ObjectivesTo describe the impact associated with congenital cytomegalovirus (cCMV) infection and experiences and perceptions of people with experience of CMV in pregnancy and families / caregivers of children diagnosed with cCMV, who responded to a UK National Screening Committee (UK NSC) public consultation on cCMV screening.MethodsThe public consultation was conducted in 2021-22 on a draft evidence review and was aimed at informing the UK NSC's decision on newborn screening for cCMV. Data were analysed using framework analysis: a subgroup of responses was inductively coded, codes were refined and initial themes identified, before targeted coding of the remainder of the data and identification of final themes and sub-themes.ResultsOf a total 155 responses, 125 (describing 128 pregnancy/child outcomes) contained information relevant to the coding framework and were included. Most (n = 109) described a live birth of a surviving child, of whom 90% (98/109) were living with symptoms or long-term sequelae of cCMV at the time of the response. Two main themes were identified: missed opportunities and emotional impacts attributed by respondents to not screening for cCMV. Many families described delays in their child's cCMV diagnosis, including due to healthcare professionals' lack of awareness of cCMV, and viewed newborn screening as a solution to avoid delays in diagnostic pathways. Diagnostic delays resulted in a lasting sense of injustice and unfairness due to possible missed opportunities to improve outcomes (e.g., through antiviral treatment or early therapies), as well as uncertainty and anxiety.ConclusionsResponses were predominantly from parents and caregivers of children with cCMV who experienced long term disability. They highlight significant gaps in awareness, support and health care for affected children that need addressing, regardless of national screening policy decisions. These responses contribute to the literature on lived experiences of individuals and families affected by cCMV.</p>","PeriodicalId":15953,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Health Services Research & Policy","volume":" ","pages":"13558196251382548"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The impact of congenital cytomegalovirus infection among families and caregivers: A qualitative analysis of responses to a public consultation on newborn screening in the UK.\",\"authors\":\"Rosamund Greiner, Sarah Dewar, Christine E Jones, Marthe Le Prevost, Tushna Vandrevala, Cristina Visintin, Heather Bailey\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/13558196251382548\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>ObjectivesTo describe the impact associated with congenital cytomegalovirus (cCMV) infection and experiences and perceptions of people with experience of CMV in pregnancy and families / caregivers of children diagnosed with cCMV, who responded to a UK National Screening Committee (UK NSC) public consultation on cCMV screening.MethodsThe public consultation was conducted in 2021-22 on a draft evidence review and was aimed at informing the UK NSC's decision on newborn screening for cCMV. Data were analysed using framework analysis: a subgroup of responses was inductively coded, codes were refined and initial themes identified, before targeted coding of the remainder of the data and identification of final themes and sub-themes.ResultsOf a total 155 responses, 125 (describing 128 pregnancy/child outcomes) contained information relevant to the coding framework and were included. Most (n = 109) described a live birth of a surviving child, of whom 90% (98/109) were living with symptoms or long-term sequelae of cCMV at the time of the response. Two main themes were identified: missed opportunities and emotional impacts attributed by respondents to not screening for cCMV. Many families described delays in their child's cCMV diagnosis, including due to healthcare professionals' lack of awareness of cCMV, and viewed newborn screening as a solution to avoid delays in diagnostic pathways. Diagnostic delays resulted in a lasting sense of injustice and unfairness due to possible missed opportunities to improve outcomes (e.g., through antiviral treatment or early therapies), as well as uncertainty and anxiety.ConclusionsResponses were predominantly from parents and caregivers of children with cCMV who experienced long term disability. They highlight significant gaps in awareness, support and health care for affected children that need addressing, regardless of national screening policy decisions. These responses contribute to the literature on lived experiences of individuals and families affected by cCMV.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":15953,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Health Services Research & Policy\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"13558196251382548\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-10-09\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Health Services Research & Policy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/13558196251382548\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Health Services Research & Policy","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/13558196251382548","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的描述先天性巨细胞病毒(cCMV)感染的相关影响,以及怀孕期间有巨细胞病毒感染经历的人、被诊断为cCMV儿童的家庭/照顾者的经历和看法,这些人回应了英国国家筛查委员会(UK NSC)关于cCMV筛查的公开咨询。方法于2021- 2022年就证据审查草案进行公众咨询,旨在为英国国家安全委员会关于新生儿cCMV筛查的决定提供信息。使用框架分析对数据进行分析:在对其余数据进行有针对性的编码并确定最终主题和分主题之前,对一个子组的回答进行归纳编码,对代码进行改进并确定初始主题。结果在155份回复中,125份(描述了128份妊娠/儿童结局)包含与编码框架相关的信息并被纳入。大多数病例(n = 109)描述了一名存活儿童的活产,其中90%(98/109)在应答时患有cCMV的症状或长期后遗症。确定了两个主要主题:错过的机会和受访者因未筛查cCMV而造成的情感影响。许多家庭描述了他们孩子cCMV诊断的延迟,包括由于卫生保健专业人员缺乏对cCMV的认识,并将新生儿筛查视为避免诊断途径延迟的解决方案。由于可能错过改善结果的机会(例如,通过抗病毒治疗或早期治疗),以及不确定性和焦虑,诊断延误导致持久的不公正和不公平感。结论反馈主要来自长期残疾的cCMV患儿的父母和照顾者。它们突出表明,无论国家筛查政策决定如何,都需要解决在对受影响儿童的认识、支持和保健方面存在的重大差距。这些反应有助于研究受cCMV影响的个人和家庭的生活经历。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The impact of congenital cytomegalovirus infection among families and caregivers: A qualitative analysis of responses to a public consultation on newborn screening in the UK.

ObjectivesTo describe the impact associated with congenital cytomegalovirus (cCMV) infection and experiences and perceptions of people with experience of CMV in pregnancy and families / caregivers of children diagnosed with cCMV, who responded to a UK National Screening Committee (UK NSC) public consultation on cCMV screening.MethodsThe public consultation was conducted in 2021-22 on a draft evidence review and was aimed at informing the UK NSC's decision on newborn screening for cCMV. Data were analysed using framework analysis: a subgroup of responses was inductively coded, codes were refined and initial themes identified, before targeted coding of the remainder of the data and identification of final themes and sub-themes.ResultsOf a total 155 responses, 125 (describing 128 pregnancy/child outcomes) contained information relevant to the coding framework and were included. Most (n = 109) described a live birth of a surviving child, of whom 90% (98/109) were living with symptoms or long-term sequelae of cCMV at the time of the response. Two main themes were identified: missed opportunities and emotional impacts attributed by respondents to not screening for cCMV. Many families described delays in their child's cCMV diagnosis, including due to healthcare professionals' lack of awareness of cCMV, and viewed newborn screening as a solution to avoid delays in diagnostic pathways. Diagnostic delays resulted in a lasting sense of injustice and unfairness due to possible missed opportunities to improve outcomes (e.g., through antiviral treatment or early therapies), as well as uncertainty and anxiety.ConclusionsResponses were predominantly from parents and caregivers of children with cCMV who experienced long term disability. They highlight significant gaps in awareness, support and health care for affected children that need addressing, regardless of national screening policy decisions. These responses contribute to the literature on lived experiences of individuals and families affected by cCMV.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.40
自引率
4.20%
发文量
39
期刊介绍: Journal of Health Services Research & Policy provides a unique opportunity to explore the ideas, policies and decisions shaping health services throughout the world. Edited and peer-reviewed by experts in the field and with a high academic standard and multidisciplinary approach, readers will gain a greater understanding of the current issues in healthcare policy and research. The journal"s strong international editorial advisory board also ensures that readers obtain a truly global and insightful perspective.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信