炎性肠病患者肠道黏膜菌群不同部位的比较显示假单胞菌种类增加。

IF 4.3 3区 医学 Q1 GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY
David Schult-Hannemann, Christina Gassner, Niklas Thur, Chiara Hennig, Lisa Fricke, Lucia Liotta, Simon Weidlich, Monica Steffi Matchado, Bärbel Stecher, Leona Arps, Katja Steiger, Julius Shakhtour, Moritz Jesinghaus, Markus List, Klaus-Peter Janssen, Mohsen Pourjam, Klaus Neuhaus, Dirk Haller, Roland M Schmid, Michael Quante, Moritz Middelhoff, H Carlo Maurer
{"title":"炎性肠病患者肠道黏膜菌群不同部位的比较显示假单胞菌种类增加。","authors":"David Schult-Hannemann, Christina Gassner, Niklas Thur, Chiara Hennig, Lisa Fricke, Lucia Liotta, Simon Weidlich, Monica Steffi Matchado, Bärbel Stecher, Leona Arps, Katja Steiger, Julius Shakhtour, Moritz Jesinghaus, Markus List, Klaus-Peter Janssen, Mohsen Pourjam, Klaus Neuhaus, Dirk Haller, Roland M Schmid, Michael Quante, Moritz Middelhoff, H Carlo Maurer","doi":"10.1093/ibd/izaf185","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Inflammatory bowel disease (IBD), including ulcerative colitis (UC) and Crohn's disease (CD), is associated with changes in the gut microbiome. Studies comparing fecal, gut mucosal, and salivary microbiomes are rare, and questions remain regarding the interaction of these compartments.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In this case-control study, 16S rRNA gene amplicon sequencing was performed on samples from stool, intestinal mucosa, and saliva of 120 patients with IBD. Patients with signs of non-IBD colonic inflammation (N = 28) and healthy subjects (N = 67) served as controls. A total of 480 16S profiles were analyzed. The results were evaluated with multiple clinical and pathological parameters and potential confounders were considered. The study aimed to find microbial biomarkers specific to IBD and signatures of intestinal barrier dysfunction.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Fecal α-diversity of IBD patients was reduced and Pseudomonas species was significantly increased in the mucosa of IBD patients (Pseudomonas-positive mucosa [PSM positive], P value < .001, Mann-Whitney U test). Comparison of matched stool and mucosa samples showed high abundance of Pseudomonas species in gut mucosa but not in fecal samples, especially in CD patients. Interestingly, in PSM positive, Paracoccus species, Bacteroides species, and Streptococcus species were more abundant. Importantly, the results were independent of disease severity, histopathology, medication, and other metadata.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The opportunistic pathogenic bacterium Pseudomonas species is more prevalent in the gut mucosa of patients with IBD. This indicates a disruption of the gut barrier with increasing mucosal colonization or invasion of the bacteria. The finding is independent of clinical metadata and confounders and occurs in new-onset IBD but not in non-IBD intestinal inflammation, which suggests disease specificity.</p>","PeriodicalId":13623,"journal":{"name":"Inflammatory Bowel Diseases","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparison of Different Sites of Microbiota Shows Increased Pseudomonas Species in the Gut Mucosa in Inflammatory Bowel Disease.\",\"authors\":\"David Schult-Hannemann, Christina Gassner, Niklas Thur, Chiara Hennig, Lisa Fricke, Lucia Liotta, Simon Weidlich, Monica Steffi Matchado, Bärbel Stecher, Leona Arps, Katja Steiger, Julius Shakhtour, Moritz Jesinghaus, Markus List, Klaus-Peter Janssen, Mohsen Pourjam, Klaus Neuhaus, Dirk Haller, Roland M Schmid, Michael Quante, Moritz Middelhoff, H Carlo Maurer\",\"doi\":\"10.1093/ibd/izaf185\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Inflammatory bowel disease (IBD), including ulcerative colitis (UC) and Crohn's disease (CD), is associated with changes in the gut microbiome. Studies comparing fecal, gut mucosal, and salivary microbiomes are rare, and questions remain regarding the interaction of these compartments.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In this case-control study, 16S rRNA gene amplicon sequencing was performed on samples from stool, intestinal mucosa, and saliva of 120 patients with IBD. Patients with signs of non-IBD colonic inflammation (N = 28) and healthy subjects (N = 67) served as controls. A total of 480 16S profiles were analyzed. The results were evaluated with multiple clinical and pathological parameters and potential confounders were considered. The study aimed to find microbial biomarkers specific to IBD and signatures of intestinal barrier dysfunction.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Fecal α-diversity of IBD patients was reduced and Pseudomonas species was significantly increased in the mucosa of IBD patients (Pseudomonas-positive mucosa [PSM positive], P value < .001, Mann-Whitney U test). Comparison of matched stool and mucosa samples showed high abundance of Pseudomonas species in gut mucosa but not in fecal samples, especially in CD patients. Interestingly, in PSM positive, Paracoccus species, Bacteroides species, and Streptococcus species were more abundant. Importantly, the results were independent of disease severity, histopathology, medication, and other metadata.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The opportunistic pathogenic bacterium Pseudomonas species is more prevalent in the gut mucosa of patients with IBD. This indicates a disruption of the gut barrier with increasing mucosal colonization or invasion of the bacteria. The finding is independent of clinical metadata and confounders and occurs in new-onset IBD but not in non-IBD intestinal inflammation, which suggests disease specificity.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":13623,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Inflammatory Bowel Diseases\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-10-08\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Inflammatory Bowel Diseases\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1093/ibd/izaf185\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Inflammatory Bowel Diseases","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/ibd/izaf185","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:炎症性肠病(IBD),包括溃疡性结肠炎(UC)和克罗恩病(CD),与肠道微生物群的变化有关。比较粪便、肠道黏膜和唾液微生物组的研究很少,关于这些区室的相互作用仍然存在问题。方法:在本病例对照研究中,对120例IBD患者的粪便、肠黏膜和唾液样本进行16S rRNA基因扩增子测序。有非ibd结肠炎症症状的患者(N = 28)和健康受试者(N = 67)作为对照组。共分析了480个16S型线。结果评估了多种临床和病理参数,并考虑了潜在的混杂因素。该研究旨在寻找IBD特异性的微生物生物标志物和肠屏障功能障碍的特征。结果:IBD患者粪便α-多样性降低,IBD患者黏膜中假单胞菌种类明显增加(假单胞菌阳性黏膜[PSM阳性],P值< 0.001,Mann-Whitney U检验)。比较匹配的粪便和粘膜样本显示,肠道粘膜中假单胞菌种类丰富,而粪便样本中则没有,特别是在CD患者中。有趣的是,在PSM阳性中,副球菌、拟杆菌和链球菌种类更为丰富。重要的是,结果独立于疾病严重程度、组织病理学、药物和其他元数据。结论:条件致病菌假单胞菌在IBD患者肠道黏膜中更为常见。这表明肠道屏障的破坏与增加粘膜定植或细菌的入侵。这一发现独立于临床数据和混杂因素,出现在新发IBD中,但不在非IBD肠道炎症中,这表明了疾病的特异性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Comparison of Different Sites of Microbiota Shows Increased Pseudomonas Species in the Gut Mucosa in Inflammatory Bowel Disease.

Background: Inflammatory bowel disease (IBD), including ulcerative colitis (UC) and Crohn's disease (CD), is associated with changes in the gut microbiome. Studies comparing fecal, gut mucosal, and salivary microbiomes are rare, and questions remain regarding the interaction of these compartments.

Methods: In this case-control study, 16S rRNA gene amplicon sequencing was performed on samples from stool, intestinal mucosa, and saliva of 120 patients with IBD. Patients with signs of non-IBD colonic inflammation (N = 28) and healthy subjects (N = 67) served as controls. A total of 480 16S profiles were analyzed. The results were evaluated with multiple clinical and pathological parameters and potential confounders were considered. The study aimed to find microbial biomarkers specific to IBD and signatures of intestinal barrier dysfunction.

Results: Fecal α-diversity of IBD patients was reduced and Pseudomonas species was significantly increased in the mucosa of IBD patients (Pseudomonas-positive mucosa [PSM positive], P value < .001, Mann-Whitney U test). Comparison of matched stool and mucosa samples showed high abundance of Pseudomonas species in gut mucosa but not in fecal samples, especially in CD patients. Interestingly, in PSM positive, Paracoccus species, Bacteroides species, and Streptococcus species were more abundant. Importantly, the results were independent of disease severity, histopathology, medication, and other metadata.

Conclusions: The opportunistic pathogenic bacterium Pseudomonas species is more prevalent in the gut mucosa of patients with IBD. This indicates a disruption of the gut barrier with increasing mucosal colonization or invasion of the bacteria. The finding is independent of clinical metadata and confounders and occurs in new-onset IBD but not in non-IBD intestinal inflammation, which suggests disease specificity.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Inflammatory Bowel Diseases
Inflammatory Bowel Diseases 医学-胃肠肝病学
CiteScore
9.70
自引率
6.10%
发文量
462
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: Inflammatory Bowel Diseases® supports the mission of the Crohn''s & Colitis Foundation by bringing the most impactful and cutting edge clinical topics and research findings related to inflammatory bowel diseases to clinicians and researchers working in IBD and related fields. The Journal is committed to publishing on innovative topics that influence the future of clinical care, treatment, and research.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信