Dupilumab在中国未控制的严重哮喘患者中的应用:成本-效用分析

IF 3 3区 医学 Q2 ALLERGY
Journal of Asthma and Allergy Pub Date : 2025-10-03 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.2147/JAA.S545324
Zheng Liu, Maosheng Xu, Huifang Zhu, Jinzhen Huang, Xuhui Ye, Xintian Shen, Xiaomei Fan
{"title":"Dupilumab在中国未控制的严重哮喘患者中的应用:成本-效用分析","authors":"Zheng Liu, Maosheng Xu, Huifang Zhu, Jinzhen Huang, Xuhui Ye, Xintian Shen, Xiaomei Fan","doi":"10.2147/JAA.S545324","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Dupilumab's recent approval in China as an add-on therapy for asthma provides a novel therapeutic alternative for severe asthma management, but its economic benefits remain unsubstantiated in China. This study aimed to adopt a cost-utility analysis to evaluate the economics of dupilumab in the treatment of uncontrolled severe asthma and provide an evidence-based reference for clinical decision-making and therapeutic regimen selection.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>From the healthcare perspective, a Markov model was developed to simulate costs and quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) over a five-year time horizon for uncontrolled severe asthma patients aged ≥12 years receiving either dupilumab add-on therapy or standard-of-care (SoC) therapy alone. The incremental cost-utility ratio (ICUR) served as the primary outcome and was compared with the willingness-to-pay (WTP) threshold based on per capita gross domestic product (GDP) of China ($13,444.68/QALY) to determine the economics of therapeutic alternatives. The robustness of the results was verified using sensitivity analysis, and the impact of the dupilumab price on outcomes was evaluated using scenario analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Compared with SoC therapy, dupilumab add-on therapy incurred higher costs but provided greater utility gains, with an ICUR of $83,941.87 per QALY gained, which exceeded the WTP threshold. One-way sensitivity analysis identified the utility of controlled asthma as the predominant influential factor, followed by the price of dupilumab. Probabilistic sensitivity analysis showed that 98.8% of simulations were consistent with the base-case results, and SoC therapy had a higher probability of cost-utility acceptability than dupilumab add-on therapy. Scenario analysis revealed that reducing dupilumab's price to $70.38 would render its ICUR below the WTP threshold.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Based on the current Chinese healthcare system, it was not cost-utility to apply dupilumab as an add-on therapy for patients aged ≥12 years with uncontrolled severe asthma. A substantial price reduction of dupilumab could improve affordability in this patient population.</p>","PeriodicalId":15079,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Asthma and Allergy","volume":"18 ","pages":"1355-1366"},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12503188/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Dupilumab Among Patients with Uncontrolled Severe Asthma in China: A Cost-Utility Analysis.\",\"authors\":\"Zheng Liu, Maosheng Xu, Huifang Zhu, Jinzhen Huang, Xuhui Ye, Xintian Shen, Xiaomei Fan\",\"doi\":\"10.2147/JAA.S545324\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Dupilumab's recent approval in China as an add-on therapy for asthma provides a novel therapeutic alternative for severe asthma management, but its economic benefits remain unsubstantiated in China. This study aimed to adopt a cost-utility analysis to evaluate the economics of dupilumab in the treatment of uncontrolled severe asthma and provide an evidence-based reference for clinical decision-making and therapeutic regimen selection.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>From the healthcare perspective, a Markov model was developed to simulate costs and quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) over a five-year time horizon for uncontrolled severe asthma patients aged ≥12 years receiving either dupilumab add-on therapy or standard-of-care (SoC) therapy alone. The incremental cost-utility ratio (ICUR) served as the primary outcome and was compared with the willingness-to-pay (WTP) threshold based on per capita gross domestic product (GDP) of China ($13,444.68/QALY) to determine the economics of therapeutic alternatives. The robustness of the results was verified using sensitivity analysis, and the impact of the dupilumab price on outcomes was evaluated using scenario analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Compared with SoC therapy, dupilumab add-on therapy incurred higher costs but provided greater utility gains, with an ICUR of $83,941.87 per QALY gained, which exceeded the WTP threshold. One-way sensitivity analysis identified the utility of controlled asthma as the predominant influential factor, followed by the price of dupilumab. Probabilistic sensitivity analysis showed that 98.8% of simulations were consistent with the base-case results, and SoC therapy had a higher probability of cost-utility acceptability than dupilumab add-on therapy. Scenario analysis revealed that reducing dupilumab's price to $70.38 would render its ICUR below the WTP threshold.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Based on the current Chinese healthcare system, it was not cost-utility to apply dupilumab as an add-on therapy for patients aged ≥12 years with uncontrolled severe asthma. A substantial price reduction of dupilumab could improve affordability in this patient population.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":15079,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Asthma and Allergy\",\"volume\":\"18 \",\"pages\":\"1355-1366\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-10-03\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12503188/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Asthma and Allergy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2147/JAA.S545324\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ALLERGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Asthma and Allergy","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2147/JAA.S545324","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ALLERGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:Dupilumab最近在中国获得批准,作为哮喘的附加治疗药物,为严重哮喘的治疗提供了一种新的治疗选择,但其经济效益在中国仍未得到证实。本研究旨在通过成本效用分析评价dupilumab治疗未控制的重症哮喘的经济性,为临床决策和治疗方案选择提供循证参考。方法:从医疗保健的角度,开发了一个马尔可夫模型来模拟≥12岁未控制的严重哮喘患者在5年时间范围内的成本和质量调整生命年(QALYs),这些患者要么接受杜匹单抗附加治疗,要么单独接受标准护理(SoC)治疗。增量成本效用比(ICUR)作为主要结果,并与基于中国人均国内生产总值(GDP) ($13,444.68/QALY)的支付意愿(WTP)阈值进行比较,以确定治疗方案的经济性。使用敏感性分析验证结果的稳健性,使用情景分析评估dupilumab价格对结果的影响。结果:与SoC治疗相比,dupilumab附加治疗的成本更高,但提供了更大的效用收益,ICUR为83,941.87美元/ QALY,超过了WTP阈值。单因素敏感性分析发现控制哮喘的效用是主要的影响因素,其次是杜匹单抗的价格。概率敏感性分析显示,98.8%的模拟结果与基本病例结果一致,SoC治疗比杜匹单抗附加治疗具有更高的成本-效用可接受性。情景分析显示,将dupilumab的价格降至70.38美元将使其ICUR低于WTP阈值。结论:基于目前中国的医疗保健体系,对于年龄≥12岁且未控制的严重哮喘患者,应用杜匹单抗作为附加治疗并不具有成本效益。dupilumab的大幅降价可以提高这一患者群体的负担能力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Dupilumab Among Patients with Uncontrolled Severe Asthma in China: A Cost-Utility Analysis.

Purpose: Dupilumab's recent approval in China as an add-on therapy for asthma provides a novel therapeutic alternative for severe asthma management, but its economic benefits remain unsubstantiated in China. This study aimed to adopt a cost-utility analysis to evaluate the economics of dupilumab in the treatment of uncontrolled severe asthma and provide an evidence-based reference for clinical decision-making and therapeutic regimen selection.

Methods: From the healthcare perspective, a Markov model was developed to simulate costs and quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) over a five-year time horizon for uncontrolled severe asthma patients aged ≥12 years receiving either dupilumab add-on therapy or standard-of-care (SoC) therapy alone. The incremental cost-utility ratio (ICUR) served as the primary outcome and was compared with the willingness-to-pay (WTP) threshold based on per capita gross domestic product (GDP) of China ($13,444.68/QALY) to determine the economics of therapeutic alternatives. The robustness of the results was verified using sensitivity analysis, and the impact of the dupilumab price on outcomes was evaluated using scenario analysis.

Results: Compared with SoC therapy, dupilumab add-on therapy incurred higher costs but provided greater utility gains, with an ICUR of $83,941.87 per QALY gained, which exceeded the WTP threshold. One-way sensitivity analysis identified the utility of controlled asthma as the predominant influential factor, followed by the price of dupilumab. Probabilistic sensitivity analysis showed that 98.8% of simulations were consistent with the base-case results, and SoC therapy had a higher probability of cost-utility acceptability than dupilumab add-on therapy. Scenario analysis revealed that reducing dupilumab's price to $70.38 would render its ICUR below the WTP threshold.

Conclusion: Based on the current Chinese healthcare system, it was not cost-utility to apply dupilumab as an add-on therapy for patients aged ≥12 years with uncontrolled severe asthma. A substantial price reduction of dupilumab could improve affordability in this patient population.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Asthma and Allergy
Journal of Asthma and Allergy Medicine-Immunology and Allergy
CiteScore
5.30
自引率
6.20%
发文量
185
审稿时长
16 weeks
期刊介绍: An international, peer-reviewed journal publishing original research, reports, editorials and commentaries on the following topics: Asthma; Pulmonary physiology; Asthma related clinical health; Clinical immunology and the immunological basis of disease; Pharmacological interventions and new therapies. Although the main focus of the journal will be to publish research and clinical results in humans, preclinical, animal and in vitro studies will be published where they shed light on disease processes and potential new therapies.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信