开放标签安慰剂作为偏头痛预防性治疗的辅助:一项随机临床试验。

IF 9.7 1区 医学 Q1 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL
Julian Kleine-Borgmann, Katharina Schmidt, Linda Ludwig, Moritz Schulz, Dagny Holle-Lee, Charly Gaul, Ulrike Bingel
{"title":"开放标签安慰剂作为偏头痛预防性治疗的辅助:一项随机临床试验。","authors":"Julian Kleine-Borgmann, Katharina Schmidt, Linda Ludwig, Moritz Schulz, Dagny Holle-Lee, Charly Gaul, Ulrike Bingel","doi":"10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2025.35739","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Importance: </strong>Placebo effects contribute substantially to the therapeutic success of many treatments, particularly in pain-related conditions. Open-label placebos (OLPs) offer an ethically acceptable approach to harness this potential without deception.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To evaluate the efficacy of a 3-month OLP regimen in reducing headache and migraine days and improving migraine-related outcomes, including medication use, disability, and quality of life, in patients with migraine.</p><p><strong>Design, setting, and patients: </strong>This controlled, bicenter, parallel-group randomized clinical trial, with a 3-month treatment phase, enrolled adults with episodic or chronic migraine between November 9, 2020, and November 1, 2022. The trial was conducted at 2 tertiary headache centers in Germany (University Medicine Essen and Headache Center Frankfurt).</p><p><strong>Interventions: </strong>Participants received OLPs plus treatment as usual (TAU) or TAU alone. OLPs were administered twice daily for 3 months.</p><p><strong>Main outcomes and measures: </strong>The preregistered primary outcome was the change in monthly headache days from a baseline to a test period after 3 months. Secondary outcomes included patient-reported quality of life assessed using the 12-Item Short-Form Health Survey physical component summary, pain-related disability assessed using the Pain Disability Index and Headache Impact Test, and global improvement.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of the 120 patients (median age, 34.2 years; 95% CI, 29.8-39.3 years; 103 [86%] female), 102 (85%) had episodic migraine, and 18 (15%) had chronic migraine. All participants completed the study. Headache days did not significantly decrease in the OLP group compared with TAU. Similarly, there was no difference in the number of migraine days, pain intensity, days of rescue medication, and the 50% responder rate. However, OLP-treated patients reported improved quality of life (β = 4.25; 95% CI, 1.33-7.17; d = 0.47; P = .01), reduced pain-related disability (Pain Disability Index: β = -5.96; 95% CI, -9.01 to -2.92; d = 0.53; P < .001; Headache Impact Test 6: β = -1.88; 95% CI, -3.28 to -0.48; d = 0.35; P = .02), and higher global improvement (χ2 = 14.16; P = .01) compared with TAU patients.</p><p><strong>Conclusions and relevance: </strong>In this randomized clinical trial, OLP treatment did not reduce headache frequency but was associated with improvements in quality of life and pain-related disability. Future research should clarify the mechanisms underlying these effects and determine their potential supportive role in migraine care for selected patients.</p><p><strong>Trial registration: </strong>drks.de identifier: DRKS00021259.</p>","PeriodicalId":14694,"journal":{"name":"JAMA Network Open","volume":"8 10","pages":"e2535739"},"PeriodicalIF":9.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Open-Label Placebos as Adjunct for the Preventive Treatment of Migraine: A Randomized Clinical Trial.\",\"authors\":\"Julian Kleine-Borgmann, Katharina Schmidt, Linda Ludwig, Moritz Schulz, Dagny Holle-Lee, Charly Gaul, Ulrike Bingel\",\"doi\":\"10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2025.35739\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Importance: </strong>Placebo effects contribute substantially to the therapeutic success of many treatments, particularly in pain-related conditions. Open-label placebos (OLPs) offer an ethically acceptable approach to harness this potential without deception.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To evaluate the efficacy of a 3-month OLP regimen in reducing headache and migraine days and improving migraine-related outcomes, including medication use, disability, and quality of life, in patients with migraine.</p><p><strong>Design, setting, and patients: </strong>This controlled, bicenter, parallel-group randomized clinical trial, with a 3-month treatment phase, enrolled adults with episodic or chronic migraine between November 9, 2020, and November 1, 2022. The trial was conducted at 2 tertiary headache centers in Germany (University Medicine Essen and Headache Center Frankfurt).</p><p><strong>Interventions: </strong>Participants received OLPs plus treatment as usual (TAU) or TAU alone. OLPs were administered twice daily for 3 months.</p><p><strong>Main outcomes and measures: </strong>The preregistered primary outcome was the change in monthly headache days from a baseline to a test period after 3 months. Secondary outcomes included patient-reported quality of life assessed using the 12-Item Short-Form Health Survey physical component summary, pain-related disability assessed using the Pain Disability Index and Headache Impact Test, and global improvement.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of the 120 patients (median age, 34.2 years; 95% CI, 29.8-39.3 years; 103 [86%] female), 102 (85%) had episodic migraine, and 18 (15%) had chronic migraine. All participants completed the study. Headache days did not significantly decrease in the OLP group compared with TAU. Similarly, there was no difference in the number of migraine days, pain intensity, days of rescue medication, and the 50% responder rate. However, OLP-treated patients reported improved quality of life (β = 4.25; 95% CI, 1.33-7.17; d = 0.47; P = .01), reduced pain-related disability (Pain Disability Index: β = -5.96; 95% CI, -9.01 to -2.92; d = 0.53; P < .001; Headache Impact Test 6: β = -1.88; 95% CI, -3.28 to -0.48; d = 0.35; P = .02), and higher global improvement (χ2 = 14.16; P = .01) compared with TAU patients.</p><p><strong>Conclusions and relevance: </strong>In this randomized clinical trial, OLP treatment did not reduce headache frequency but was associated with improvements in quality of life and pain-related disability. Future research should clarify the mechanisms underlying these effects and determine their potential supportive role in migraine care for selected patients.</p><p><strong>Trial registration: </strong>drks.de identifier: DRKS00021259.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":14694,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"JAMA Network Open\",\"volume\":\"8 10\",\"pages\":\"e2535739\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":9.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-10-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"JAMA Network Open\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2025.35739\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JAMA Network Open","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2025.35739","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

重要性:安慰剂效应对许多治疗的成功起到了重要作用,特别是在疼痛相关的疾病中。开放标签安慰剂(olp)提供了一种道德上可接受的方法来利用这种潜力而不欺骗。目的:评估3个月OLP方案在减少偏头痛和偏头痛天数以及改善偏头痛相关结局(包括药物使用、残疾和生活质量)方面的疗效。设计、环境和患者:这项对照、双中心、平行组随机临床试验,治疗期为3个月,纳入了2020年11月9日至2022年11月1日期间患有发作性或慢性偏头痛的成年人。该试验在德国的2个三级头痛中心(埃森大学医学院和法兰克福头痛中心)进行。干预措施:参与者接受OLPs加常规治疗(TAU)或单独TAU。olp每天两次,持续3个月。主要结局和测量:预登记的主要结局是3个月后从基线到测试期每月头痛天数的变化。次要结果包括患者报告的生活质量,使用12项简短健康调查物理成分摘要评估,使用疼痛残疾指数和头痛影响测试评估疼痛相关残疾,以及整体改善。结果:在120例患者(中位年龄34.2岁;95% CI 29.8-39.3岁;103例[86%]女性)中,102例(85%)为发作性偏头痛,18例(15%)为慢性偏头痛。所有参与者都完成了研究。与TAU相比,OLP组头痛天数没有显著减少。同样,在偏头痛天数、疼痛强度、抢救用药天数和50%的应答率方面也没有差异。然而,olp治疗的患者报告生活质量改善(β = 4.25; 95% CI, 1.33-7.17; d = 0.47; P =。结论和相关性:在这项随机临床试验中,OLP治疗并没有减少头痛频率,但与生活质量和疼痛相关残疾的改善有关。未来的研究应阐明这些作用的机制,并确定它们在选定患者偏头痛护理中的潜在支持作用。试验注册号:DRKS00021259。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Open-Label Placebos as Adjunct for the Preventive Treatment of Migraine: A Randomized Clinical Trial.

Importance: Placebo effects contribute substantially to the therapeutic success of many treatments, particularly in pain-related conditions. Open-label placebos (OLPs) offer an ethically acceptable approach to harness this potential without deception.

Objective: To evaluate the efficacy of a 3-month OLP regimen in reducing headache and migraine days and improving migraine-related outcomes, including medication use, disability, and quality of life, in patients with migraine.

Design, setting, and patients: This controlled, bicenter, parallel-group randomized clinical trial, with a 3-month treatment phase, enrolled adults with episodic or chronic migraine between November 9, 2020, and November 1, 2022. The trial was conducted at 2 tertiary headache centers in Germany (University Medicine Essen and Headache Center Frankfurt).

Interventions: Participants received OLPs plus treatment as usual (TAU) or TAU alone. OLPs were administered twice daily for 3 months.

Main outcomes and measures: The preregistered primary outcome was the change in monthly headache days from a baseline to a test period after 3 months. Secondary outcomes included patient-reported quality of life assessed using the 12-Item Short-Form Health Survey physical component summary, pain-related disability assessed using the Pain Disability Index and Headache Impact Test, and global improvement.

Results: Of the 120 patients (median age, 34.2 years; 95% CI, 29.8-39.3 years; 103 [86%] female), 102 (85%) had episodic migraine, and 18 (15%) had chronic migraine. All participants completed the study. Headache days did not significantly decrease in the OLP group compared with TAU. Similarly, there was no difference in the number of migraine days, pain intensity, days of rescue medication, and the 50% responder rate. However, OLP-treated patients reported improved quality of life (β = 4.25; 95% CI, 1.33-7.17; d = 0.47; P = .01), reduced pain-related disability (Pain Disability Index: β = -5.96; 95% CI, -9.01 to -2.92; d = 0.53; P < .001; Headache Impact Test 6: β = -1.88; 95% CI, -3.28 to -0.48; d = 0.35; P = .02), and higher global improvement (χ2 = 14.16; P = .01) compared with TAU patients.

Conclusions and relevance: In this randomized clinical trial, OLP treatment did not reduce headache frequency but was associated with improvements in quality of life and pain-related disability. Future research should clarify the mechanisms underlying these effects and determine their potential supportive role in migraine care for selected patients.

Trial registration: drks.de identifier: DRKS00021259.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
JAMA Network Open
JAMA Network Open Medicine-General Medicine
CiteScore
16.00
自引率
2.90%
发文量
2126
审稿时长
16 weeks
期刊介绍: JAMA Network Open, a member of the esteemed JAMA Network, stands as an international, peer-reviewed, open-access general medical journal.The publication is dedicated to disseminating research across various health disciplines and countries, encompassing clinical care, innovation in health care, health policy, and global health. JAMA Network Open caters to clinicians, investigators, and policymakers, providing a platform for valuable insights and advancements in the medical field. As part of the JAMA Network, a consortium of peer-reviewed general medical and specialty publications, JAMA Network Open contributes to the collective knowledge and understanding within the medical community.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信