西马鲁肽对美国现实世界中肥胖或超重患者一年医疗费用的影响

IF 1.5 4区 医学 Q3 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
Prachi Arora, Wojciech Michalak, Zhenxiang Zhao, Megan Fiasconaro, Yu Hong, Xin Zhao, Bríain Ó Hartaigh, Sara Alvarez, Angela Fitch
{"title":"西马鲁肽对美国现实世界中肥胖或超重患者一年医疗费用的影响","authors":"Prachi Arora, Wojciech Michalak, Zhenxiang Zhao, Megan Fiasconaro, Yu Hong, Xin Zhao, Bríain Ó Hartaigh, Sara Alvarez, Angela Fitch","doi":"10.1080/14737167.2025.2570688","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Patients with obesity or overweight are at increased risk for obesity-related complications (ORCs), including cardiovascular disease. Treatment with once-weekly (OW) semaglutide 2.4 mg has demonstrated clinical efficacy, however its impact on healthcare resource utilization (HCRU) and costs warrants further investigation.</p><p><strong>Research design and methods: </strong>This retrospective real-world study evaluated HCRU and costs (excluding pharmacy) among patients with obesity or overweight and ≥1 ORC in the Komodo Healthcare Map database. Baseline characteristics of patients starting OW semaglutide 2.4 mg treatment were matched to obesity medication (OM) non-users. HCRU and medical costs estimates at 12-month follow-up, both all-cause and ORC-related, were compared between the two cohorts.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Patients treated with semaglutide 2.4 mg vs OM non-users had 37% and 21% lower incidence of all-cause inpatient (IP) and emergency room (ER) visits, respectively, and 45% and 29% lower incidence of ORC-related IP and ER visits, respectively. All-cause and ORC-related total medical costs were lower among patients treated with semaglutide 2.4 mg (11% and 15% lower, respectively), translating to an observed savings of $3,342 and $2,408 at 12 months.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>In patients with obesity or overweight, OW semaglutide 2.4 mg treatment was associated with decreased total medical HCRU and costs at 12 months.</p>","PeriodicalId":12244,"journal":{"name":"Expert Review of Pharmacoeconomics & Outcomes Research","volume":" ","pages":"1-11"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Effects of semaglutide on one-year medical costs among patients with obesity or overweight in US real world setting.\",\"authors\":\"Prachi Arora, Wojciech Michalak, Zhenxiang Zhao, Megan Fiasconaro, Yu Hong, Xin Zhao, Bríain Ó Hartaigh, Sara Alvarez, Angela Fitch\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/14737167.2025.2570688\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Patients with obesity or overweight are at increased risk for obesity-related complications (ORCs), including cardiovascular disease. Treatment with once-weekly (OW) semaglutide 2.4 mg has demonstrated clinical efficacy, however its impact on healthcare resource utilization (HCRU) and costs warrants further investigation.</p><p><strong>Research design and methods: </strong>This retrospective real-world study evaluated HCRU and costs (excluding pharmacy) among patients with obesity or overweight and ≥1 ORC in the Komodo Healthcare Map database. Baseline characteristics of patients starting OW semaglutide 2.4 mg treatment were matched to obesity medication (OM) non-users. HCRU and medical costs estimates at 12-month follow-up, both all-cause and ORC-related, were compared between the two cohorts.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Patients treated with semaglutide 2.4 mg vs OM non-users had 37% and 21% lower incidence of all-cause inpatient (IP) and emergency room (ER) visits, respectively, and 45% and 29% lower incidence of ORC-related IP and ER visits, respectively. All-cause and ORC-related total medical costs were lower among patients treated with semaglutide 2.4 mg (11% and 15% lower, respectively), translating to an observed savings of $3,342 and $2,408 at 12 months.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>In patients with obesity or overweight, OW semaglutide 2.4 mg treatment was associated with decreased total medical HCRU and costs at 12 months.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":12244,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Expert Review of Pharmacoeconomics & Outcomes Research\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"1-11\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-10-09\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Expert Review of Pharmacoeconomics & Outcomes Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/14737167.2025.2570688\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Expert Review of Pharmacoeconomics & Outcomes Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/14737167.2025.2570688","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:肥胖或超重患者发生肥胖相关并发症(ORCs)的风险增加,包括心血管疾病。每周一次(OW)的西马鲁肽2.4 mg治疗已显示出临床疗效,但其对医疗资源利用(HCRU)和成本的影响有待进一步研究。研究设计和方法:本回顾性真实世界研究评估了Komodo Healthcare Map数据库中肥胖或超重且ORC≥1的患者的HCRU和成本(不包括药房)。开始接受西马鲁肽2.4 mg治疗的OW患者的基线特征与未使用肥胖药物(OM)的患者相匹配。在12个月的随访中,比较两个队列的HCRU和医疗费用估算,包括全因和orc相关。结果:与未使用semaglutide的患者相比,使用semaglutide 2.4 mg的患者全因住院(IP)和急诊室(ER)的发生率分别降低37%和21%,orc相关的IP和ER的发生率分别降低45%和29%。在接受西马鲁肽2.4 mg治疗的患者中,全因和orc相关的总医疗费用较低(分别降低11%和15%),12个月时可节省3342美元和2408美元。结论:在肥胖或超重患者中,2.4 mg OW西马鲁肽治疗与12个月总医疗HCRU和成本降低相关。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Effects of semaglutide on one-year medical costs among patients with obesity or overweight in US real world setting.

Background: Patients with obesity or overweight are at increased risk for obesity-related complications (ORCs), including cardiovascular disease. Treatment with once-weekly (OW) semaglutide 2.4 mg has demonstrated clinical efficacy, however its impact on healthcare resource utilization (HCRU) and costs warrants further investigation.

Research design and methods: This retrospective real-world study evaluated HCRU and costs (excluding pharmacy) among patients with obesity or overweight and ≥1 ORC in the Komodo Healthcare Map database. Baseline characteristics of patients starting OW semaglutide 2.4 mg treatment were matched to obesity medication (OM) non-users. HCRU and medical costs estimates at 12-month follow-up, both all-cause and ORC-related, were compared between the two cohorts.

Results: Patients treated with semaglutide 2.4 mg vs OM non-users had 37% and 21% lower incidence of all-cause inpatient (IP) and emergency room (ER) visits, respectively, and 45% and 29% lower incidence of ORC-related IP and ER visits, respectively. All-cause and ORC-related total medical costs were lower among patients treated with semaglutide 2.4 mg (11% and 15% lower, respectively), translating to an observed savings of $3,342 and $2,408 at 12 months.

Conclusions: In patients with obesity or overweight, OW semaglutide 2.4 mg treatment was associated with decreased total medical HCRU and costs at 12 months.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Expert Review of Pharmacoeconomics & Outcomes Research
Expert Review of Pharmacoeconomics & Outcomes Research HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES-PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY
CiteScore
4.00
自引率
4.30%
发文量
68
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Expert Review of Pharmacoeconomics & Outcomes Research (ISSN 1473-7167) provides expert reviews on cost-benefit and pharmacoeconomic issues relating to the clinical use of drugs and therapeutic approaches. Coverage includes pharmacoeconomics and quality-of-life research, therapeutic outcomes, evidence-based medicine and cost-benefit research. All articles are subject to rigorous peer-review. The journal adopts the unique Expert Review article format, offering a complete overview of current thinking in a key technology area, research or clinical practice, augmented by the following sections: Expert Opinion – a personal view of the data presented in the article, a discussion on the developments that are likely to be important in the future, and the avenues of research likely to become exciting as further studies yield more detailed results Article Highlights – an executive summary of the author’s most critical points.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信